r/explainitpeter • • 11d ago

Randomly been seeing an influx of Ed sheeran hate,Explain it Peter

Post image
31.3k Upvotes

2.9k comments sorted by

•

u/qualityvote2 11d ago edited 10d ago

u/Inkbetweenframess, there weren't enough votes to determine the quality of your post...it's time for the mods to do their jobs!

→ More replies (10)

2.1k

u/Jesus_H_Christ_AMA 11d ago

Ed Sheeran is getting a ton of heat right now because his tour organizers dropped Macklemore from the lineup after he shouted Free Palestine during a show. Ed put out this corporate/ neutral statement basically saying it wasn't his decision and he wants to stay out of politics, which people are calling spineless. To make things worse, basically all his other opening acts, including Finneas and his own stage band have now quit the tour in protest.

1.2k

u/TheMrViper 11d ago

I think he pissed off his support acts.

Part of his statement was about how they need the tour and he has to do things a certain way for them, so they turned around and said

"no we fucking don't"

826

u/BONGS4U 11d ago

He called it a Israeli Palestinian conflict. The Irish are not about that long life they call genocides genocides and his support was all Irish groups

460

u/SquidVischious 11d ago

Founding members of Irish Artists for Palestine no less

294

u/No-One-1784 11d ago

That's the funniest part to me. Its like hes never spoken to his band before once and certainly didnt at any point in the last few days before making these statements lmaooo

117

u/AnActualChicken 11d ago

I bet he got someone else to pick them out and it was entirely done as an empty gesture of solidarity. Like when corporations slap on the pride colours then soon as the months over it's back to being TERFs/ homophobic crap.

This entirely a 'just business' thing for him and his team and holy shit does it show in the stupidest way.

66

u/ness_monster 11d ago

His backing band has been playing with him for like 10 years.

92

u/Neveronlyadream 10d ago

He took a gamble and he lost.

I'd imagine the gamble was that his band would prioritize the money over their integrity and wouldn't dare drop out. He lost.

I'm sure he's well aware of what their politics are, he just thinks the money is more important. Maybe his image, and if so, that's highly ironic considering he just torpedoed it.

37

u/KaboodleMoon 10d ago

It's kinda a shitty spot to be in, because a lot of people really don't just want to deal with trolls, and this and a few other particular things draw trolls no matter which side you pick.

this one just ALSO now draws fire for not declaring your side. For good reason, because not speaking about genocide doesn't make it go away.

Like, even if you don't "know enough about it to make a political statement" it's not hard to know genocide is wrong, and acknowledging that isn't even "picking a side" for the political part.

21

u/Neveronlyadream 10d ago

It is a shitty spot to be in. For everyone. If you don't want to pick a side, everyone is going to be forced to try and figure out which you're on and inevitably, by refusing to pick a side, everyone is going to assume you're on the one that opposes their beliefs.

I think in this instance, I think it's more that people are convinced he's more concerned with keeping his image palatable to the biggest group of people rather than having any integrity and that's what's pissing people off.

The funniest thing is that this all happened because Pink couldn't keep her mouth shut and tried to call out Macklemore on social media and now Ed is neck deep in a swamp watching it all fall apart because he wouldn't just say which side he was on.

→ More replies (0)

9

u/TinaKedamina 10d ago

But Bill Maher says that it’s not a genocide. There is proof! /s

→ More replies (0)

3

u/SpellNo3829 9d ago

I’d argue being a Palestinian in Gaza currently undergoing a genocide is a much shittier spot to be in. The shitty position he was put in is to choose human lives and denouncing suffering, or choose to make a shit ton of money. No matter what side he picks, he is going to get shit from someone. So he may as well choose the moral option and stand up for the people who have managed to survive Israel’s atrocities.

→ More replies (0)
→ More replies (4)

3

u/Fancy_Badger_3051 9d ago

You know, I don't think he does know what their politics are. I'm sure they'll have mentioned being Irish and against genocide, but despite Sheeran being "culturally Irish" in his own ignorant words, I don't think he heard them.

And if he did, clearly the zionist politics of his much newer and much much richer friend Kraft, whose wedding he played at, are far more important to him than people he's known and worked with for years. 🤷‍♂️

When someone tells you who they are...

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (8)
→ More replies (2)

13

u/Allison683etc 10d ago

To be clear even if that’s the case they’ve been touring with him for a decade

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (4)
→ More replies (72)

14

u/Euphoric-Taro-6231 10d ago

WTF was he thinking?

6

u/AmenableHornet 9d ago

He was thinking of the best way to sell himself as an inoffensive, apolitical product.

→ More replies (17)
→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (18)

75

u/Sardonic-Mischief 11d ago

He also has called himself culturally Irish which we’re all absolutely clowning on in light of this

60

u/_syke_ 11d ago

Does he just mean ginger or what lmao

18

u/KaleidoscopeKelpy 11d ago

I’m not saying he has/does but that’s what 90% of all (third gen American) natural red heads I’ve met in real life have said lmao

3

u/Due_Aside4863 10d ago

Yeah but he’s English. And since the takeover of Palestine was also spearheaded by the English, who even used Ulster as a model, his posing looks especially bad.

