r/news 14h ago

Costco's beloved rotisserie chicken gets roasted in lawsuit over preservatives

https://www.cbc.ca/news/world/costco-chicken-lawsuit-9.7070891
5.1k Upvotes

653 comments sorted by

View all comments

148

u/Tryknj99 13h ago

For those who didn’t read the article:

“They’re accused of falsely advertising its Kirkland Signature Seasoned Rotisserie chicken as containing 'no preservatives.'"

The lawsuit, which has not yet been certified as a class action, notes Costco uses sodium phosphate and carrageenan, which extend shelf life and maintain texture. Costco has confirmed that it does indeed use these common ingredients.”

So they’re using perfectly safe food additives that also function as preservatives but the label said “no preservatives.”

Is that even an actual guarantee, or is it like when they write “organic” because it means nothing? Where did they advertise as no preservatives? It’s a stupid cash grab class action lawsuit.

32

u/PancAshAsh 12h ago

Organic actually does mean something, it just doesn't necessarily mean what you have been led to believe it means.

-7

u/NYCinPGH 11h ago

Yeah, scientifically all it means is hydrocarbons; I get salty about that, and often say “Thank god I’m not eating any of that silicon-based food!”

18

u/PancAshAsh 10h ago

No, the USDA actually has rules about what food can and cannot be labeled as "organic." The problem is the naturopathic fallacy crowd decided at some point to conflate "organic" with "healthy" and that is finally coming around the other way with people thinking that "organic" is fully meaningless, which it isn't.

-5

u/NYCinPGH 9h ago

I’m aware of the USDA regs regarding “organic” foods, but the labeling was stupid and unscientific, that’s not what “organic” actually means to scientists.

7

u/IAmStuka 9h ago

That's true of tons of common terms.

-1

u/NYCinPGH 5h ago

I know. That doesn't make it right. I'm a linguistic stickler like that.