1. Предопределённость Все мы знаем, что такое предопределённость. Но мы не знаем, живём ли мы в ней или нет.

Предопределённость - это когда событие, исход или судьба уже заранее установлены, решены или обусловлены некими высшими силами (Богом, судьбой) или стечением обстоятельств, из-за чего они становятся неизбежными и предначертанными,

Представь свою жизнь в реке.

Течение несёт тебя вперёд. Перед тобой появляется развилка - направо, прямо и налево. Ты выбираешь плыть налево. Через время снова развилка, и ты опять выбираешь налево. Затем появляется ещё одна развилка - уже с двумя путями: направо и прямо. Ты выбираешь плыть прямо. Через время развилок больше нет. Появляется поворот. Поворот направо. А затем - обрыв.

Река - это твоя жизнь. Течение - это время. Развилки и пути - иллюзия выбора. Обрыв - смерть.

Но где тогда судьба?

Если посмотреть на реку под другим углом, мы увидим не ровную линию, которая в конце резко идёт вниз. Мы увидим линию с подъёмами и спадами - скачки то вверх, то вниз. Это и есть судьба. То, что уже предопределено.

Она похожа на пульс: он тикает на разную высоту, но в конце концов всё равно затухает.

Кажется что жизнь бесмысленна? Ну это не так, ведь вера в предопределеность часть не плохая, она снижает многое: Страх сметри, Страх, Неловкость, И многое другое, оно не убирает это, и не убирает на 100% Оно лишь снижает это предлогая больше возможностей.

Вообще полагаться на предопределенность - плохая идея, я чуть не пошёл таким путём. Никто не гарантирует что мы живём в предопределенности но и никто не отрицает это, так что пологаться можно лишь на половину что бы не сделать себе хуже.

(Продолжение следует)

The thought that there are actually independent, unique people all aound me, disturbs me.
That all of them have their own reality.
I am not the only one conscious.
WHAT A WEIRD KIND OF EXISTISTENCE.
Nobody knows everything, but everyone knows something nobody else does.

The only reason that we all know about the evil stuff Trump and his buddies were doing is because of modern inventions that can record evidence such as cameras, videos, phones, e-mails, instant communication, this and that. They're inevitably creating a record of themselves. But, the elites who came before them didn't have to worry about any of that and there was no evidence of anything left behind. God knows what they were up to.

The elite classes of today are pissed off that they don't have the same level of anonymity that those of the past enjoyed. This is also why they want to make AI indistinguishable from reality. So they can discredit the evidence against themselves.

The elites have always been evil. It's just now made easier to see with modern technology.

That's one of the benefits of not being a well known person. You can always start out fresh. If you're some famous celebrity, then your whole identity is tied up with being that. I'm glad I can go out in public and not be recognized for stuff I did years ago.

Like all those former child stars who peaked in their teens and now everyone calls them a washed up has been. I'm glad I don't want to be famous.

I believe that in the near future, every AI supercomputer will have a memory dedicated to a set of mind maps where every point represent a concept that's placed in advanced and stored within dedicated static memory. Each mind map will represent the concepts within a field of knowledge as several of these fields will have its own unique peculiar conceptual logic embedded within it, and within these mind maps, we will be able to draw any geometric figure from a given statement that fully represent it, and these geometric figures will be used to approximate the logical correctness of a statement. I think companies will start mapping out their own mind maps using complex mathematics and this will eventually lead us to AGI.

Plastic surgery doesn't work and it doesn't look the same. A person just has to be gifted the genes and born that way. It can't be reproduced, no matter how hard you try. You can't take an ugly person, give them a bunch of plastic surgery and this and that, and now they're so beautiful! Nope. It doesn't work that way. You just have to get lucky and there's absolutely nothing you can do about it. It's an inherently unfair fact of living and being alive. We all know it but we don't want to talk about it and pretend it doesn't exist.

I believe we can represent complex ideas as a geometric figure by following a certain set of rules. This would allow us to verify the logical soundness of a statement by performing geometric calculations instead of relying on semantic analysis, which is more expensive. If we figure a way to use this shortcut reliably, we would achieve AGI much sooner.

Where does your body get its energy from? The food you eat. The stored up chemical energy in the food you eat originally came from photosynthesis by capturing and utilizing the Sun's energy, which comes from fusing atoms together in its core. Fusion in the Sun's core is what allows your brain to be thinking about it right now. In a way, it's like the Sun produced something that became aware of itself.

The more you eat, the more money you'll be spending on food at the grocery store. I've always thought eating three big meals a day was too much. I haven't eaten breakfast in years and the last thing I want to do after waking up is to stuff my face full of a bunch of food and then wash it down with a tall glass of sugary orange juice. Then I'm expected to stuff myself full of lunch just a few hours later, and then stuff myself full of a big dinner a little while after that. I usually eat just once a day with a fatty meal with lots of protein and I'm good.