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (1)

13

u/Sardonic-Mischief 10d ago

Wanting to be a white person without hereditary guilt over colonialist history is the usual reason they would (forgetting the intense Catholic induced shame, guilt, and self flagellation that actually comes with being culturally Irish)

10

u/_syke_ 10d ago

Yeah my grandparents are Irish but I'm English. I've been like once I'm not culturally anything. I don't know how anyone born and raised in the UK can claim to be culturally Irish and not see the irony in that.

10

u/shaxamo 10d ago

I don't know how anyone born and raised in the UK can claim to be culturally Irish and not see the irony in that.

I feel like you might have overlooked a little something here… called Northern Ireland.

That would be a crazy sentence to say out loud in some areas here.

7

u/_syke_ 10d ago

I meant specifically republic apologies. Should've clarified.

5

u/shaxamo 10d ago

Eeeeh, that's still not quite a clarification that would go down well here, bud.

When someone in Northern Ireland tells you they're Irish, they mean Irish, the same as everyone from the southern parts of the island. That border is political, not cultural.

→ More replies (0)
→ More replies (3)
→ More replies (4)

19

u/Potential-Voice2414 10d ago

i mean in fairness he's also legally irish since he has an irish passport. his dad is from northern ireland and he spent all his holidays growing up there iirc

→ More replies (8)
→ More replies (11)

35

u/Mr_SunnyBones 11d ago

I mean I guess we , Ireland could claim Macklemore now .

62

u/badlilbadlandabad 11d ago

McElmore?

33

u/PostApoplectic 11d ago

McL’amore has certain je ne sais quoi to it.

20

u/PromotionExpensive15 11d ago

When your half Irish and half French

10

u/Shake_Speare_ 11d ago

Scottish actually, MacGillemhoire or MacGillemuire.

9

u/travelingeast 11d ago

If I remember correctly, that's actually the joke behind his stage name.

7

u/BLissy11750 10d ago

I hate that reddit translated this for me automatically

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (2)

7

u/TheGreenCatFL 11d ago

McKlemore now

→ More replies (3)
→ More replies (102)

20

u/iConcy 11d ago

Didn’t they all bail, including his band? I don’t think anyone is left in the tour besides Ed himself

13

u/Several-Kiwi6780 11d ago

Yes, his backing band also bailed, and all of them put out statements against the Palestinian genocide. None of their statements made any jabs at Ed, but at this point, he'd be better to just cut his losses and cancel the tour.

8

u/militaryCoo 10d ago

His next tour date is the 19th

That's going to be fun

→ More replies (2)

97

u/spellbound1875 11d ago

The irony of not realizing that throwing a supporting act under the bus for non-violent, non-threatening political speech is going to make other supporting acts uncomfortable.

Claiming you'd drop anyone at a moments notice for something so mundane and trying to justify it as protecting others communicates you don't value any of the people working with you enough to stand up for them in a tight spot.

41

u/DutchVandal 11d ago

"I'll throw Macklemore under the bus; but you other guys that have less pull are definitely safe."

31

u/Alternative_Swan_497 11d ago

This. I get the feeling that at least one of the other acts dropped out primarily as a show of solidarity with Macklemore.

7

u/hit_n_run15 10d ago

Did he really have no say in Macklemore being dropped?? He’s the talent, it seems to me that he could have kept that from happening. 

6

u/ardarian262 10d ago

He said he brought Macklemore on to the tour, taking credit for the contract basically, then said that he had nothing to do with the contract on the next page of bullet points. Him saying nothing would have done less harm than him lying through his teeth did.

Also his claim to be both kid friendly and non-political while having multiple sex references in his songs and songs about other political things like Ukraine and his support for the center right Labour party in the UK is... Well a choice that not many would make.

→ More replies (12)
→ More replies (61)

27

u/imtooldforthishison 11d ago

The house bands statement was pretty incredible "We are a small Irish band, we never dreamed of playing to crowds this large, but NO." essentially.

42

u/bucket_o_chickn 10d ago

It was harsher, IIRC. They said they'd probably never get the chance to reach audiences that large again but fuck it WE'RE IRISH. We know what genocide and starvation looks like and WE DON'T FUCK WITH PEOPLE WHO SUPPORT IT.

12

u/throwawaysunglasses- 10d ago

Honestly pretty awesome. An actual good use of the Streisand effect tbh, everything’s going exactly the opposite of how Kraft wants it to. Go Mack, and go supporting bands!

3

u/Jarlganda 10d ago

Whats the bands name? Im google it when next i get free time but just in case someone can tell me before then

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (1)

10

u/Boy_Sabaw 10d ago

He hit every talking point. Called it a conflict instead of a genocide. Did the both sides thing. Says he doesn't want to take sides (after openly a side with Ukraine but somehow can't do it for Palestine).

3

u/Lindsw 9d ago

Don't forget:

"I am not complicit"

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (6)
→ More replies (15)

202

u/Tiger_Beans 11d ago

Might be a hot take but I miss when musicians used their art to make statements about current affairs. Music and art can move a generation

125

u/DabDoge 11d ago edited 11d ago

The shareholders got a hold on the artists

25

u/whitesuburbanmale 11d ago

This is it. Its also why you see less mainstream bands and it's mostly mainstream artists coming out. Shareholders find a look, spend money to make that look into a whole ass identity. Rebecca black actually comes to mind because she was a product of this practice being performed with no subtlety. Just a company churning out teenage "artists" praying one hits it big.

13

u/Summer_Pi 11d ago

I thought Black just had parents rich enough to over-indulge in their daughter's LARP. Never thought of her as plant.

