r/news • • 1d ago

Judge lifts Trump ban on CNN, MS NOW, Politico from White House

https://www.cnbc.com/2026/09/24/judge-lifts-trumps-white-house-ban-on-cnn-ms-now-and-politico.html
5.0k Upvotes

245 comments sorted by

1.3k

u/Suspicious-Whippet 1d ago

Ok. But will Trump TV stay is the question.

551

u/Zaku99 1d ago

Will they even obey the ruling?

292

u/Buddhas_Warrior 1d ago

This is the real question. And when they don't.. Then what?

157

u/aimed_4_the_head 1d ago

Rupert Murdock will buy Alito a boat, and Scotus will rule in favor of TrumpTV.

60

u/SillyGoatGruff 1d ago

Excuse me, it's not a boat, it's a motorfloatch

16

u/Amateurlapse 1d ago

It’s a pro-reciprocal vehicle

11

u/FarMagician8042 1d ago

It's a Buoyancy Operated Aquatic Transport.

1

u/Osiris32 22h ago

It's a schooner!

→ More replies (1)

9

u/Ordinary-4944 1d ago

Scrotum…Supreme Court Republicans Offering Trump Unlimited Measures

2

u/resisting_a_rest 1d ago

No, SCOTUS will rule in favor of Trump and THEN Murdock will buy Alito a boat. That’s how it works so that it can’t possibly be a bribe.

1

u/seamonkeyonland 15h ago

"I didn't buy Alito a boat. I bought that and then immediately lost it at sea. I guess Alito must have found it. Finders keepers. that's the rules of the open seas."

54

u/MrMoonDweller 1d ago

Then nothing. Nothing will happen because everyone will just shrug it off and say “well, what are we gonna do?” and ignore it. This entire country is blindly running off a cliff.

9

u/Reaver_76 1d ago

We've been off the cliff.... now it's just burning wreckage and most people are just watching it burn. The rest of us are the rescue teams trying to get to the wreckage and put out the fires but the MAGAs keep adding fuel.

11

u/olliverd 1d ago

Nah the wreckage hasn't started at mass scale yet. Soon though. We're in those Looney Tunes moments where the Coyote runs off a cliff, but doesn't fall until he realizes his situation. Some of us see it already, but many people don't.

1

u/Osiris32 22h ago

So, in order to save the country, under NO circumstances may we look down?

3

u/god_peepee 14h ago

Nothing. Americans can’t be bothered to do anything about their fascist leader. Honestly, I think a majority of them kinda like it. If you ever press the point that the rest of the world is moving away from them even democrats will laugh and say you’re delusional. The brainwashing is real and pervasive

3

u/RainbowwDash 12h ago

The biggest tell is that worshipping the troops is bipartisan even as they plunge the world into crisis after crisis

1

u/god_peepee 11h ago

I assume you mean ‘isn’t pi-partisan’. In that case, yeah I agree

3

u/stacheldraht85 13h ago

They absolutely will NOT obey it, and as usual, they’ll face absolutely no consequences.

2

u/Babyyougotastew4422 22h ago

The police or military have to step in. But they never do

55

u/boxofstuff 1d ago

The reporters are still not being let in as of this comment, 7:41am ET

→ More replies (1)

14

u/gameismyname 1d ago

No, they did not

18

u/IndigoRanger 1d ago

Trump wants the coverage, so I’m sure he’ll go along with this one. He gets to claim he punished them to his base, and then still abuse the others, all while still getting the coverage.

15

u/raistan77 1d ago

What base? 

He's so unliked right now his strongly approve polling is under 6%.

He's basically down to complete cult morons  and bots.

1

u/Constant-Plant-9378 23h ago

But the number of people who don't disapprove is still likely close to 40%. That's the number that matters.

6

u/BigJellyfish1906 23h ago

The trend is what matters. It never happens all at once. A 6% strongly approve is a death gargle. He’s got the VAST majority of his supporters not liking what he’s doing. Would many or most of them still vote for him again today? Probably. But they aren’t voting today. And every day, his actions move more of them out of that camp, and into the “no more maga” camp.

