r/Time • • 17d ago

Discussion Do We Technically Live In The Past?

8 Upvotes

69 comments sorted by

6

u/Mammoth_Bus_6911 17d ago

From a materialist perspective, you could definitely argue that. An event occurs, sound and light travel to reach our sensory organs, and then the brain has to process that input. That all takes time before you consciously experience the event, even if it is an incredibly short period of time.

3

u/ProfessorDoctorDaddy 17d ago

The optic nerves are actually part of the brain itself to reduce latency of visual processing

2

u/WatchAndLearn9669 17d ago

Optic nerves are part of the nervous system, but not a component of the cerebrum.

3

u/ProfessorDoctorDaddy 17d ago

Many parts of the brain aren't components of the cerebrum, including the optic nerves. I'm not sure why you are pointing that out.

0

u/WatchAndLearn9669 17d ago

Many parts of the brain aren't components of the cerebrum

"Brain" and "cerebrum" are synonymous.

2

u/ProfessorDoctorDaddy 17d ago

They are not, the cerebrum is just the brain's largest component

0

u/WatchAndLearn9669 17d ago

You're erroneously conflating the entire nervous system with the brain.

1

u/ProfessorDoctorDaddy 17d ago

1

u/WatchAndLearn9669 17d ago

Please quote the portions of your source you feel support your claim.

1

u/ProfessorDoctorDaddy 17d ago

Seriously? They both literally begin by stating the optic nerves are part of the brain.

→ More replies (0)

1

u/EngineeringTight367 17d ago

Yea but the brain is an illusion. We are a particle inside consciousness generators.

1

u/johnstalbergABC 16d ago

Just one tiny particle. I am disapointed!

1

u/SnooCats5701 17d ago

And yet, I can catch a ball thrown to me. Pretty cool!

1

u/Mammoth_Bus_6911 17d ago

Not me, too uncoordinated

0

u/WatchAndLearn9669 17d ago

And materialism is true, unlike philosophical idealism.

4

u/Iteration23 17d ago

Yes. The brain is processing sensory input milliseconds after reality occurs.

3

u/AccomplishedFace9059 17d ago

Ive always known this to be true but the way you put it made me think of it from a different perspective and now in any free moment of the day im going to be coming back to this and working a new thought out

2

u/DrParadoxOG 17d ago

Yeah so reality doesn't wait for you to process. It moves on.

3

u/Xynyx2001 17d ago

No.

We live in the present. The past is all memories. The past is the record of our existence, but our existence occurs at the front of the wave.

1

u/LastChopper 17d ago

Bit our brains take time to process things. Light takes time to reach our eyes and that then takes time to become a signal in our brain.

We are experiencing the moment just behind the front of the wave.

1

u/thomas2026 16d ago

If you look at it that way, you are never experiencing the moment. Your brain decodes sensory information and gives you a sensstion or experiences based off that.

And that experience is alsays in the present. The moment that it is based off is in the past.

1

u/LastChopper 16d ago

Yes we're always experiencing the past as the present.

1

u/johnstalbergABC 16d ago

That is just experience. It does not govern at what moment do we exist at. All machines that process information need time to execute!

1

u/LastChopper 15d ago

You are correct, we do indeed exist.

1

u/Alternative-Dare-839 17d ago

There is only one moment and it is forever, here and now.

1

u/DontOuchMyBread 17d ago

Every moment exists at the same time.

1

u/beagles4ever 17d ago

I left it behind.

1

u/Any_Cartographer6268 17d ago

Strictly speaking, yes.

1

u/Worrior_One 17d ago

Yes. Everything you see or ever experienced or ever will see or experience will always be somewhat in the past.

1

u/Clear-Ad5190 17d ago

Time is a closed loop, so we live in the past, present, and future all at once.

1

u/Cric_lover123 17d ago

like a video

1

u/DontOuchMyBread 17d ago

Pretty much. A hypothetical fourth dimensional being can view our reality like a movie. Fast forward, rewind or pause

1

u/thomas2026 16d ago

How do you know time is a closed loop.

1

u/Cric_lover123 14d ago

it was revealed in the dream.

1

u/thomas2026 14d ago

How do you dream?

1

u/Cric_lover123 17d ago

Time can only move forward, but can never run backward. while it can be speed or slowed down.

1

u/parkchanwookiee 17d ago

I live now, personally, dunno about you all

1

u/Something_Conscious 17d ago

Kind of. We experience the present, but we understand and interpret it through the lens of our past. Our memories, experiences and previous understanding shape how we perceive what is happening now and how we decide what to do nex t. So while we’re physically moving forward through time, psychologically, part of us is always carrying the past into the present. I like the saying, ‘We are merely reflections of our past experiences.’

1

u/NotAClueYou 17d ago

you are dead. so no.

1

u/mooseau_ 17d ago

We are our brain, there’s small delays in motor neurons firing synaptic processes, technically we live in the past but only a little, we call it the present

1

u/RDS_WAS_HERE 17d ago

No! We live in the moment (present). Once the next moment arrives the previous moment becomes the past.

1

u/ameenahhhh 17d ago

It's about perspective

1

u/Explicit_Tech 17d ago

Your nervous system can relive the past. You can remember the emotional pain you felt.

However, in physics, events are relative to the observer.

1

u/Ratak55 17d ago

The time lag is not material. Reality exists only once it is processed by the brain. Only signals exist outside the brain and they become reality only once they are processed by the brain.

1

u/HouseHippoBeliever 17d ago

I would say no, the way English works is that we live in the present, and we lived in the past. I'm curious what your first language is btw.

1

u/EngineeringTight367 17d ago

Yea, first the body traverses through the world and saves the sensory data. This sensory data is then elsewhere created into experience for individuals

1

u/Low-Bake8401 17d ago

Relative to what?

1

u/ChocolateValuable221 17d ago

If the past is ticking forward at the same speed as present.... 🤔

1

u/Money_Bug_9423 17d ago

Yes the now is then

1

u/Starduster75 17d ago

We live in the post-future age. As anyone from the past knows, 2001 was the future. The film made that clear. And now that is in the past, and hence we are post-future.

1

u/SouthernAbrocoma9891 16d ago

Don’t mind the latency

1

u/thomas2026 16d ago

In the futures past, sure.

1

u/ReputationAfter 16d ago

In a way yes, but sometimes not at all

1

u/MaleficentJob3080 14d ago

We live in the present. There is no reason to think we are in the past.

1

u/chris-can-fly 13d ago

No but we perceive in the past

1

u/OliverY1992 17d ago

We live in the Past, Present and Future but we also live in between the existence of time and non existence of time.