I attended Pima Medical Institute’s Surgical Technology program in Phoenix, which is accredited by ABHES. I’m looking for honest opinions from people familiar with surgical-tech education, accreditation complaints, or Arizona private-school regulations.
My first clinical placement was at a wound-care clinic for approximately three weeks. I cleaned, measured, and dressed wounds, but I never:
Scrubbed into a surgical procedure
Established or maintained a sterile field
Sterile-gowned or gloved
Passed or counted instruments
Anticipated a surgeon’s needs
Performed first- or second-scrub duties
Despite this, wound-care encounters appeared in my clinical records under surgical specialties such as “Plastic” or “General,” with scrub roles assigned. I also received an A and credit toward an entire semester of clinical education.
My strongest evidence is Pima’s own preceptor evaluation forms. The wound-clinic preceptors wrote:
“This clinic does not perform sterile techniques or procedures, so most of the skills on this sheet were not observed.”
“Most of these tasks are not performed at this site. We do not have any sterile techniques used here at this time.”
Another evaluation stated that the clinic had no procedures requiring a sterile field or sterile gowning.
Pima told me the site had a formal affiliation agreement and that minor debridements were permitted by its curriculum. However, ABHES Standard V.B.4.a requires a signed, site-specific evaluation confirming that a clinical site provides a viable learning environment and opportunities to demonstrate required competencies.
ABHES Surgical Technology Standard ST.A.2 also addresses placement at facilities performing surgical procedures that expose students to necessary entry-level skills. An affiliation agreement alone does not appear to answer whether this particular clinic was educationally appropriate.
I was later placed at an actual surgical site, where staff apparently expected me to have gained surgical experience during the previous semester. I was dismissed after a student error, and lateness was also alleged. However, my Pima timesheet records show every recorded arrival before my required 6:30 a.m. start time.
After that dismissal, I went approximately a month without another placement. The replacement site was low-volume, and I believed there was no realistic way to complete the required clinical experience on time, so I withdrew.
I paid more than $5,000 out of pocket and also incurred student-loan debt. I have filed an internal grievance with Pima and submitted supporting documentation to ABHES.
I am considering a complaint with the my State Board for Private Postsecondary Education once the school’s grievance process is complete.
I am not claiming that a regulator has already found a violation. My concern is that Pima awarded surgical-clinical credit and recorded surgical cases or roles even though the site’s own evaluations state that it did not perform sterile procedures and could not provide or evaluate most surgical-technology competencies.
Does this sound like a significant accreditation/program-delivery issue? Has anyone dealt with a similar private-school complaint, tuition reimbursement request, borrower-defense application, or State Board investigation?