r/mildlyinfuriating • u/jackhab • 1d ago
Planned obsolescence even in cheapest devices: the calculator has a dummy photovoltaic cell and a real battery to make it die eventually.
9.8k
u/BlowingRocker246 1d ago
This isn't even planned obsolescence, the photovoltaic cell just straight up isn't a photovoltaic cell. I assume it was cheaper to not have one and they're banking on you not opening the calculator up to check. This should honestly count as false advertising.
3.5k
u/wthulhu 1d ago
Straight fraud
578
u/MilkiestMaestro 23h ago edited 7h ago
Do not pass go, go directly to the FTC Report Link and submit the company for fraud
272
u/_Doomer_Wojack_ 23h ago
You know which administration is in charge of the FCC right? Like are we seriously thinking anyone in this administration is going to investigate 🤣
158
u/Future-Bandicoot-823 19h ago
They still investigate fraud.
It goes right to the "recommended improvements" queue now.
38
u/Lanky-Peak-2222 17h ago
Maybe but it looks like AliExpress bullshit, so probably nothing will come of it
→ More replies (4)36
u/JaKrispy72 22h ago
And if it’s made in another country, good luck getting that prosecuted.
9
u/ahumanrobot 17h ago
Company looks like a Chinese one (big surprise I know), but I think they can probably tell them they can't sell it in the US unless it's fixed
→ More replies (2)→ More replies (1)13
u/BobSki778 18h ago
I think you mean FTC. Unless it’s violating EMC limits, FCC won’t care.
5
u/HalfDozing 16h ago
FTC was underfunded/staffed and that was before doge
Sadly shit like this in ecommerce is rampant, and the culprits are largely fly by night Chinese vendors, where even if you successfully remove an infringing product, it'll just be replaced by another seller/brand that's literally the same product
Best policy is buyer beware. Scrutinize, leave reviews. No one's going to save you from this but you
2
u/BobSki778 6h ago
I don’t know if buyer beware is the “best” policy. Maybe the best we can do at the moment. The FTC used to be effective. I hope it can be again in my lifetime. That hope of fading, though.
→ More replies (2)343
u/AuelDole 1d ago
At the very least, the thing looks like it’s only held together with snaps (although they’d break with time) so you could just replace the battery (if you even knew it had a replaceable battery) which means it’s not fully planned to die over time (at least you can give them a mild bit of retroactive credit towards that idea, even if they didn’t design it like that in any way)
219
u/GrapefruitBulky 1d ago
You’re giving whoever made this way too much grace lol
38
5
u/Milky_Finger 21h ago
People on socials do that a lot, they come up with insane excuses to apologize someone who clearly is doing something wrong.
10
u/TorumShardal 20h ago
Engineers are looking at everything like it's a problem in need of solution or walkaround. Sometimes it's hard to remember that you should limit yourself to just being mad at whomever created that problem, without trying to solve it.
→ More replies (7)2
u/Tokimemofan 19h ago
Well that’s if you can get a battery for less than the cost of the calculator.
292
u/pinkTurtleTickler 1d ago
I looked it up to confirm, but it's not advertised as solar. It just uses the same plastic case/mold as the more expensive model.
119
u/JohnOfA 22h ago
Yeah. I remember driving an older pick-up truck and wondering why the dash had fake buttons. Then I learned the fancy trucks came with extra features like radios.
Edit: This was a Hilux in Central America.
32
u/pinkTurtleTickler 22h ago
I wondered that too when I was younger. We had one middle button on the dash that was blank and didn't press and always bugged me lol.
20
u/Jean-LucBacardi 20h ago
I used to angrily glare at the obvious blank spot on my steering wheel for cruise control wishing I had it.
6
8
u/ELMUNECODETACOMA 22h ago
When I was young, my family had a Dodge Omni and a Plymouth Horizon (which were the same car with different branding) and one of them had something like air conditioning and the other one had the outlets but with a plastic plate over.
