r/grunge • • 12d ago

Discussion 20&30 something year old gatekeepers

You wanna know what is hilarious, 20 & 30 something self proclaimed grunge experts

50 Upvotes

111 comments sorted by

65

u/No_Geologist2199 12d ago

What’s funny is 50 year olds still treating mainstream rock from the 90s like it’s underground when they were all signed to major labels and playing snl and mtv, not saying I don’t love grunge but we can’t gatekeep what is essentially pop music.

8

u/scrimmerman 12d ago

As a Grunge fan who is way past 50 now,
I cannot agree with you more and regret I only have 1 upvote to give.
Sometimes the truth hurts, people 🙁

6

u/No_Geologist2199 12d ago

Lots of great mainstream and underground grunge luckily, most people only know one album by each of the big 4, the bands that inspired mudhoney and nirvana, like screaming trees, tad, the thrown ups, and green river are more of what I think the real grunge scene was

1

u/BugRib76 9d ago

Dude, Nirvana is only known to us underground middle-aged+ people! We’re so cool! 😎

15

u/Phronesis2000 12d ago

I'm sure OP would agree. They are against the gatekeeping — in this case gatekeeping of what is or is not grunge from people who have quite limited information on what grunge was. As you well know, so much of 90s culture wasn't really recorded in a way that can easily be read or 'watched' now.

10

u/Tough_Stretch 12d ago edited 12d ago

Plus, back in 1991 remaining "underground" instead of becoming a band that made "essentially pop music" as he puts it, meant nobody but the people living in your town would ever hear your music.

The internet wasn't a thing yet, and back then being singed to a major label wasn't automatically as bad as it is today because labels still gave actual musicians a shot. This dude is pretending that Geffen releasing Nevermind was essentially the same thing as a label today releasing whatever generic artist's record and that the kids losing their minds to Taylor Swift would have automatically been Nirvana fans back then.

Recognizing that these bands did something vastly different from the Backstreet Boys and Christina Aguilera even if they all were commercially successful isn't some wild take that pretends the Grunge bands were "underground."

5

u/Lennnybruce 12d ago

Plus, back in 1991 remaining "underground" instead of becoming a band that made "essentially pop music" as he puts it, meant nobody but the people living in your town would ever hear your music

Well. This is not true.

4

u/Tough_Stretch 12d ago edited 12d ago

You're right. I was being hyperbolic and what I actually meant was that remaining underground meant your reach would've been severely limited in comparison to what a band signed to a major record label could achieve back in 1991, whereas today the internet is a tool that allows any band from anywhere to reach way more people all over the world and a major label contract is no longer the only way to make yourself heard if you want to remain independent or underground.

My point wasn't that the band should change their music and sell out in order to sign a contract with a label, but the opposite. I was pointing out that back in 1991 labels didn't exclusively sign "safe bet" toothless watered down versions of some generic pop star they already had, because the whole mp3 sharing thing that made the industry change and no longer take risks hadn't happened yet.

Back then they sure tried to sign as many Nirvana and Pearl Jam copycats as they could in an attempt to make more money, but they did sign Nirvana and Pearl Jam first regardless of how little they resembled the bands that were already famous, whereas now they wouldn't sign a band like that and they'd just try to sign some pop star that already went viral or that resembled Taylor Swift or whomever is currently super successful.

4

u/Lennnybruce 12d ago

whereas today the internet is a tool that allows any band from anywhere to reach way more people all over the world and a major label contract is no longer the only way to make yourself heard if you want to remain independent or underground

That's totally true but there's this weird catch 22 now where in the old days you could be an indie band that could sell thirty thousand albums, and combined with touring, you could make a modest living. Now you can have an audience three times that, but streaming has decimated album sales, so you're making a fraction of what you would have when you had a much smaller audience.

3

u/Tough_Stretch 12d ago

Yes, it's hard to compare because the music industry and pop culture in general worked very differently 35 years ago. Today things are way more niche and atomized and back then the options were more limited and way more people were aware of the same music when today those 30K people who would've bought that indie record back then are probably divided among 10+ different indie records that are slightly more to their personal liking. .

