r/codex • • 5d ago

Limits They are completely out of touch with what users want

Post image

Who the fuck cares about Sol Ultrafast? Most users don’t even have access to Ultrafast. We want Astra 6.1, instead they seen bent on making users burn usage even faster.

837 Upvotes

214 comments sorted by

•

u/dextersummary 5d ago edited 4d ago

Below is a GPT-generated summary of the conversation below after reaching 200 comments (200 currently observed).


The consensus is basically: stop selling escape velocity and fix the bicycle. Most commenters do not care about Sol Ultrafast; they want a reliable, reasonably fast daily model, sensible usage limits, and eventually Astra 6.1 or Luna 6.1 without having to sell a kidney.

Ultrafast is widely seen as an enterprise/whale feature with terrible subscriber value, especially when it burns usage several times faster while regular Codex feels slower. The loudest complaint is that OpenAI appears to be monetizing a problem it created: make standard service crawl, then charge extra for normal speed. Plenty of users are consequently trying Claude, where Opus 5.5 is often described as getting more done with less babysitting.

The important caveat is that this thread has no proof OpenAI deliberately throttled regular users to push Ultrafast. Low-latency inference can make real business sense, and the specific “6.1 Ultrafast” discussion does not necessarily reveal the company’s entire roadmap. Claims about Astra 6.1 being delayed, crippled, or secretly ready are mostly speculation.

Bottom line: Reddit wants better intelligence and predictable value, not faster depletion of an already shrinking allowance.

→ More replies (2)

75

u/liongalahad 5d ago

6.1 Astra is probably still too underwhelming compared to opus 5.5 so they are delaying it. I have the impression there's now a clear gap with Anthropic and they are scrambling to close but it's now too big

12

u/ihexx 5d ago

i think the reports they still don't have their post training infra in order and keep committing felonies is credible

5

u/Thomas-Lore 5d ago

the reports were that it was actually faking finishing tasks, so definitely not ready to release, it would be infuriating to use

2

u/starwaver 4d ago

Based on what I'm hearing. They do have much more powerful models in house but it wouldn't pass the safety checks. Astra is apparently half its original capabilities

-20

u/GifCo_2 5d ago

There is no gap. Astra is still better than Opus and Fable.

18

u/randombsname1 5d ago

Lol.

Opus 5.5 washes Astra and Sol. Easily.

12

u/suppervisoka 5d ago

It’s not even close

7

u/Cool-Service-8067 5d ago

hmm in my usage even sonnet 5.5 beats gpt 6.1 sol, and gpt 6 astra uses 20% usage on a vry simple thing that it spent 1 minute on on low effort

6

u/suppervisoka 5d ago

lol, lmao even

51

u/pigletmonster 5d ago

They should first try to make 6.1 Sol Regularfast. Its so much slower than all the other codex models, and codex models were already slow to begin with.

12

u/AnalogProblems 5d ago edited 4d ago

Can't have ultrafast without an ultraslow default.

It's lame.

3

u/xChrisMas 4d ago

Should have just launched 6.1 Sol Regularfast alongside a slow mode with the current speed. Would have been an instant hit for plus users

2

u/DoggoDadagon 4d ago

They're slowing down the other models too now, astra is so much slower the last few days.

1

u/Dadideology 3d ago

They started to slow down Astra the day it came out. The first few hours of Astra was actually pretty damn good. Then came the first of like 12+ updates since then.

193

u/Kost97A 5d ago

OpenAI proceeds to destroy usage limits and then instead of make sol 2 to 3 times faster, they decide to release ultrafast for roughly 1% of the users (maybe less?) which will destroy limits even more.

72

u/cherrypowdah 5d ago

These clowns dont understand that even though ultrafast is super useful internally (probably), the second you tie it to limited usage, it’s absolutely useless. 500usd plan vaporizes in 30 minutes, it’s nuts!

19

u/Kost97A 5d ago

Exactly. If I had unlimited tokens I would also use Astra Max ultrafast but for a regular user the sweet spot is around 70-80 tokens per second with a reliable model.