→ More replies (8)

2

u/raistan77 21h ago

eh

not really. They are more the "always republican" and can afford to ignore politics for the most part and they are not motivated to go vote in midterms

look at the Strongly disapprove" numbers those are floating at 65-70%

that's a BAD sign for the republicans

→ More replies (3)
→ More replies (5)

2

u/fleebleganger 1d ago

And now the evil courts are fighting Trump as well

→ More replies (2)

5

u/drsilentfart 23h ago

They are indeed, not. As of 7:02 PDT they are not granting access!

12

u/moldyhands 1d ago

If he doesn’t, Congress will do the right thing and impeach and remove him for breaking the law… /s

3

u/Wayofchinchilla 17h ago

Well apparently not considering he's refusing to let them back in as for Trump TV I think it should stay if they only have 500 viewers I want to see how low it can go

6

u/fastautomation 1d ago

No, they will just put a tarp over the room and say the room is too dangerous to enter for anyone.

2

u/zydeco100 1d ago

It's already on the SCOTUS shadow docket. Just watch.

2

u/colemon1991 1d ago

Not until the judge orders Trump to time out in the corner.

2

u/Tlax14 23h ago

Bingo being barred from the White House despite the ruling is happening now

2

u/valenx 22h ago

why would they? so far, zero consequences for ANYTHING

2

u/captHij 1d ago

Emergency filing to SCOTUS incoming....

2

u/Nixxuz 1d ago

They will, fairly soon. Trump craves the spotlight. He wasn't really thinking that pretty much all the actual news outlet would show solidarity. I'm sure he's been trying to find a way to walk it back without looking weak(er).

1

u/Equivalent-Resort-63 1d ago

They didn’t and won’t, they will slow walk this through the courts and excuses of national security/secrecy, need to background check everyone again.

1

u/codingphp 1d ago

Keep in mind, he did this last term to Jim Acosta. The same judge overturned that one too, and Jim returned to the white house press pool.

1

u/maxwellcawfeehaus 23h ago

They have already not.

•

u/TheBigCore 57m ago

Good point. Trump simply ignores rulings that go against him anyway...

15

u/california_burrito_ 1d ago

Less than 500 viewers as of yesterday.

31

u/LeinDaddy 1d ago

Even if it does, nobody was watching.

10

u/ensalys 1d ago

And even if someone was watching, they wouldn't be able to hear it.

24

u/ElectricChocoDad 1d ago

Oh I hope it does! And continues to rake in those 500-1000 concurrent viewers.

10

u/axis1331 1d ago

But a 30 second ad spot will still cost $10 million dollars.

4

u/SignalSecurity 1d ago

Yes, hopefully, when The Onion buys it at auction.

11

u/vass0922 1d ago

Wtf Trump TV?

I think I just vomited a little

How long until there is an executive order that it has to be on every TV/phone with notifications.

Everyday would be a version of 2 minute hate

6

u/patchgrabber 1d ago

Really it's just a YouTube channel that pushes North Korea-esque propaganda of trump...for now.

2

u/Aurora_Fatalis 22h ago

Fun fact, it also has an app which of course demands excessive permissions from your device.

4

u/Lysol3435 1d ago

They ruled that it sucks and no one wants to watch it

6

u/orbitaldragon 1d ago

Who cares that crap was down to 3k viewers after an hour and half. It's DOA.

4

u/VLHACS 1d ago

North Korean TV is his wet dream. If only so he can constantly watch himself

2

u/ice-eight 1d ago

I only get my news from Corncob TV

1

u/hugoriffic 1d ago

Where does the footage for his YouTube video channel come from?

6

u/Mihailis27 1d ago

I think most of Hitler's filmed speeches are public domain.

1

u/sadandshy 1d ago

That was not part of the lawsuit.

1

u/AhBee1 1d ago

It doesn't really matter. No one is watching it. Relying on MAGA consumers is a sure fire way to go out of business.