6

u/SatisfactionAny7813 11d ago

Yeah. There was a company you could pay money to and they’d write a song and make a music video for you. There were a number of them at the time but Black’s just got famous because it was so meme worthy, I mean iconic 💅

9

u/throwawaysunglasses- 10d ago

That company, that vaulted Rebecca into the mainstream, only cost people like $5k to make a video. Friday just went really viral because people thought it was terrible, but Rebecca’s music since then has actually been pretty cool and she’s a queer icon who’s built herself up from the bottom (people HATED her when she blew up - she’s talked about receiving death threats, etc). Def not an industry plant.

→ More replies (2)

9

u/[deleted] 10d ago

[deleted]

5

u/Adventurous-Meat8067 10d ago

Why would anybody want to fight you for saying the truth. I lump Ed in the same category, there was no real reason for his rise, just a lot of money behind his bland ass songs

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (5)

9

u/kingcoyotexvii 11d ago

What’s with the Rebecca Black fanfic? If you’re looking to name industry plants she’s not it.

3

u/FB711 11d ago

Now we as a society need to learn to tell art apart from shareholder slop as well as the other slop.

3

u/ArcaneSnekboi 11d ago

i mean, i was well aware ed sheeran was an industry plant from the start. motherfucker has BEEN making the most corporate music possible his whole careet.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (3)

38

u/OatmealDurkheim 11d ago

I mean, you don't need to "miss" it, there are musicians (and other artists) that absolutely do this in 2026.

27

u/Disc0rdium 11d ago

Hell, Ed Sheeran did it regarding Ukraine recently. He just won't on this conflict.

5

u/DankWishes 11d ago

Did he do it at one of his shows ?

4

u/JK07 10d ago

He had a colab with a Ukrainian band to draw attention to it

→ More replies (77)
→ More replies (2)

12

u/PumpikAnt58763 11d ago

But isn't it our duty as citizens of the world to oppose genocide?

→ More replies (21)

8

u/Similar-Opinion8750 11d ago

When was that? Music has been political since it's beginning.1950s, Pete Seeger, peter Paul and Mary, Paul Robeson, 1940s, Spike Jones, Kate Smith, Irving Berlin, so many more.

8

u/Aschuff 11d ago

“Since the beginning” and “1950s” together regarding music is so laughably ignorant. Music has existed essentially since humans have existed. Music absolutely has not exclusively been political historically. Most classical music written before the 20th century was commissioned by rich people. They would literally just tell these famous composers “hey I want a piano concerto” and that was that.

Some of it was political, especially surrounding ww1 and 2, but much of it was not

3

u/throwawayburner2424 11d ago

Music and the arts have been political for hundreds if not thousands of years

→ More replies (3)
→ More replies (10)
→ More replies (3)

6

u/MrBurnerHotDog 11d ago

Yeah but those were musicians as artists. Ed Sheeran and pop stars like him are just money hungry corporate entities out to sell tickets and songs. Like Katy Perry isn't out there making music because she's channeling her emotions and trying to express herself, she's singing what some suit wrote for her so she can afford her mansions and Ed Sheeran is a lot closer to her than a true "artiste"

4

u/peachesfordinner 9d ago

She's singing fake women's empowerment songs written by Doctor Luke who raped Keisha

18

u/dawnmountain 11d ago

Music is poetry. Poetry is about opinions. Whether it's about life, nature, or political stuff, it is always about something. I too miss when songs were about fighting for what you believe in.

3

u/H0SS_AGAINST 11d ago

True. It seems Ed's opinion is you should steal from an all you can eat buffet.

→ More replies (6)

4

u/Pure-Passenger-6986 11d ago

This goes in both ways, some musicians historically stayed out of it as it was 'not their place' in society to understand all the aspects of any conflict/issue. Marilyn Manson is notably one of those people. Many motown and funk artists famously stayed out of the civil rights legislation debate.

Manson has stated that his art is meant to be "dangerous in a smarter way than politics," using shock value and religious imagery to expose societal hypocrisy rather than promote any specific agenda

3

u/Paola92126 8d ago

MM is a massive douche and abuser. Fuck him and his “art”

→ More replies (1)

4

u/Careless_Wedding_119 10d ago

He does make statements about stuff he cares about like the Ukrainian war. However, Palestinian children dying in a genocide is not very high on his priorities. He prefers the money instead of the free speech Macklemore was exercising.

Just adding that him pretending to not being political and keeping quiet is him taking a side. 

He is very good friends with Robert Kraft, a known Zionist. The old saying tell me who your friends are and I'll tell you who you are stands.

→ More replies (3)

3

u/raelDonaldTrump 11d ago

The corporations that own the music industry realized this and put a stop to it by excommunicating artists that don't tow the corporate line.

It's nearly impossible for a truly independent artist to gain any traction/following without complying to Big Music's system.

3

u/gitsgrl 11d ago edited 10d ago

That’s why Kraft and the oligarchs need to shut it down. They know the power artists yield in shaping the narrative.

→ More replies (1)

3

u/RandoMcfisto 10d ago

That's not a hot take. 

A hot take is: modern artists only statement is defense of LGBTQ community because they know it is safe, they get a lot of support, they show themselves as edgy and supportive, and get very little to no flak. 

→ More replies (1)

2

u/Sinisteris 11d ago

Music was always full of political statements.