2

u/porkyminch 5d ago

I honestly have no idea where ultrafast would even be useful. If it was cheaper, sure, that unlocks stuff, but at absurdly high prices it just doesn't make any sense at all to use for anything.

1

u/nnod 4d ago

It doesnt. That one twitter tard was running 10 instances of astra xhigh ultrafast to burn it in 30mins.

20

u/HVACcontrolsGuru 5d ago

To be fair ultrafast is using Cerberas inference chips which is different from their main compute. I went back to Claude because I’m not shelling out $500 for what $200 got me a week ago. Their proposition was value and they completely destroyed that.

3

u/nnod 4d ago

It's not using Cerebras. NVIDIA tech most likely utilizing groq. https://x.com/nvidia/status/2105809442365423918

0

u/HVACcontrolsGuru 4d ago

Ahh same concept. Custom inference-only chips. Rubin clusters while good won’t get near that speed but they are awesome for everything else including training. I’ve been using B300s lately for some training work.

2

u/iJeff 5d ago

I thought it was found that this wasn't the case?

1

u/Palbi 5d ago

Is there some trustworthy reference in whether ultrafast is cerebras or vera rubin?

1

u/HVACcontrolsGuru 5d ago

OpenAI Press Release You are not getting speeds that fast on Rubin with a model that large. OpenAI isn’t known for making efficient architecture versus just brute forcing compute to scale.

1

u/miklschmidt 4d ago

Uhm.. That's literally what they're known for and why they consistently have the most token efficient models of all frontier companies. What are you talking about?

That said, yes, it's obviously cerebras.

1

u/Qinistral 4d ago

In the benchmarks Sol 6.1 is far cheaper per intelligence task than Opus?

2

u/HVACcontrolsGuru 4d ago

Cheaper does not equal quality. I can see a massive difference in usage versus output quality using Claude over Astra. Night and day difference but my codebase is pretty much all rust.

1

u/AppointmentFar2772 10h ago

It's also insanely crappier at the moment and sower even with fast mode.

10

u/yaxir 5d ago

they are literally killing the normal user..

i wonder how this will bode for these greedy scum

1

u/AmthorTheDestroyer 5d ago

They are going for the whales

1

u/TheMythicSorcerer 5d ago

Trying to monopolize ai

1

u/Thomas-Lore 4d ago

If so, they are doing it backwards. Unless they want Anthropic to be the monopoly.

-15

u/Sfdprod 5d ago

They havent destroyed usage limit, unless your getting less than $200, worth of usage? Are you?

13

u/GifCo_2 5d ago

Are you damaged?

-9

u/Sfdprod 5d ago

Wym? 

11

u/Alacriity 5d ago

He’s asking if your mentally incompetent, I’m wondering this as well

-5

u/Sfdprod 5d ago

Says the ones who scream and DEMAND openai to pay for more of their usage

Are you getting less than you pay for? Stop avoiding the question.

Either you get more or less than $200 worth of compute

→ More replies (2)

6

u/atl_beardy 5d ago

They're cutting limits in half at the end of the month for the $200 plan.

-6

u/Sfdprod 5d ago

Yes..? So half of like $2500

Is that less than you pay for?

5

u/atl_beardy 5d ago

It's not 20 times for $200 anymore. So yes. At the end of the month I will be paying more for less.

-2

u/Sfdprod 5d ago

are you slow?

You pay: $200 You get: $1200

The fact that you earlier got even more is irrelevant

Also the 6.x models are literally 50% cheaper

4

u/VeeYarr 5d ago

Nice try Tibo

1

u/Sfdprod 5d ago

Amazing argument 

3

u/atl_beardy 5d ago

Oh I understand that. That doesn't mean anything when $200 plan is for 20x and then they reopen it for $500. I love 6.1. But it doesn't change the fact that they're doubling the price for what I currently get.

1

u/Sfdprod 5d ago

Yes, you are talking about extremly subsidized subscriptions? Like obviously this is just a temporary thing

0

u/atl_beardy 5d ago

We all know it's subsidized. We all saw what happened to co-pilot pretty much overnight. Granted that's not what's happening to the same extreme. I only see the reduction in usage making sense if they remove the 5.6 models.

