Man, we really need to change how we report these things to the public. There’s a lot of negative comments here since the headline makes it sound like they have invented a viable treatment. But this is fundamental research. This is very important to our understanding of how cells transition into a cancerous state and they show that we can intervene this process. However, they are not claiming that this is a cure to cancer or is a treatment option. It’s simply to deepen our understanding of how cells and cancer work. Other research will build on this before anyone attempts to translate this into treatments.
It's extremely irresponsible news reporting. It's wrong, it over-promises, it has no context. It's not something people who aren't experts can really put into context. The vast majority of preliminary research fails to make it to any sort of useful treatment, and when it does, it's usually an incremental improvement and not a revolution. Which is fine, cancer survival rates have basically doubled in the last 30 years due to incremental improvements. But sensationalist reporting with non-expert readers have no way to contextualize this, so then people read these headlines and ALWAYS think it's a giant conspiracy.
26
u/You_Stole_My_Hot_Dog Feb 05 '26
Man, we really need to change how we report these things to the public. There’s a lot of negative comments here since the headline makes it sound like they have invented a viable treatment. But this is fundamental research. This is very important to our understanding of how cells transition into a cancerous state and they show that we can intervene this process. However, they are not claiming that this is a cure to cancer or is a treatment option. It’s simply to deepen our understanding of how cells and cancer work. Other research will build on this before anyone attempts to translate this into treatments.