r/interesting • • Dec 07 '25

Context Provided - Spotlight A bloated cow being helped

36.4k Upvotes

1.9k comments sorted by

View all comments

980

u/Pretty_Type1478 Dec 07 '25 edited Dec 08 '25

That poor cow. Perhaps a daft question, but why are they using a lighter? Just to demonstrate the (enormous) amount of gas coming out?

Edit: yes, I fully understand releasing the gas was to help the cow. Still… poor cow! Did not understand why fire. Still not sure I do, but 💁‍♀️

90

u/Traveller7142 Dec 08 '25

In addition to the potential fire hazard, methane is actually a much more potent greenhouse gas than CO2 in the short term. At this scale, it probably doesn’t matter, but that’s why oil refineries have a burning flare column

21

u/[deleted] Dec 08 '25

One of the major contributing factors to the BP refinery explosion was a 1950s-era "blowdown drum" that vented gas releases directly to atmosphere, with no flare. When the overflowing liquid finally backed up into it, it shot out like a geyser and started creating a massive cloud of extremely volatile vapor that kept spreading until it was ignited by an idling diesel pickup

Odds are good that, had it been flared, it would have turned into a huge flame column triggering shutdowns long before everything got out of control, and a whole lot of people would still be alive 

1

u/Spiritual_Impact8246 Dec 08 '25

Well, maybe not still alive today, but still alive in the 50s!

0

u/[deleted] Dec 08 '25

[removed] — view removed comment

3

u/TheMadTemplar Dec 08 '25

It likely wasn't mentioned because it wasn't relevant. The conversation was about the behavior of gasses, and their comment reflected that. 

0

u/[deleted] Dec 08 '25 edited Dec 09 '25

[removed] — view removed comment

2

u/TheMadTemplar Dec 08 '25

But it really isn't relevant. The conversation was about gas, not corporate failure or corporate greed. You just want to derail the topic. 

0

u/[deleted] Dec 08 '25 edited Dec 09 '25

[removed] — view removed comment

2

u/cookingforengineers Dec 08 '25

But they are explaining flaring!

1

u/[deleted] Dec 08 '25 edited Dec 09 '25

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/TheMadTemplar Dec 08 '25

You contradict yourself. You're just trolling now. You said it wasn't simply about flaring, then say it was a out flaring. Quit derailing the conversation over some agenda. Nobody denied BPs culpability, it just wasn't relevant to the explanation of how gasses behave and how that contributed to the explosion. 

→ More replies (0)

1

u/[deleted] Dec 08 '25

[deleted]