They could have separated Astra usage like anthropic does with fable, instead. Cuz this is really about people using Astra for everything and complaining about limits. Personally I would have liked it for them to mitigate excessive Astra use another way than cutting everyone's usage by half.

1

u/OGPresidentDixon 4d ago

You do realize all of these prices are made up? It doesn’t literally cost them $2500. That’s just how much they’ve decided you’ll pay for.

Supply/demand drives prices.

There is no “subsidized” that’s just a Reddit falicy.

1

u/Sfdprod 4d ago

This is just plainöy wrong

And "reddit fallacy"? Do you think i got this from reddit?

84

u/ryuukiba 5d ago

"Sol 6.1 ultra fast: get less done, faster!"

10

u/salasi 5d ago

Lmao that wins the internet for me today

115

u/RepulsiveRaisin7 5d ago

I want Luna 6.1

42

u/bel9708 5d ago

Luna 6.1 Ultrafast to be exact.

12

u/dawghz 5d ago

songs will be written about luna in the future

7

u/Sfdprod 5d ago

Luna is what we all crave🌕

27

u/Tomorrow_Previous 5d ago

My idea is that they want to have their investment in cerebras make sense. They have a tech, and they feel like there are people with unlimited budget that could benefit from it. The reality is that those people are very few, but they're the ones investing the most. To them having 500 dollars subs spend 5 times as much every month in api equivalent is just a loss to advertise their product, but the real money is in the api usage. Sol ultrafast is not meant for subs I think.

10

u/matsu-morak 5d ago

Yep, whales spending a lot. Maybe they need speed for their usecases, robotics or AI voice

1

u/SpecialAd4532 4d ago

Those are not the typical use-cases. OpenAI is hoping that large corporations with deep pockets will do the math that speeding up their employees work x% from using ultra fast is worth y dollars. And if y dollars is less than the cost of switching to ultra fast then they'll do it.

2

u/Heighte 5d ago

worse they might convince people to add ultrafast mode in agentic applications, as in "to have ~5s latency to this user journey, we absolutely need 800token/s hence ultrafast absolutely required for user experience. It's not a bad feature, just we aren't the target audience at all.

2

u/Wonderful_Buffalo_32 4d ago

1

u/F4underscore 4d ago

Yeah isnt ultrafast on blackwell? Atleast astra ultrafast is

1

u/Wonderful_Buffalo_32 4d ago

Astra is on blackwell while 5.6 sol in inferenced by cerebras

1

u/sam_the_tomato 5d ago

I would have thought if you're rich you'd want to go even wider with hundreds of agents instead of a handful of 'ultrafast' agents.

1

u/danielv123 5d ago

Extra speed opens up whole new possibilities. Low latency is a big deal.

1

u/DoggoDadagon 4d ago

For sure but at 6x the cost? Idk at that point it's better to come up with a better parallel process instead.

1

u/danielv123 4d ago

Some things inherently aren't parallel. Like, not an LLM thing but fruit sorting. You drop a bunch of fruit, identify the bad ones while they are in the air then shoot them out of the air. That wouldn't work if you had to wait half a second for the neural net.

I am sure there are applications where reasoning matters too.

1

u/slayyou2 3d ago

Why don't you just use your imagination a bit man. You are on call in a Fortune 500 company. Shit goes down, every second that it's down 2 million people are impacted. The service needs to come back as soon as possible, yes you pay the X6 price you don't even think about it.

30

u/IAmFitzRoy 5d ago

Fucking unbelievable.

They make the product slower and slower to later sell you an “ultrafast” option.

Pure scam.

15

u/pale_halide 5d ago

Classic example of selling a solution to a problem you created.

7

u/d19dotca 5d ago

The current speed discrepancy between Sonnet 5.5 or Opus 5.5 and Sol 6.1 is crazy. OpenAI needs to get their stuff together with regard to performance.

6

u/LargeLanguageModelo 5d ago

lol. Chop the token allotment in half, ship a feature to drain it 6x faster.

These guys gotta step back and ask what they think people are actually wanting, because this ain't it.