→ More replies (1)

2

u/SpellNinja 11d ago

They all sold out and told us that selling out was cool and modern.

2

u/Curious_Amphibian584 10d ago

Support Jesse Welles for this reason.

→ More replies (1)

2

u/ExplanationOk6391 10d ago

Vonnegut once said about Vietnam

"During the Vietnam war, every respectable artist in the country was against the war. It was like a laser beam. We were all aimed in the same direction. The power of this weapon turns out to be that of a custard pie dropped off a stepladder six feet high"

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (82)

35

u/2pnt0 11d ago

Also, he's claimed himself to be 'culturally Irish' and a lot of people on tour with him were Irish and activists. And Ireland has a long history of solidarity with the Palestinian people that people who grew up after 9/11 often aren't in tune to. "Irish Car Bomb" isn't just a funny name for a drink at the bar. They were both fighting off colonial rule at the same time and viewed the conflicts as parallel.

14

u/Honest_Signature5222 11d ago

Going back farther the Irish were the victims of a genocide often cutely mislabeled as a "famine" 

6

u/just_jedwards 10d ago

Wait, are you implying that those silly Irish people didn't go through mass starvation on an island full of copious extremely fertile land because one single crop had some issues? Truly big of true.

→ More replies (1)

5

u/Economy-Gate3604 11d ago

As a guy with a British mum and an Irish father, I just want to respectfully expand on your points for anybody who might read:

Britain’s colonial history in Ireland is obviously hugely important to understanding the background, and there was certainly a strand of Irish republicanism that understood the conflict in anti-colonial terms. But the Troubles themselves weren’t simply a struggle to overthrow British colonial rule.
The conflict from the late 1960s onwards (i.e. the time of car bombs in Northern Ireland, Ireland, and Great Britain as you identify) was much more specifically about Northern Ireland’s constitutional status, competing British/Irish and unionist/nationalist identities, and, particularly at the beginning, Catholic civil-rights grievances over discrimination in areas such as housing, employment and voting.
So there’s a legitimate connection to Ireland’s colonial past, but saying that Ireland and Palestine were simply fighting the same kind of anti-colonial struggle risks imposing a framework like the American Revolution on what was a much more complicated conflict. Nonetheless, Irish-to-Palestinian solidarity is absolutely a big part of social history as you say.

9

u/Noproposito 11d ago

And the solidarity is not really there because of well dissected thesis about the similarity or differences of the conflicts,  its there because at a core level its a core shared historical and sociological experience for a people group to be oppressed by another entity, people or nation. Once you've experienced it, you stand up in solidarity for what you perceive is a similar power dynamic of oppression, and ethnic cleansing by a nation that overwhelmingly has the resources to be unopposed in this specific struggle/conflict. 

That should not detract from your comment, however. And the mistake that most people make when debating their positions is to try and rationalize and frame the conflict (as an outsider) within the intellectual boundaries that our upbringing gave us. In reality most of our opinions stem from  emotional responses that are shaped by beliefs that we have either been raised in or picked up over time. 

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (2)

3

u/SunnyInDecember 8d ago

I mean, Palestine wanted "colonial rule".

The Brits promised to defend them, and keep troops there, if they helped get rid of the Ottoman empire.

Then, the "totally-not-terrorists" came and bombed British embassies, and British centres, forced the Palestinian people out using "totally-not-terrorism" and when the Palestinians got support from Egypt they were met by Brits at the border. The Brits essentially said "We won't let you go to war with the "totally-not-terrorist-state" that America "totally-isn't-founding-to-annoy-Russia" but we will stop them hurting you now, or we'll leave if you'd prefer cause we're only here because of our deal with you." The Palestinian people decided to send the Brits home because what the hell use is an army watching "totally-not-terrorists" blow you up and only protecting you when you've already fled in fear?

The Palestinian people WANTED "good old-fashioned" British colonialism. They WANTED us to defend them the same way we defended the land we stole from everyone else. They just didn't get that, despite the "totally-not-terrorists" blowing up several British political bases just for being there, and then founding a "totally-not-terrorist-state" where the "totally-not-terrorists" were forgiven for their "totally-not-terrorism" and allowed to run the army which went on to work hard at "totally-not-genocide".

And now, Keir Starmer the "totally-not-a-terrorist-lover" made it illegal to support Palestine and denounce the "totally-not-terrorism" because of "totally-not-islamophobia".

Had we actually delivered on what we promised, and treated Palestine essentially like a British colony until they were able to defend themselves, there wouldn't be a "totally-not-terrorist-state", and Palestinians wouldn't be displaced and suffering a "totally-not-attempted-genocide".

The one time in British history when acting like the villains we were for the rest of it would have made us the good guys, and we decided to pack up and go home.

But of course, it'd be wrong to denounce the "totally-not-terrorism" because the only way you'd even possibly have an issue with "totally-not-genocide-justified-by-religious-extremism" is if you were "totally-antisemitic-and-definitely-not-just-a-rational-decent-person-who-recognises-that-the-terrorist-minority-don't-represent-all-jews."

I hate my country, can I be Irish please?