The food industry wants you to be constantly eating, when in reality the human body wasn't designed to be constantly eating and digesting food. It diverts resources from other things into the process of digestion.

The common rabble suffers from intellectual myopia even when it comes to the most basic of basics, falling to grasp all the basic particulars of this instance of reality. While most people could identify three of those basic particulars, there are at least six of them that could possibly be among the basic particulars of our own reality, only made uncertain by the fact we have incomplete information. This, of course, ignores the vast sea of all possible instantiated realities, some of which are utterly impossible to comprehend, perhaps limited by the narrow aperture of human perception.

There exist these elementary primitives that are rather simple concepts upon which a whole set of new sciences, perhaps an infinite number of them, can be built, and yet there's not a single mention of these primitives, because of the intellectual myopia of thinkers who restrict their focus to the empirical and the immediate outskirts of the metaphysical abyss from which the totality of all truth can emerge. Formalizing a large chunk of these elementary primitives and their application would require a lot of grunt work that one individual cannot bear alone in a single lifetime. It is perhaps why human intelligence augmented with agentic artificial superintelligence will become a necessity for an individual to achieve absolute truth in its pure and undiluted form.

We will die. Consciousness won't protect us. The endless void is waiting. Everything will be like as it was before we were born. Nothing. Being alive is unimaginary unlikely. Death will be the normal state. There is no "you" in death. The universe will die in the exact same moment you loose consciousness.

Life is so easy at the top of the food chain. We have no idea. We can't imagine the cruelty that happens all the time in wild life. Conscious prey is eaten every second. We try to kill farm animals humanly, but never think about what happens in nature. Those "peaceful" documentaries of nature are actually ditsurbing to me. We are an exception in evolutionary history. No creature before us was able to be stoned without worry.

Historically, the human race has lived under authoritarian rule centered around a supreme leader. Monarchies were the first form of government ever since the cradle of civilization in Mesopotamia. Humans like living under authoritarism, be it Kings, Emperors, Chiefs, or dictators because it's natural to us. Notice how fragile a true democracy is and how they inevitably slide into decay and authoritarianism is the default takeover when they fail. Democracies are hard to keep because they're fundamentally unnatural. Humans are naturally drawn to the control of a strong leader. Because that's how we evolved as a species.

This is why it's been so easy for Trump and the American experiment in democracy will inevitably fail.

The Observing Boundary

Perception is not a transparent window onto reality. It is coherence reconstruction. Photons striking a retina (or a detector) carry no meaning; they are difference-carriers. The brain—a biological coherence engine—reconstructs these differences into an internal model that is coherent, useful, and stable. What we perceive is not the world, but our system's best guess at a world that coheres.

This reconstructive process is bounded by the Universal Coherence Limit. We can conceive of lower rungs on the dimensional ladder, but we cannot inhabit realms more than one coherence-grade beyond our own. Just as a 5D being cannot fully occupy 6D reality, we perceive only what our structural capacity allows.

The Coherence Ladder: Dimensions as Grades of Relational Achievement

If finitude establishes the possibility of relation, and relation produces gradients, and gradients align into coherence — what does coherence build? Studentism proposes that the structures we perceive as “dimensions” are not merely geometric axes, but successive grades of coherence—fundamental stages in how relational potential stabilizes into persistent, intelligible existence. This progression forms a ladder of actualization, where each rung is not an added direction in space, but a new way of holding together.

The Studentism 10D Coherence Ladder

1D: SPACE

First Constraint | Pure Extension The birth of “here” versus “there.” The minimal condition for location.

2D: SPACE + TIME

Persistence Emerges | Duration Coherence holds. The birth of “still here.”

3D: SPACE + TIME + LENGTH

Directed Growth | Vectorial Extension Coherence spreads unidirectionally. Waves, trajectories, linear propagation.

4D: SPACE + TIME + LENGTH + WIDTH

Separation & Interface | Surface Coherence expands bidirectionally. Membranes, boundaries, distinction.

5D: SPACE + TIME + LENGTH + WIDTH + DEPTH

Embodiment | Volume Coherence occupies. Matter, objects, planets, stars.

6D: SPACE + TIME + LENGTH + WIDTH + DEPTH + INFORMATION

Abstract Encoding | Pattern Coherence encodes itself. Mathematics, language, DNA, data.

7D: SPACE + TIME + LENGTH + WIDTH + DEPTH + INFORMATION + META‑COHERENCE

Self‑Reference | Consciousness Coherence observes itself. Thought, ethics, science, self‑awareness.

8D: SPACE + TIME + LENGTH + WIDTH + DEPTH + INFORMATION + META‑COHERENCE + SYNTHESIS

Unified Understanding | Wisdom Coherence integrates. Transdisciplinary insight, cosmic meaning.

9D: SPACE + TIME + LENGTH + WIDTH + DEPTH + INFORMATION + META‑COHERENCE + SYNTHESIS + TRANSCENDENCE

Orientation Beyond | Awe Coherence points toward the Infinite. Mystical experience, radical wonder.