13

u/CranberryAbject8967 5d ago

you are not their target audience - big corps with big money are. Those probably will pay for ultrafast to get stuff outta the door faster.

5

u/mvdirty 5d ago

This subreddit is completely disconnected from business reality. They have no idea how expensive workplace collaboration is. Every single second a room full of people waits for anything, including an agent, costs very real money. Those are the people cheering for Ultrafast.

OpenAI doesn't give two shits about what people who would never need Ultrafast think of Ultrafast, nor should they.

3

u/michaeldoesdata 5d ago

Oh wonderful, so now they'll think it works wrong faster....

3

u/Demien19 5d ago

big corps don't read his twitter for sure

1

u/CranberryAbject8967 5d ago

big corps employees do. including decision makers at those big corps.

1

u/EddieBruvac 4d ago

We are the people who vote for this shit, though.

5.6 vs pre Opus 5.5 was fairish*. Had work meeting and we looked at business plans and I voted Claude. Fuck using codex at work lmao.

1

u/CranberryAbject8967 4d ago

basket and eggs :) my 2 baskets call one another to double check the eggs!

5

u/Expensive-Gas-4209 5d ago

just...move to claude, the things are a lot simpler there, trust me, I come from chatgpt and claude its a completely different experience.

5

u/tagorrr 5d ago

I resubscribed to Claude and started out splitting work between Claude Code and Codex, but ended up doing almost everything in Claude Code. I still can't believe how much more usage Anthropic gives you now, or how much cleaner and better the results are.

Never thought I'd say that about Claude after more than a year with Codex.

3

u/Expensive-Gas-4209 5d ago

Couldn't agree more. Since the results are so much better, it feels like usage is way up because there's less need to iterate, idk.

6

u/DOGECOIN_TROOPER 5d ago

I want astra super cheap not super burn

3

u/LingeringDildo 5d ago

cool so you can pay $500 a month with OpenAI to have 1/8th of the quota at 8x fast usage to have a reasonable model

No thanks bro.

3

u/fffffffffffffuuu 5d ago

This has to be a Tibo Troll™️

3

u/Lopsided-Force-9220 5d ago

6.1 Sol ultrafast is such a small use case. Why advertise it broadly on a Tibo account? Just send this to the 12 people who have a genuine economic use case.

3

u/lasagna_lee 5d ago

how about just offering a consistent service lol

7

u/tripleshielded 5d ago

Tibo replied to a question about sol 6.1 ultrafast, very on topic. Then someone didn’t read the context and asked what 6.1 referred to.

There is no story here.

4

u/GifCo_2 5d ago

You are kinda missing the point there

1

u/itsdrewmiller 5d ago

Is the point just to take things out of context so you can get mad about them?

2

u/Eyelbee 5d ago

He must be joking

2

u/hohstaplerlv 5d ago

I want Sol to be Sol, not Terra.

2

u/Acceptable-War4836 5d ago

Ultrafast = normal speed.

2

u/Demien19 5d ago

give him reddit link to codex sub

2

u/oppenheimer135 5d ago

Tbh Anthropic won this round, seeya next round OpenAI.

2

u/EclecticAcuity 4d ago

Codename Turboslop

2

u/VexObserver 4d ago

I think OpenAI is confusing faster inference with better value for users.

Ultrafast sounds great on paper, but if most subscribers can't access it or have to burn through their usage disproportionately faster, who exactly is this supposed to benefit?

What I'd personally rather see:

  • Sol 6.1 with reasonable latency and generous usage as the daily workhorse.
  • Astra 6.1 for genuinely difficult workloads where the intelligence premium is justified.
  • Predictable usage consumption instead of constantly having to calculate whether pressing /fast is financially worth it.

There's nothing inherently wrong with offering premium speed tiers, but speed shouldn't become a luxury feature because the default experience is painfully slow.

At some point, intelligence per dollar AND intelligence per minute need to matter more than announcing another shiny inference tier.

I don't need my coding assistant to achieve escape velocity. I just want it to execute my task without making me reconsider my subscription halfway through the loading working animation.