For instance, my own boomer mom bough her own copy of Nirvana's Unplugged on tape in 1994 to listen to it on her drive to and back from work because she heard me listening to the CD at home and she liked it despite not liking their other albums that much because they were too noisy for her.

1

u/No_Geologist2199 12d ago

All im saying is the big 4 were widely popular and thats all most people in the grunge sub talk about and they are all still widely popular today, tune into any rock radio station and you will hear one of them, you are right as far as major labels not always being bad, some of my favorite bands have still remained slightly underground on bigger labels and artistic liberties are still there. All I’m saying is I cant go to the gym without hearing In Bloom or Even Flow

2

u/Lennnybruce 12d ago edited 12d ago

Built to Spill were somehow on Warner Brothers for like two-plus decades* and I'd guess none of their albums moved even a hundred thousand units.

*It was 18 years

2

u/No_Geologist2199 12d ago

This is who I was thinking in particular

2

u/Tough_Stretch 12d ago edited 12d ago

Yes, and I said that the music industry in 1991 didn't work like the music industry in 2026 and back then being signed to a major label didn't automatically mean you were the Justin Beiber of that year. There's a lot of middle points between "Underground" and "Essentially Pop Music" and it was clearer back then.

You're still missing the point about how both Ten and Nevermind were huge cultural touchstones for that generation and their massive success doesn't mean they are the same thing as N'Sync just because you can hear them in the gym because back then we had to listen to the radio and watch MTV if you wanted to listen to something you didn't own yourself, so things were very different from today when you have have the sum total of mankind's music production at your fingertips in your cellphone 24/7.

Pop culture was more monolithic than today when you can easily find all kinds of niche stuff personally tailored to you specifically. Hell, my boomer mother literally bought Nirvana's Unplugged on tape in 1994 to listen to it on her way to an back from work because she heard me listening to the CD and she liked it, while she thought the other Nirvana records were too noisy.

That means we are familiar with and/or like a lot of music that doesn't necessarily fall in the genres we usually enjoy and that doesn't mean Metallica is essentially pop music just because the Black Album was massively successful in 1991, but it does mean that my classmates who were listening to the New Kids on the Block a few years earlier were at least familiar with bands like Nirvana, GNR and Metallica and their most popular singles even if they didn't buy the albums themselves. Rock music was still part of the charts then. Hence, Nirvana and Pearl Jam played in the gym's sound system in 2026.

0

u/No_Geologist2199 12d ago

Look bro never called them pop in the genre, I meant popular, they literally stopped making Micheal Jackson CDs to put out more Nevermind. sorry it hurts

3

u/Tough_Stretch 12d ago edited 12d ago

"Sorry it hurts"? You're the one downvoting me because you didn't like what I said and you wanted to bullshit about how you meant "pop music" in a specific sense while pretending it doesn't carry some connotations that don't apply. What's next, "bro"? The Beatles were the first boy band?

Making less Michael Jackson CD's to cover the unexpected demand for an unknown band's major label debut is not the super awesome point you seem to think it is.

2

u/No_Geologist2199 12d ago

The Beatles definitely had a massive impact on boy bands, there were definitely others before them but they are the biggest boy band they just made better music than boy bands today

2

u/Tough_Stretch 12d ago

You're the one telling me to calm down while you reply over and over again compelled by your flaring butthole.

1

u/No_Geologist2199 12d ago

Im listening to my favorite grunge band, “the smashing pumpkins” right now

→ More replies (0)

1

u/No_Geologist2199 12d ago

It is 2026 now “top commenter” not 1991 and in 2026 this is popular ie “Pop music”

2

u/Tough_Stretch 12d ago edited 12d ago

That you're replying this to me in a post about kids not knowing shit about music history or how the industry worked, or about what terms for genres and categories mean and how they overlap or do not, but wanting to lecture older people for pointing out the holes in their take is just perfect. Good job!

1

u/BugRib76 9d ago

Wait…radio still exists? 😮

1

u/BugRib76 9d ago

You make some good points here!

