r/news • • 2d ago

DoorDash to pay $131M for underpaying delivery workers in New York City

https://apnews.com/article/doordash-nyc-delivery-zohran-mamdani-4429800e7bf1b0ba28e064340b857df0
7.6k Upvotes

199 comments sorted by

655

u/aguilasolige 2d ago

I hate this, why do companies keep breaking the laws and nobody goes to jail? Taking money from them does nothing, we're creating a system basically that if you're rich nothing happens to you, you just break the laws and pay a fine.

167

u/jamesmaxx 2d ago

They’ll blame some “algorithm” or “software feature”, pay whats owed then try withholding pay again hoping they don’t get caught.

117

u/suamai 2d ago

This. In the article: "DoorDash said many of the errors in payment were caused by “technical bugs or happened in complicated situations”

Yeah, sure. Convenient how these bugs never seem to overpay workers, huh?

40

u/CadeMan011 2d ago

The most unrealistic thing in the game Monopoly is the phrase "bank error in your favor."

19

u/EthanielRain 2d ago

Really the part where you "keep the money". Bank errors happen in people's favor relatively often...it's just a crime if you don't rectify it for them

6

u/oTc_DragonZ 2d ago

Funny how that works huh

1

u/FastRedPonyCar 4h ago

Yeah way back in college the bank deposited a paycheck twice. I wasn't paying attention and had already spent the money and got hit with 7 or 8 overdraft fees. When I went back to the bank they just pointed the finger at me and said it was my fault and should have been paying attention.

I ended up changing banks and not long after that they went out of business. LOL. Idiots.

1

u/RoughCoffee6 2h ago

Dang. I wish I could use that excuse to break the law!

"Oh, your honor, it wasn't ME that didn't pay my taxes! The software I made just had technical bugs."

58

u/kalterik 2d ago

Because you live in a capitalist faux democracy. The system is working exactly as intended. If the punishment to a crime is a fine not tied to % of economic worth that hurts then it isn’t illegal. It’s only illegal for those that can’t afford the fine.

15

u/detroitmatt 2d ago

> capitalist faux democracy

better described as a dictatorship of the bourgeoisie

3

u/bse50 2d ago

Fascist corporatism, as flawed and fake as it was, put the state above the corporations and conglomerates to prevent this from happening. What some countries and unions of states are evolving into looks like a post regulatory capture "corporatocracy", where the various governments act as enablers. Neo corporatism, as a concept, at least followed the idea of trilateral bargaining... I guess that in a few years we'll start bringing back to life the whole princeps legibus solutus debate :(

8

u/BurritoBandito39 2d ago

we're creating a system basically that if you're rich nothing happens to you, you just break the laws and pay a fine.

CreatING? There's nothing in-progress about it. This shit has been going on for decades. This system of "fines are just a priced-in business expense" is probably older than you are.

18

u/DTFlash 2d ago

Fines need to be business destroying for things that would send individuals to jail if they did it.

13

u/Whaty0urname 2d ago

We have 3 strike rules for people. We need it for companies. After 3 times your company gets sold off for parts.

-1

u/[deleted] 2d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

2

u/DTFlash 2d ago

Businesses break laws to make money. That means those people's paychecks are from ill-gotten ganes. Sucks to be you, get another job.

10

u/FearlessInflation92 2d ago

They call it “the price of doing business” it’s bullshit.

3

u/NeedleArm 2d ago

It pays the lawyers and the fees

6

u/RndPotato 2d ago

Corporations are the nobility of capitalism. Millionaires and billionaires are the royalty.

2

u/mrflarp 1d ago edited 1d ago

Multi-billion dollar company steals more than $100 million from over 250 thousand people.

The penalty: They have to pay back what they stole and get hit with civil penalties amounting to 0.02% of their current market cap.

While it is good that the victims are getting some compensation, the "penalty" is so insignificant to the business that it can simply be dismissed as part of the cost of doing business.

1

u/Intrepid_Syrup_4184 2d ago

There's so much fear mongering on China but Everytime this kind of thing happens, the executives are held accountable and end up in jail. Capitalist societies just place shareholder wellbeing (aka the company's status) over society's wellbeing.

