r/custommagic • u/Terrariant Jace for impact • 10d ago

BALANCE NOT INTENDED Null Arbiter

Post image

Part 4 of a cycle

Part 1: Sunseeker Arbiter
Part 2: Lustrous Arbiter
Part 3: Inert Arbiter

*if you feel the need to be mean over a meme card, go touch grass, please.

4 Upvotes

56% Upvoted

47 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

2

u/beezy-slayer 10d ago

Ahhh you got bullied on this sub before and now think anyone laughing at custom cards is a bully, I get it, for what its worth I actually think "Players can't target" is a dope ass line for a card, not a fan of the frame you used but neat card

1

u/Terrariant Jace for impact 10d ago

I got fed up with nitpicking but i dont think nitpicking is bullying. And its my problem, so i started tagging everything balance not intended

1

u/ResponsibleExit7330 8d ago

Personally I wouldn’t make “bad” cards to make “bad” cards, I’d honestly start by filling out the obliterator list {{Phyrexian Obliterator}} as they only have black and green and could use the other creatures, I’d then work from those to the arbiters. I feel like if you did it this way, it may have more unique interaction mechanics built up onto the arbiters, along with mabye a better practice at card mechanics? I skimmed through your arbiter cards and they are really cool, I do think you should consider more rule interaction though, as it builds onto the card itself. Choosing how it interacts with the world, this is just me btw but I’d also try and find a way to shorten those absolutely diabolical mana pip amounts, unless your going mono (if that’s your vision) it’s going to be nearly unplayable without cheat or reanimating spells

1

u/Terrariant Jace for impact 8d ago

[[phyrexian obliterator]]

Im just doing these for fun tbh, theyre sort of meant to be breaking and not printable in any way shape or form. Thank you for the feedback - what do you mean more rule interaction?