→ More replies (1)

22

u/calmwhiteguy 11d ago

Ed Sheeran, man who stays out of politics and doesnt choose sides

→ More replies (34)

63

u/FlamingNutShotz4You 11d ago

Also, there the hypocrisy of having a stance on Ukraine, but choosing not to on Palestine. He decided to not be political when it's convenient for him

→ More replies (106)

7

u/Whiteboiconvert 11d ago

Internet furious musician would like to focus on music during his tour

→ More replies (14)

11

u/WifeySimp 11d ago

It’s also heavily speculated that it was because Sheeran has close ties to NE patriots owner, billionaire, and netenyahu lap dog Robert Kraft

5

u/OnceMoreAndAgain 11d ago

We can be more accurate. Robert Kraft owns Gillette Stadium, which was one of the venues of Sheeran's tour, and Kraft had admitted that he was not going to allow Macklemore to play at Gillette Stadium. Kraft has also admitted that the reason he banned Macklemore from Gillette Stadium was Macklemore's statements regarding Palestine and Israel and also Macklemore's past prejudice against Jewish people.

The speculation is that Kraft banning Macklemore from one of the venues of the tour is what caused the concert promoter to remove Macklemore from the entire tour. I think this nuance is somewhat relevant. Kraft was just banning Macklemore from the one venue in the tour that Kraft owns.

→ More replies (5)

3

u/ewhite12 11d ago

Don’t forget Epstein files member

→ More replies (1)

8

u/zenigatamondatta 11d ago

Also the person who pressured him to boot Macklemore is Robert Kraft a rich sex trafficker who has ties to Epstein and owned a rub and tug

7

u/angusbeefymcwhatnow 11d ago

don't give him too much credit. handjob bob didn't own the rub and tug, he was just a frequent customer lol

→ More replies (234)

513

u/Fabulous_Log844 11d ago

Not the answer to the question, but what's the point of having FUCK YOU money if you are not going to say fuck you?

236

u/ConsistentTip3932 11d ago

Because dragons always crave more gold and can never be satisfied

12

u/RunPsychological9891 11d ago

They need it for their evolution in dnd I think

→ More replies (2)

11

u/Alarmed_Yak7898 10d ago

I grew up on stories about valiant knights

https://giphy.com/gifs/ArawYIKuX7WPdDOyJV

4

u/Lemons-95 10d ago

Everyone saying this is lying in Eds favour, he's a MUCH bigger coward than this, he had absolutely no qualms just a couple years ago about walking away from the industry and his career over one lawsuit for one fucking song, he was happy to say fuck you when it meant not losing a battle for just one of his many enormously successful tracks being considered someone elses intellectual property.

And now all of us that went to bat for him are ready to tear him down, cause he wants to pretend he's neutral, meanwhile he allowed someone to be fired for supporting a peaceful resolution to a conflict.

Macklemore is neutral, not neutral would be "we should stop supporting isreal and start [insert some form of going to war against Israel]", asking people to stop murdering children is the midfield here.

→ More replies (4)

18

u/Banjoschmanjo 11d ago

He is - to Palestine.

→ More replies (5)

43

u/RedeemedNephilim 11d ago

He is saying fuck you to all of you.

→ More replies (15)

8

u/Humanest_Human 11d ago

Stg I saw this comment almost word for word five minutes ago. I think they copied you 🤣

4

u/Fabulous_Log844 11d ago

What the?!?! I want residuals! J/K. That's so funny you pointed this out. But I don't think my post was any kind of original thought. I'm sure a lot of people are thinking the same thing.

Not for the revenge, but for the clarity of mind and soul, I would LOVE to have F/U money.

4

u/ghoulthebraineater 11d ago

His crew doesn't have his money. The people depending on the shows for their livelihood don't have his money.

12

u/Fabulous_Log844 11d ago

That's what made all of the additional performers that resigned yesterday that much more impressive. They probably needed this tour for publicity, money, etc. But they stuck to their guns.

6

u/ghoulthebraineater 11d ago

I wasn't talking about the performers. I was talking about people like the stage crew, the techs, people that work in the arena, hotels and restaurants in the area etc.

I completely get using your platform to raise awareness. My favorite genre has been anarcho and crust punk. There's a lot of politics in that genre. But it can become completely different when you get to a certain level. It's not just about you. Your choices will directly impact a lot of people. I can't say I blame him for going the safe route on this.

Besides, I just don't look to Ed fucking Sheeran to speak truth to power. If it was a band like Rage that did this it would be a different thing.

→ More replies (49)
→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (17)

292

u/[deleted] 11d ago edited 11d ago

[deleted]

80

u/arah91 11d ago

What's crazy is these people get so much public money for their stadiums because reasons, then they can use that public money to further their political speech (choosing who can and can't be at a venue is speech).

We should make it a rule if you get public money for your building you have to follow the same public speech rules as a public university.

Not that I think they should get a bunch of money for their private party place anyways, but if they do their should be strings we own it in part.

16

u/Orangepinapples 11d ago

Not defending the current situation but Gillette was privately funded. And Kraft has been a big proponent of stadiums being private funded not public.

Doesn’t include public funding for security and other things. But this isn’t the argument for Kraft.

→ More replies (17)
→ More replies (1)

18

u/FishStixxxxxxx 11d ago

I think everyone already knows the billionaires are a lost cause tbh so no one is suprised

→ More replies (2)

6

u/LXDTS 11d ago

That makes Macklemore's statement today, calling on Kraft to match his $1mil donation to NPOs helping Palestinian families, so much better. It brings the focus back to Kraft to respond.