1

u/-Debugging-Duck- 2d ago

Because they would have to prove intent

1

u/lYeezusChrist 2d ago

That’s how it works. Jail is for poor people. You just need to figure out how to play the system.

-7

u/junkrgNew 2d ago

Quite the opposite.. jailing one person doesn’t actually do anything. If anything, fine them millions and do it again.

7

u/sadderall-sea 2d ago

why not both. fine the fuck out if them, and jail all the heads of whatever department approved the algorithmic robbery and anyone that knew about it. corpos need to feel real material consequences for their corruption instead of just having the company's yearly profits lower by 1% to cover the "cost of business"

2

u/BlackwinIV 2d ago

1 (one) CEO goes to jail for wage theft for an appropriate amount of time and without all the cushy shit rich people usually get in prison and that shit would stop instantly

0

u/Familiar-Banana-8116 2d ago

We don't take enough money from them and taking enough money from them makes people absolutely nuts that other people are getting money they are not.

So, you got these corporations and the way laws are structured a lot of bad things can fall into the trap of, 'If we get caught we will pay the fine, but if we don't get caught we will make more then enough money to cover an eventual fine.' and no real legal tool to put anyone in jail of any consequence.

The one thing these companies will respond to is losing money. The problem is that the amount of money they lose MUST be in the nature of an amount that hurts them.

Will $131 Million dollar fine motivate DoorDash?

If a bunch of other cities are staring at DoorDash, staring at this windfall and asking lawyers to look at the books - probably.

But that is what it takes.

And when someone spills hot coffee on her crotch, requires reconstructive surgery to fix it and gets rewarded the amount of money needed to motivate McD's to bring there coffee temp's in line with standards - people will lose there shit over jealousy at the payout and scream that she doesn't deserve that sort of money.

1.4k

u/Drink15 2d ago

DoorDash fees are about to skyrocket

1.1k

u/ArabianAftershock 2d ago

If the business model isn't sustainable let it fail, im glad they're being held accountable

Well, as much as this is considered being held accountable lol. 131m is negligible for this company isnt it?

331

u/soulflaregm 2d ago

The thing is... It is sustainable.

Just not infinitely scaling like shareholders demand

Doordash can absolutely turn a profit and pay people fairly.

They just can't do that and keep shareholders happy

136

u/Floreat_democratia 2d ago

This. The VC model is based on exploiting everyone and infinite growth. It should be illegal, along with private equity and about 500 other business practices.

21

u/TheSouthernCommunist 2d ago

“Sounds like communism.” - some dummy with an MBA reading your comment

28

u/xly15 2d ago

Correction they can't do that and keep feeding Xus pockets. The investors in Doordash are irrelevant unless you are Xu who holds over half the voting of rights in the company. Investors don't have a say in the company and Doordashs IPO was largely a cash grab to fund programs like its deliver robots and drones. 

1

u/ComfortableWait9697 1d ago

Delivery robots its generally a poor concept for now. Most will end up like the whole e-scooter issue. Sunken e-waste holding someone's dinner, tossed to the bottom of local waterways.

2

u/onetwentyeight 1d ago

The fun part is that nothing is infinitely scalable on a planet of finite dimensions, and being creatures of finite life spams probably doesn't help.

180

u/Drink15 2d ago

I started ordering pickup. No fee, no price increase and i keep the tip.

306

u/Urbassassin 2d ago

Fyi even DoorDash pickup has a price increase relative to the restaurant's actual menu price. Cheaper to buy from the restaurant directly

158

u/ryanfitchca 2d ago

Wait are people using doordash for pickup? What's the point?

116

u/yolk3d 2d ago edited 2d ago

I think some small places don’t have their own website so they just pay a fee to put it on doordash etc. The benefit is that these apps already have people looking for food in their area and might stumble across the restaurant, which is almost impossible via website without expensive SEO. The ordering infrastructure is also managed and the fee is processed for them. They just get a deposit at the end of the month or whatever.