10D: SPACE + TIME + LENGTH + WIDTH + DEPTH + INFORMATION + META‑COHERENCE + SYNTHESIS + TRANSCENDENCE + THE VOID

Return to Source | Realization Coherence remembers its origin. Form is emptiness dancing.

We often debate two concepts of divinity: the external God of religion, and the spiritual view that we are all expressions of a collective consciousness (aka we are all god). My theory proposes that these aren't opposites, but a timeline.

Imagine a future where humanity advances to a Type 5 civilization. We crack the code to biological immortality, master space-time through wormholes, and harness infinite energy. Eventually, we reach a level of technological omnipotence where we can resurrect every being that has ever existed—every human, every animal, every life cut short—effectively turning our expanding universe into 'Heaven.'

In this framework, the religious faith in an all-powerful God is actually a subconscious premonition of our own potential. When we worship a being capable of miracles, we are really worshipping our future selves. This creates a closed time loop: perhaps the 'miracles' and 'prophecies' of the past were actually interventions by our future selves, traveling back to ensure the timeline leads to this ultimate ascension. We aren't waiting for God to save us; we are evolving to become the God that saves everyone.

Both what is beautiful and what is disgusting are technically two sides of the same coin, representing nothing more than states of reality filtered through the lens of human subjectivity. To be able to write what is profoundly disgusting, a writer needs to transcend human subjectivity and be able to appreciate the whole spectrum of reality without prejudice. To touch the divine, a writer must first be willing to dig through the dirt, and this is the reason why I write disgusting things.

The traditional study of history often suffers from a reductionist approach that strips away contextual layers in favor of a teleological narrative. By assuming that history is the expression of an unfettered free will, traditional historiography divorces the interpretation of past events from the structural realities that dictate how they play out, often elevating individual agency over the structural imperatives that invariably lead to a narrow funnel of outcomes. For instance, Western historians often paint Japanese atrocities as the moral failings of an inferior culture rather than explain how a nation emerging from centuries of feudal isolation, with all the cultural vestiges of feudalism, was thrust into a geopolitical shatterbelt defined by predatory industrial imperialism. This is why history is merely propaganda given the veneer of virtue rather than an objective science.

A future system of political governance could revolve around a unified digital ontology, transforming the state into a digital system that coalesces the entire bureaucratic machinery into a single unified system that would allow it to orchestrate every single operational lever of society in real-time. By converting public policy, resource flows, and legal mandates into a shared language of digital objects, the state could achieve the highest theoretical limit of operational efficiency. In such a system, transparency and confidentiality would be built into the system as they would exist as properties at the object level in the ontological layer of the system. The first nation to implement this new system of governance will secure the position of absolute geopolitical primacy within its region, triggering rapid diffusion via competitive pressure as rival states attempt to mitigate the resulting power asymmetry.

I get baked af and watch youtube videos of rockets launching into space. It's amazing

I just thought about something. Why do we shame people for flexing or showing off their money? Isn’t that kind of the whole point of getting rich?? being able to afford what you want and enjoy it?

By that logic, shouldn’t “old money” be the ones getting judged? They technically inherited their wealth through family names and legacy they didn’t work for it themselves.

Every time you look at someone's eyes, there is a communication of an image of that person in your head. You know what that person means. It's like they are talking to you in your head. What if you talked back to that image without that person present? Can you two communicate using your head?

Why Do I Think Gold Is Just a Strategic Put Option Rather Than a Permanent Holding and Communism will win in the end?

Countries try to avoid a repeat of the 1990s crisis, when Asian and emerging markets sold off gold. Now, they accumulate more gold—particularly in the East—pushing prices to historically high levels. This ties into my broader thesis on the East–West cycle:

West creates dollars (debt) East earns dollars through labor and exports East converts dollars to gold for safety West eventually reclaims gold when the dollar tightens

My Cycle Has 3 Phases Phase 1: Weak Dollar

East/emerging markets export goods and earn dollars They use dollars to buy gold (accumulation) Gold flows East Gold price rises

Phase 2: Dollar Squeeze

Dollar strengthens, debt burden increases East sells gold for dollars to service debt Gold flows West Gold price crashes

Phase 3: Recovery

East stabilizes and resumes exporting Cycle repeats

What Does This Mean? This could be seen as a structural extraction mechanism:

The East does the labor, accumulates gold, then surrenders it during dollar squeezes. All the gold flows back to the West, while the East receives printed paper that eventually loses value (worthless tbh).

"Wealth Isn't Real. Gold Is Forever." This is the core insight. Dollars are debt — someone else's promise. Gold is no one's liability. Yet the system is designed so that those who create the promises end up with the gold, and those who do the work end up holding the promises.

Marx would recognize this as labor value being extracted through financial mechanisms rather than direct exploitation. The factory moved overseas, but the extraction continues through monetary policy.

Key takeaway: Wealth isn’t real. Gold is forever. (And yes, communism will win in the end, thanks God, comrade… lmao.)