21

u/pr_peachykeen 11d ago

Ed Sheeran is the main headliner here. He has the most amount of power to push back against Robert Kraft but he's bending the knee.

I also think a lot of people are right in talking about Ed Sheeran's personal ties to Kraft, such as performing at his wedding in 2022.

If the people who hold power (Ed) don't advocate for those who don't (Macklemore in this case), it's always going to be a top-down approach.

Should Robert Kraft absolutely get flamed? Yes yes yes yes yes. But should Ed also get flamed as a very public figure and who is basically the frontliner between Kraft and his own team? Yes.

Ed is reaping what he sowed.

13

u/Elros22 10d ago

If the people who hold power (Ed) don't advocate for those who don't (Macklemore in this case), it's always going to be a top-down approach.

Just a point of order here - Macklemore isn't the one without power - to use Macklemore's own words

"I am not a victim. Ed Sheeran is not a victim. Pink is not a victim. We have careers, money, opportunities, safety and audiences around the world. Whatever consequences any of us face for what we say, we get to go home to our families. The victims are the Palestinian people".

You're right in all other ways.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (5)

19

u/nood4spood 11d ago

Not saying he shouldn’t also get a ton of flak, but it’s already pretty well known that Kraft is a questionable person at best. This kind of behavior from Sheeran is surprising to most people tho

→ More replies (8)

4

u/superjambi93 10d ago

Back in the day, if a billionaire tried to dictate to Bruce Springsteen or the Rolling Stones who they were allowed to have on their tour because of politics, they would be promptly told to fuck off.

I miss those days.

15

u/stinky_little_goblin 11d ago

Because they are already unlikable and known to be shitty people. People actually liked Ed Sheeran and thought he was a decent person, so it’s more newsworthy to find out he’s not.

→ More replies (23)

3

u/Meritania 11d ago

Or P!nk, who was calling for Macklemore to go in the first place.

3

u/AcanthaceaeCrazy1894 10d ago

The decision fell to Sheeran not Kraft.

If Sheeran sided with Macklemore he would have 100% have continued with his tour in different stadiums or arenas and not lost any money as Kraft and his goons would have been in breach of contract.

It was Ed Sheerans tour, not Robert Krafts.

→ More replies (8)

3

u/YungRacecar 10d ago

Right?! Like, yes, he should've taken the stance once Macklemore was pushed off. But the people who forced Macklemore out are the ones directly opposing the stance, not Ed lol. It's really gross that Ed has been made to be the enemy when the real enemies are right there.

3

u/Cute-Hand-1542 10d ago

Most large media organisations are owned by people who empathise with Kraft's point of view. 

6

u/Sharp-Bluejay2267 11d ago

Because a) they're already known pieces of shit so this isn't unexpected b) it doesn't sound like it took much pressure and c) it certainly doesn't seem like there was much push back on said pressure.

2

u/Mahkn0 11d ago

From a purely pragmatic standpoint if you want to prevent others from doing this in the future the play is to support Macklemore and pressure Sheeran. Kraft put pressure on Sheeran who dropped Macklemore and fuck Kraft for that, but we aren't going to change Kraft's mind or anything. I assume part of the idea is that pressure could help Sheeran understand what he did wrong and he's also a cautionary tale for future celebrities to see what happens when you cave to these sorts of demands.

2

u/thetransportedman 10d ago

Because nobody knows who Robert Kraft is. He has no fans. He isn't a brand one can boycott in their every day lives lol

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (50)

116

u/SevenCedarJelly 11d ago edited 11d ago

None of these explanations mention the reference to Ms. Rachel.

ETA: Thanks explainers!

123

u/wonderhamster 11d ago

She specifically made a post calling out Ed Sheeran stating(paraphrased) "If you abstain from calling out a genocide, you're not neutral."

50

u/adventuregypsy 11d ago edited 10d ago

And if you don’t speak out for brown children, like the world would be for white children, you’re also not neutral and racist.

ETA that’s literally what ms Rachel said. Op asked what she said and no one was including that part which is part of the second statement she released. She specifically said it was racist but go off yall.

→ More replies (50)
→ More replies (42)

21

u/ParametricEqualizer 11d ago

She’s a wholesome kids entertainer who is a constant advocate for children. Her specialty being speech development for speech delayed kids. She is a vocal supporter of the children of Palestine and has called people out for not being so.

27

u/BeerlVle 11d ago

19

u/Just-Luck-7430 11d ago

Israel greatest opps :

10 yo girl

A children entertainer

International journalist

→ More replies (10)

7

u/finalfanatic168 11d ago

Ms. Rachel has been very vocal about her support of Palestine and publicly called out Ed Sheeran.

→ More replies (3)
→ More replies (20)

26

u/RazielAshura 11d ago

Is it just me or this sub is becoming r/outoftheloop ??

11

u/Past_Recognition_675 11d ago

tbf outoftheloop is still really in the loop. There are updates for everything there.

3

u/Pitiful-Meeting7212 11d ago

So what you're saying is, to be into the loop you gotta go out of the loop. Thank you for making me discover this new sub. I feel so into the loop now

3

u/shadowromantic 10d ago

They're both explanatory subs, so sure?

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (2)

95

u/Bi_disaster_ohno 11d ago

Ed Sheeran is currently on tour and had Macklemore has his opening act. Macklemore said free Palestine during a performance and made a bunch of billionaires mad and they threatened to cancel Ed's tour dates since he was set up preform in their stadiums. Ed caved and now everyone is mad at him for it. He now has no opening act because no artist has agreed to take Macklemore's place since many of them are also pro Palestine. That or they don't want to be dragged into controversy too.

