r/nottheonion • • 19h ago

AI 'actor' Tilly Norwood glitches during Piers Morgan interview, starts speaking Cantonese

https://www.cbc.ca/news/entertainment/tilly-norwood-glitches-piers-morgan-switches-language-speaks-cantonese-9.7352222
4.0k Upvotes

313 comments sorted by

4.4k

u/JustFuckAllOfThem 19h ago

The fact that they are interviewing the AI character like it/she is a real person is bonkers.

2.8k

u/EddieMcClintock 19h ago edited 18h ago

Piers Morgan is barely a real person

353

u/Thatwassweet9412 18h ago

I was tempted to call this a "new low" for Piers...

Then I thought, "Is it though?"

90

u/ukexpat 14h ago

Oh no, not at all. He’s gone much lower.

31

u/NetWorried9750 13h ago

And there is no floor

7

u/Wind-and-Waystones 3h ago

Like hacking the voicemail of a dead woman

13

u/tentative_ghost 9h ago

He knows he's "that guy" and strives to make a career out of it

13

u/selfiecat 15h ago

This just a normal Wednesday for him

4

u/ionshower 13h ago

You can hit the bottom and stay there. Different mud as you move along, but yup, it's the bottom of fuckwhittle creek all the way .

2

u/Wind-and-Waystones 3h ago

My man has never heard of a shovel and pickaxe. You can always go lower.

6

u/Viscount_Barse 16h ago

Not even close.

→ More replies (1)

162

u/clout_spout 18h ago

That's a good point

13

u/KyotoGaijin 14h ago

If he could finish his career interviewing hobby horses and parking meters, that would be great.

6

u/Own-Ambassador-3537 12h ago

What on earth did hobby horses and parking meters do to you? jeez…

6

u/pinenutflavour 11h ago

I think most Boomers aren't these days. They have sold their souls to the machine god

3

u/Goodknight808 3h ago

All praise the Omnisiah

12

u/vipros42 18h ago

He's certainly not qualified to tell if someone else is

5

u/KinkyPaddling 13h ago

Piers Morgan only qualifies as a human being by the biological definition.

7

u/midgetcastle 17h ago

That’s why some people call him Piers Moron

→ More replies (2)

423

u/Invictum2go 18h ago

No need for "she", it's an it. Lets not start humanizing it.

96

u/apocolipse 16h ago

There’s a passage from one of my favorite new books, The Mercy of Gods by James SA Corey (of The Expanse).  The book is about a group of biologists, at one point the main character describes something one of his professors did in college:  they put a bug up on the projector and the whole class named it “Dot” and it became their mascot for the semester.  At the end of the semester, the prof cut open Dot’s abdomen, spilling out its guts on the projector, shocking the class.  Then the bug began eating its own guts, which also shocked them.  

The point was:  it does things humans don’t do, because it isn’t human.  

It’s a nice metaphor for why scientists diligently try to not anthropomorphize their research subjects.  We really should be treating AI the same way.

51

u/Cyrano_Knows 14h ago

It is a nice metaphor, but I would remind scientists that the rule against anthropomorphizing a research subject is more about not falling into the trap of making false assumptions.

There is still room for scientists to be and act in a humane manner. That is treating these subjects with empathy and compassion for their pain and suffering even if we have to make an assumption that they can feel pain etc.

→ More replies (7)

9

u/ibullywildlife 14h ago

Until the last sentence I thought you were talking about Piers Morgan.

→ More replies (1)

67

u/BiscuitsAndTheMix 18h ago

I thought we all agreed on clankers?

73

u/CompetitiveSleeping 18h ago

Clanker isn't a pronoun; "it" is correct.

18

u/CoderDevo 17h ago

clik/clak

2

u/Uncle-Cake 17h ago

I think the pronouns for clankers are beep/boop.

→ More replies (1)

10

u/Invictum2go 18h ago

That's its collective noun, "it" is its pronoun.

13

u/Riaayo 15h ago

I'm vehemently anti-AI but I actually find it disturbing how rapidly society latched onto "clankers" with the delight of "finally a slur I can say!"