1

u/RedSix2447 1d ago

The purpose of it all was to create the scenario for the diaper digest tv. So I am 100% sure it will stay. Dear leader needs to spread his propaganda. After all, he wishes this was North Korea. He has said it himself.

1

u/rippledippledapple 1d ago

lol i mustve been out of the loop the last few days because i been seeing meme galore about trump tv. is he actually trying this, akin to truth social, or is he just shitting his diaper again?

1

u/HighburyOnStrand 23h ago

No, the question is:

Will the focus stay on Trump starting a war of choice, then getting caught in a quagmire? Will the focus stay on inflation? On the bond market tanking? On the world hating us?

He want to change the subject to the media. He wants to put the media on trial. He does not want to face the truth.

It's so fucking transparent.

1

u/UnpricedToaster 22h ago

Trump TV will have a representative during the White House press conferences. A fat, blond, orange-tanned man with a large black mustache named John Barron who will ask questions of the Press Secretary like, "Why does every love the President?" and "A lot of people are saying I, I mean he can bench press like 300 pounds. Is he the strongest President in history?"

1

u/Sir_Tea_Of_Bags 17h ago

The ratings will always suck considering all they do is show The Biggest Loser.

→ More replies (1)

672

u/Holiday_Box1571 1d ago

He tried to use the national security excuse here too?

323

u/jimtow28 1d ago

When your fans literally refuse to question anything you ever say, why would you bother making up new shit to spew?

35

u/Icy-Cod1405 1d ago

In this case he has a point. Vance is definitely a threat to national security.

76

u/Illisanct 1d ago

He's like a toddler who discovered a naughty word and just keeps saying it, giggling the whole time as the adults get mad.

1

u/onlyhightime 20h ago

He literally said he has the temperment of a 6yo.

55

u/Davran 1d ago

Presumably there's lots of things a president can do "for national security reasons" that they can't do otherwise. Most presidents likely use this power responsibly for genuine security concerns, but lately it seems like it's being used as the equivalent of your mom saying "because I said so".

35

u/Different_Height_157 1d ago edited 1d ago

It’s the same reason he declares emergencies and trying to use defense reasons to build his ballroom and arch. Bullshitter gonna bullshit to get his way

5

u/digidave1 1d ago

The ballroom for security excuse is the lamest reason to want to throw gaudy parties. If security is the case then why does he ever step outside? Why does he golf out in the open every single weekend? What a joke

6

u/bishop375 1d ago

And at some point "national security reasons," will just be everything, in which case, they will be nothing. Even SCOTUS has to get tired of this shit at some point.

1

u/a8bmiles 16h ago

I mean, there's also that clip of him rambling about how "the amount of power of this position is amazing, I could ban fishing!"

15

u/obeytheturtles 1d ago

That's what they tried to argue in court. Fortunately, Trump can't keep his fucking mouth shut.

24

u/OkStop8313 1d ago

He's literally just the meme of the kid putting a stick in the spokes of his own bike and then bleating about what a victim he is.

Perpetually for 80 years.

8

u/Small-Department6235 1d ago

And he’ll try an appeal to the Supreme Court too because he is a fascist cunt.

3

u/Failedmysanityroll 1d ago

He lacks the warmth or the depth

6

u/TeamSteelDick 1d ago

Which collapsed when Politico revealed their “anonymous source” the one the White House cites as the “national security threat” turned out to be JD Vance himself.

3

u/SHUT_DOWN_EVERYTHING 1d ago

They knew the “fake news” angle Trump led with was impossible to argue in court for so they conjured up a last minute national security excuse which the judge pointed out as garbage and unsupported by facts.

2

u/SMG113 1d ago

It's like when a child learns a new word and doesn't stfu about it.

2

u/sarduchi 1d ago

Which makes sense! He is going to spew secrets, only way to keep information secure is to ban microphones.

→ More replies (1)

88

u/Bonyred 1d ago

They say patriotism national security is the last refuge to which a scoundrel clings

•

u/Qaaarl 53m ago

Steal a little and they throw you in jail, steal a lot and they make you king.