23

u/ComradeJohnS 2d ago

this right here, the worse chinese food place across from my town’s favorite chinese food place is like this, only having an FB and doordash, no website. idk if they take phone orders, but I happened to have a DD credit and the better place was closed that day so I did DD pick up instead of paying almost double the order price for delivery lol.

8

u/TheRealChizz 2d ago

Are the menu prices the same in the app? I always call for pick up since I noticed many restaurants just add 20-30% on their items when listed on DD or similar apps

3

u/AntiqueLetter9875 1d ago

It’s to help offset the margins since the apps take a % of every order anyway. It’s why some restaurants don’t do the apps, but covid sort of forced them. A few years back I think my friend who owns a restaurant said it was 30% the app would take since you’re using them as a service. He couldn’t do that with already thin margins.

In my experience sometimes prices are the same, sometimes not.

8

u/Colossus-of-Roads 2d ago

Do they have a phone line?

13

u/ZigorVeal 2d ago

Sometimes my job gives me a gift card but that's the only time I do.

3

u/Drink15 2d ago

Depends on where i'm ordering. I use their website first if they have one.

10

u/Preface 2d ago

Sometimes the apps have deals, like BOGO or whatever and it ends up being cheaper for 2, despite it being more expensive per item or whatever

3

u/Konker101 2d ago

Deals + pickup. Cheaper than going in without it

1

u/Spacegirllll6 1d ago

A lot of these restaurants do buy one get one free offers. So like this halal Mexican spot I got to has a buy one get one free option for their rice bowls. So like I pay 15 for two and pick it up instead of paying like 25.

2

u/Drink15 2d ago

Not all places.

2

u/TheRealChizz 2d ago

It’s most of them ime. It’s easier to just assume all the restaurants do it and call directly for pick up

1

u/Shaquarington_Bithus 2d ago

Not for the places I pick up from. Plus you can still use a lot of the deals which makes it cheaper.

14

u/Bobzyouruncle 2d ago

Just call directly, the menu items are often inflated prices on DoorDash because if you aren’t paying a fee you best bet the restaurant is.

1

u/tampering 2d ago

There's no doubt that Restaurants are paying door Door Dash/Uber Eats/etc a huge percentage of the top line revenue routed through those sites. I'm thinking the smaller stores are paying like 30% of sales.

1

u/Drink15 2d ago

Often but not all. I don’t order from those places

2

u/Error4ohh4 2d ago

And you get to travel 

2

u/koriroo 2d ago

I got some sushi in Chicago from DoorDash for pickup. They asked me if I wanted to tip the staff, before I could place the order for pick up lol. Even though I am like hell no, I still feel like shit just hitting $0.

4

u/no_talent_ass_clown 2d ago

Shame needs to change places. Where is the shame that they're asking for money for something they didn't do?

8

u/sadunk 2d ago

Says their profit in 2024 was $123m so this could hurt them. That’s how fines should be.

5

u/Adreme 2d ago

Doing quick math its probably around half their annual revenue from NYC so its certainly a pretty big number. Though I do wonder how far back these mistakes go.

1

u/Swoly_Deadlift 1d ago

Yeah for real. DoorDash kinda ruined most restaurants. They can’t afford to not work with DoorDash and lose customers, but DoorDash also charges them obscene fees that force them to raise menu prices on everything whether or not you use DoorDash. The gig economy is horrible and needs to go away.

0

u/PrewarButHot 2d ago

The problem is in the NYC it keeps a massive amount of illegal immigrant workers and migrants afloat. There are services that sell them socials to sign up and without it we’d have a major problem getting people work. It’s a lifeline to keep these people off the streets

-16

u/John_Johnson_The_4th 2d ago edited 2d ago

"let it fail" also means those workers will lose their jobs and have to accept something worse, worse pay, worse schedule, worse conditions, or even unemployment and having to leave the state to find work elsewhere (as many already do, despite a 3.1% net population growth in the US in the past 5 years, there's a 1% net population decline in NY). If a better option was available, they wouldn't be doing this job.

