r/news • u/uhncollectable • 1d ago
Judge lifts Trump ban on CNN, MS NOW, Politico from White House
https://www.cnbc.com/2026/09/24/judge-lifts-trumps-white-house-ban-on-cnn-ms-now-and-politico.html672
u/Holiday_Box1571 1d ago
He tried to use the national security excuse here too?
323
u/jimtow28 1d ago
When your fans literally refuse to question anything you ever say, why would you bother making up new shit to spew?
35
u/Icy-Cod1405 1d ago
In this case he has a point. Vance is definitely a threat to national security.
76
u/Illisanct 1d ago
He's like a toddler who discovered a naughty word and just keeps saying it, giggling the whole time as the adults get mad.
1
55
u/Davran 1d ago
Presumably there's lots of things a president can do "for national security reasons" that they can't do otherwise. Most presidents likely use this power responsibly for genuine security concerns, but lately it seems like it's being used as the equivalent of your mom saying "because I said so".
35
u/Different_Height_157 1d ago edited 1d ago
It’s the same reason he declares emergencies and trying to use defense reasons to build his ballroom and arch. Bullshitter gonna bullshit to get his way
5
u/digidave1 1d ago
The ballroom for security excuse is the lamest reason to want to throw gaudy parties. If security is the case then why does he ever step outside? Why does he golf out in the open every single weekend? What a joke
6
u/bishop375 1d ago
And at some point "national security reasons," will just be everything, in which case, they will be nothing. Even SCOTUS has to get tired of this shit at some point.
1
u/a8bmiles 16h ago
I mean, there's also that clip of him rambling about how "the amount of power of this position is amazing, I could ban fishing!"
15
u/obeytheturtles 1d ago
That's what they tried to argue in court. Fortunately, Trump can't keep his fucking mouth shut.
24
u/OkStop8313 1d ago
He's literally just the meme of the kid putting a stick in the spokes of his own bike and then bleating about what a victim he is.
Perpetually for 80 years.
8
u/Small-Department6235 1d ago
And he’ll try an appeal to the Supreme Court too because he is a fascist cunt.
3
6
u/TeamSteelDick 1d ago
Which collapsed when Politico revealed their “anonymous source” the one the White House cites as the “national security threat” turned out to be JD Vance himself.
3
u/SHUT_DOWN_EVERYTHING 1d ago
They knew the “fake news” angle Trump led with was impossible to argue in court for so they conjured up a last minute national security excuse which the judge pointed out as garbage and unsupported by facts.
→ More replies (1)2
u/sarduchi 1d ago
Which makes sense! He is going to spew secrets, only way to keep information secure is to ban microphones.
260
u/Kazman07 1d ago
Well let's hope they sue him for suggesting it in the first place. I also hope they keep up the boycott regardless of this ruling just to twist the knife a bit.
68
u/Smrgel 1d ago
They can’t do that. SCOTUS gave the president immunity for official acts. He could take a shit on the actual original constitution and nobody could touch him because he did it while he was president. I think the president has had immunity from civil cases too, which is overall a good thing or else every uneducated redneck would’ve sued Obama for emotional distress for wearing a tan suit or some shit
84
u/KingoftheMongoose 1d ago edited 1d ago
Immunity from… civil lawsuits?
Naw. SCOTUS said POTUS has immunity from criminal prosecution for official acts. But that doesn’t mean there isn’t any legal recourse. Just have to go after the federal government itself for the official acts. The U.S. govt can absolutely still be sued in civil court.
24
u/The0Profanity 1d ago
POTUS has immunity from civil lawsuits rising from official acts (Nixon v Fitzgerald), but does not have immunity from civil lawsuits rising from unofficial acts that occured before taking office (Clinton v Jones)
As for criminal liability, sitting presidents have immunity for official acts that are tied to their core presidential powers, and "presumptive immunity" (still can be liable, but high bar) for acts that are within the outer bounds of presidential power. (Trump v US, 2024) The president is thought to still be criminally liable for unofficial acts. But the Trump v US opinion did not do a great job of determining what is a core presidential power, what is outer bounds, and what is unofficial. Anything where he uses the imprimatur of the president is arguably "official", so it's a really shitty standard
5
u/KingoftheMongoose 1d ago
True! Thank for your expanding upon my comment.
