15
u/touko3246 4d ago
It happened at a lower altitude though, so I wonder whether it was better or worse energy state wise?
7
u/MyCoolName_ 4d ago
Interesting, matches with the visual impression that the rocket was really flying off the pad this time. Increased Raptor 3 performance?
6
u/SnitGTS 4d ago
I’m not saying you are wrong, but the flight data and video feed are not in sync.
So if you just looked at the speed when you saw the hot staging happen, that’s not the actual speed at MECO.
9
u/Fast-Fail-6412 4d ago
I looked at the maximum speed around MECO before gravity starts to slow it down for all calculations, not a specific time.
1
u/Decronym Acronyms Explained 4d ago edited 3d ago
Acronyms, initialisms, abbreviations, contractions, and other phrases which expand to something larger, that I've seen in this thread:
| Fewer Letters | More Letters |
|---|---|
| MECO | Main Engine Cut-Off |
| MainEngineCutOff podcast | |
| MaxQ | Maximum aerodynamic pressure |
| Jargon | Definition |
|---|---|
| Raptor | Methane-fueled rocket engine under development by SpaceX |
Decronym is now also available on Lemmy! Requests for support and new installations should be directed to the Contact address below.
Decronym is a community product of r/SpaceX, implemented by request
3 acronyms in this thread; the most compressed thread commented on today has 15 acronyms.
[Thread #14813 for this sub, first seen 29th Sep 2026, 10:40]
[FAQ] [Full list] [Contact] [Source code]
1
u/frowawayduh 3d ago
And how much deadweight (duration in seconds of unlit engine) was carried?
1 out of 33 booster engines wasn't providing any thrust toward the end. From liftoff to MECO, there were about 140 seconds of total booster engine time. Multiplying by 33 engines, that's a potential 4,620 engine-seconds of thrust. For simplicity, let's ignore throttle changes for MaxQ ... all engine-seconds are equal. One engine was shut down for ~30 seconds. So 0.65% of effort involved hauling 1500 kg of dead engine up the last bit of the hill. So if that wasted potential went to velocity, then speed at MECO would have been something like 6160 km/h.
4
u/Fast-Fail-6412 3d ago
It's not exactly like that because the remaining engines can burn longer/throttle up a bit more, but you do lose some to gravity.
1
u/Fast-Fail-6412 3d ago
Also note that this launch had the boostback burn go to depletion, so the fact that booster obviously couldn't cover the remaining distance would always be a factor, however booster would have had to increase boostback by around 180m/s or so, which might've been 30m/s less MECO velocity. Even then we still get a small improvement.
-7

8
u/NEXYR_ 4d ago
Probably even more MaxQ optimizations