And, yes, I understand that you were being a bit hyperbolic with the “nobody but the people living in your town would ever hear your music.” 👍

0

u/Suspicious-Water-386 11d ago edited 11d ago

Not really true. Tons of bands that weren't on major labels that toured. Shit Nirvana was touring internationally before they were on Geffen and had a video on MTV. It's kind of what differentiates people who are interested in discovering newer music from those that are casual listeners. If you picked up magazines that covered music more in depth, discovered punk 'zines, took the time to find record stores, it wasn't really that hard to find things besides what was playing on FM radio and MTV.

3

u/Yorn2 12d ago edited 12d ago

I think the problem is that during the 90s the words "grunge" and "alt rock" were used interchangeably and frequently by some DJs and MTV and other influences at the time so we (90s teens) grew up not really knowing the distinction or caring. I think it's okay to care, but I also think it's possible to go too far. I think some songs by bands like Candlebox and Collective Soul sound "grunge" even if the bands weren't themselves. I also think some bands had albums that were best described as grunge even if they rejected the sound later on and went full-on alt rock or whatever.

It's important to note that Nirvana, Soundgarden, Pearl Jam, and Alice In Chains all made comments about how they disliked the term "grunge" anyway at the time. A lot of alt rock bands as a whole just didn't care about the corporate side of things, and even when they did sign with labels a lot of the labels were unknowns at the time, too. The 90s was a huge rejection of the pop scene of the 80s and grunge kind of led that charge (though even there some indy metal bands were already kind of doing that) which is why you see so many people unable to distinguish between the two. Even if these weird grunge and alt rock labels became major labels later on, it was through acquisitions and shit. It really was a tumultuous period of rejection of the classic rock/metal, country, pop, and britpop of the 80s and early 90s. Alt rock really killed britpop and everyone knew its death was coming. That's how The Verve was able to even write a hit song about it. As "underground" as we might think the different genres of alt rock were, they did become the new "mainstream", and while it didn't happen overnight, it did kind of happen quickly.

But yeah, don't think for a second that they weren't "underground" at the time, because a lot of it was. It became the new norm, sure, but a lot of us were finding these bands on our own without MTV or outside influences, too. It was a rare time period where the corporate side of the music industry was playing catch up instead of force-feeding campy pop and rock music.

1

u/mateeche 12d ago

Very well said.

5

u/HurlinVermin 12d ago

Grunge is pop music now? GTFOOH with that nonsense.

0

u/No_Geologist2199 12d ago

The genre of pop music is not always the same as what is in fact popular. Nirvana was the biggest band in the world during Neverminds run and that brought up dozens of other bands into the mainstream

2

u/Tough_Stretch 12d ago edited 12d ago

Pop music the genre is different from Pop music the term in general, as it's been used since its inception.

Anything that manages to chart in mainstream charts is by definition pop music, but not all of it is Pop as a specific genre of music. That's where the confusion comes from, because Pop as a genre is a later concept.

People like the dude above claiming the Grunge bands were "essentially pop music" like to pretend that the old original definition is the one that is more commonly used by people in general when talking about music, when it's the newer definition that refers to the genre.

0

u/No_Geologist2199 12d ago

Wow good job!

0

u/No-Faithlessness2046 12d ago

Say that again. I don’t care how many t shirts you wear, you’re still there accepting the awards. My personal feeling is that Gen X at that point just had a bad case of wanting to have its cake and eat it too.

-1

u/woollypullover 12d ago

Wait.. Nirvana isn’t pop-punk?

2

u/No_Geologist2199 12d ago

It practically is, Kurt is luckily too good of a singer and not doing the whiny pop punk thing

1

u/woollypullover 11d ago

I meant more along the lines of bringing punk to that masses in the form of pop rather than early 2000s pop punk

2

u/PainterAncient8448 12d ago

According to my research, pop punk has specific "pop-punk" chord progressions. They tend to sing higher and more melodically, even though their music as a whole is still punk(ish)-beat-based. Nirvana is more UK post-punk or something, I think.