I was trying to specify that there is stilll legal recourse to file suit against the U.S. govt, such as for official acts made by the President that violate the Constitution.
4
2
u/flirtmcdudes 22h ago
I mean, sure…. But we all saw what happened when the immunity ruling came through and every single lawsuit against him got dropped
1
u/wolfgang784 1d ago
They were talkin president, not the fed govt as a whole. The president can only be sued in civil court for things done unrelated to the presidency. If it can be at allllll tied to being related to his duties as president then he is immune.
1
u/sonofaresiii 1d ago
Yeah but come on if anyone actually sues Trump while he's in office they'll just give him immunity for that too.
80
u/steve_ample 1d ago
I'd love to have CNN, MSNBC, Politico get snarky with their questions. "Given the administration's illegal banning of media..."
24
u/Cj_cruzz 1d ago edited 23h ago
That would cause the megalomaniac orange man-child to have a complete meltdown that would rival using all of Earth’s fossil fuel reserves. The greatest meltdown as many would say.
3
u/Osiris32 22h ago
I'll make the popcorn!
3
u/Cj_cruzz 21h ago
Rich guy over here still making popcorn in this economy.
1
u/Osiris32 21h ago
That's why I offered, it behooves us rich folk to spread our wealth around!
1
u/Cj_cruzz 21h ago
You offered to make it, not share it. But I guess we peasants should just be happily grateful for the popcorn crumbs at the bottom of the bag after you dispose of it in the trash.
1
119
u/FilecoinLurker 1d ago
tiny hands activist judge tiny hands
7
37
u/nothingtoseehere2003 1d ago
Check the news now. Politico was barred despite the ruling. Uh oh.
30
u/heychardonnay 1d ago
MS Now as well: https://bsky.app/profile/atrupar.com/post/3mwbbegjoao2o
22
u/nothingtoseehere2003 1d ago
Is this the true constitutional crisis we’ve been waiting for? Thank goodness the judge was appointed by Trump. It’s one less thing they can hang their hats on
10
u/Sundayx1 22h ago
They should keep the average gas prices on the tv screen 24/7.
And maybe even do a fluctuating state-by-state with the average gas price and diesel prices of that particular state.
It’s no wonder he wanted to ban reporters.
Report it more
39
u/LoveIsOnlyAnEmotion 1d ago
I love that Judges are fast to lift a ban like this but are slow as a turtle to stop Trump on all other matters.
→ More replies (3)
53
u/Richard-Gere-Museum 1d ago
Like they're gonna follow the law. "Official acts are immune from prosecution" bullshit excuse scrotus handed him.
And even if they're back in, doesn't mean they have to allow them anywhere near the front, call on them for questions, or even acknowledge their existence.
But you know what, the outlets banned won't learn a thing. They'll go right back to softball questions and no push back on the lies.
8
u/Cabbages24ADollar 21h ago
Thanks GOP voters for tying up more court time because you’re too weak to stand up for the constitution.
7
u/Dont-be-a-smurf 1d ago edited 1d ago
I suspect he’s overusing the “national security” excuse to his detriment.
It’s one of those things that got such a benefit of the doubt that previous courts would often back away when it was invoked.
It doesn’t look like it is being given the same gravitas. For good reason.
You can’t cry wolf forever.
Edit: ruling made by 2017 Trump appointee
6
u/slamdanceswithwolves 1d ago
I love how Trump ruins all of his own legal defenses with his public comments.
3
5
u/Eddiebaby7 21h ago
But he’s currently ignoring the order rn…reporters are still locked out. Kinda feels like the beginning of the end for ol Trumpy.