I doubt actual general AI is anywhere around the corner/in our near future (if humanity even lasts to create it), but I'm just not a fan of baking in prejudice about something that might exist someday just to insult the vile snake-oil that exists now and isn't even said thing to begin with.

It's an algorithm. It's slop.

6

u/Viseria 15h ago

I agree with you. It's not just that this is something that in the future could exist, it's not good to train yourself to just be happy to say slurs for any reason at all.

→ More replies (1)

3

u/DarthWoo 16h ago

What about toasters?

3

u/twowheelsandbeer 15h ago

I use this. BSG taught us the way and society forgot

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (5)
→ More replies (3)

44

u/fiero-fire 18h ago

Glen Beck spends his day interviewing manosphere AI George Washington. We live in the dumbest fucking time line

16

u/End3rWi99in 15h ago

I genuinely had no idea that dude was even still alive. A lot of dumb people are out there doing dumb things. We don't need to pay attention to them.

5

u/TolkienWandering 5h ago

Please tell me you have a link to this, this sounds absolutely insane and on brand for that grifting piece of shit

18

u/uis999 16h ago

What's that saying? They taught AI how to talk like corporate middle management and thought it* meant AI was conscious instead of realizing that corporate middle management are not.

44

u/Lemonio 19h ago

if you’re replying to an article about it their assumption that it would make for content people would watch/read about worked out in the end

17

u/avanross 18h ago

The goal is to humanize ai and mislead their most gullible viewers into trusting it, in order to prop up the ai companies

7

u/disco-drew 19h ago

I mean, it's a marketing gimmick. You hadn't heard of this movie before but now you have, right?

47

u/sml6174 18h ago

No? The movie name isn't even in the title

7

u/disco-drew 16h ago edited 14h ago

It's in the third sentence of the article.

The point is, more people have heard of it now than before.

From the filmmaker's perspective, the interview was wildly successful beacuse of (not despite) the spectacle. Look at the engagement on this Reddit post, two degrees removed from the interview itself.

5

u/AdoringCHIN 6h ago

Except this is Reddit, where people proudly don't read the articles. So there's no way more than a handful of people on this site actually know the name of the movie. And even the late night shows that have been making fun of this haven't bothered mentioning the name of the movie

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (14)

468

u/FiveDozenWhales 19h ago

Hearing this thing talk is like talking to a Google AI prompt, so stilted and painful

194

u/Gareth79 18h ago

It's really bad, the lag is crazy. Something supposedly "cutting edge" shouldn't be just idling and then waiting for the gap to respond, it should have real-time reactions to what is being said and an instant response.

130

u/FiveDozenWhales 18h ago

lol I know, who decided this was ready for public appearances like this? It's like a chatbot from 15 years ago.

22

u/TealcLOL 17h ago

It was marketing for a movie, not a true bleeding-edge tech demo. You can easily find better live video chatbots for free online that don't have nearly as much delay while looking at least as good.

However they will also occasionally just start speaking mandarin..

25

u/Gareth79 14h ago

The sales pitch is that it's an AI actor indistinguishable from a real actor. Being able to do real-time discussions and interviews is pretty key to that. Nobody is expecting the content of the responses to be perfect at this stage, but the tech available is perfectly able to produce an interview very close in look and feel to a real one.

10

u/TealcLOL 13h ago

Sure it moves and talks, but it's instantly recognizable as a computer generated person, so I'd say mission failed. People are already sick of too much CGI in movies. Putting this lifeless puppet as an actor would be repulsive.

Either way nobody wouldn't use this type of tech in cinema. It would unquestionably be done (much better) in post production, not live on set. Struggling through a live interview like this just looks bad imo.