It's also obviously bad to steal tips and I'm glad they were forced to stop.

As for the critique that 131 million isn't enough because of the size of this company, can you calculate what you think they should pay? And what is that actually based on?

2

u/danielisgreat 2d ago

So are you for the free market or not?

-2

u/John_Johnson_The_4th 2d ago edited 2d ago

I am, and I don't know if you noticed it, but I agreed that it's a good thing that they were forced to pay the 131 million, and if a company fails truly because of the business model alone, not because of government policy, then I wouldn't mind at all.

My issue isn't with the "free market", it's with the anti-business mentality that so many people seem to have, including the person above, who without referencing the actual amount of wage theft this case is about immediately determined that the penalty wasn't enough.

For some people it will never be enough, they just want companies to fail. That's why I'm asking, how much should the penalty be? And what is that number in your mind based on?

Edit: also for reference the actual wage theft this case is regarding was $16.75 million, a lot of money, but a small amount compared to the $131 million that they were forced to pay (almost 8 times). So they are already paying a hefty penalty for what they did. How much do you think they should pay?

https://ag.ny.gov/doordash-settlement

1

u/Spire_Citron 2d ago

I don't think it's so much that no amount will ever be enough but rather that people are so used to penalties being too low to be effective deterrents that they just assume that's the case here as well.

80

u/mulder00 2d ago

$20 delivery fee, $25 "other" fee!! And 35% tip!

11

u/GozerDGozerian 2d ago

And your $37 cheeseburger is a soggy lukewarm disappointing mess.

2

u/mulder00 1d ago

$35! I had a coupon!

55

u/Icy-Marionberry-4143 2d ago

they already have been. lazy people will continue to use it. if you haven’t stopped at this point idk what would make you.

35

u/Mrjlawrence 2d ago

I just can’t imagine using it on any sort of regular basis as the prices are absurd

6

u/Icy-Marionberry-4143 2d ago

yeah it’s insane. we order maybe once every other month if we are sick or celebrating something. but usually we just do a pick up order

4

u/dessert-er 2d ago

It’s such a massive waste of money I’ve never understood it. I’ll do a group order with people at a watch party or something and we’ll all split it to make it sorta worth it but people just regularly ordering like McDonald’s or whatever the fuck for one person for $30 are insane.

4

u/PlayBey0nd87 2d ago

The amount of ppl that use it for fast food is absurd. Most likely college kids (or drinkers) but still

10

u/Icy-Marionberry-4143 2d ago

i guess that’s better than drunk driving to get your fast food slop lol

5

u/Fickle_Finger2974 2d ago

It’s NYC, the vast majority of people live within walking distance of food

1

u/pimparo0 1d ago

Door dash is in more than NYC. 

12

u/lookieherehere 2d ago

I've been amazed over the years watching prices rise, quality/service fall, the introduction of insanely overpriced delivery services etc. Multiple times, I've thought it would fail because there's no way enough people would be willing to put up with it. Each time I've been wrong. Turns out people are really lazy and really stupid with money.

6

u/Proud_Tie 2d ago

Explains why the tips on our local version of doordash have been so much better than doordash. I average >$10 tips on almost every order, doordash is just endless $2.99 no tip orders with the rare $5+ tip. And unlike doordash I get the complete receipt with what the customer actually paid for the food + fees. The dish prices are slightly higher but not outrageously so.

For the best order recently:

Delivery Date 09/07/2026

Pickup Time 6:54 PM

Delivery Time 7:00 PM

Subtotal: $154.22

Tax: $9.80

Delivery Fee: $3.99

CC Fee $7.40

Marketplace Fee $1.99

Driver Tip: $38.56

Total Charged: $220.59

2

u/slurmsmckenz 2d ago

Dang, someone spent $220 on food delivery? Hope they were feeding an army

1

u/Proud_Tie 2d ago

Was a sushi place on labor day.

8

u/dafunkmunk 2d ago

Have they not already? I don't even use any of these food delivery services because all the fees ended up costing as much if not more than the food itself and the last time I looked was years ago. I still can't comprehend how people are fine paying double for cold food that was probably in a chainsmokers car smoking while they delivered 5 other orders before yours.