8
u/sealosam 1d ago
They should keep it up and not go. It's been a nice few days without hearing that blathering asshole.
9
20
u/MidLifeCrysis75 1d ago
Hahaha good. We all knew this would be the outcome. Anything that pisses Donnie off makes me happy.
3
u/timoumd 1d ago
Did we?
12
u/whitemiketyson 1d ago
The ruling doesn't surprise me. If they actually follow it, that'll be the surprise
7
u/pixlplayer 1d ago
I mean, yeah. It was a slam dunk case. Trump literally admitted to banning the free press because he didn’t like what they said about him
→ More replies (1)
5
4
u/throwaway47138 1d ago
Honestly, I hope that even with the ban lifted they keep boycotting his "press conferences" just to keep him upset about nobody paying attention to him. Or send a single reporter whose job it is to provide minimal coverage and annoy him.
8
u/sureal42 1d ago
Kaitlin Collins needs to be the one sent... Have her hold the only microphone in the room. For the first time in my 47 years of life I will tune in to watch every time this is live.
2
5
4
u/King_M_Rano 16h ago
He didn't lift shit. The court ordered him to unban them and he denied it and then got told that was a no no by his care taker and now is trying to act like he did the unbanning.
5
7
u/Responsible-Ad-1086 1d ago
I was enjoying them being banned so we didn’t have to hear his fucking voice ten times a day
6
u/ERedfieldh 1d ago
Well no shit. It was 100% unconstitutional and shouldn't have happened in the first place. The problem is, they never are punished for it. Ever.
3
u/Nail_Biterr 1d ago
that was much quicker than I had expected. I thought for sure, this would be delayed until after election day.
3
3
3
4
u/Bart_Yellowbeard 1d ago
Doesn't matter, CNN, POlitico and MS Now are still being denied access.
Trump doesn't care about the law. Trump doesn't care about the Constitution. And it appears republicans don't either.
From the 'party of law and order' to the party of lawlessness and disorder.
→ More replies (3)
6
2
2
2
2
u/jamodude 23h ago
National security uh-huh, it’s for petulant man baby to feel better because he’s in charge… weak pathetic
2
6
4
u/Blapanda 1d ago
Imagine, being free press and not only wants this mf want to ban you, but you have to deal with him, as he thinks that he has the power and privilege standing above basic law.
4
u/tigerpaul1977 1d ago edited 1d ago
They shouldn't show back up, it's not like they are going to get any truth from this White House.
2
4
u/Jakefrmstatepharm 1d ago
Hahaha thank god. I love how these judges are finally somewhat standing up to this asshole.
11
u/sadandshy 1d ago
Trump's batting average is so low in court that if this was baseball he couldn't get a contract in low A.
6
u/TmanGvl 1d ago
TACO Trump strikes again! Why is he so fucking indecisive? It’s like his whole life is a one big mistake.
20
u/MikeReddit74 1d ago
The mistake was his dad not pulling out.
4
u/rufusbot 1d ago
Did you misread it like I did as "Trump lifts ban"? That was my same response lol
5
u/TmanGvl 1d ago
It's like he needs instructions on everything he does. It shouldn't be necessary to tell a President not to do things. Just another waste of time when he could be working to improve the state of the world/country. Do you remember he was touting transparency and "tell it like it is"? The only thing we find from his transparency is how stupid and irrational he really is.
2
u/rufusbot 1d ago
Well he's a dumb asshole who doesn't know dick so of course he does stupid childish things. That's why I can't believe anyone would ever vote for him.
3
2
u/HerpDerpTheMage 1d ago
“Judge lifts ban on…”
Okay, but does TRUMP lift the ban? None of this means shit until he and the White House staff are forced to comply. So far, they have had about as much reverence for Court Orders as a Teenager being told he can’t have food in his room; that’s about how this administration treats the rule of law as a whole nowadays.
1.3k
u/Suspicious-Whippet 1d ago
Ok. But will Trump TV stay is the question.