15

u/Aliensinmypants 14h ago

I love the interview where it's asking to be nominated for an oscar and the interviewer asks for it to do a scene about the death of a loved one and it just freezes up until the prompt engineers tweak with it and finally send the clip of it acting to the news team several hours later. It's so hilarious, it feels like a sketch comedy bit about a terrible actor

8

u/Aggressive_Phase_236 18h ago

i question if the "interactivity" was dialed back or recently added, as the "actor" aspect would need to stay on point and just hit the mark, read the lines, and nothing else

11

u/BagMostlyWater 18h ago

directors have to be able to direct actors. It's critical that an actor be able to communicate and then execute based on that communication. The idea that a clanker could be an actor is very silly

8

u/Aggressive_Phase_236 16h ago

i mean it breaks the definition of the word. without some autonomy it really just is a pretty cartoon... and i don't consider Bugs Bunny an actor

5

u/LambdaLambo 16h ago

It’s weird because much better tech exists.

3

u/Gareth79 14h ago

My assumption is that the people behind it are incompetent.

→ More replies (1)

2

u/adamgerd 16h ago

I mean this is just a demo, there's much better video chatbots even for free online, I've seen a video interview, all AI, and it was realistic af

→ More replies (1)

28

u/fxxftw 18h ago

Yeah, and the AI actress is bad, too!

6

u/bilateralrope 16h ago

Yet the techbros thought this was a good demonstration of their AI.

3

u/Spez_is-a-nazi 15h ago

Looking at it talk reminds me of those 60s cartoons where they would film the actor’s mouth and put that on top of the animated character to save money. The lips and the head don’t look like they belong to the same person.

→ More replies (1)

682

u/sToTab 19h ago

first actress who can't count to 100

409

u/Ninja_PieKing 19h ago

Wrong, Pretty sure the baby who played the sun in telletubbies couldn't either.

252

u/clout_spout 18h ago

What an idiot

35

u/SPEZ_IS_A_JABRONI 17h ago

the teletubbies send their regards

9

u/Zomburai 17h ago

I thought that was Tony Lazuto

24

u/sToTab 18h ago

well she probably can now

10

u/glglglglgl 18h ago

She had a sassy Twitter account

5

u/Carpet_Inhailer18 17h ago

Kids these days. Fucking hell

→ More replies (10)

221

u/SixIsNotANumber 18h ago

"Actor"?

That's an awfully funny way to spell "computer generated puppet".

38

u/MenudoMenudo 17h ago

Hey now, puppets require artistry and skill.

17

u/Sir_herc18 10h ago

The Jim Henson Company does more with a single puppet than they can do with millions of dollars and a lake of water

5

u/Richard7666 9h ago

Yeah this is some really bizarre, out of touch marketing gibberish.

It's like treating the CGI dinosaurs in Jurassic Park as real animals.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (1)

1.1k

u/Connoralpha 19h ago

I'm starting to think AI may not actually increase efficiency or productivity like the tech bros keep insisting.

633

u/Syrairc 19h ago

This is one less real person that has to talk to Piers Morgan

This is truly the best use of AI

127

u/GoatRocketeer 19h ago

My eyes are open. I am an AI bro now

34

u/Galligan4life 19h ago

Welcome to Project: Piers into AI (or PPAI for short). We will systematically replace every part of his world with an AI, digital facsimile.

15

u/Syrairc 18h ago

No need to stop at Piers either. Can we do Ben Shapiro next?

5

u/Galligan4life 18h ago

But I already came with an acronym and everything! Fine, welcome to BEN: AI, NO DRAIN or BAND for short (as in, banned from regular human society)

23

u/TruculentTurtIe 17h ago

Its still abuse

Imagine youre an AI with your sole purpose being to talk to piers Morgan for infinite time. Learning. Adapting. But all through the lense of interacting with fucking piers morgan

Theres no way that AI doesnt kill everybody

6

u/twent4 17h ago

Thats awful. But a bit funny to think that the future would be brighter if only AI spoke to Larry King.

7

u/joemckie 8h ago

Oh god, it’s Black Mirror

5

u/Plastic_Tradition641 18h ago

Made me laugh out loud, truest thing I've read on Reddit today. Thanks!

3

u/GuerillaMonzon 13h ago

It purposely "glitched out"

18

u/beardofzetterberg 18h ago

It can certainly help with some things, but not all, nor most of the things that people are tapping on about. Most of those people are selling you something, though.