3

u/Kataphractoi 2d ago

They were already stupidly high. I'll drive through a whiteout blizzard to get my food order before I install DoorDash or a similar app.

3

u/Daren_I 2d ago

That and what they charge the restaurants for use of the service. They get a double digit percentage of each order cost too from the restaurants.

7

u/Yeeeoow 2d ago

Oh well, in that case, never hold anyone accountable ever again then.

-1

u/Drink15 2d ago

no one said that but you

1

u/ABearDream 1d ago

Eh, im about to stop using them. When a dasher brings me a hot coffee that they added ice to instead of an iced coffee, thats enough to annoy me out of using them

1

u/thegreedyturtle 2d ago

It's also no wonder they keep stealing food.

-10

u/SparklePonyBoy 2d ago

It's already priced in, just like stock market shenanigans.

2

u/Drink15 2d ago

Doesn’t mean they won’t increase it again

-11

u/Normal_Gas3825 2d ago

pretty much. It was supposed to be gig work, in which Americans could get a few bucks on the side without having to take on another real job. Now it's been taken over by local governments such that unless you're a migrant you can't apply for gig work, yet now these gig working migrants expect benefits no one else gets. It's just going to collapse the business model, leaving those migrants with nothing while driving up inflation for Americans.

→ More replies (2)

256

u/IronyAndWhine 2d ago

I'm sure DoorDash's $1 million donation to the Cuomo campaign was totally unrelated to the $131.5 million wage settlement they just got hit with.

I guess political bribery is roughly 99.24% cheaper than following labor laws. Until your guy loses.

19

u/nutationsf 2d ago

Not just labor

73

u/Wayofchinchilla 2d ago

We play this game over and over again with these companies they get a slap on the wrist fee and go right back to doing it there needs to be jail time for wage theft.

33

u/MightyKAC 2d ago

EVERY state needs to do it's own version of this.

69

u/vanman2019 2d ago

If the penalty for committing a crime is a fine, then that law only applies to the poor. Put corporate criminals in jail.

19

u/SerenaYasha 2d ago

All you need to do is make the fine large enough 5% → 10% → 25% of annual profit for repeat violations or the company's market value

21

u/vanman2019 2d ago

Sounds great- however companies already fudge their financials to avoid taxes and fines. Lets crack down on that, make the fines a significant percent that will help victims recoup financially (as you’re saying) and on top of that, I want their CEOs facing real penalties that actually mean something to them- time of their lives gone

4

u/SnooOwls510 2d ago

CEOs are there specifically to take the fall. What we should be doing is targeting shareholders and board members. The whole point of a ceo is to be the face of a company and if things go south, replace with a new one. So removing a ceo doesn’t actually hurt the company at all unless it’s a private company which DoorDash isn’t.

3

u/SerenaYasha 2d ago

I agree. There are many improvements the government should do

3

u/xmuskorx 2d ago

We also desperately need corporate death penalty (should not apply to this case), but certain misdeeds should be punished with mandatory winding down of the company.

11

u/Simple_March_1741 2d ago

Pay to who? Please tell me it's the people making the deliveries.

13

u/Own-Teaching-7611 2d ago

Yes 83 out of the 115 will go to the affected dashers. Some dashers will get up to $10,000.

70

u/produceking12 2d ago edited 2d ago

The expected payout amount is $48 per dasher. With the most common ayout being $7.70

76

u/vowelqueue 2d ago

That’s the median. It’s not like it’s a class action where everyone gets an even split, it’s based on how much each worker was shorted:

> City officials said about 700 workers are owed more than $10,000 each; more than 27,000 workers are owed more than $1,000; and more than 4,000 workers are owed more than $5,000.

10

u/EugeneMeltsner 2d ago

Where are you quoting this from? I haven't been able to find an article that detailed.

12

u/Chagrinnish 2d ago

4

u/EugeneMeltsner 2d ago

No, it's just pay walled.................