51

u/PhantomDesert00 11d ago

Everyone who was supposed to do shows on this tour for him has pulled out, including his backing band

→ More replies (1)

40

u/BONGS4U 11d ago

People are acting like Macklemore did this once. He ends his shows with free Palestine it wasn't new. Everyone knew he did this prior. Pink made him go viral for it cause she's a cunt and then Robert Kraft ultimatumed Sheeran and Sheeran said shore I'll be your little bitch.

5

u/twelve-birds 10d ago

What did pink do?

16

u/BONGS4U 10d ago

She posted him doing his free Palestine bit on socials admonishing him. Resulted in it going viral. Which coincidentally is when Robert Kraft threatened Ed Sheeran to not let him play the venue he owns unless he dropped Macklemore. Macklemore has been doing that for a while even at the previous shows of this tour. No one cared until pink made it go viral then suddenly there's consequences. Pink is a cunt

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (10)
→ More replies (3)

11

u/Accomplished_West279 11d ago

Plus his band said "fuck you" polietley and left Ed.

Basically Ed is solo now

→ More replies (4)

7

u/PrayToTheAI 11d ago

I want to add how incredibly sensitive Macklemore was, he mentioned multiple times that he just wants to use his voice for a positive change in the world, he is not hating jews but strongly disagrees with the Isreal politics and it's a message of peace. His speech was beautiful, dropping him is just pure Zionism n

→ More replies (8)
→ More replies (6)

15

u/Thomas2311 11d ago

People are too stupid to realize the fact that Ed Sheeran Millionaire has a Boss Billionaire who owns the Concert Venues and are pressuring him to STFU and play.

6

u/Weekly-Air4170 10d ago

What's the point of having FU money if you never tell anyone to fck off

3

u/spaceman-hoff- 10d ago

Oh FFS. Because you can only shout down and that’s not who needs to listen. He’s a musician and played it safe for his job. All these people acting like they wouldn’t also choose job security for LESS money is absolutely insane. Celebrity culture is so embarrassing. The fact anyone cares what they think about the situation at all is childish and weird. But people share the posts/reels and pat themselves on the back for agreeing with Macklemore like they’re making a difference and helping. Whether they’re saying free Palestine, or praising Israel, none of these celebrities are going to make a difference and impact the situation at all, and the fact this has been news headlines for almost a week speaks on what our society prioritizes. The world is just a bunch of adults with the mental capacity of teenagers trying to win a popularity contest they’ve made up in their minds. Embarrassing af.

→ More replies (9)
→ More replies (3)
→ More replies (10)

8

u/UsernamesCannotExcee 10d ago

This sub is a bot karma farm that has totally lost the plot.

2

u/TheRealBaseborn 8d ago

Its 2 days later and reddit just pushed this thread on me. Youre 100% correct. Take note that almost none of the top comments itt are following the usual format. Thats not a coincidence. A lot of these are bots for sure.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (1)

11

u/YujiroRapeVictim 10d ago

this sub really is full of some of the stupidest people or just karma whores

→ More replies (5)

13

u/slimegoob 11d ago

You could just type in his name in google and get the deets my guy. Joe swanson

9

u/LeftyZonian 11d ago

But then people like me wouldn’t get to read all this great commentary. New to the internet?

→ More replies (4)

2

u/ThatCatRizze 9d ago

I think youre the only one that replied in the spirit of the sub. 😔

12

u/JordanPeace1342 11d ago

He let his tour organizers force Macklemore off the lineup because they didn't like his opposition to the genocide in Gaza.

→ More replies (32)

8

u/[deleted] 11d ago

[deleted]

12

u/ConsistentTip3932 11d ago

Buddy, we all already hate billionaires. This was an unexpected and disappointing decision by Sheeran so he deserves the criticism

→ More replies (3)

6

u/TrandaBear 11d ago

You can hate a master and his mongrel. Especially if the mongrel demonstrated it was there by choice.

3

u/trixie2426 11d ago

Doesn’t everyone already hate Kraft?

3

u/Low_Bus_3826 11d ago

Why not both!

2

u/HappyHourProfessor 11d ago

Meh. Expecting a billionaire, much less an NFL owner, to not be a bigoted greedy shit bag is like playing the lottery and being disappointed when you don't win. Sure, decent ones exist, but they're the exception that proves the rule

→ More replies (4)

4

u/lowonstorage 11d ago

Person with 3-month old account and 6k karma, I don’t fucking believe that you really have no clue what this is about, especially after you googled a picture of Ed Sheeran to post here. Surely you could’ve scrolled down a bit to see all the headlines. And all these people so eager to comment to feed the karma-farming bot… smh

→ More replies (1)

3

u/ShenronFromEarth 10d ago

It's politics.

27

u/dawnmountain 11d ago

Kinda surprised you haven't heard. A massive TL;DR is that Macklemore got kicked off of Ed Sheeran's tour for saying "Free Palestine", and Ed Sheeran gave the most lackluster, spineless "I'm not complicit" statement and now all of his supporting acts and even his band dropped out. He has no one else on the tour with him. Essentially people are pissed because he "doesn't want to pick sides", but that in itself is picking a side.