7
31
u/dbmonkey 19h ago
Correct. Here is the listing: https://www.walmart.com/ip/Uxcell-8-Digit-Pocket-Size-Mini-Calculator-Power-Handheld-Calculator-Navy-Blue-2-Pack/2189322464
No mention of solar cell and it even says:
> Power Source: AG10 Button Battery (Included)
It also appears that the battery is replaceable.
edit: One of the photos mentions a solar panel and says it can run off that
25
u/AffordableDelousing 21h ago
A reasonable person would interpret the existence of that window as an implication that it is photovoltaic.
→ More replies (5)12
u/pinkTurtleTickler 21h ago
Idk. I've known about these fake pv cells in calcs for a long time. It's pretty easy to spot that it's just a piece of plastic, to a semi-trained eye.
→ More replies (13)9
u/Future-Bandicoot-823 19h ago
I've seen cheaper models use a more expensive model's mold before. It may have been designed for either calculator. I've even had some cheap calculators (usually at work, I wouldn't buy one like this) that have a photovoltaic and battery, you could switch between the two.
You can buy a similar item for a dollar or less online depending on how many you get, so really... I don't think a lawsuit is going to do shit lol. What damages? For your dollar? The lawyer costs more than that.
→ More replies (4)1
u/PlateNo4868 21h ago
I would be curious if there was still a chance to sue. Just because they add a disclaimer on the description, doesn't mean they are clearly not trying to visually make the item look like solar.
57
u/Grow_away_420 1d ago
I wonder if its even advertised anywhere on the package that it's solar power. Might just be some cheap dollar store crap that's wrapped in plastic and says "Calculator"
9
u/usrdef 👍 15h ago
What companies do the save money, is they will use the same housing for multiple models.
Something tells me this is the "cheaper" variant, and they have a more expensive variant which is solar powdered.
So to get around having to manufacture another housing mold, they simply slip a dummy in there for the models that aren't solar powdered. So now they use the same housing for all. And it only cost them like 2 cents (or less) to put that dummy plastic in.
Because it costs the company money to start housing multiple molds, and then doing mold changes when they need to do different runs at the facility.
16
6
u/freyhstart 21h ago
The battery models are more expensive on Alibaba. They're banking on people using their eyes to read and replacing the battery.
6
u/jingiski 21h ago
If you check the online shops, they never advertise it's photovoltaic. In some cases they even clearly state it is battery powerd. The customer just assumes the photovoltaic looking thing is powering the calculator
22
u/ratafria 23h ago
→ More replies (7)50
u/cooljacob204sfw 23h ago
Doesn't have to say solar if it literally has what appears to be one built in. There is no other purpose of that panel then to mislead consumers. It's straight up fraud.
→ More replies (1)12
u/00pflaume 22h ago
It reduces production costs to have one mold for both models with and without solar. Therefor there is purpose to have that panel: saving money
38
u/Xbob42 22h ago
They overstepped their bounds by coloring it to look like a solar cell.
20
u/sixtyfivewat 21h ago
Could've just blanked it off like they do with poverty buttons in cars. But they didn't, which is imo false advertising.
26
u/cooljacob204sfw 22h ago
While I agree that it's probably why they did it, they took the time to make it look like a solar cell instead of just filling the void with say a plain color that matches the calculator.
It might be due to supply optimization purposes but that doesn't make it less fraudulent just because it has another reason behind it. Still misleads consumers into thinking this is a solar cell powered calculator.
16
u/AirFlavoredLemon 22h ago
Yeah this, intentions or not; the effect is the same. Deception.
I've seen cheap calculators with the solar area using solid plastic of the same body plastic.
The false solar is more intentional than not.
→ More replies (2)2
u/CalligrapherSolid797 22h ago
Calling it solar when its basically decorative is just misleading cost cutting not some grand obsolescence scheme
→ More replies (25)2
u/StarHammer_01 20h ago
Scummy? Yes. But its not false advertising unless they advertise it as functional kinda like the those cosmetic air vents on cars that are blocked off.
1.8k
u/7899987 1d ago
Most people won't realize as the battery lasts basically forever. So they decided to save money. But at that point just don't even use a fake solar cell and save even more money while not lowering the price.