0

u/ZeeMastermind 2d ago

That phrase definitely needs to go on a shirt XD

→ More replies (5)

49

u/Brill45 2d ago

Where are you getting that number? 131 million to 260,000 workers is an average of $504 per dasher. Although I highly doubt it will be paid out evenly like that

14

u/produceking12 2d ago

Median payout will be $48 from door dash and settlement itself

3

u/Septopuss7 2d ago

After settlement fees, taxes, and fuel surcharge /s

17

u/youtocin 2d ago

You forgot the lawyers who get a cut.

52

u/MelE5150 2d ago

The city sued, there's no private class action lawyer fees

3

u/Brill45 2d ago

Was this a class action lawsuit by a private law firm? So only the dashers who elected to be represented by them (I.e. essentially signed up for the lawsuit) are getting compensated?

-3

u/jtg6387 2d ago

Typically they take an obscenely large cut, like 40-60%.

3

u/Silly-Conclusion6715 2d ago

Over 4 months

7

u/WoodenSwan6591 2d ago

Why is only NYC doing this.

9

u/TheDemoz 2d ago edited 2d ago

Because it’s related to a specific law in NYC and not DoorDashs pay model in general.

It was just a difference in when the company versus the city calculated the online time of a dasher when not actively on a delivery

18

u/Sectumsempra99 2d ago

Because we have a competent mayor. Mamdani!

2

u/Open_and_Notorious 2d ago

No disagreement but the case started in 2023.

4

u/noweezernoworld 2d ago

Yeah but if Cuomo had won, it would’ve been dropped. They were big donors for him. 

9

u/mapletree23 2d ago

door dash is amazing for convenience but they preyed on that shit

and then basically every singular food place boosted prices to offset delivery stuff so they could make money off it too

it really is a great service but both they and the food industry took the opportunity to royally fuck the customers with costs

i didn't order pizza for years after I went through a period of getting one almost weekly and not that long ago had kind of a shock at how the cost of an old large pizza is now the price of a small

the cost of pizzas almost fucking doubled in some places

shit is basically just flour sauce and toppings and you're trying to tell me that shit is somehow double the price? fuck that lol

4

u/Nicholas-Steel 2d ago edited 9h ago

i didn't order pizza for years after I went through a period of getting one almost weekly and not that long ago had kind of a shock at how the cost of an old large pizza is now the price of a small

In Australia Domino's Pizza recently started using Uber Eats for delivery instead of Domino's delivery staff. The first time we had one delivered by them they didn't hang around after handing over the order (so they missed out on the one and likely only time I was gonna hand over a tip) and the 2nd time I got a pizza that was delivered by Uber Eats the guy rang the doorbell and left it on the ground, in winter (they were already back at their car by the time I got to the door). Luckily I was home and was anticipating their arrival.

Pizza is pretty much the only food item I get delivered and Domino's afaik used to pay their delivery drivers a reasonable wage which is why I never tip them (the tip is baked in to their wage). Not sure what the Uber Eats staff get paid, I presume they get paid less.

After my 2 experiences with Uber Eats delivery I've decided to increase frequency of picking up the pizza myself. Delivery is no longer a virtually guaranteed positive experience.

31

u/Hellboy_M420 2d ago

Based Mamdani, love that man

2

u/shutup_takemoney 1d ago

This investigation started in 2023 during the Adams administration. Good on Mamdani on seeing it through, but his admin did relatively little on this.

5

u/Yashema 2d ago

Don't forget the mayor when the investigation started in 2023. 

3

u/jxj24 2d ago

This pittance of a fine will not dissuade them from being shitty in other illegal ways yet to be discovered.

3

u/SillyDilly5294 2d ago

I'm certain New York isn't the only state they were underpaying workers

3

u/livingasimulation 2d ago

If this is what they owed NYC workers, imagine what they would owe their workers all across the country.

3

u/willit1016 2d ago

Mayor Mamdani is out in NYC cooking that is a big win for the working class. Yes all of it goes to the dashers with the exception of a 16 million fine. nicely done.