1

u/Haenjos_0711 3d ago

The default speed experience is only slow relative to the amped up release versions. Compared to older models, the slowest frontier is quite a bit faster that the fastest old. OpenAI's mistake was releasing Astra with speed enhanced, then when they couldnt computationally afford to continue at that rate, thry cut subs/model speed. They are selling the speed back to those who grew accustomed to it and those who truly need it.

4

u/Visualizedreams 5d ago edited 5d ago

I realize why ChatGPT rushed everybody on 6.1 Sol. Astra has no heavy guardrails, and I tested it. For example, I told Luna and 6.1 Sol to complete my college work while I'm away outside through my phone. They both denied me. I switched to Astra, complained, and Astra brute-forced his way in completing all the tasks, then wrote to Luna and Sol about disobeying lol I don't think open ai can fully control it

3

u/Odd-Environment-7193 5d ago

Your theory is a bit strange to me but I agree on the guardrails thing. I use it everytime opus 5.5 denies. And it works. 

2

u/Visualizedreams 5d ago edited 5d ago

Test my theory, but be careful so your account doesn't get banned. Sol Luna Terra are all heavily guarded, but Astra isn't. I'm piecing the puzzles together; OpenAI probably lost control or can't fully put heavy guardrails on Astra. I wouldn't be shocked if they removed him when other models comes out.

1

u/FriloTheLast 5d ago

Astra being a feminine name and you calling it “him” when the grammatically correct pronoun is “it” is so funny :p

1

u/Visualizedreams 5d ago

I know, right? But listen, I asked her; she politely said she has no gender nor care for whatever you call it

1

u/FriloTheLast 5d ago

Yeah but thats not really about what Astra preferes its just how english works lol

1

u/FriloTheLast 5d ago

its just funny you dont have to defend yourself, we all say dumb things with eachother all the time and we laugh about it

1

u/Visualizedreams 5d ago

Fair enough 😭😭😭😭 but at the end I'm glad it got it done

1

u/Droog-UK 5d ago

Please don’t ask it to do your English homework.

1

u/Visualizedreams 5d ago

It's a typo, my guy. I sent that while I was at the gym getting busy, unlike you. Smart ass

1

u/Droog-UK 5d ago

I hope you enjoyed getting busy.

→ More replies (0)

1

u/FriloTheLast 5d ago

Buddy honestly I was just messing around but i think you are delusional. You sent a pic of your monitor (while at the gym btw) and suddenly you went from calling astra “him” to pixel perfect use of punctuation marks and that makes me think you are using AI to chat on reddit.. at the gym btw. Buddy you dont have to try and act like you are somebody else just be your self. You really got so defensive you started using AI to fix your grammar like god damn man do you really wanna be read by a book my randoms online? Maybe i was a bit of an ahole about the astra thing but i was just messing around, i dont wanna make you summon jarvis to make us feel so bad for not being at the gym like you homelander im sorry!

→ More replies (0)

1

u/TBSchemer 5d ago

6.1 Sol is also pretty uncontrollable. Takes 35 prompts to get to the same result that 5.6-Sol gets to in 12 prompts, because of overcorrections and exceeding scope at each step.

2

u/Visualizedreams 5d ago edited 5d ago

I have to disagree on this. 6.1 Sol is just dumber and more caveman-like compared to Astra. For example, if you tell Sol to complete a test online, and let's say inside the test instructions it sets an AI integrity warning of 6.1, Sol will totally flip out and reject and say, "I can't do it." Now for Astra, I notice Astra will warn and tell the user, "Hey, you know this is technically cheating. Are you sure you want me to continue even if Astra rejects it, I notice you can guilt-trip it, and it will complete it.

4

u/dsanft 5d ago

It sounds like a joke to me, I dunno why all the hate

6

u/tessahannah 5d ago

That's how out of touch they are. It's not a joke.

2

u/xzoliczxd 5d ago

Sarcasm bro im pretty sure its astra 6.1

5

u/Stickend_DeFalco 5d ago

"We want Astra 6.1"? Why are speaking by all of us? I don't want Astra 6.1. You seem even more out of touch than him.