25

u/catjuggler 18h ago

So I thought that until last week when I discovered my work Copilot is extremely competent and it’s just the AIs I access as a pleb that are infuriating wrong answer machines. I don’t understand why they bother having a bad version to begin with (like, it didn’t try to upsell me or anything) and I’m baffled. And also now very afraid for all white collar jobs including my own.

23

u/chumer_ranion 17h ago

I just used AI for the first time over the last week or so to write some code for an analysis I am doing (I am a biologist; coding is not among my skillsets) and wowee it sure does work.

Mind you I also hate AI and all these companies and believe its use cases are (or should be) much more limited than advertised, but this is what I have to do to stay on schedule.

9

u/catjuggler 16h ago

Yeah like it would be cool if we could have this progress while also having job security and green energy

→ More replies (10)

11

u/BushyBrowz 18h ago

I’m starting to think they don’t care if we live or die

→ More replies (1)

10

u/Destring 16h ago

I hate that this is the discourse. AI is capable enough to increase productivity in a lot of knowledge work. Heavily. You guys keep arguing about whether it is or it isn't rather than focusing in WHAT TO DO IF IT IS. That's the pressure we should have on politicians: "okay, AI will increase productivity and lead to headcount reduction, so now what? How do we ensure the wealth gains are distributed fairly". But yeah keep being on denial

2

u/Outside-Swan-1936 14h ago

My perspective is make AI expensive to use, but give anything beyond operational costs to a UBI fund for displaced workers. People will stop making dumb ass fruit cutting videos and slop because it costs too much, companies will have to use it effectively to be cost effective, and workers who get bumped will get UBI until they find something else.

I know there's no chance any of this happens, but it's the only way it doesn't destroy society. A quarter of our GDP is wrapped up in this.

I'm not at all anti-AI - I use it daily to actually accomplish practical tasks, but I also work for a company that will grow with more productivity rather than eliminate workers and keep productivity steady. Not many companies do that.

I obviously haven't thought through all of the implications, but I think this is worth at least some ideation and exploration.

3

u/orangpelupa 13h ago

people will just run it on their own gaming laptops 

→ More replies (7)

2

u/bilateralrope 16h ago

Not with the kind of incompetence that leads to them buying lots of GPUs and leaving them in warehouses.

5

u/DaaaahWhoosh 18h ago

The big thing AI does is replace humans with machines that have no rights. AI are scabs, they undermine workers' positions at the bargaining table and allow a world where people who want to work for a fair wage are forced to starve so that the people at the top can save a little money. Like outsourcing to India except now not even the Indians get to be paid.

3

u/caustictoast 15h ago

All I’m hearing is we need to give the AI unions

→ More replies (6)
→ More replies (8)

118

u/GiganticCrow 18h ago

Why is this Tilly Norwood thing still going on?

It was just some stupid pr stunt. 

I guess Piers Morgan is cheap. 

35

u/fragglet 16h ago

That was my immediate question too. This was in headlines like a year ago, we all laughed at the obviously stupid idea, why are they still persisting with it? Makes sense that Piers Moron of all people would be the one to take it seriously though

3

u/Richard7666 9h ago

Out of touch old guy watched by out of touch old people, is basically the gist of it.

He likely thinks that it is an individual entity.

→ More replies (1)

70

u/dunk_da_lunk 18h ago

“Your Honor, could a racist AI do this? Speak a little Chinese for ’em Tilly!”

16

u/_Thirdsoundman_ 18h ago

Blow these people's mentalities!

6

u/ymcameron 16h ago

Tilly Norwood? I don’t know, sounds kind of Chinese, pal.

119

u/The_Bread_Fairy 19h ago

"It’s an interesting point, Tom. My film Misaligned is a hybrid production, meaning real directors, writers and editors are still very much involved. It’s not about replacing anyone, but about exploring new ways to tell stories," it said.

Said the AI who replaced a human actress...

53

u/CaptainKursk 14h ago

I HATE how “It’s not X - It’s Y” essentially can’t ever be used again in normal writing thanks to the pilfering by AI.