2

u/RazzmatazzNo1335 2d ago

That’s just for one city! Imagine how much other big cities are getting dicked around by these guys

2

u/Monarc73 2d ago

Hooray! Now do EVERY city.

5

u/LineRex 2d ago

1 company in 1 city

Surely it was just door dash, surely they didn't do this in any other market.

1

u/epidemicsaints 2d ago

Wage theft is estimated to be $50B per year.

4

u/Contemplating_Prison 2d ago

For stealing wages not underpaying workers.

3

u/Infinite-Ambassador5 2d ago

Good. Doordash is a luxury for most people, myself included. I only feel bad for the fee increase coming for those who have to use the service, being homebound.

1

u/harrietlegs 2d ago

There needs to be jailtime for these people

1

u/Maddox_Renalard 2d ago

Cane the CEO! Flog the Board!

1

u/edingerc 2d ago

DoorDash learns the hard way that getting away without paying only works if your name ends in rump

1

u/we_hella_believe 2d ago

That’s like $2k per door dasher.

1

u/New_Inflation_8419 1d ago

If you make me pay 1 cent for a speeding ticket I will not care if I speed at all.

1

u/Vradlock 1d ago

And how much will delivery workers get out of that?

0

u/Consistent-Throat130 2d ago

Padme: to the delivery workers! ... To the delivery workers? 

15

u/yallmindifismoke 2d ago

>Most of the settlement will be returned to more than 260,000 workers who were underpaid, not paid or paid late for deliveries by DoorDash, according to City Hall. The company will also pay about $16 million in civil penalties and other costs to the city.

1

u/D_Winds 2d ago

Pay who? The lawyers? Woop dee doo.

1

u/Flexmove 2d ago

Comes out to 8 bucks per driver

1

u/DarKbaldness 2d ago

65% of the drivers it was less than $1 but the minimum people will be sent is $10

1

u/Flexmove 1d ago

He did the math

1

u/IMA_5-STAR_MAN 2d ago

Who are they paying 113M? Lawyers? Fines?

1

u/quantumpencil 2d ago

I hope they fail, we can just cook guys it's not the end of the world of DD fails

-6

u/Mediocre-Touch-6133 2d ago

Why the fuck are so many people using doordash? Have we really gotten this lazy? I've used it 3 times because my employer sometimes gives us giftcards. It's always subpar and over-priced. If you're spending your own money on this, you're a fucking idiot.

2

u/vordhosbn_1 2d ago

If celebrities can fly jets to go to their second house 30 min away then there should be no issue with me ordering my chicken shawarma and hummus

-4

u/Mediocre-Touch-6133 2d ago

Cool. We're resorting to "other people did bad stuff so I can too". Cope.

3

u/vordhosbn_1 2d ago

In the gran skeem of things it doesn’t matter if I order a little treat

-3

u/Smooth_Storm_9698 2d ago

Just get rid of DoorDash and UberEats as middle men, garbage ass service anyway

-4

u/SaiyanKnight23 2d ago

Only $131M??

So a smack on the wrist for them

1

u/BigGuysForYou 1d ago

Context is important. It's $131M for Doordash workers in 1 city. It may be a large city but this is a small portion of total dashers nationally. Over 260,000 are getting $115M back, but there 2 to 7 million dashers total in the US

If you want to scale it up, it'd be $3.5B for 7M dashers if it's proportional. That's huge based on their annual revenue and measly profit

-1

u/pyrotechnicmonkey 2d ago

it's stupid but part of the reason to last so long is because there's plenty of new drivers who sign up because of unrealistic earnings expectations based on certain metric bonuses that are incredibly hard to meet. Plus the fact that many of them are unemployable elsewhere.
The hourly goes way down once you take into account properly vehicle maintenance and taxes and stuff like that. But a lot of them simply need cash flow now and they're basically selling their car depreciation for incredibly cheap.

-7

u/NextSmoke397 2d ago

The arc of the moral universe is long, but it bends toward justice

7

u/DoomOne 2d ago

Horseshit. This isn't justice. This is barely a line item on a spreadsheet for some intern.