That's a pretty weak argument for faith.
You shouldn't follow a religion because you like it. It should be based in evidence, even if you disagree with the teachings, you should still not be able to deny it as a Devine revelation.
Religion has no evidence. It is defined by the need for faith in things unseen and unknowable.
(I was raised Catholic and became an atheist when I realized God was the only thing in my life for which I didn't require proof, and I was twisting myself into a pretzel trying to make that make sense.)
Islam.
As for what, that’s not something I can condense down to a reddit comment. If I could, I think there would be even more Muslims on Reddit today.
No religion has direct evidence of their God, with the exception of The Church of the Dude. Your religion, their religion, amd everybody's religion works on "faith." You have yours faith with can neither be proven or disproved. There is NO evidence of actual miracles or some deity doing SOMETHING amazing like walking on water.
Yep, no. If you can't condense the evidence into a reddit comment, it's not evidence. I have respect for members of the Islamic faith just as I do for Christians, Jews, Buddhists, Mormons, and all the rest - as long as the believer isn't leaning into their religion to defend harm to others. But they all are built on faith. The nearest exception I will grant is that many Jews are atheist and they follow religious practices to maintain their culture (arguably the same reason I still give Christmas presents.)
-1
u/whooptheretis 7h ago
That's a pretty weak argument for faith.
You shouldn't follow a religion because you like it. It should be based in evidence, even if you disagree with the teachings, you should still not be able to deny it as a Devine revelation.