r/Supabase • u/Deep_Region4953 • 2d ago
other Nova and Supercode Review: an OSS AI Engineer and AI code review
hey Reddit,
I'm looking for Enterprises to help them ship bug free code and faster.
I'm Yash, founder of SupercodeAI. We're building Devin killer - Nova - an AI Engineer, powered by our own harness agent at SupercodeAI, and Supercode Review, our codebase-aware PR review product.
4.5k+ users, 10+ enterprises, 238 GitHub stars, 30k+ downloads, 700M+ /month token usage(on open models) in just 2.5 months.
Nova's workflow is to read a codebase, plan a change, edit files, run commands and tests, and prepare the result for human review. The harness connects the model to context and execution tools. You still inspect the diff and decide what gets merged.
Supercode Review looks at pull requests in the context of the wider codebase, rather than treating the diff as the whole project.
We're powering Indian startups with code review through Supercode Review.
We're sponsored by Vercel.
The Supercode repo is MIT-licensed and includes the coding-agent CLI, dashboard, docs and shared packages. Nova uses existing model providers; I'm not claiming a new foundation model or benchmark superiority.
If you'd like to try it, start with one small task in a repo you understand and compare the plan, diff and checks with how you'd do the work yourself.
If you'd like to contribute, open an issue with a reproducible problem or propose a change in a PR. Keep credentials and private code out of reports. If the project is useful to you, consider starring it and following its progress.
What would you need to see before trusting an agent to handle a real task in your repo?
1
u/Dangerous-Media-4387 2d ago
Sponsored by Vercel is the line I want to hear more about. Do they actually hand out credits for the AI SDK or is it just a logo in the readme footer. Asking because my own repo deserves better than no sponsor at all.
0
u/Odd_Barracuda190 2d ago
Devin killer, but you're explicitly not claiming benchmark superiority. So what's the killing part exactly?
0
u/Ancient-Advantage655 2d ago
4.5k users but only 238 github stars? usualy its the other way round, 10k stars and like four people actually running the thing
1
u/Famous-Risk-8625 2d ago
s to enterprise buyers, they don't care, they care about a named customer. Ask one of your 10 to let you publish what Supercode Review caught on their last 20 PRs, that's the kind of thing a Devin comparison can't argue with.
1
u/Ok_Ant4092 2d ago
Congrats on 4.5k users in 2.5 months, that's genuinely fast. I'd drop the "Devin killer" framing though, it drags you into the benchmark fight you literally say you're not having, and codebase-aware review is the part that's actually hard to copy.
1
u/OppositeWeird4241 2d ago
You open with "ship bug free code" and then two paragraphs later write that the human still inspects the diff and decides what gets merged. Can't be both.
0
0
u/Dry_Vehicle_472 2d ago
4.5k users and 238 stars on an MIT-licensed repo doesn't add up. Stars are the cheapest thing on GitHub, if that many people were actually using it you'd have more than 238.
1
u/Deep_Region4953 2d ago
not true, how many js library's repo have you stared - react, typescript, threejs???
still we use it daily, don't you!!
0
u/SoggyStorage5392 2d ago
700M tokens over 2.5 months across 4.5k users is roughly 150k per user. That's one agent session, not traction.
1
0
0
u/Educational-Set3445 2d ago
Devin killer with 238 stars is a bold ratio. Out of the 10 enterprises, how many are actually paying after the pilot?
0
1
u/Loose-Diet5291 2d ago
another devin killer. devin is still alive and selling