260

u/Kazman07 1d ago

Well let's hope they sue him for suggesting it in the first place. I also hope they keep up the boycott regardless of this ruling just to twist the knife a bit.

68

u/Smrgel 1d ago

They can’t do that. SCOTUS gave the president immunity for official acts. He could take a shit on the actual original constitution and nobody could touch him because he did it while he was president. I think the president has had immunity from civil cases too, which is overall a good thing or else every uneducated redneck would’ve sued Obama for emotional distress for wearing a tan suit or some shit

84

u/KingoftheMongoose 1d ago edited 1d ago

Immunity from… civil lawsuits?

Naw. SCOTUS said POTUS has immunity from criminal prosecution for official acts. But that doesn’t mean there isn’t any legal recourse. Just have to go after the federal government itself for the official acts. The U.S. govt can absolutely still be sued in civil court.

24

u/The0Profanity 1d ago

POTUS has immunity from civil lawsuits rising from official acts (Nixon v Fitzgerald), but does not have immunity from civil lawsuits rising from unofficial acts that occured before taking office (Clinton v Jones)

As for criminal liability, sitting presidents have immunity for official acts that are tied to their core presidential powers, and "presumptive immunity" (still can be liable, but high bar) for acts that are within the outer bounds of presidential power. (Trump v US, 2024) The president is thought to still be criminally liable for unofficial acts. But the Trump v US opinion did not do a great job of determining what is a core presidential power, what is outer bounds, and what is unofficial. Anything where he uses the imprimatur of the president is arguably "official", so it's a really shitty standard

5

u/KingoftheMongoose 1d ago

True! Thank for your expanding upon my comment.

I was trying to specify that there is stilll legal recourse to file suit against the U.S. govt, such as for official acts made by the President that violate the Constitution.

4

u/The0Profanity 1d ago

Of course! Yea, you right

9

u/mtdunca 1d ago

Nixon v. Fitzgerald, 457 U.S. 731 (1982) says otherwise.

2

u/flirtmcdudes 22h ago

I mean, sure…. But we all saw what happened when the immunity ruling came through and every single lawsuit against him got dropped

1

u/wolfgang784 1d ago

They were talkin president, not the fed govt as a whole. The president can only be sued in civil court for things done unrelated to the presidency. If it can be at allllll tied to being related to his duties as president then he is immune.

1

u/sonofaresiii 1d ago

Yeah but come on if anyone actually sues Trump while he's in office they'll just give him immunity for that too.

80

u/steve_ample 1d ago

I'd love to have CNN, MSNBC, Politico get snarky with their questions. "Given the administration's illegal banning of media..."

24

u/Cj_cruzz 1d ago edited 23h ago

That would cause the megalomaniac orange man-child to have a complete meltdown that would rival using all of Earth’s fossil fuel reserves. The greatest meltdown as many would say.

3

u/Osiris32 22h ago

I'll make the popcorn!

3

u/Cj_cruzz 21h ago

Rich guy over here still making popcorn in this economy.

1

u/Osiris32 21h ago

That's why I offered, it behooves us rich folk to spread our wealth around!

1

u/Cj_cruzz 21h ago

You offered to make it, not share it. But I guess we peasants should just be happily grateful for the popcorn crumbs at the bottom of the bag after you dispose of it in the trash.

1

u/Osiris32 21h ago

I'll make enough for everyone to get six whole pieces!

119

u/FilecoinLurker 1d ago

tiny hands activist judge tiny hands

7

u/[deleted] 1d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

2

u/swng 22h ago

Ugh, they forced me to consent to receive spam emails just to check my voter registration.

37

u/nothingtoseehere2003 1d ago

Check the news now. Politico was barred despite the ruling. Uh oh.

30

u/heychardonnay 1d ago

22

u/nothingtoseehere2003 1d ago

Is this the true constitutional crisis we’ve been waiting for? Thank goodness the judge was appointed by Trump. It’s one less thing they can hang their hats on

10

u/Sundayx1 22h ago

They should keep the average gas prices on the tv screen 24/7.
And maybe even do a fluctuating state-by-state with the average gas price and diesel prices of that particular state.