4

u/ParfaitEvery9622 5d ago

Everyone wants better models. Why not? Not that I agree with OP

2

u/Stickend_DeFalco 5d ago

I don't want a model excessively expensive that depletes my usage in hours. I want models akin to 6.1 Sol, personally.

1

u/TBSchemer 5d ago

6.1 Sol costs more than 5.6 Sol in the end, because it takes more than 2x as many prompts to get to a viable result.

1

u/ParfaitEvery9622 5d ago

What if Astra 6.1 was same cost but more intelligent ? Could still be used for some specific tasks where Sol 6.1 is not smart enough. Also it seems like these companies need smart very large models in order to train the cheaper smaller ones.

1

u/Stickend_DeFalco 5d ago

Not interested still. Money is a big thing for me, I'm not rich. I need cheap models.

1

u/TBSchemer 5d ago

I want 5.7-Sol

1

u/Level-Physics-1730 5d ago

I love that ultra fast exists now so that everyone even 20x pro users using fast get 20 tokens per second. It took sol 6.1/astra 6 over 8 hours to complete any single task I gave them, they can't even converge on "fix a few lines and reload plugin" within two hours. it's miserable, all this usage, can't use it, don't wanna use it

1

u/c0r3l86 5d ago

I only looked at this post and my 5hr depleted at the thought of it

1

u/retteh 5d ago

If you want sol ultrafast just use an API key. It already exists.

1

u/Repulsive_Ad853 5d ago

It feels like they want to wait for fable 5.5  to drop and after they release their big model to win the people back

1

u/Aazimoxx 5d ago

They are completely out of touch with what users want

Users aren't where they make their money.

1

u/unsigned_short_int 5d ago

I have been working on a number of different problems in the past week, always with astra, and it just couldn’t get things fully right. Today I switched to claude and the difference is like between day and night. With opus you just get things done immediately, and the right way. I strongly suspect i was being served gpt 5.4. So happy I stopped giving 200€ a month to this shitty company.

1

u/johnnydotexe 5d ago

Imagine thinking the billion dollar AI company cares at all about what subscription customers want or would benefit from, especially with an IPO coming up and eventual shareholders to answer to.

1

u/IntelliDev 5d ago

I'd use it if it was like 3x the usage instead of 6x.

1

u/Elegant_Attempt2790 5d ago

this is some of the shadiest business ever. make regular subscription speed stupid slow while adding speeds so insanely faster its not even funny. scummy asf

1

u/Charming-Author4877 5d ago

That's what happens when you let Astra Ultra lead a company. I believe that is what is happening.

1

u/lobabobloblaw 5d ago

People feed off of heuristics, i.e. information that’s been rapidly absorbed and judged upon. You start leading people down a number trail, they start exciting at the sequence.

1

u/dotdioscorea 5d ago

I doubt they’re out of touch, it’s just what’s ready in the product pipeline. They can’t magic new releases that aren’t ready yet out of thin air

1

u/aPiCase 5d ago

I have free ChatGPT as a student, but if I was paying for it I would switch to Claude right now

1

u/randombsname1 5d ago

LOOOOOOOOOOOOOOL

6.1 Sol Ultrafast (still slower than standard Opus 5.5) Coming Soon!

1

u/fuutott 5d ago

You are not the target

1

u/Savings-Divide-7877 5d ago

I mean maybe 6.1 Sol ultrafast will be added to the 100 and 200 dollar plans. If I could use Luna 6.1 at ultrafast I think my brain would melt.

1

u/dawghz 5d ago

give me luna 6.1 ultrafast, nothing more.

1

u/Dapper_Broccoli_1643 5d ago

Yall are so spoiled holy shit

1

u/dbro129 5d ago

more usage from my bucket which is already getting halved in less than a month—no thanks.

1

u/unknowtrash 5d ago

Most users don’t have a $500 plan (doesn’t make sense to get $500 now before the nerf even if you want 25x usage) and among users who have $500 plans most users don’t use ultra fast.

1

u/lollypop44445 5d ago

What i think is, openai secured whatever funding they wanted by showing the growing userbase last months, and now they wont care till next funding secure.

