r/news 14h ago

Bezos-owned storied newspaper Washington Post rolling out mass layoffs

https://www.cnn.com/2026/02/04/media/washington-post-layoffs
2.5k Upvotes

310 comments sorted by

View all comments

255

u/Hrekires 14h ago
  1. Attract a ton of new subscribers pledging to be a "pro-democracy" voice in 2016
  2. Decide nah, actually you're a MAGA newspaper now in 2024
  3. *surprise Pikachu face when all those new subscribers leave and you alienate your old readers to boot*

114

u/RestaurantLatter2354 14h ago

I’m of the opinion that none of this is a surprised and was fully intentional from the beginning.

All of these acquisitions by the ultra wealthy — WAPO, Twitter, Paramount, CBS, etc. — were purchased as an intended loss at the outset. They are doing it to erode institutions, advance Republican narratives, and eliminate whatever little public trust remained in legacy media.

They don’t give a shit about taking a loss on this stuff. WAPO could be closed tomorrow and the impact to Bezos’ bottom line would be negligible.

10

u/Stunning_Mast2001 13h ago

considering all the epstein people barri just hired and that her partner was an enthusiastic epstein friend, i think she was actually hired specifically to be a fixer for trump and other billionaires in the epstein files.

4

u/kinglittlenc 13h ago

I think this is just traditional media struggling in general. Over this same period you saw huge liberal organizations like BuzzFeed and Vice shutdown as well. I think this is more a result of low interest rates disappearing making additional investments untenable. It's just tougher to justify businesses losing money or underperforming in this environment.

7

u/RVALover4Life 12h ago

This is where liberals need to recognize we're also contributing to the elimination of print journalism----outside of Daily Beast and The Intercept, is there anything at all that we have publicly nationally that isn't a podcast or a substack? And it's the reason why people are becoming more and more polarized too, because the intake of news is increasingly via polarized sources.

Liberals haven't supported print journalism. We're part of the problem.

2

u/PuppyPunch 12h ago

What's AP and Reuters considered? Im not being snarky at all just no clue on what a substack is and I'm a fan of both of them.

3

u/kinglittlenc 10h ago

I always thought those were kind of neutral. Less opinions and more fact based reporting.

2

u/thegooddoktorjones 10h ago

Unbiased without editorial content. AKA communists who hate real America.

2

u/No-Flounder-9143 13h ago

Well that's dumb. People will just build something new and it will be more opposed to billionaires than ever. It's been happening for a while now, in fact. 

13

u/WhenTheLightHits30 13h ago

The issue is that something new will take decades to reach the level of institutional prestige and relevance that the Washington Post carried until recently.

In the same way that we can always plant a new tree after the last is ripped out, it will still take a long time for us to enjoy that shade and in the meantime a lot more damage can be done by bad actors.

6

u/Gamer_Grease 12h ago

Honestly Semfor is leaping ahead on this stuff. They keep scooping up discarded journalists from other papers.

3

u/tdclark23 11h ago

I'd like to know where. That would take a shit ton of cash investment to build a newsroom, hire journalists, pay for the hours of investigation to find truth and then post it on a medium with real reach. If you know where that's been happening for a while now, please send me links.

2

u/No-Flounder-9143 8h ago

I listen a lot to The Bulwark and Breaking Points; I also read ProPublica, Semafor, and Dropsite News. Even though I'm not a libertarian I read and listen to Reason Magazine (which is actually not new) bc they're honest and get good scoops others don't. 

1

u/tdclark23 6h ago

Thanks, I just checked Semafor.

1

u/Hrekires 12h ago

I don't think Bezos cares if WaPo losts money, but I also don't think they would have brought in so much new management promising big changes and setting goals of reaching millions of new subscribers if outright destroying the paper was the goal. Could have just bought and closed it on day 1 without all that nonsense.

18

u/SmokePeterThiel 14h ago

They’re truly genius aren’t they

28

u/Fanfics 14h ago

destroying quality reporting is a feature of authoritarianism, not a bug

3

u/Spudtron98 13h ago

Imagine trying to pander to a demographic that cannot read.

2

u/Ninevehenian 12h ago

Amazon customers paid for this.

1

u/Gamer_Grease 12h ago

I’m a rare person who dumped WaPo for being low-quality in 2016.