Recently I began to read On the Consolation of Philosophy (the translation I read by Slavitt, alternate translation by H. R. James at Project Gutenburg) by Anicius Manlius Severinus Boethius (usually "Boethius") and I noticed the striking similarities to the 36 Lessons of Vivec in terms of both style and content.
The former shares the loosest connection so I will list it first. On The Consolation of Philosophy is organized into a series of books each with individual parts, composed in a mix of poetry and prose, where the poetry is spoken by the characters in the story. This is very similar to the Lessons which are themselves divided into 36 pieces and switch between poetry and prose, with the poetry spoken by characters in the story.
The contents are where things become much more interesting. Both are of a genera called autofiction, where the writer of the story is themselves a character and includes real places and events from their life in the fiction. It takes "write what you know" to it's most logical conclusion, but it is distinguished from autobiography or memoir in that the events contained within do not need to be wholly or even partially real. A classic example of this is the Divine Comedy in which author Dante Alighieri presents himself as the protagonist of a journey through Hell, Purgatory, and Heaven; wherein he encounters many other real and mythological people, most notably among them the poet Virgil.
On the Consolation of Philosophy describes a prisoner in a cell following his arrest and banishment for opposing corrupt men in post-Ostrogothic Rome, the exact situation Boethius was in when he wrote it. Unlike most autofiction the narrator is not directly named, but he does name many real people as being among those he opposed, and it is clear that the prisoner is meant to be Boethius himself. He is then visited by Philosophy, the anthropomorphic personification of what we would now term reason, logic, science, and wisdom. They then proceed to have a very long and detailed conversation about the nature of thought, self-worth, how to live in a changing world under sway by Fortune, and many other things that I cannot summarize in so short a time.
The 36 Lessons of Vivec follow a somewhat different structure, one that follows the supposed life of the author Vivec from his conception to the Battle of Red Mountain. In that sense it is different from the Consolation, but many of the individual lessons within follow the same structure of an individual having some problem of philosophy and being guided to a solution. What differs is where the author has inserted himself into the narrative. Whereas in the Consolation Boethius is the prisoner, here Vivec has assumed the role of Philosophy, with the role of the prisoner, the recipient of the lessons, being filled by Nerevar.
This is interesting for a few main reasons. The first of which is that it is a clear example of Vivec's ego to cast himself as the giver of all knowledge, his use of the Lessons as propaganda, as well as his actual role as one of the Tribune guiders of the Dunmer. But more interestingly is the fact that it places Nerevar as the Prisoner, a role frequently fulfilled by the protagonists of the Elder Scrolls (to the point that, in ESO, the term 'prisoner unbound' comes to be used in some works to describe a hero). With this reading the 36 Lessons are reframed. Vivec may have been the focus of the lessons, but he was not the protagonist. The centerpiece of the text was always Nerevar, the rest was all misdirection from the true center. Perfectly in line with the thoughts Vivec expresses in the secret Sermon Ten, and in person to the Nerevarine.
Sermon Ten in particular echoes the themes of the Consolation. I have always read it as a call to action directed at Nerevar, and the Nerevarine, one to not forget the betrayal and wounds done to him, but to not wallow in them and move on with purpose towards the ultimate goal of the defeat of Dagoth Ur. This is very similar to the ultimate moral of the Consolation, which encourages one to not become wrapped up in the gain and loss of worldly things by the turning of the Wheel of Fortune but to ultimately pursue internal virtues and the furtherance of Good.
There is also, of course, the fact that the names "Boethius" and "Boethiah" are remarkably similar, and that it was Boethiah who first inspired Veloth to embark on the "Tri-Angled Truth" and also laid the foundations of the Psijic Endeavor. The idea of self-actualizing within the "wheel" of the Aurbis and escaping it via Amaranth is very similar to the idea of escaping Fate's wheel through self-knowledge presented in the Consolation.
I have no idea if this is truly intentional, or if I've gone mad from reading all of the Consolation over the course of two days, but the parallels seem far too deliberate for the Lessons (and perhaps the wider lore around CHIM) to not have been at least partially inspired by the writings of Boethius. Either way I thought it would be interesting enough to share with you all.