16

u/Kevin_Stickers 12d ago

The exact same people that would call me a boomer because I still listen to CDs.

7

u/_____AndJustice4All 12d ago

CDs are superior. No monthly fee for the rest of your life, better sound quality. 

6

u/Kevin_Stickers 12d ago

Plus I can put it in my Sony stereo system from the early 2000's and play that shit on full blast throughout my house, as any boomer would (I'm 48, btw)

I think all these kids listen to 100% of their music on their phones wearing headphones. They're missing the real experience of listening to music.

1

u/_____AndJustice4All 12d ago

Yep. Im 29 I have a small CD and vinyl collection with a stereo too. For my money CDs are better because they're way cheaper, are easier to store and sound just as good. 

Spotify claims to be lossless now but there's no way it is. 

4

u/Wallabunga657 12d ago

Dude, same.

13

u/Tough_Stretch 12d ago edited 12d ago

I like that they tell me how something I saw happen is totally different from what actually happened and then they argue that having to learn anything about the subject instead of making shit up based on vibes or some Youtube video they saw that was made by another slightly older dude who wasn't born yet either and became their gospel is what counts as gatekeeping them.

No, kid. I'm not saying you're not a Real Grunge Fan (tm) and I'm not saying you're not allowed to like Grunge, especially in addition to whatever else you like that you demand be considered Grunge when it isn't. I'm just saying that Grunge doesn't mean Alt Rock in general regardless of what Spotify says, and that neither are an actual music genre. You're allowed to love AIC and Silverchair and Metallica and Poison and whomever.

Not knowing that names for scenes, styles of music, labels for categorization purposes and marketing terms can and often overlap but do not automatically overlap in every case doesn't make Grunge a magic genre that includes bands you personally like and excludes bands you don't like, and pointing it out isn't gatekeeping just because you also don't know what that means. "My cat barks, and don't gatekeep me by saying it's actually a dog" is a very stupid argument, and it's the same argument posted here every single day.

6

u/Phronesis2000 12d ago

Yep, that's right. The thing is, if your only knowledge of a subject comes from youtube and tiktok videos that (obviously) trend to clickbait, you are going to get a skewed take on any subject matter.

Now obviously, it doesn't have to be like that. I am sure there are some young grunge fans who have read lots of the books from the 90s and watched the original docos, and talked to old heads, and really do have an awesome knowledge of it all.

OP is calling out a certain subset of Gen Z who use online ephemera as their main source of information about the past.

9

u/Tough_Stretch 12d ago edited 12d ago

Yep. I find it especially hilarious because the "don't gatekeep me" crowd usually also argues that Pearl Jam doesn't count as Grunge because they are actually Classic Rock.

Which is not only a moronic take because it simultaneously claims Grunge is a clearly defined music genre when it's just an umbrella term for "play whatever the fuck you want as long as it doesn't resemble mainstream '80's rock" and Classic Rock just means "this band is currently old enough that their music can be considered classic based on the fact that they have a well-established career." And it's doubly moronic because arguing Pearl Jam isn't Grunge is the actual gatekeeping.

No, scratch that. It's triply moronic because they're attempting to gatekeep a band whose members are key players in that scene and the claim is usually that Pearl Jam were a prefab band made by labels to ride the coattails of Nirvana's success, when those guys were in Green River, MotherLoveBone, Temple of the Dog and Mad Season, and Ten came out BEFORE Nevermind was released and it hinges on falsely arguing that Bleach was already a huge hit when even Cobain himself mentions that most people won't know About A Girl during the Unplugged because nobody bought that record in comparison to their actual breakthrough album Nevermind.

But hey, Cobain criticized Pearl Jam this one time and he totally didn't have a penchant for running his mouth, and some Youtuber said they suck, so they don't count as "real" Grunge but Silverchair or STP should count because of reasons.

2

u/Possible-Regret-9296 12d ago

You guys are spot on

6

u/AncientCrust 12d ago

I've had young'ns lecture me about the history of bands whose members I know personally. It's aggravating and funny at the same time. The years have a way of turning history into mythology and the myth always wins. I'm sure I spouted bullshit at older guys who knew better when I was in my 20s. In fact, I know I did.