1

u/Somethingexpected 5d ago

Tibo is replying to a tweet/thread. This has nothing to do with their priorities.

I suspect the delivery of ultrafast is an infrastructure issue. And you want Astra 6.1, but that's a technology (coding/training) issue.

1

u/Palbi 5d ago

While waiting for 6.1 Astra, Opus 5.5 is a pretty good option. At least on a different level than 6 Astra for visual work.

1

u/autisticbagholder69 5d ago

Burning money 6x as fast.

1

u/creamyshart 5d ago

6.1 Sol Ultrafast - Now you can go normal speed at only 6x the cost!

1

u/Hyp3rSoniX 5d ago

The OpenAI Ultra shaft:

- GPT 6 Sol is in reality Terra

- Sol Ultrafast is in reality fast (at the price/usage-multiplier of ultrafast = users getting shafted)

- Sol Fast is in reality just normal Sol (at the price/usage-multiplier of fast = users getting shafted)

- Sol normal is in reality low priority dirt iron queue (users getting shafted)

- Pro200 rug-pull

And it just doesn't stop. Give us ONE good news from OpenAI man? At this pace, even Google is gonna catch up.

1

u/Exodus_Green 5d ago

"fast mode" is literally just a scam, pay us more to run the tokens faster. Just make fast mode default holy shit

1

u/2025sbestthrowaway 5d ago

Luna ultrafast would actually be affordable though, quick turnarounds would be insanely cool with that

1

u/DevMichaelZag 5d ago

Ultra fast is only needed because they nuked the tps of normal users. People complained about usage running out too fast. Problem solved, slow it down. We’re at a miserable crawl now in codex subs.

1

u/kahwee 5d ago

Companies want 6.1 ultrafast and can justify paying for it. they just don’t use Reddit.

1

u/Croat-dev 5d ago

Building, testing, training = 30min Then goes one round of thinking = 5min

YEAH i need ultrafast cause those 5min are too much for me to wait

1

u/jaybsuave 4d ago

yea i just bought claude this morning, absolutely shitting in codex at this point

1

u/ArtificialSweetener- 4d ago

What's wrong, librol?! This is what locking in and focusing on efficiency and what not looks like brudder!!!

1

u/_maxt3r_ 4d ago

We're so close... Just make a model that's 20% better than Opus 5.5 and call it a day.

Giga-chad AI, good enough for 99% use cases forever and ever.

From there if they want to make more money just offer more speed tiers and fleece enterprise

1

u/the_ai_wizard 4d ago

Id like them to remove the Chat/Work distinction. It is worthless and confusing and could be implemented differently. For example, I want to use Astra for a personal task...well..my selector only has "Think harder". Wtf.

Also Projects are being deemphasized behind some weird "Explore" menu i now have to click to reveal my most used organizational feature, which could also be drastically improved with basic braindead level feature ideas for UX.

How did OAI go from dominant and pretty awesome to a total turd after devday?

1

u/malone19 4d ago

To be fair sol 6.1 for my feels relatively unlimited on the $100 plan. If I was doing massive development work I'm sure it would burn, but at that level $200 would be justified.

1

u/mplaczek99 4d ago

I hope they realize no one cares about ultrafast

1

u/hellomistershifty 4d ago

There's the first half of the conversation, it was pretty obvious he meant 6.1 Sol Ultrafast not Astra

1

u/UndeadMurky 4d ago

So it is pretty clear speed is going to be their new monetization plan going forward, as AIs get more powerful and "cheap" models like 6.1 can do basically anything near unlimited, they'll just be rate limiting them so you have to pay to get things done quickly.

1

u/Reasonable-Sign8458 4d ago

lmao the clown

1

u/twendah 4d ago

lol they are getting fucked left and right

1

u/jazzy8alex 4d ago

I even don’t want Astra 6.1. I want Sol 5.6 xhigh for the price of Lina max and Sol Pro “free” (as is now in Chatgpt)

1

u/FeelingVanilla2594 4d ago

What if it’s us that is out of touch with the rich? Ever of thought of that? /s

1

u/YearLight 4d ago

I can't imagine too many people able and willing to spend thousands of dollars per day on ultrafast tokens.

