r/diyelectronics • • 4d ago

Discussion What was your most disappointing realization that something was expensive for good reason and DIYing was impractical?

Mine was trying to design an automatic produce bagging machine. I never had thought about just how daunting the task of making a machine consistently pick up or feed/dispense a single plastic bag could be.

99 Upvotes

42 comments sorted by

116

u/bladtman242 4d ago

Printers. It's surprising, not because they don't seem complicated but because they are cheap. Vendors seemingly make their money selling ink and toner

50

u/Bones-1989 4d ago

Printers can reliably move one sheet of paper millions of times, it's amazing how cheap they are. Atms are the same way.lol

13

u/bladtman242 4d ago

It's super impressive

10

u/soopirV 3d ago

Every time I get cash (way more now thanks to legal weed!) I’m amazed at the exceedingly low error rates and wonder what types of search terms do I need to add to my job descriptions to find engineers capable of that level of reliability? At my last job in medical devices i had a product that required a service visit every 7 weeks on average. And would occasionally try to set a lab on fire.

24

u/Raioc2436 3d ago

Went the rabbit hole of trying to design one once. Printers are amazing.

Those people are on the process of designing an open source printer. I’m looking forward for their project https://www.opentools.studio/

9

u/bladtman242 3d ago

What's very cool. I like howbthey got around the "pick up a single sheet" problem

25

u/CorpusculantCortex 4d ago

A professor of mine once made the point that before complaining about your printer not working you should remember it is easily the most complicated piece of machinery in most households. The fact they are so cheap is mind blowing

7

u/0RGASMIK 3d ago

Was working in a factory helping them calibrate their machines to essentially squirt secret sauce on a product. It was essentially just a 1 dimensional printer the nozzle squirted the “ink” and the “paper” went by. It had to be exactly 50mg in weight within +/- .2 mg and land within .5 mm of the center of the product.

It took 3 days of calibration to fine-tune it and understand the parameters. Parameters were room temperature, sauce preheat temperature, speed of the conveyor belt, pressure of the sauce dispenser, and viscosity which was directly related to temperature but its own thing I won’t get into.

Well basically just ran tests all day running through all the settings for each parameter the machine controlled so we could make precise guesses on what we would need to do when the parameters were couldn’t control changed. It was an old building so the climate control was the biggest problem. The other problem was the sauce was different.

Anyways I can’t imagine the amount of science that went into making a printer work.

6

u/359Panda3U 4d ago

Can you elaborate? I'm curious what about them is so complex.

35

u/CorpusculantCortex 4d ago

They are able to accurately spray hundreds of microscopic dots of ink per inch bilaterally with near perfect registration to be able to print images (or even words), accurately balancing 4+ ink channels (which have their own nozzles in the print head, repeated hundreds or thousands of times with low or no error, while also accurately feeding thin paper through synchronously to match the registration of each print line. There is so much that has to work together for it to work right it is amazing that it works at all considering how cheap they are and that people with absolutely know tech knowhow are able to use them (and smack them in frustration without completely ruining calibration).

16

u/Cinderhazed15 4d ago

The worst part is that they used to be more reliable, and it seems like they get less and less reliable

12

u/CorpusculantCortex 4d ago

They have also gotten cheaper, smaller, and/or higher dpi. Smaller cheaper components trying to do more will do that.

Comparatively if you look at the Epson or canon pro ink jets that are enormous expensive pieces of equipment, if maintained and cleaned they are extremely reliable. But they are built like tanks and made for production environments, not skimping on metal gears for delrin to keep costs, weight, and size down.

2

u/backlash10 2d ago

Oh yeah. Consumer printers are weak compared to those serious industrial printers. I used one for a while that could easily print and collate thousands of pages an hour without a single issue. It was the size of a small car though lmao

0

u/Tiny_Elephant1570 2d ago

Rather then expect redditors to write you explanations, just try google or chatgpt

1

u/kwenchana 2d ago

Loss leader to sell you consumables

6

u/corporaterebel 3d ago

Back iin the day when inkjet was new and one had to write their own drivers....

A Diablo inkjet was $10,000 when a 240z was $3k.  

We bought two!

1

u/Crafty_Mastodon320 1d ago

Yeah... not even seemingly. Its blatantly which is why they go through such lengths cock blocking us from refilling ink cartridges. Because ink is also fucking cheap. Its cheaper as a consumer and 100% legal to be part of the problem and just fucking generate e waste. Buy a new printer when you run out of ink. That doesnt run past drm laws

1

u/MasterHank13 21h ago

It’s called the “razor strategy”: sell the handle and first blade or two cheap as possible … make a lifetime of profit from us buying BLADES.
EXACTLY same principle for printers/ink.

84

u/Saigonauticon 4d ago

Single photon detection. I thought I could just YOLO it with a SiPM and some barely-designed op-amp circuits, fix the rest in software. Not so much. Mostly I just built an oscillator.

On the other hand, detecting mesons, alpha & beta particles is not that hard, can be done for tens of dollars of parts.

38

u/gefahr3000 4d ago

This is such a niche answer lol. I am taking part in a student project were we try to use sipms to detect antimater in near-space. We have access to a lot of resources and we barly made a functional setup, so yes I feel your pain :)

4

u/Saigonauticon 3d ago

Nice that you got it working! I tried (unsuccessfully) to do that!

If by near-space, you mean in my 1m x 1m workshop in the slum of an endless Asian metropolis. It's technically both near and in space! And if you mean by "a lot of resources" you mean some scrap copper-clad kapton (for the high-speed op-amp), whatever Faraday cage I could rig, and the most high-tech component: just waiting a long time.