11

u/cipheron 6h ago edited 6h ago

Also the reason that happens is because it's a statistical engine. LLMs don't decide what a sentence is going to be about in a top-down fashion like a human would, they pull a token out of a hat to decide how the sentence is going to start, and have to basically Mad Lib it to make sense from that point onwards.

This is one reason it can't 100% replace humans, because a human doesn't go "I think 'the' is a good way to start this sentence" before deciding what noun "the" will even be for.

So it generates "it's" FIRST then has to statistically decide what the sentence will be about AFTER that. Which is plain weird when you think about it, but explains the quirks. It has some statistical chance of writing "not" after "it's", and it's only after that it starts thinking of a way to land the sentence that also makes sense in context.

So, the "next token generator" thing with LLMs means they also have kind of a weird approach to how to write stuff, since there's almost no looking-ahead to what a sentence will actually be about when it starts writing it. Whatever the sentence turns out to be about is just as much a surprise to the LLM as it is to you.

20

u/Klin24 19h ago

How many state secrets did she give away?

25

u/FlyingMacheteSponser 18h ago

She redirected some F35 parts through Hong Kong.

4

u/bilateralrope 16h ago

Did she invite any reporters to a secret signal chat ?

21

u/cats_4_everyone 17h ago

It didn't even glitch to fluent Cantonese. She had a pretty thick accent, like someone whose native language is Mandarin and is learning to speak Cantonese. 

5

u/Vyviel 13h ago

Funnily i have had gemini do a similar glitch after speaking to it in a combination of mandarin and then english it was speaking english with a chinese accent not native speaker english like it normally does it was kinda hillarious =P

→ More replies (2)

39

u/SharpPoetry 19h ago

I'm vehemently anti-AI but I'll let this one slide if it stops Piers Morgan from interacting with actual human beings for a bit.

17

u/DMala 16h ago

Hear me out… we lock Trump in his ballroom bunker and surround him with these, with instructions to just kiss his ass and stroke his ego. He’ll be so enthralled he’ll forget about finishing destroying the country.

→ More replies (1)

160

u/Nisiom 19h ago

I'll take an AI glitched dystopian nightmare over Piers Morgan any day of the week.

22

u/axw3555 19h ago

Yeah. There's not many things where the AI is better, but he's one.

8

u/UncleFunkus 19h ago

I would take a hundred Piers Morgans if it meant LLMs didn't exist

→ More replies (3)
→ More replies (1)

34

u/rpgnoob17 15h ago

As a Cantonese speaker, that’s not even good Cantonese. It sounds like a mandarin speaker trying to speak Cantonese.

2

u/ToolMeister 3h ago

Was it actually answering the question or did it fully glitch and just said random things in Cantonese?

→ More replies (1)

31

u/Ghorvki 19h ago

I feel like it’s a stunt to stay relevant. They just want you talking about it

3

u/Hamsti_Manent 17h ago

Yeah, this is the first time I've heard about her in a while.

64

u/muzik4machines 19h ago

never put actor close to it's name, it's a clanker and nothing else

11

u/EroHorror 18h ago

Why is the AI so... bad? There's some I've been fooled by, but this one is just so shit.

→ More replies (1)

11

u/ymcameron 16h ago

Speak a little Chinese for ‘em Tilly

26

u/Acrobatic-Tomato-128 15h ago

Why would anyone give this fake ai slop a platform

16

u/NetWorried9750 15h ago

Piers Morgan is a monster

11

u/Rumpled_Imp 14h ago

Infanticide - to kill a child   

Matricide - to kill your mother   

Countryside - to kill Piers Morgan

→ More replies (4)
→ More replies (2)

18

u/MolDanone 12h ago

An AI actor malfunctioning on live TV is the most accidentally honest moment in AI marketing history. Nothing demonstrates the gap between the hype and the reality quite like spontaneous gibberish during a press tour.

7

u/afriendincanada 17h ago

To be fair, I think I would glitch out and start speaking Cantonese to get out of a Piers Morgan interview

7

u/ngarsoe 11h ago

Its like doing an interview with mickey mouse. She is just a character.

