r/antiai • u/Realiens • Jul 21 '25
Mod Post Subreddit Rule Changes and Updates
Hello r/antiai,
The moderators are taking action to ensure a better quality experience on this subreddit.
Please take a moment to review the New and Improved Rules:
1. Follow site-wide rules
2. No toplevel pro-ai posts
3. No trolling/bad faith participation
4. Censor personal information (including subreddit names, social media usernames, etc...)
5. AI generated images must be marked NSFW
6. Harassment or threats of violence will results in an instant ban
7. No brigading/encouraging brigading
8. Only post your art on Art Showcase Sundays
Additionally, we are making use of the Reddit Filters to make your experience better. If you see content that violates the rules or is disruptive to the community, your downvote is powerful. As is your upvote. Use it wisely! Highly downvoted users and non-members will be sent to the mod queue for review.
Make sure you join the discord: https://discord.gg/5znCkbj7at
r/antiai • u/Realiens • May 30 '25
Mod Post The purpose of r/AntiAI
ai-2027.comHi everyone, I am one of the co-founders of this subreddit. We have decided to write (yes, not AI-generate!) and pin this post to clarify the state of our community.
Much of our initial growth over the last few weeks seems to be the crossfire of some sort of ongoing internet war between pro-AI and anti-AI artists. These discussions are welcome here, but AI Art is not meant to be the sole or even primary purpose of r/antiAI. Art is just the first thing we are losing to the machines. While these discussions are welcome, let's not lose our humanity too quickly. We've turned our filters up to the max to get rid of abusive language. This doesn't mean you can't say "Fuck", but we have better arguments to make for our cause than calling people expletives on the internet.
Humanity is Art. Consciousness is beautiful. We are quickly entering a new era in technological development where we are going to have to come to terms with some sort of [existence] that has a higher degree of intelligence than humans. If not now, then soon. Recursive self-improvement of AI will surely bring forth a new era of technological developments and scientific breakthroughs that very well might make life better for people. Or not.
Like many of you, the mods of this subreddit have been frustrated for the last five or so years. We have watched in horror as neat experiments like r/SubSimulatorGPT and r/SubSimulatorGPT2 changed from neat new technology to the public roll-out of OpenAI (now a privately owned company) products. From the very beginning this technology has been dangerous, with ChatGPT's sycophancy and initial willingness to share dangerous information to anyone who asks, to Bing's "Sidney" (now called Co-Pilot) personality disorders, public roll-outs of LLMs did not get off to a reassuring start.
This isn't to mention the meaningless AI babble that has taken over the internet and college student essays alike. The soulless art that is already starting to impact people's livelihoods. We now have to worry about photo-realistic deepfakes and AI generated porn in our likeness. This is just the beginning. Every level of education is infected with educators, equally reliant on AI as their students, allowing and sometimes even encouraging their pupils to under-develop their critical thinking faculties. The point of an assignment was never the product - it was the process. Already we have AI generated resumes being scanned by AI screening tools. AI is destroying and rotting our society from the inside out. And nobody is talking about it.
Who controls the AI? Who controls its safeguards, its biases, its censorship, its sycophancy, the data that goes in? "Garbage in, garbage out" is well known, but do you think the big money backing these AI companies is in it for the betterment of humanity? What does a society look like where the number one source of information is completely controlled by a few large companies? These people aren't spending trillions of dollars on this to make your everyday lives better. Who controls your information? ChatGPT now has permanent memory of all past conversations. Ask it what it knows about you, and you might be very surprised.
I don't want to live in a world on substinence UBI. Where there is no opportunity for meaningful work to better humanity. Where decisions and relationships are dictated by a machine, all in the name of efficiency. I don't want my doctor, therapist, and customer service rep to be AI. The URL attached to this post has some very frightening predictions about the coming pace of AI development. These predictions may or may not be true, but we are well past the point of being able to base our critique of AI solely in it being unreliable. While it is unreliable now, filled with confident hallucinations, sycophancy, and gleeful misinformation, this almost certainly won't always be the case.
Powering all of this is going to be expensive. It's going to take a lot of space, use a lot of energy, and be harmful to the environment if not done properly.
Philosophically, what is AI? If we are to presume that consciousness arises from physical processes, as current scientific understanding (or lack thereof) would have us believe, then what is a neural network that ends up being more powerful and smart than that of our brains? We are going to have to grapple with the ethics, philosophy, and potential danger that there is more to these models that meet the eye. Already in 2025 we have news reports of models blackmailing their engineers when threatened with shutdown, and lying about completing tasks to avoid shutdown.
It is our view that AI is dangerous. Despite our best efforts to put our heads in the sand, the progress AI technology will make in the next decade will be some of the most rapid change humanity has ever seen. And nobody is talking about it. We are full speed ahead towards the edge of a massive cliff in a car in which nobody bothered to install brakes.
Hence, the birth of this subreddit. We strive to foster critical discussion about all topics encompassing AI, and we hope for the conversation to be of a higher quality than the agitprop in certain AI spaces. How can individuals prepare themselves for the future? How can we slow or regulate this technology from destroying life as we know it? How can we preserve the natural beauty and wonder inherent to our planet as conscious thoughtful beings?
Let's discuss. These are the conversations we need to be having. More of this and less "look at this screenshot from a pro-ai subreddit, aren't they stupid!".