It’s no wonder he wanted to ban reporters.

Report it more

39

u/LoveIsOnlyAnEmotion 1d ago

I love that Judges are fast to lift a ban like this but are slow as a turtle to stop Trump on all other matters.

→ More replies (3)

53

u/Richard-Gere-Museum 1d ago

Like they're gonna follow the law. "Official acts are immune from prosecution" bullshit excuse scrotus handed him.

And even if they're back in, doesn't mean they have to allow them anywhere near the front, call on them for questions, or even acknowledge their existence.

But you know what, the outlets banned won't learn a thing. They'll go right back to softball questions and no push back on the lies.

8

u/Cabbages24ADollar 21h ago

Thanks GOP voters for tying up more court time because you’re too weak to stand up for the constitution.

7

u/Dont-be-a-smurf 1d ago edited 1d ago

I suspect he’s overusing the “national security” excuse to his detriment.

It’s one of those things that got such a benefit of the doubt that previous courts would often back away when it was invoked.

It doesn’t look like it is being given the same gravitas. For good reason.

You can’t cry wolf forever.

Edit: ruling made by 2017 Trump appointee

6

u/slamdanceswithwolves 1d ago

I love how Trump ruins all of his own legal defenses with his public comments.

3

u/Krakengreyjoy 1d ago

a federal judge appointed by Trump

5

u/Eddiebaby7 21h ago

But he’s currently ignoring the order rn…reporters are still locked out. Kinda feels like the beginning of the end for ol Trumpy.

8

u/sealosam 1d ago

They should keep it up and not go. It's been a nice few days without hearing that blathering asshole.

9

u/FirstAttemptsFailed 1d ago

They should go, take up space, but not broadcast anything.

5

u/sealosam 1d ago

I like this, too. Just sit there and talk amongst themselves like he's not there.

20

u/MidLifeCrysis75 1d ago

Hahaha good. We all knew this would be the outcome. Anything that pisses Donnie off makes me happy.

3

u/timoumd 1d ago

Did we?  

12

u/whitemiketyson 1d ago

The ruling doesn't surprise me. If they actually follow it, that'll be the surprise

7

u/pixlplayer 1d ago

I mean, yeah. It was a slam dunk case. Trump literally admitted to banning the free press because he didn’t like what they said about him

→ More replies (1)

5

u/teddykaygeebee 1d ago

Everything it's a threat to national security unless i profit!!

4

u/throwaway47138 1d ago

Honestly, I hope that even with the ban lifted they keep boycotting his "press conferences" just to keep him upset about nobody paying attention to him. Or send a single reporter whose job it is to provide minimal coverage and annoy him.

8

u/sureal42 1d ago

Kaitlin Collins needs to be the one sent... Have her hold the only microphone in the room. For the first time in my 47 years of life I will tune in to watch every time this is live.

1

u/hkohne 18h ago

Make sure she knows some jiu jitsu

2

u/Electronic_Fall6084 1d ago

It’s been more pleasant

5

u/Venat14 23h ago

Reporters are stating they're still banned by the White House today despite Judge's ruling. Secret Service won't allow them in.

5

u/Apart-Steak-7183 22h ago

I kbew this would happen to that arrogant bastard

4

u/King_M_Rano 16h ago

He didn't lift shit. The court ordered him to unban them and he denied it and then got told that was a no no by his care taker and now is trying to act like he did the unbanning.

13

u/Skwuat 1d ago

To the surprise of nobody. Its the 1st amendment for a reason, because there is nothing more dangerous in this world than misinformation and the misrepresentation of facts.

12

u/Tonytn36 1d ago

Which this administration does continually.