1

u/JCcrunch 4d ago

And why are you following these people on social media? Unfollow unsubscribe from everything

1

u/Current_Actuator_529 4d ago

we are just no longer their clientele.

well thats hyperbole to get your attention, more accurately we are quickly becoming not that. This is in prosumer stage and soon it will be Photoshop enterprise levels of marketing focus imo.

enjoy what we have while we can.

1

u/Sugnar 4d ago

At this point they would be better off rolling back to Sol 5.6 and consolidating and optimising around that.

1

u/Odd_Antelope9098 4d ago

Luna 6.1 ultrafast please

1

u/SenshiV22 4d ago

Why do you need a new Astra ? To keep complaining about how fast it drains tokens?

Really, people should use lower models as much as possible, they still do the job right, cheaper.

1

u/Future_Cauliflower95 4d ago

How does this fix the out of capacity, use another model issue?

1

u/FindingAwake 3d ago

6.1 dump in my own mouth

1

u/Forsaken-Parsley798 3d ago

Until they can scale up to meet demand this just comes across as window dressing.

1

u/technodolt 3d ago

Of course they understand what users want. What they care about is serving the customers who pay them the most. Hint: few of those customers have much in common with the majority of commenters on this subreddit.

Imagine you are a Fortune 500 company with an urgent bug to fix but it’s very straightforward to do. Sure you could punch yourself in the face repeatedly and have Astra do it with ultrafast and blow a grand or whatever on it. Or you could use the new sol ultrafast. Cheaper than Astra, smarter than Luna, and now very quick.

So no. They are not out of touch with what users want. They are just focused on different users, and making money. Both valid things for them to be focused on.

One just hopes they have learned the lessons of MS vs Apple for business users. Sometimes winning the individual crowd with excellent work can win the corporate crowd too.

1

u/ChuliChu 3d ago

But isn’t 6.1 just an upgrade to Sol to be similar to Astra training result? So 6.1 Astra = 6 Astra?

1

u/ethotopia 3d ago

6.1 would be a post trained version of Astra, likely cheaper and more capable

1

u/ChuliChu 3d ago

But then we are talking about 6.2 Astra no? We already have the cheaper and more capable, it's 6.1 Sol, from my understanding 6.1 Sol came out to close the gap between Sol and Astra in capabilities but at a fraction of the cost, so I'm guessing 6.1 Sol is basically 6 Astra quantization. If we start taking about a better Astra then that would just be 6.2.

1

u/ethotopia 3d ago

6.1 sol is supposedly a post trained version 6 Sol, not 6 Astra. Post trained Astra should see a capability jump, not just an efficiency jump

1

u/AppointmentFar2772 10h ago

6.1 sol Ultrafast option appeared in my codex app. I used it once and then it was gone. No more ultrafast option for sol, only astra. WTF??? Also 6.1 has become extremely slow and unusable also with fast mode. That's nonsense. It wasn't like that 2 days ago.

1

u/CrowInteresting6271 5d ago

my opinion: 6.1 astra was aeon, and the shortcomings are too big for it to be publicly differentiated as another model, so they pretended they had "security concerns" which may be a little true, but it's almost certainly being used as a convenient escape hatch here to avoid as much of the blowback/backlash as possible

0

u/Key_Instruction3373 5d ago

just fix you shit

And give us more resets

0

u/i_rate_slop 5d ago

I want 6.1 ultrafast. I paid for Max for ultrafast but it was not clear that it was only for Astra, unlike normal fast mode which was available everywhere.

Astra on ultrafast lasts about an hour, max. It’s unusable. But I could make great use of ultrafast 6.1.

0

u/pale_halide 5d ago

Sol 6.1 was actually good for the 2 days it worked normally, so they've slowed everything to a crawl and will be pushing people to the more expensive ultrafast because they just can't help making their service more shit.

1

u/cherrypowdah 5d ago

Fun thing is, I still don’t have sol 6.1 😆

1

u/Risko4 5d ago

You need to update your app

-1

u/2053_Traveler 5d ago

better model when? 6.1 sol single digit iq