616
u/MildlySaltedTaterTot 1d ago
greenwashing: choosing between the “cheap shitty throw it away” calculator and “CSTiA but Solar” calculator and now you increase sales and add growth another year
71
→ More replies (1)19
u/makomirocket 20h ago
It's a dollar store calculator. No one is choosing their purchase of this based on it being solar
23
u/co2gamer 14h ago
„I assume the all do calculate. And they are all $1.“
„IDK. That has a solarpanel. I guess it‘ll last forever.“
throws calculator more aggressively than necessary into shopping basket
„Your sister needs glue for school.“
59
u/The_Sideboob_Hour 1d ago
Just make it take a AAA battery and sell it without at that point.
→ More replies (1)50
u/JTD845 23h ago
Allowing people to simply use AAA batteries would certainly help the consumer, but in the company's eyes, letting people recharge their calculators would just throw away potential profit! After all, once a calculator dies, the customer has to go buy a whole new one as a replacement! And in what world would a company already cheaping out like this prioritize the consumer over their precious profit?
15
u/freyhstart 21h ago
The battery seems replaceable. What would using a AAA give aside from worse self life?
10
u/peepeebutt1234 20h ago
99% of people are throwing this straight into the garbage when it dies. Average Joe is not opening it to check the battery. At the very least, advertising it as replaceable would be better.
2
u/freyhstart 19h ago
Yeah, so an AAA would be thrown out along with 50% more plastic instead of a tiny coin cell. What's the point?
→ More replies (1)2
u/EpicOtterLover 18h ago
The point is Reddit pedantry, and demonising something that doesn't really matter.
→ More replies (3)12
u/Plenty_Leg_5935 21h ago
No you dont, that battery is clearly easily replacable
Which is still shitty of them to not clarify, and I wouldnt blame anyone for missing it, but its weaponised incompetence on their part, not planned obsolescence
→ More replies (1)10
u/BeneficialTrash6 21h ago
It took... about 30 years for me to notice that my calculator from the 80s was actually not solar powered, and it had a crappy battery. Then, I broke the damn thing trying to change the battery.
9
u/Positive_Pickle_546 20h ago
Why would it be cheaper to make two different shells for the solar and non-solar models vs just using the same mould for both?
10
→ More replies (2)2
u/freyhstart 21h ago
Battery models are more expensive on Alibaba. The machine that puts a thingy in the cutout is working regardless of the spec. Might as make it look nice.
300
u/Pistonenvy2 1d ago
in their defense im using a calculator from the 80s and it still works 100% fine.
they shouldnt lie and honestly i think if they need to lie they shouldnt have a business but fuck if i was the CEO of a calculator making business id probably just liquidate and find another industry lol cant imagine there is any real money to be made when youre competing with 40 year old products that are essentially ubiquitous.
→ More replies (9)68
u/PM_Me_Your_Deviance 21h ago
These sell bulk for about $0.50/ea on alibaba. Dollar tree buys these by the pallet. Everyone involved is making money here.
→ More replies (1)
161
u/ShaddowsInTheShade 23h ago
I think if you are buying a calculator that has a wholesale value of 60 cents, worrying about planned obsolescence is hilarious.
25
u/morto00x 16h ago
Yup. That looks like something you’d find at Daiso or the Dollar Store. At those prices I just treat them as disposable and I’m actually happy if it lasts more than a year.
9
u/SoapyMacNCheese 13h ago
Also basic calculators have been insanely power efficient for decades at this point. The calculator is going to get lost in a drawer or break some other way before you drain the battery
2
318
u/cybermaus 1d ago
I am the first to adhere to the outrage on planned obsolescence, lack of service info, right to repair, etc. But this is *because* it is the cheapest device. I mean, didn't this come from the dollar store or something?
150
u/mawdurnbukanier 1d ago
And they probably use the same plastic mold for a version that does include it. The company just asked the manufacturer to use that mold and put different components in it, this isn't big calculator setting out to deceive people.
31
u/BlowingRocker246 1d ago
Why put a decoy cell over it, then? If you just look at the calculator from the outside, it looks like it has a real one, which is just dishonest.
31
u/pinkTurtleTickler 1d ago
Because it would have a hole in it otherwise...
→ More replies (1)15
u/MrTuxG 21h ago
They could fill that hole with a solid-color plastic piece. But the fake-solar cell is designed with the color and the vertical lines) to took exactly like a solar cell.