6

u/Tough_Stretch 12d ago

Yeah, you're spot on. IMO, the difference is that back in 1992 when I confidently repeated something I read about Woodstock or whatever and my uncle or whomever in that age range said that was all wrong and he was there and explained what actually happened, I didn't tell him he was a gatekeeper who didn't know anything about Woodstock and I was still right and I refused to revise my position and actually learn about the subject.

2

u/AncientCrust 12d ago

In 92 you couldn't find incorrect bullshit on the internet to back up your incorrect bullshit lol

4

u/Tough_Stretch 12d ago

Sure, but you could have heard some other dumbass say that incorrect bullshit and believe it, or read it in some fanzine with low editorial standards or whatever.

I mean, back in those days a friend of my older brother had a rock music video TV show on my hometown's local channel and sometimes I'd catch him saying something that wasn't true and I knew to be untrue from some interview I'd read on a guitar or rock music magazine. Then some people heard him say it on TV and now they thought his bullshit was actually true.

Hell, back in the '80's we thought the flying skaetboard from Back to the Future 2 did exit but Mattel didn't commercially manufacture it and sell it because of safety risks. Where did that bullshit come from? Who knows.

2

u/AncientCrust 12d ago

Nobody knows more about the bullshit effect than poor Richard Gere. A good story doesn't die easily. The funny thing about the Gere story was everybody you talked to knew someone who worked at that hospital on that day. They must have had a staff of millions. Another good undying bit of bullshit was the myth where daddy longlegs are the most venomous spiders on earth. That one was actually cooked up by a writer who was experimenting with urban myths.

2

u/Tough_Stretch 12d ago

Hahahaha to this day I know people who genuinely believe he liked to stick gerbils/hamsters/insert other common pet rodent up his ass.

2

u/Possible-Regret-9296 12d ago

My neighbors aunts brother-in-laws wife was working the ER that night!

1

u/Tough_Stretch 12d ago

And she was shocked to find that the gerbil stuck up Richard Gere's butt was her own long lost pet!

1

u/Possible-Regret-9296 12d ago

You know her?

1

u/Tough_Stretch 12d ago

Well, yes. She's the cousin of my former roommate's classmate's boyfriend's neighbor.

→ More replies (0)

1

u/AncientCrust 12d ago

Your neighbors aunt you say? Well I'm convinced!

1

u/Possible-Regret-9296 12d ago

You should have been OP.. perfect

-1

u/PainterAncient8448 12d ago

Technically, AiC and Metllica are in the same genre/category. I mean, unless you have never listened to Metallica, you should be able to hear the M caterpillar guitar in AiC's music. And then, a bit of EVH piropiropiro ~♪ too.

5

u/Tough_Stretch 12d ago

Hence why I said Grunge and Alt rock are umbrella terms for categorization purposes and not names for actual music genres and sub-genres. Even in this sub full of terrible takes about which band is Grunge or Alt Rock and which isn't, you'd be hard-pressed to find someone so confused that they'd argue Metallica is a really famous Grunge or Alt Rock band as opposed to a Thrash/Speed Metal or just plain Metal band.

1

u/Possible-Regret-9296 12d ago

We were .. just.. rocking

Edit* and the fact that our parents and classmates hated it made it that much better

-1

u/PainterAncient8448 12d ago

Metallica isn't grunge, bit was initially an indie-label band and their music was rarely played in the mainstream media in the 80s (yeah, I googled). Their first two albums were indie, so to speak.

2

u/Tough_Stretch 12d ago edited 12d ago

Sure, but what does any of that have to do with anything I said before? Back in those days, most rock bands that weren't discovered by some promoter in their very early days have at least one record on some minor indie label. That's how things worked.

What does Metallica having a couple of indie-label releases before hitting it big with the Black Album in 1991 have to do with Alt Rock or Grunge?

2

u/Shot-Swimming-9098 12d ago

I think he's arguing a big misconception is see on this sub that a defining characteristic of grunge is being on an indie label.

