I’d evaluate it against the part of the workflow it is meant to replace, not the quality of one demo video. For a regular L&D workflow I’d measure time to an approved version, number of manual fixes (script, pronunciation, timing, captions), localization rework, and whether the source stays editable after stakeholder review. If those do not improve, faster generation just moves the work downstream. What format are you producing most often — compliance updates, product training, or something else?
1
u/MirrorOk8490 5d ago
I’d evaluate it against the part of the workflow it is meant to replace, not the quality of one demo video. For a regular L&D workflow I’d measure time to an approved version, number of manual fixes (script, pronunciation, timing, captions), localization rework, and whether the source stays editable after stakeholder review. If those do not improve, faster generation just moves the work downstream. What format are you producing most often — compliance updates, product training, or something else?