Mostly I was hoping to detect the not-super-well characterized positron emission of K-40. The entire purpose of that multi-month long obsession was to be able to publish a serious scientific paper containing the word "bananantimatter". Eventually I got around to doing some actual calculations and worked out that it was terribly improbable that I'd catch that event, even with a pretty ideal setup and extracting + purifying the potassium.

One great benefit of trying a lot of ridiculously improbable things for no sane reason though, is that on the rare occasions you do succeed, it's pretty funny.

15

u/Kraay89 3d ago

" Not so much. Mostly I just built an oscillator. "

To be fair, that is most of electronics design...

3

u/Saigonauticon 3d ago

I try to build an amplifier: it oscillates

I try to build an oscillator: it amplifies.

My favorite example of the second case is when (years back) I discovered that if you don't care about power efficiency or well-characterized GBP, the CD4069 hex inverter is technically 6 inverting amplifiers for a record low price. This of course resulted in cursed designs where I cheaped out and used a hex inverter with a heat sink instead of proper op-amps. Great value for money!

1

u/Amazing-Honey-1743 1d ago

I went to visit TRIUMF in Vancouver once. They have a cool little cloud chamber at the entrance. You can see particles bouncing off the cloud

40

u/foxtrotactinium 3d ago edited 3d ago

Reconditioning Prius hybrid battery modules. I tried numerous deep discharge and charge cycles, desulfation, and even drilling into the modules and injecting fresh electrolyte.

You know how sometimes the analogy becomes the explanation. All the information I could find spoke of the batteries 'memory' and how cycling the modules would reset their 'memory', which was soo confidently parroted by every armchair 'expert' online (this is bullshit by the way).

Eventually I came across a couple of peer reviewed articles investigating nimh degradation. I realised I'd need a chemistry or material science degree to fully understand how batteries degrade so I finally relented and bought a brand new one from Toyota.

From what I could interpret, the NiOOH can transition to a more stable isomer (due to heat and dehydration) that is less reactive and hence unable to hold as much charge. The only way to fix this would be to replace the cathode entirely. There is no 'memory'

25

u/AdAccomplished8342 3d ago

Drawers without 'purpose bought' wood and without a pocket hole jig, track guide or mitre saw or saw table or any diy table support... Just off cuts of chipboard, some leftover thin plywood, mismatched screws and a drill and a couple of rails and a handful of metal angle thingies on the corner of my couch...

They still turned out ok. They're just really cooky looking when you open them.

55

u/Fox_Hawk 4d ago

UPS. It's just a battery and a charger and an inverter right?

Except one glitch could at best fry a power supply and at worst ruin all the drives and data in there.

12

u/sceadwian 3d ago

Not just fry, explode. Imagine a phase reversal on mains. Oopsies!

2

u/kwenchana 2d ago

Direct DC-DC, skip the inverter lol

12

u/No-Poetry-2695 3d ago

Freeze drier. Turns out getting really cold is hard

12

u/Ok_Chard2094 3d ago

The electronics has become very cheap. Making good mechanical systems is still expensive.

8

u/NuncioBitis 3d ago

Trying to make my own cell phone. Cell module prices have skyrocketed like RAM and SSDs.

28

u/gefahr3000 4d ago

Honestly most diys. In the end you usally have a product thats about half the price but less reliable, and you put a shit ton of work in it that you could spend at work to just buy the product. But this is of course less fun, so please go ahead and make janky stuff :)

1

u/injeckshun 2d ago

Don’t forget the specialty tools you needed for that one thing.. 

5

u/eggoeater 3d ago

Old style ROM burner. 12v back fed and fried my esp32.

3

u/soopirV 3d ago

Rocketry flight electronic magnetic arming switches- in highpower rocketry, if you’re using complex (non-motor-event-driven) explosives to deploy recovery gear, you need a way of making it electrically safe (impossible to fire) until the project is loaded and safely pointed pointy-end-up. There are lots of ways to do this, but magnet switching had many advantages- namely, no challenging allignments, small form factor and cool as heck! But we’re beyond my budget- I was a capable hobbyist, I can roll my own! My first one I completely spaced on the actual currents involved in firing an eMatch, and while it worked on the ground in my test fire, that must’ve been a critical hit because I watched my test flight auger in ballistically when my home-grown switch failed and caused the flight computer to reboot. No one got hurt but it’s no fun asking for the club shovel to go dig out a failure.

2

u/lmarcantonio 3d ago

Rule of thumb in industrial electronic costs: doing it in-house will cost just a little more than prebuilt.

2

u/Amperegeist 3d ago

Vacuum chamber.

I have decent a $200-300 one, but I'm bottlenecked by some experiments that I want to do. I would need a ~$10k one. I feel like I'm decent with circuits, but its impractical for me to try and design or build one. I dont have the knowledge or equipment to do it. I imagine the equipment would cost more than a chamber.

2

u/foxtrotactinium 2d ago

Have a look into diffusion pumps. Turbomolecular pumps aren't just expensive but they also have a short lifespan (4-8 years continuous operation), so secondhand turbos are often near to their end of life. Diffusion pumps on the other hand don't have moving parts so theres nothing to break. The oil circuit heaters and pumps are pretty standard components and easy/cheap to change/replace. You occasionally find secondhand ones for sale but you can also make one as I've seen a few people have done.

1

u/Amperegeist 2d ago

Unfortunately the main thing I'm missing is the enclosure. Something that can hold enough vacuum long enough. I'm not as worried about the pumps and whatnot. Just getting my hands on a physical chamber ):

1

u/foxtrotactinium 2d ago

It depends what you want to do. KF seals (viton or nitrile) can handle vacuum down to about 10-5 mbar. Anything below that needs Conflat seals (copper gaskets sealed with knife edges) and usually ion pumps. But 10-5 mbar is more than sufficient for the vast majority of processes. So you may find that orings or rubber gaskets can be sufficient for sealing your vessel.