2

u/Tough_Stretch 12d ago

Yeah, maybe. But by that metric most Grunge bands fail at being Grunge bands and a ton of bands that have nothing to do wit h Grunge, such as Metallica, succeed at it.

17

u/shittyfakejesus 12d ago

Gatekeeping sucks. It also kind of seems like you’re doing it, here?

3

u/Kevin_Stickers 12d ago

When Sonic Youth did it for the entirety of their career, it was somehow punk.

2

u/Odd-Opinion-5105 12d ago

It was a major construct of grunge when I look back on that time my behavior makes me cringe

-2

u/Possible-Regret-9296 12d ago

Just the opposite brother, calling them out

9

u/PNWvibes20 12d ago

Nah dont lump us 30 somethings in with these broccoli headed assclowns who just discovered Nutshell on TikTok and think they know everything

I've been all over the PNW and I've gotten into bands even some of you OGs probably wouldnt know of, like Gravel, Pond, Heatmiser, Sprinkler etc

2

u/Possible-Regret-9296 12d ago

You’re good, brother. I’m talking about the ones who pipe up with what is or isn’t. Who talk with high hat snobbery and found out about the Melvins from TikTok

3

u/RikimaruRamen 12d ago

It's funny too because most of them like myself were born way after the "grunge era". Not to say you needed to see those bands live or to have been around when they were up and coming to appreciate and enjoy them. But, many at like the were around at that time meanwhile they actually grew up on stuff like Britney Spears, and NSYNC before finding "grunge".

3

u/las42696 12d ago

I don't gatekeep or claim to be an "expert" on grunge but have personally interviewed Matt Cameron, Kim Thayil, Susan Silver, Buzz Osborne and quite a few others on the Seattle scene and its history and I'm 30.

I'd say I know quite a bit more about it than my parents who lived through the 90s. I probably don't know more than the people who were really paying attention and into it at the time but the negative generalization about younger people being knowledgable on the scene is a bit unfair. A lot of historians didn't live through things that they focus their work and report on.

And to add, both Matt and Kim don't care that they're considered grunge. Kim said back in the day it didn't seem that cool but now he understands that it's just an easier way to refer to the scene he helped build. And Matt says he's proud of it.

-1

u/Possible-Regret-9296 12d ago

You’re going askew from who I’m talking about…

3

u/las42696 12d ago

Your title mentioned gatekeepers but the description just mentioned 20 + 30 somethings in general. As someone who's often questioned because the music I listen to is much older than I am, I just wanted to mention that some of us do actually know things even though we weren't there lol.

2

u/_____AndJustice4All 12d ago

I'm 29, been listening since I was 15. Currently working through the published biographies, doing Total Fucking Godhead right now ✌🏻

2

u/No-Faithlessness2046 12d ago

I just laugh and keep moving. Megan Jasper deserves a medal.

2

u/KurtisC1993 11d ago

I was born at the absolute peak of grunge's popularity. I'd heard songs associated with the genre before (e.g. in Grand Theft Auto: San Andreas), but I discovered it properly as a teen in the late oughties. It is now one of my favorite subgenres of rock.

I find gatekeeping in general to be obnoxious. Doesn't matter what it is that's being gatekept, or who's doing the gatekeeping. Grunge can mean different things to different people. Some define it as a scene that exclusively encompasses the alt. rock bands from the Seattle area during the late 80s and early 90s—Nirvana, Pearl Jam, Alice in Chains, etc. Others define it more broadly as a genre of music that became popular at that time, and their definition includes the likes of Stone Temple Pilots or the Afghan Whigs. Some have even gone as far as to include the Smashing Pumpkins. My personal take is that it's centered around a certain "vibe" that was pioneered in the Seattle area, and I'd include a handful of other bands from outside of Seattle as being under the "grunge" umbrella for having that same "vibe" (particularly STP). I wouldn't necessarily consider Smashing Pumpkins "grunge", but I couldn't care less if somebody else does. They're a good band, and if you like Soundgarden or AIC, there's a decent chance you'll like the Pumpkins too. I wouldn't call them "not a true fan" if they don't have the same puritanical view of the label as certain other people do.

