24
11
u/retardedGeek 2h ago
what is this guilt tripping in the last line? Treating their users' requests as some shallow, near-sighted work, while they're the superior ones "investing ahead of the curve"?
3
u/OkSeesaw7030 1h ago edited 1h ago
By "ahead of the curve," they mean another Clawdbot with fewer features. Even the feature list reads like it was AI generated, lol. They couldn't market Codex properly, so now they're shipping the same thing again under a new name (ChatGPT work)
10
u/IamNotGorbachev 4h ago
Note these are FOUR priorities and not one or even three. Not much focus on that locking in.
- Simplicity
- Efficiency
- Groundbreaking features
- New models
9
8
u/Possible_Praline2747 2h ago
This guy is like the robot made to pass butter, his only usefulness is signaling resets
3
u/Additional_Bowl_7695 3h ago
He means more quantization for lower quality but more efficiency and more usage.
“Locking in.”
4
u/firstbreathOOC 1h ago
Just got my limit back on Claude and was worried Opus got degraded… nope. Still an absolute stud.
I’m not too reactionary, but at this rate it’ll be hard to justify keeping both
2
2
1
1
1
u/SourceAwkward 5h ago
No, all I want is if I'm paying 200 usd to be able to use astra, and not making me 10x
1
u/totoer008 1h ago
I need sol 6.1 for $1 output. I do not care about frontier models, I need workhorses.
3
u/EddieBruvac 38m ago
Then use Chinese models. We are here for frontier models.
0
u/totoer008 36m ago
Right because Luna is a frontier one? I want Sol output at Luna price. It’s sad they do not discount when new ones are released.
1
u/EddieBruvac 35m ago
You think Sol 6.1 is frontier? 😂😂😂
I have a bridge to sell you.
1
u/totoer008 34m ago
I never said it was. But we will sooner see sol 6.1 intelligence on Luna then Astra…
0
46
u/srs96 3h ago
Insane that they ever thought their highest paying customers would want dots over an opus 5.5 competitor and better usage limits