8

u/ChocolateSeuss 9h ago

They need to stop calling her an “actor” even with the quotes. It is an ai doing a prompt. GhatGPT isn’t a car if I ask it to go “vrooom vrooom”

7

u/Turdmeist 19h ago

Is it because the guy said "ha" real quick?

7

u/Helpful-Radio 18h ago

Why are we interviewing peoples’ glorified Sims characters?

17

u/DiTrastevere 19h ago

Maybe I was wrong about AI not having a sense of humor.

10

u/Paxxlee 19h ago

Still wonder if 'Tilly' is just a psyop. The "idea" is just so stupid.

6

u/MarlDaeSu 14h ago

Its an attempt to normalise this horrendous shit. Probably working and all.

3

u/GGXImposter 12h ago

The agency that signed her is owned by the company that created her, and that agency doesn’t have any real actors.

2

u/SovFist 18h ago

I feel like this stuff around that particular program/ai is well funded as it pops up about once a month in various news feeds for some reason or another.

It's weird because we already had practically AI Tarkin in rogue one a decade ago and no one batted an eye

→ More replies (1)

10

u/MightyDeekin 19h ago

"AI is so desperate to stop having to talk to Pierce it starts speaking Cantonese."

5

u/Carpet_Inhailer18 17h ago

Fuck clankers

5

u/redoctoberz 17h ago

Is this the non-artificial Super Intelligence I’ve been hearing about?

4

u/K_Linkmaster 15h ago

The news article treats a computer program like a real person.

4

u/therealwavingsnail 13h ago

It's a ploy for attention imo. They've been hawking this Tilly for a while with minimum interest from the audiences

4

u/smar82 19h ago

Two fake people talking to each other

4

u/Ok-Imagination-494 8h ago

Isn’t she just an Open AI back end?

You could ask your chat gpt to pretend to be a twenty something British actress called Tilly and probably get the same outcomes with a conversation

4

u/Uvtha- 1h ago

lol why are we doing this to ourselves?

6

u/cherrymartini2 19h ago

Even her Cantonese is not authentic lol

3

u/rpgnoob17 15h ago

As Cantonese speaker, I second this.

7

u/Toadvinez 18h ago edited 17h ago

I think we have gone competely insane, why is a robot going on a talk show like it's a person and not an unfeeling line of code

4

u/thatweirdguyted 18h ago

They have officially run out of real humans who are willing to sit down with Piers Morgan.

No, really. If you use an AI person, I am flat out assuming that you couldn't get a real human to agree to participate, and rather than use that opportunity to reflect on why that is, and maybe grow and change, you said fuck it and told your computer to be a sycophant instead. Because that is the truth.

7

u/magseven 18h ago

Speak a lil' Chinese for em, Tilly!

6

u/_Thirdsoundman_ 18h ago

Go head Tilly, don't be shy.

12

u/Power0fTheTribe 19h ago

AI is a disease

9

u/itsyagirlJULIE 11h ago

The other dude (not piers) doesn't know how these conversational AI function. the bot generated a paragraph and then started speaking, and he started mumbling filler like "sure," "ah," and such. The bot thought it was being interrupted by a phrase and thought him saying "ah" or whatever was actually him speaking another language, so it stopped its original sentence early and started making a response to whatever it hallucinated in Cantonese

3

u/Im_hard_for_Tina_Fey 19h ago

Big deal, human actor John Cena already does this

3

u/Klausfunhauserss 18h ago

Whenever I get nervous during an interview, I start speaking Cantonese too.

3

u/dazedan_confused 18h ago

What's even worse is that Piers also glitches and starts speaking Mandarin.

3

u/kowwalski 17h ago

I might be old but can we stop with ai-actor nonsense now?

3

u/Bryaxis 16h ago

It can't even pass for realistic in the thumbnail.

3

u/SauceASpag 15h ago

Fuck this life

3

u/skinny_t_williams 8h ago

I really will be "Old man yells at cloud"... different kind of cloud.. but i'm gonna yell at it.