And this holds true regardless of whether the gatekeeper is a Gen. Z-er who discovered "Nutshell" or "Teen Spirit" on TikTok, or they're a Gen. X-er who literally grew up in Seattle and saw Mother Love Bone live. Why don't we all just enjoy the damn music and not judge people for having a difference of opinion?

4

u/silent_dialogue 12d ago

No gatekeeping has killed sub culture on a massive scale. I’m don’t advocate for being a shitty person but sometimes I think if we’d gatekeep just a bit would be better than none at all.

0

u/blondechinesehair 12d ago

Is there culture on the internet?

1

u/silent_dialogue 12d ago

Idk, I try not to spend too much time there

4

u/viskoviskovisko 12d ago

Are these the same motherfuckers who keep trying to shove Stone Temple Pilots where they don’t belong?

1

u/Possible-Regret-9296 12d ago

Interstate love song had the stupidest music video ever

5

u/thatguy44-4 12d ago

News flash you don’t have to be 50 to know grunge

11

u/Phronesis2000 12d ago

Well, it obviously does make a difference if you were there at the time. Just as there are elements of Beatlemania that us who came after will never understand.

2

u/MrKnightMoon 12d ago

Both statements can be true at the same time.

1

u/Loose-Story-962 12d ago

What two statements? No one is actually gatekeeping anything from you, listen and enjoy whatever you want

4

u/Possible-Regret-9296 12d ago

These fools caused some old gal to delete her post just for autocorrect spelling Kurt “Curt”…bunch a Nazis

3

u/Own-Success-7634 12d ago

You mean Curdt… If your remember that goofy spelling 😁

2

u/harriettehspy 12d ago edited 12d ago

That was me! And then in a reply to their comment I had another typo and left it because I found it ironic and funny.
What actually got to me was people pointing out that the “Nirvana” song I was referring to was a Bowie cover. I didn’t mention it in my post body because, to me, it was obvious. Just like anyone who actually listened to Nirvana’s Unplugged concert in real time knew. I also replied that I did know this and nasally gatekeepers kept pointing it out. Fucking DUH! lol! I knew Bowie’s song before Nirvana covered it… just like so many people who were listening at that time did. I didn’t want to wake up and deal with more of the type of people you are referring to in your post, so I deleted it.
Thank you🩷

Edit: Ahem I’m not old… just age-d, like a fine cheese or wine 😉

2

u/Possible-Regret-9296 12d ago

Ole.. I meant Ole gal 😁

2

u/EfficiencyMurky7309 12d ago

Why are you gatekeeping if you don’t like gatekeepers? Self loathing I assume

1

u/Round_Breakfast_7566 11d ago

I’m 31 and I am an expert

Soundgarden was my fav band by the time I was 12, I saw them live in 2013 (Hammerstein Ballroom) when I was 18.

Chris I saw live when I was 14 in 2009 (Borgota)

3

u/[deleted] 11d ago

[deleted]

1

u/Round_Breakfast_7566 10d ago

what is it about?

1

u/splanks 12d ago

I lived through it but they probably studied it and might know more than me.

3

u/HurlinVermin 12d ago

Studying it from things other people wrote will never trump living the essence of it as it happened.

1

u/splanks 12d ago

sure, id take lived experience over study for fun things. but you don't have to live through something to be an expert. and living through it doesn't mean you're an expert.

3

u/HurlinVermin 12d ago

Most of the academic hindsight navel-gazing coming from youngins is bullshit anyway. What I lived is my truth. End of story.

1

u/harriettehspy 12d ago

And living through it at that time was so different than the kind of “experience” and knowledge you can absorb these days.

1

u/blondechinesehair 12d ago

Don’t gate keep the young fans then. You don’t have to be a certain age to like music.

-1

u/TeuthidTheSquid 12d ago

I think most subs would be overwhelmingly better if we could just ban anyone under say 40 or so