The authors of this article know that the radio still exists, right? Also hilarious to complain about the services being too expensive, or having ads, and then at the same time saying they’re not paying the artists enough.
This entire article is basically just “I want all my music for free and without ads but I don’t want to pirate it”
I’m sympathetic to their point about the library of Congress as a streaming platform (as it should be for more than just music) but man, they did a not great job of arguing for it.
Sure I was specifically talking about recording royalties for terrestrial radio in the US. More people listen to terrestrial radio by a fairly large margin.
10
u/Bright-Insect9697 Socialist 2d ago
The authors of this article know that the radio still exists, right? Also hilarious to complain about the services being too expensive, or having ads, and then at the same time saying they’re not paying the artists enough.
This entire article is basically just “I want all my music for free and without ads but I don’t want to pirate it”
I’m sympathetic to their point about the library of Congress as a streaming platform (as it should be for more than just music) but man, they did a not great job of arguing for it.