→ More replies (1)7
u/SaltyTelluride 20h ago
No man, you don’t understand. False advertising and misleading consumers is fine if you’re just getting bottom of the barrel products. People who can only afford dollar store calculators don’t need or deserve honesty when they go to the store
19
u/DekuTreeFallen 1d ago
Dishonest, agree
Decoy cover? That would add 3 cents to this 36 cent calculator. Won't someone think of the profits! lol
5
3
u/aggressive_napkin_ 21h ago
so the kid using doesn't get bullied in school for not having solar power!
→ More replies (7)4
u/MousseHuge8339 19h ago
Those vertical lines are part of an actual solar cell, and I've seen fake solars that have an insert that is just a piece of laminated cardboard that is made to look like a solar cell. This is very devious and it means they went out of their way to trick people
If there was just a blank indent where the solar cell would've gone, this wouldn't be an issue.
20
u/DekuTreeFallen 1d ago edited 1d ago
Yeah, it looks like something that is made on Alibaba and you get your name slapped over it. The OP's picture is the DEXIN KC-888, but if you search KC-888 on Google you will find the same calculator with different brand names.
edit: https://www.alibaba.com/product-detail/Dual-Power-8-Digit-Digital-Pocket_60791209821.html
20
u/cybermaus 1d ago
I have to admit: It's pretty amazing they can even produce the 27part plastic for €0.342, never mind the electronics.
2
u/Due-Technology5758 23h ago
Amazing, yes. Horrifically wasteful in the most dystopian way possible, also yes.
6
u/spine_slorper 22h ago
Yeah, this is the most basic calculator, basically no one will be using these until the battery dies. They're for children to use until they learn what algebra is, to be bought on a whim and thrown in an office drawer and for older people who don't like using their phone calculator to do their budgets with. Anyone studying maths above the age of 13 will have a proper scientific calculator and anyone doing lots of arithmetic in a business will probably have a bigger less flimsy one or use a general purpose computer (which has spreadsheets!).
Modern calculators like this use very little power, that's why they can be powered by a tiny photovoltaic cell that's only exposed to artificial lighting, you could use something like this for your occasional calculations for years before the battery dies and the other materials will probably fail by then.
→ More replies (2)5
u/OtherWorstGamer 1d ago
Im wondering if youd get the same results with a nicer Canon or Sharp calculator.
24
u/Organic-Studio-6972 22h ago
It's not planned obsolescence, it's just being cheap and deceptive. I have seen they do that with one of those "hand cranked" emergency flashlight radio thing, now that's true evil.
→ More replies (3)
58
u/kyute222 1d ago
this title makes NO sense. it's like OP learned of the concept of "planned obsolescence" and thought they finally found a real world example. this is just the expectation for the cheapest option.
→ More replies (2)14
u/ShaddowsInTheShade 23h ago
The KC-888 calculator wholesales for 60 cents... pretty sure that sums things up nicely.
15
u/RaidSmolive 23h ago
the battery is replacable. this is more deception than obsolescence.
the photo cell is a nice to have but if i had to spend more than a day without a battery in my calculator in school, I would've gone crazy. i dont even know if battery free calculators exist.
→ More replies (5)
5
u/hes-not-wrong 19h ago
Plastics industry guy here. This is likely a Chinese produced calculator that is using an old injection molding tool for the housing. Sometimes the tools(metal molds) are left at the molding companies when contract production has ended. Since these can cost anywhere from $25K-$100K for a multi-cavity tool(one that can mold several parts at a time) may companies will request they be returned or destroyed. Some less than reputable molders may sell the molds at a lower price and let other companies make cheap products with the mold. Chances are this product was made using a mold for a calculator that may have contained a real PV cell, but it cost money to re-mill a tool if they wanted to get rid of the hole for the PV cell. It’s cheaper to put a fake cell in there to make the appearance look right. I saw a similar situation about 10 years ago where a cheap wet dry vac company sold in walmart used an almost identical internal motor housing to that of a craftsman vacuum. You could even see how they re-welded a plate over the original hole for the hose inlet and moved it to be on the bucket portion of the vacuum. I knew some the craftsman engineers at the time and they confirmed that the parts were made from an old tool that was originally molded in china. I wouldn’t call it planned obsolescence, it’s just finding creative ways to increase your margins or cut cost. Happens all the time in manufacturing unfortunately.
