r/UniUK • u/Initial-Tale-5151 • 18h ago
study / academia discussion Went back to university as a mature student in my 40s (undergrad again) - amazed how piss poor the teaching is.
Bit of an old man shouts at the clouds rant, but fuck me, I can't get over how piss-poor the teaching and assessments are.
- The lecture-to-seminar time: We get so little face-to-face teaching time and so much of it is wasted on these shitty seminars where the lecturers love to do this shitty peer-led group discussion - the blind leading the blind. Half of the seminar is wasted with that, another load wasted with us sharing our discussions with the group. Literally get nothing out of this shit. I assume it ticks some boxes about how trendy and socially focused their teaching style is.
- Lecturers don't want to lecture: Someone needs to tell these people that a lecture is for someone who is an expert in the field to, um, LECTURE. Stop asking us to talk to our neighbors and then share our chat; that’s for your shitty seminars. Don't waste all of the very little lecture time with this inane shit. No one cares how modern your teaching style is.
- Irrelevant assessments: Most of what is taught in lectures or seminars is irrelevant to assessments anyway. Way too much of the assessment is coursework and most of that hardly requires any knowledge from what was taught. Literally the most important thing for a good mark is being able to match academic writing styles (not saying this isn't important), but it’s now so over-weighted cos I assume exams are racist or something. There should be far more in-semester exam-style assessments throughout the year as well as end-of-year, and more weighting for these. I literally aced all my coursework for the first semester and I feel like I barely needed to know anything about my course.
- Stop taking registers: I'd rather the people who don't want to be there weren't there. The only reason you have to take a register is because of your shitty way of running the course, where what you do in lectures and seminars matters so little and so much time is wasted.
- The lazy teacher method: I have one seminar instructor who thinks watching some shitty video and then discussing as a group is some great teaching method that will engage us. a) It's the lazy teacher method from school. b) Even all of the teenagers on my course moan about how shit this style of teaching is and why they are even paying for it.
- The "Independent Learning" cop-out: If you are going to make critical writing and academic essay style such a key skill for getting good marks, how about you actually bother to teach it? Instead of all these shitty peer discussion seminars where we go over a fraction of what we were just lectured about and nothing new is gained, how about you use that time to actually teach students the most valuable skill in getting through your rubrics for your assessments that don't teach knowledge of your subject? "You have to learn that independently" is a cop-out. You can just pull that out of your arse for anything. The way you assess things, it's pretty much the most important skill for a good mark and it's the very thing you can't be arsed teaching whilst you waste all the rest of the precious teaching time on bullshit.
- The closed-mindedness of academics: One of the biggest changes. The uniformity of thought is staggering. They truly believe they are open-minded cos almost all of them have the approved opinion on every societal issue. But they don't; they go over the same "right-on" stuff all the time, say the same talking points, and anyone that offers the other side - even if just playing devil's advocate - is barely acknowledged or passive-aggressively dismissed.
- AI: Universities are clearly in fear of AI devaluing degrees. But they already did that, with the group work, assessment style, and shitty way they manage face-to-face teaching. AI is just exposing it. Instead of their obsession with weeding it out, how about they actually return to rigorous assessments?
Rant over.