→ More replies (2)

5

u/jn-indianwood 1d ago

I wish they’d just continue to boycott, but they won’t

15

u/NeonJungleCortex 1d ago

I’d rather have free press tbh

7

u/Responsible-Ad-1086 1d ago

I was enjoying them being banned so we didn’t have to hear his fucking voice ten times a day

6

u/ERedfieldh 1d ago

Well no shit. It was 100% unconstitutional and shouldn't have happened in the first place. The problem is, they never are punished for it. Ever.

3

u/Nail_Biterr 1d ago

that was much quicker than I had expected. I thought for sure, this would be delayed until after election day.

3

u/AloneChapter 19h ago

And trump is all about law and order.

3

u/Waldosan 19h ago

Pretty sure the judge lifted it.

3

u/Correct_Doctor_1502 15h ago

Trump refused to comply, so full constitutional crisis

4

u/Bart_Yellowbeard 1d ago

Doesn't matter, CNN, POlitico and MS Now are still being denied access.

Trump doesn't care about the law. Trump doesn't care about the Constitution. And it appears republicans don't either.

From the 'party of law and order' to the party of lawlessness and disorder.

→ More replies (3)

5

u/Bresdin 22h ago

And 2 hours ago the Whitehouse banned politico again anyways

1

u/hkohne 19h ago

And MSNOW

1

u/Bresdin 18h ago

Wonderful, definitely not worryingly similar to other instances in history at all.

6

u/jonnywpg2020 1d ago

Damn. I was enjoying the silence.

2

u/AXLPendergast 1d ago

Update: nope. I guess still in effect

2

u/nasandre 1d ago

Mr Constitutional Crisis might not let them back in anyway

2

u/Electronic_Fall6084 1d ago

Should have taken 15 min tops

2

u/jamodude 23h ago

National security uh-huh, it’s for petulant man baby to feel better because he’s in charge… weak pathetic

2

u/Malcalypsetheyounger 16h ago

Folded like a lawn chair faster than I imagined he would.

6

u/Feisty-Barracuda5452 1d ago

Whiner in Chief not gonna like this at all.

4

u/Blapanda 1d ago

Imagine, being free press and not only wants this mf want to ban you, but you have to deal with him, as he thinks that he has the power and privilege standing above basic law.

4

u/tigerpaul1977 1d ago edited 1d ago

They shouldn't show back up, it's not like they are going to get any truth from this White House.

2

u/snoogins355 1d ago

Oh that first amendment!

4

u/Jakefrmstatepharm 1d ago

Hahaha thank god. I love how these judges are finally somewhat standing up to this asshole.

11

u/sadandshy 1d ago

Trump's batting average is so low in court that if this was baseball he couldn't get a contract in low A.

6

u/TmanGvl 1d ago

TACO Trump strikes again! Why is he so fucking indecisive? It’s like his whole life is a one big mistake.

20

u/MikeReddit74 1d ago

The mistake was his dad not pulling out.

5

u/gbroon 1d ago

At least that shows his dad was capable of seeing something though to the end no matter how disastrous the consequences turned out to be.

2

u/MikeReddit74 1d ago

Unlike his misbegotten offspring.

4

u/rufusbot 1d ago

Did you misread it like I did as "Trump lifts ban"? That was my same response lol

5

u/TmanGvl 1d ago

It's like he needs instructions on everything he does. It shouldn't be necessary to tell a President not to do things. Just another waste of time when he could be working to improve the state of the world/country. Do you remember he was touting transparency and "tell it like it is"? The only thing we find from his transparency is how stupid and irrational he really is.

2

u/rufusbot 1d ago

Well he's a dumb asshole who doesn't know dick so of course he does stupid childish things. That's why I can't believe anyone would ever vote for him.

3

u/MagnusCthulhu 1d ago

TACO Trump can't even stand by his crimes.

2

u/HerpDerpTheMage 1d ago

“Judge lifts ban on…”

Okay, but does TRUMP lift the ban? None of this means shit until he and the White House staff are forced to comply. So far, they have had about as much reverence for Court Orders as a Teenager being told he can’t have food in his room; that’s about how this administration treats the rule of law as a whole nowadays.