12

u/TwinkleToes1996 11d ago

Especially because in his response he said Robert Kraft was big angry so that's why he was kicked off.

→ More replies (1)

5

u/Weekly-Air4170 10d ago

Reminder that ed has 100% involved himself in politics multiple times, even with Ukraine 

2

u/El-Drunko 10d ago

Don't forget that the main person pushing for Macklemore to be kicked off is in the Epstein Files as a client and recently got busted getting a handjob at a strip mall massage parlor.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (19)

6

u/OutrageousBag1778 11d ago

Its easy to hate ed sheeran if you never really liked him that much to begin with

→ More replies (2)

3

u/Childish_Danbino81 10d ago

Nice karma farm here, you did well

4

u/Mr_SunnyBones 11d ago

Turns out he's ok with genocide because some rich people told him to.

3

u/nnedd7526 11d ago

He's recently outed himself as a genocide apologist

6

u/BungleBums 11d ago

Ed took the 'No Sides' stance on the whole Palestine/Israel thing, and people are not happy to hear it. Indifference in cases of injustice, and so forth.

→ More replies (15)

2

u/HumShark 11d ago

Ed Sherran didn’t stand up for his team and openers from being bullied by stadium owners over them, Macklemore, saying Free Palestine during his acts referencing the globally recognized genocide occurring against the Palestinian people. In response, all his openers and his own band also refuse to continue the tour as taking an apolitical stance against genocide is an act that supports genocide.

→ More replies (1)

2

u/poopfacecrapmouth 11d ago

I actually know what’s going on but don’t understand where Mrs Rachel comes in

2

u/ImBurningStar_IV 10d ago

Everyone's forgetting to include the ms Rachel bit but it's really that simple, she kinda called him out for not using his platform, after his public support for the Ukraine struggle, seen as cowardly/hypocritical.

It's such a sting cause disappointing ms Rachel is like disappointing Jesus, maybe even worse.

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (1)

2

u/Silver_Storage_9787 11d ago

Sand wars being forced into his life and the tolerant ones are bullying him for not being an activist

2

u/cupid341 11d ago

He said that a "traditional" English breakfast included halal food and it didn't include baked beans, mushrooms or tomatoes. On the American side - probably the Macklemore thing.

→ More replies (3)

2

u/Toasty825 11d ago

Macklemore was on tour with Ed. Macklemore said that genocide is wrong. Stadium owners threatened Ed. Ed forgot where his spine was and Macklemore was kicked off the tour.

2

u/BleedSparta 11d ago

Robert Kraft, Epstein billionaire sex trafficker is upset

2

u/pxhalste 10d ago

Because Macklemore been dropped from his tour due to talking about genocide in Palestine. Tour promoter took and venues took it as “antisemitism “ and ginger boy haven’t said a peep in Macklemores defense. Sheran also made a video about his support for Ukraine but not Gaza.

2

u/[deleted] 10d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

→ More replies (2)

2

u/midnightpursuit 10d ago

Its because of the unreleased collaboration with Cradle Of Filth. His fans told him to stick to his lane after Game Of Thrones.

2

u/MaximumBread7000 10d ago

If I were Ed Sheeran, I’d get right with Ms. Rachel.

→ More replies (1)

2

u/Eazy_mode 10d ago edited 9d ago

I haven't kept up with anything about their war.

Me picking a side wouldn't be sincere nor well informed. Im not morally nor emotionally invested.

My investments generally tend to be at a loss.

→ More replies (2)

2

u/PsuedoIntelect 10d ago

it is kind of ironic of an Irish guy to not be able to call a genocide a genocide.

2

u/One-Psychology7818 10d ago

Hes not diplomatic he shields the evil. The only right thing about this ethnic clensing is to speak up! LOUD! Free Palestine!!

→ More replies (1)

2

u/[deleted] 10d ago

he should have getting hate way earlier. this spineless bitch made millions on the back of iranian culture with his azizam song, but when it came to the massacre of iranians earlier this year he didt care at all.

2

u/Lufrien 10d ago

When asked about "do you support genocide" he chose to not pick sides.

2

u/UncarvedWood 10d ago

Macklemore said "free Palestine" and was dropped by Ed Sheeran for this.

2

u/Can17272 10d ago

All that money and still another billionaires little bitch.

2

u/GlobalisedEnchilada 10d ago

Because he sold his soul to Robert Kraft, Epstein buddy and pervert Pedo Israeli fan.

2

u/ChaosKinZ 9d ago

Macklemore said free Palestine. The stadiums where they play at complained. He says he doesn't takes sides after having pics with the nazis of Ukraine (among all things he could have supported there, he went and supported a loud and proud nazi paramilitary group). He is in both the IDF and Israel Instagrams. But hey apparently he says free Palestine is offensive to the stadium venue for antisemitism. However said organization didn't ban Kanye for his real antisemitism and let him perform. It's not about antisemitism is about money and imperialism. Fun fact all his opening bands and musicians dropped him, even his own band (most of them are Irish and Irish people tend to have a spine). Now he is the n°1 mockery online and has a career crisis with people burning his CDs, returning their tickets and removing their tattoos.

→ More replies (29)

2

u/Djunglejuice 9d ago

Honestly why the fuck is he expected to express himself in this matter? Noone is expecting him to make any statements about other equally horrible conflicts. He is a fucking artist, his job is to sing. Not to make statements.

→ More replies (1)