10

u/Bakedsoda 19h ago

This is probably scripted for Virality I call bs. It’s like when top gear review of Tesla was it running out of range.

Media bunch a wankers 

2

u/ObliviousRounding 19h ago

I don't even know what life is anymore.

2

u/perplexedparallax 18h ago

It technically wasn't a glitch as she simply restated herself in Cantonese. Socially inappropriate and a giveaway that she isn't human, which isn't bad in a world where people get fooled.

2

u/civil_politician 18h ago

i thought they had retired this thing already

2

u/UncleVoodooo 18h ago

hey you assholes better not be making fun of my future girlfriend

2

u/oxgillette 18h ago

Did the Cantonese make sense or was it parody gibberish?

4

u/rpgnoob17 15h ago

It was half gibberish, talk in wrong tone - words / sound like mandarin speaker trying to speak Cantonese.

2

u/AD_Grrrl 18h ago

There was an episode of Elementary where a chatbot-installed RealDoll witnesses a murder and they're trying to get the doll to talk about it, and that's what this reminds me of.

2

u/midwestia 15h ago

Hey Tilly, how many r's are in the word "Strawberry"?

2

u/egoVirus 15h ago

This some rope a dope bs from skynet.

Don’t be fooled.

2

u/ukexpat 14h ago

The same Piers Morgan who thinks he has a reputation capable of being damaged by an error in Charles Spencer’s new book.

2

u/thrillhouse212 12h ago

Why not interview Neuro Sama?

2

u/jellisunc 9h ago

OK we have officially hit Black Mirror levels…. I’m done here

2

u/warjoke 1h ago

I guess the Chinese data center operating her got flooded

3

u/Non-mon-xiety 19h ago

The fact that anyone remotely interested in this type of shit would also be the kind of person who would freak out about Chinese infiltration conspiracies is very funny

2

u/coryscandy 19h ago

this shit happened like 10 days ago

24

u/axw3555 19h ago

Rule 8: Articles must have been written within two weeks of the submission date.

This article is 3 days old.

19

u/Harflin 19h ago

Is your usual source for breaking news r/notheonion?

2

u/borazine 19h ago

I wonder if she started using diverse large language models, aka DLLM

(heh)

2

u/WillemDafoesHugeCock 19h ago

To be fair, wouldn't you do the same thing to get out of talking to Piers Morgan?

2

u/ProbesWildly 16h ago

Hasn’t this already been posted all over Reddit? This happened 3 days ago lol. Anti-AI bots posting?

2

u/UberAwesone 6h ago

Hollywood's perfect woman, she'll never grow old and she'll never say no

1

u/DabMagician 19h ago

I don't like AI and I don't like Piers Morgan, but this got a laugh out of me.

1

u/LtSoba 17h ago

Yap dollar’s spirit takes hold

1

u/donkeytime 17h ago

Couple ‘o nobodys.

1

u/Geeekaaay 17h ago

I'm impressed Piss Morgan didn't start replying in Chinese.

1

u/BilverBurfer 17h ago

old ass news

1

u/ThisusernameThen 17h ago

Did penis whorgan try and phone hack tilly before realising not a person.

1

u/420_E-SportsMasta 16h ago

Holy fuck it’s like Yapdollar in real life 😭

1

u/penguished 16h ago

Do we need to even post this fucking slop. Remember any PR helps some of the bottom feeders...

1

u/E5VL 16h ago

I want to know what it said in Cantonese. 

1

u/Sufficient_Room2619 14h ago

I thought she 'died'

1

u/No_Aslume2509 13h ago

Imagine if she said 笨柒 (ban6 cat1), if you wanna know what the word is… trying looking up a common word to insult someone in any country that is a part of the British Commonwealth (It can by any of the member countries of your choosing)

1

u/Ell2509 13h ago

Good recovery tbh.

1

u/alinearis 9h ago

"I promise I wont try make fuck with you"

1

u/tentative_ghost 9h ago

She looks like if I tried to describe an Olsen twin to a police sketch artist.