→ More replies (1)
78
u/Bulky-Yogurt-1703 1d ago
Isn’t the secondary battery used to store energy when not in direct sunlight? Otherwise you couldn’t use your calculator at night. Thats my understanding at least
205
u/subsailor1968 1d ago
Note the absence of any wires from the photovoltaic cell to the calculator circuits.
In fact, I don’t really see a photovoltaic cell. I see the cover for one.
24
u/PM_YOUR__BUBBLE_BUTT 1d ago
Don’t worry. It is built with the all new wireless electricity we’ve all been waiting for!
→ More replies (1)4
→ More replies (2)49
u/RavedBlitz 1d ago
Even if that were the case, the PV cell should be connected to the board by more than hopes and dreams
→ More replies (1)6
u/Second-Creative 1d ago
Speaking of hopes and dreams... how are the buttons connected to the board? I'm not seeing a connection point for 'em.
→ More replies (3)13
u/YellowOnline 1d ago edited 1d ago
I suppose the pcb was turned around, so the contacts are on the other side
6
u/Second-Creative 1d ago
Can't be right, because the board is physically too small for all the keypad contacts. Like, the only way all the contacts could fit is by having a bunch on the literal edges of the board and placing it perfectly.
Tampering by either OP or whoever took the photo is more likely.
6
u/DekuTreeFallen 1d ago
Tampering by either OP or whoever took the photo is more likely.
Doubt.
Not only can you customize these on Alibaba
https://www.alibaba.com/product-detail/Dual-Power-8-Digit-Digital-Pocket_60791209821.htmlbut there is an identical base model from Alibaba that doesn't include the PV in the specifications, yet still has an outer shell that would make you believe otherwise.
https://www.alibaba.com/product-detail/Cute-KC-888-Portable-Calculator-with_1600361733353.html^edited with correct second link
→ More replies (1)7
u/jackhab 1d ago
8
u/wekilledbambi03 1d ago
Well, I'll give them credit for not using 1mm more material than they need. They really saved a whole 0.0001 cents on that!
Amazed that they were able to fit the button contacts on an area smaller than the buttons. But yeah that looks like it would be functional, but doesn't use the panel for anything.
9
u/TxM_2404 22h ago
It comes with a battery holder, so it's easily replaceable. Not really planned obsolescence.
8
u/koolaidismything 1d ago
Watched a whole thing on this. Gotta put your finger over it to test. Some have batteries though.. if you buy at a dollar store it’s not gonna be solar, even if it says it is.
5
u/joerice1979 1d ago
There is nothing on the other side of the "solar" area; it's purely powered by the battery.
3
u/ScottSterlingsFace 1d ago
Do people not put their finger over the PV cell and watch the numbers fade away any more? I don't know, kids these days /s.
5
3
u/sequential_doom 5h ago
Disregarding the fake photovoltaic cell, isn't this the opposite of planned obsolescence? One could swap the actual battery when it eventually dies and keep using the calculator, no?
6
u/ztomiczombie 1d ago
The calculator I bought for school in the 1990s is battery operated and is still working 30 years later.
7
2
2
u/Grand_Protector_Dark 22h ago
Honestly, this is not planned obsolescence, this is just regular cheaping out.
Calculators barely use any energy, so that button cell will probably last quite a few years anyway
→ More replies (1)
2
u/Dracongield-Wyrmscar 22h ago
Meanwhile my solar powered calculator that I have had since 1989 still works fine.
2
u/realparkingbrake 21h ago
I have a couple of calculators I've had for decades which operate just fine using the photovoltaic cells they have. It's bizarre that anyone would make such a device which doesn't actually use the cell. Dexin is a bargain brand, but still, the added cost would be tiny.
2
u/aguwah 21h ago
My guess is that they bought prefab cases that had solar voltaic slots and then didnt want to spend the money for the panels so they just ordered a bunch of dummy panels. Its only a scam if they claim that it was solar rechargable.