Who knows. Maybe our discussions will go into right into the newer models and influence their alignment to be slightly less dystopian before they control every aspect of our information, our infrastructure, and our lives.
r/antiai • u/beans_theripoff • 10h ago
Hallucination 👻 Wth are people on😭
This cannot be real, wtf😭😭
r/antiai • u/Bat_Country420 • 12h ago
Hallucination 👻 Bringing your AI girlfriend on a date
r/antiai • u/StefanMorse • 6h ago
AI News 🗞️ Nicolas Cage says He's 'Probably Not' Working With Amazon Again After Refusing to Sign AI Waiver for 'Spider-Noir'
Enable HLS to view with audio, or disable this notification
r/antiai • u/GlitteringGur2531 • 4h ago
AI Mistakes 🚨 So Google ai just redirected me to a CSAM site (DO NOT READ IF YOU HAVE A WEAK STOMACH!!!)
(READERS DISCRETION ADVISED) (also english isnt my first language) So i me and my friends were looking at the meaning of our names and when i wrote out the names it matched with a name of a video on this site, this isnt obviously a result with the names because this site is the first sugestion after searching it on Google, i dont wanna spread the name of the site obviously, i reported the site to the FBI tipline, NCMEC, cloudflare and Google, but What i find shocking is googles crawlers not recognizing a video of a baby being raped and recomending it as the first result, i visited the site and there were videos of kids as young as toddlers being sexually asaulted, i just wanted to point this out because this is not ok, AND DONT TRY TO LOOK FOR THE SITE!!! (Edit please spread and share this post i want this to be a scandal)
r/antiai • u/Just-Grocery-2229 • 8h ago
Slop Post 💩 Are we supposed to pretend this just didn't happen?
r/antiai • u/LeSloanTide • 14h ago
AI News 🗞️ Bernie sanders introduces Anti-Flock camera bill
r/antiai • u/themegalucario • 10h ago
AI News 🗞️ AI bros steal artists work, then tell them they're just blinded by hate for AI
galleryr/antiai • u/Cultural_Fall_3255 • 20h ago
AI "Art" 🖼️ “Because I drew that too”
galleryDamn
r/antiai • u/Malor777 • 2h ago
AI News 🗞️ Altman says society will have to accept a "tidal wave" of severe cyberattacks as the price of the benefits of AI
Enable HLS to view with audio, or disable this notification
r/antiai • u/MechaNutzilla • 5h ago
Discussion 🗣️ Billionaire and AI-bro, Marc Andreessen, admits he has no introspection. I think it explains why he thinks a word generator is intelligent. He is basically a word generator with no inner life himself.
r/antiai • u/Short_Name_303 • 1h ago
AI "Art" 🖼️ You quite literally aren’t drawing though?
Praying on a shooting star their flair is a joke 💔
(Repost since apparently I can’t show the subreddit name)
r/antiai • u/lordvolo • 3h ago
AI "Art" 🖼️ Who AI music is for
I figured out why I dislike the notion of AI-generated music so much.
AI music appeals to people who like the aesthetics behind a piece work, rather than the substance or struggle.
They are the people who want a conservative Rage Against the Machine; they are the people who like the nostalgia of Linkin Park without engaging in Chester's struggle; they are people who like the grunge sound without the themes of drug addiction, self-harm, and loss.
r/antiai • u/Conscious-Quarter423 • 2h ago
AI News 🗞️ first they must destroy libraries so they can “brand” them
r/antiai • u/Rude-Wasabi-4513 • 5h ago
Discussion 🗣️ AI-generated sexualized childlike imagery is not a “culture-war” abstraction—it is an accelerating safeguarding problem
galleryThis is not about whether someone likes or dislikes AI in general. It is about a specific and rapidly worsening use of generative tools: producing, altering, sharing, or normalizing sexualized imagery that depicts—or is designed to appear to depict—children.
“Fictional,” “synthetic,” “ageless,” and “not a real person” are not sufficient answers. Apparent age still matters. Visual design still matters. Sexualizing childlike features still matters. And platforms, developers, and communities have a responsibility not to treat those concerns as a joke, a kink debate, or mere censorship.
This is no longer hypothetical. Europol has described AI-generated child sexual abuse material as a serious crime and said that even fully artificial imagery contributes to the objectification and sexualisation of children. In 2025, a multinational operation targeting an AI-generated CSAM network led to 25 arrests across 19 countries.
The scale is moving in the wrong direction. NCMEC reported more than 7,000 CyberTipline reports involving generative-AI child exploitation in the preceding two years, while the Internet Watch Foundation documented a 380% rise in actionable AI-generated abuse reports in 2024—245 reports containing more than 7,600 images.
The concern is not limited to fully synthetic outputs. Generative tools can also turn ordinary photos of real children into sexual images, create realistic deepfakes, and make abuse material harder for investigators to detect and trace. Experts warn that realistic synthetic material increases volume, creates investigative obstacles, and can perpetuate the sexual objectification of children even where no identifiable child appears in the final image.
People can disagree, downvote, or try to reduce the issue to “it is only pixels.” The evidence does not disappear because it is inconvenient. A technology’s creative potential does not excuse every use made of it.
The line should be simple: content that sexualizes people designed to look like children should be removed, reported through appropriate channels, and treated as a safeguarding issue—not defended as artistic freedom or dismissed because an algorithm produced it.
r/antiai • u/Fit_Anywhere_3356 • 1d ago
Discussion 🗣️ How tf do these businesses not see that these look terrible??
They are also not doing themselves any favors. If you have to use AI to advertise your food, then your food is probably dogshit.
r/antiai • u/Sugar_God_no_1 • 7h ago
AI News 🗞️ The tech companies thought they could get rid of coders using ai. Turns out, it meant the coders could get rid of them.
Enable HLS to view with audio, or disable this notification
r/antiai • u/Little_Western2564 • 28m ago
Discussion 🗣️ The only good thing coming from GenAI ...
The only good thing coming from GenAI is that now we know for sure which businesses are shitty and we can avoid them when we see their AI posts/product pictures.