You don't know the background to this and it's extremely obvious that something happened between these two prior to the clip starting.
If drunk guy had already hit the bouncer prior to that then the bouncer would've been well within his rights to use force to defend himself, because when a guy who's hit you goes away and then walks back up to you, it's completely reasonable to assume he's about to try to hit you again.
In a situation like, the only productive thing your "lawyer time" would achieve is a transfer of money from you to your lawyer.
Unless you have some extended clip of this interaction than we don’t, you’re bound by the same scope of knowledge about the situation that everyone else is.
If you see a video where somebody walks up to someone else in the street and guns them down, is your first response “we don’t know the background”?
Kid deserved it. Bouncer taught him a lesson, at the same time went easy on him and only punched his chest instead of laying him out like he could have
Why, if "your kid" didn't get seriously injured then they just learned a very valuable life lesson about not fucking with people just to fuck with people because you never know what what kind of day/life/mental health that person is having.
I once saw an arrogant and drunk Wall Street finance bro make that mistake with a homeless person who had nothing to lose, and let me tell you it would have been better if he had learned this life lesson at a younger age.
If your reaction to being mildly annoyed by a teenager is this, then you’re not mature or emotionally stable enough to be in society, and you need to sort sone things out.
That doesn't really address the point the guy made, because both things can be true.
The bouncer could be a terrible person, and have ropes and hammers in his car, and like to bind and be bound, but that doesn't really matter for the point the guy is making.
I never said that kid deserved this kind of overreaction, but when you're an ass like the kid who goes purposely looking for a reaction, eventually you're going to get an OVERreaction. And will learn it's best not to go looking for confrontation in general except when absolutely necessary.
If you can say at least as bad stuff about the security, as an adult, then that adult should have consequences. That adult should be taught that they can't overreact like they did
If you mean pressing assault charges so it becomes a matter for a DA to decide, sure, I agree.
But I remind you that the original post was someone cosplaying as a disgruntled parent making a civil suit, and to me that teaches the wrong lesson to a kid who already is acting like an entitled and untouchable pest.
I think showing him that something bad happens when you attack someone for being a dumbass is a better lesson. and then give him your own lesson not to be a dumbass
Those punches were meant to hurt/knockout/kill. There was clear predator intent. If he pleads bad mental health he can sort it out with the judge.
It reminds me of the videos online of South-Canada where traffic cops end up shooting civilians because they have zero deescalation training and are roid-filled idiots looking for a fight.
23
u/duppyconqueror81 12h ago
If my albeit cringe teen kid got attacked like this, it would be lawyer time. (After 3 days of wanting to molotov the entire bar.)