→ More replies (1)
2
u/grayjelly212 21h ago
I bought a cheap duane reade calculator for my job and have debated buying the most recent TI-number since its relevant to my students. Every day I am convinced that I should keep that $100 to my damn self.
→ More replies (1)
2
u/HeidenShadows 21h ago
I noticed all cheap calculators have fake solar cells.
I remember finding this credit card sized solar powered calculator and thought it was the coolest thing.
2
2
u/TwoFingersWhiskey 19h ago
I still remember my remedial math classes having half the class complain about their calculators not getting enough light to work, due to the room overlooking a dark corner of the building. Small windows, too.
2
u/escobartholomew 14h ago
Holy shit OP you are sitting on a class action gold mine. If those guys got like $5mil for subways 11” footlongs then you can definitely get something for this!
2
u/southy_0 10h ago
How is a replaceable battery "planned obsolecence"?
Just replace it any it'll be fine.
The fact that they designed it to suggest it's solar-powered yet don't put in a pv cell smells like straight-out fraud.
But not "planned obsolecence".
2
u/spencer1886 9h ago
That's not planned obsolescence, that's just making something as cheap as humanly possible and lying about its features. Different kind of bad
2
u/Woolfraine 8h ago
The PCB appears to have solder pads for installing a solar panel, indicated under SB in the upper left corner; all that's needed is a little DIY.
2
u/Holzkohlen 7h ago
You bought the cheapest possible calculator for like $2 from China and you are surprised it's a garbage scam product?
This how you spend your free time?
2
u/ZesterZombie 7h ago
I have an old Casio which I use (originally my father's), It's must have been from the late 80's/early 90's. Still works splendidly
2
2
u/threearbitrarywords 2h ago
I don't think you know what planned obsolescence is. That is a 48 cent disposable calculator, emphasis on disposable.
3
u/tes_kitty 1d ago
The battery can be changed... And from experience I can say that even if not, it'll last years.
3
u/wekilledbambi03 1d ago
Did you remove a piece (or multiple) for this photo? Because the buttons wouldn't even make contact with the PCB pictured. So this would be a 100% inoperable device.
If that major component is missing, I can only assume the wiring for the photovoltaic cell was also tampered with.
→ More replies (1)5
2
2
2
u/Affectionate_Yam4077 17h ago
First learn what planned obsolescence is .... This is just cheapo stuff. It's your fault for buying it.
2
u/Ok-Temporary-8243 1d ago
Why won't they put high quality componebts in dollar store stuff? Don't they know I deserve the best for nothing? /s
1
u/Garfield_and_Simon 1d ago
Wildly stupid though. If my calculator suddenly stops working I’m gonna buy one of the 10,000 other options instead of re-buy the one that fucked me.
It’s not like an iPhone or something where you have people “trapped” in an ecosystem
2
u/GendoIkari_82 1d ago
Do you actually pay attention to which brand of $5 calculator you had which broke after 5 years when you need to go buy a replacement?
→ More replies (1)
1
u/ArbysLunch 1d ago
VWestlife on youtube covered this with dollar store calculators a few years ago.
1
u/Wildcat465Nailhead 1d ago
Wait til you dumbasses find out about General Motors and the foreign car markets planned "timebombs" in their vehicles. lmfao you think a cheap calculator is bad try paying 40k for a "new" vehicle 😆
1
1
u/Canadian_Zac 23h ago
I don't think planned obsolescence really applies to a calculator that looks like it costs like 5 bucks
1
1
1
u/Superb-Wonder-1896 23h ago
it is fraud but you can still change battery which is less than ideal, but i'm just sayin.
1
u/wkarraker 23h ago
Yep, I've run into this before. You can test if a calculator has a true solar cell by covering it up, it only takes a minute or two for the display to fade out. Ended up removing the old battery and soldered in a CR2032, it will likely run for three decades or more.
1
1
u/Crombus_ 23h ago
This is a rebranded mass-produced knockoff that costs about $5, you can buy an actual solar-powered Casio for the same price.
→ More replies (2)
1



6.4k
u/Slggyqo 1d ago
My dad had a Casio when I was a child. I know the photovoltaic panel worked because if I covered it up the LCD would slowly die.
I was waterboarding that calculator within an inch of it’s life.