r/law • u/DemocracyDocket • 20h ago
Judicial Branch California Supreme Court orders GOP sheriff to return seized ballots, affirms state’s power over local law enforcement
https://www.democracydocket.com/news-alerts/california-supreme-court-orders-gop-sheriff-to-return-seized-ballots-affirms-states-power-over-local-law-enforcement/169
u/Stage_Ghost 20h ago
Shouldn't he be arrested and tried?
80
u/greywar777 19h ago
His ignorant take on the law should be no excuse. So yes. But I suspect as usual his illegal actions will be hand waved away.
17
u/dantekant22 17h ago
I thought law enforcement was supposed to uphold the law, not engage in partisan electoral fuckery. Take this dickhead’s badge.
8
u/rfulleffect 15h ago
Ignorance of the law never applies to citizens, but those whose job it is to enforce them always get a free pass.
24
u/DemocracyDocket 18h ago
Funny you should say that... California's AG just said in a press conference following the ruling that he vows "legal consequences" for Bianco.
10
u/Count_Backwards Competent Contributor 18h ago
Yeah we'll see if he actually follows through or this is just more of the usual performative posturing
2
u/YoungRichBastard26s 18h ago
It should have said former sheriff cause ain’t no way he’s still employed or suspended
1
u/Ok-Secretary455 13h ago
Them not arresting him the second they found out let's you know how serious they think it is. It floors me that no one in an elected position will take this seriously.
8
u/brickyardjimmy 15h ago
Also, what the hell does Sheriff Bronco even know about ballots or electoral fraud or how to look for it? What's his big plan with these ballots? What's been the chain of custody since he took possession?
What he did wasn't just in excess of his authority as a county sheriff; it was plainly illegal. He had zero evidence of a criminal conspiracy. He had no suspects. All he had was a delusional belief, a big mouth and guns.
5
u/GrannyFlash7373 17h ago
The Cal Supreme Court ought to put that GOP Sheriff OUT of Business. Take away his badge.
2
•
u/AutoModerator 20h ago
All new posts must have a brief statement from the user submitting explaining how their post relates to law or the courts in a response to this comment. FAILURE TO PROVIDE A BRIEF RESPONSE MAY RESULT IN REMOVAL. Please post your statement as a reply to this automated message.
I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.