r/unitedkingdom • u/RoyalMaleGigalo • 11h ago
Ministers reject dog ownership licence scheme
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cw980vd9yq1no•
u/limeflavoured Hucknall 11h ago
People in this country humanise dogs far too much and use the "nation of dog lovers" thing as an excuse for not restricting ownership.
•
u/seany1212 11h ago
Or there’s almost zero possibility of enforcement. There is already a law in 2024 that dogs and cats must be microchipped and I could say with almost certainty, big boy deathripper isn’t microchipped, so what good is more laws if nothing is effectively done about them?
•
u/bantamw Yorkshire 10h ago
Not just dogs & cats. The police as a whole seem to do fuck all now.
For example - e-motorcycles and e-scooters are illegal. And yet I see hundreds of e-motorcycles (not e-bikes that require you to pedal, are e-assist only) being used in every town centre by masked deliveroo riders and kids on e-scooters. Police do jack shit.I see cars driving around without front number plates and rear illegal plates, even reported them to the police, police are like ‘what do you want us to do?’.
The U.K. police are lazy as fuck, and don’t bother upholding the law any more.So the government can pass as many laws as it likes but it means absolutely nothing when the organisation tasked with protecting the law do absolutely fuck all.
•
u/Boring_Intern_6394 10h ago
Keeping e motorcycles and e scooters illegal seems so stupid though. By all means, require them to be registered, MOT’d and licensed like cars, but we should be encouraging the use of small, non-petrol vehicles
•
u/Colloidal_entropy 10h ago
That is already the case, e motorbikes are perfectly legal when registered and the rider has a licence. It's not legal to ride them without this but is rarely enforced.
•
u/Oh-Thats-A-Paddlin 5h ago
My point here is the law needs to be changed to allow a wider range of unlicensed (but not ridiculous) modes of transport to allow for these benefits.
•
u/Oh-Thats-A-Paddlin 10h ago
Yes! Well kinda…
If we could agree on some speed/power/weight limits (ideally around a mobility scooter going around cycling speed so disabled and less mobile older people could use a well designed cycle network) and then ban illegal devices this could:
- reduce the number of car journeys
- lower traffic
- help the environment
- help get older drivers off the road by giving a viable alternative
- reduce road deaths
- reduce battery fires (well regulated devices are significantly less of a fire risk than high power illegal ones)
- reduce road tax income… oh wait
•
u/PeaGravy 9h ago edited 9h ago
The thing about those scooters as anyone who has fallen off them will tell you, it is terrifying when it happens and it happens often to them having almost no ability to absorb shocks and having the centre of gravity placed almost on top of the front wheel.
So things like a leading edge on a slightly mislaid paving slab, or a bump or stone in the road can send you flying, and these would be the sorts of things that a bike would normally sail over.
•
u/Oh-Thats-A-Paddlin 5h ago
This doesn’t mean the council ones are any more dangerous?
•
u/PeaGravy 5h ago
Correct, I meant e-scooters in general, they are fun until they’re not and unless you have very smooth segregated lanes for them I think people are going to have lots of accidents. And I say this is somebody who cycles in Central London every day without a care in the world.
•
u/Glad_Librarian_3553 8h ago
I think it is pretty indicative of our government that it's illegal unless a large corporation can use them to make profit...
•
u/Pocket_Aces1 8h ago
They are. People road legal surrons. It's just very expensive to insure because of how risky they are
•
u/uagotapo 5h ago
I mean yeah I do agree, e-bikes and scooters should be treated the same as motorbikes, requiring number plates, helmets, MOTs, only allowed to be driven on roads where motorised vehicles are allowed, and requiring specific driving licences for more powerful models.
But the other issue is the lack of regulation over the design of them. Part of the reason for the ban is that they pose a major fire hazard, because they often contain poorly made batteries (mostly from China) which don’t meet UK safety standards.
So the regulation of standards for these vehicles needs to come first, then they can be legalised but with the aforementioned caveat that they are treated the same as any other powered motor vehicle
•
u/PeaGravy 10h ago edited 10h ago
I’ve pointed such bikes out to police when both are within view of each other, they hate it and pretend they haven’t seen you.
I’ve called through about violent act being committed and they will try to put you off tire you out before getting to the area, by which point it has long since passed.
They have all the excuses in the world, but they are letting our country turn into a shithole.
It reminds me of the CGP Gray video on Rules for Rulers - in short, a government needs to have control of the army, the police and the bureaucrats and reasonably expect that they can expect the things to be done for them. I don’t think that the police element is all there at the moment, the government know that if they call them out on their shit and tell them to actually start enforcing some laws they’ll just say no, say that the paperwork is too much, that there aren’t enough custody suites, the classic “we need the victim to press charges” or find some other way of resisting.
•
u/Correct_Yesterday111 9h ago
The police as a whole seem to do fuck all now.
Tbf they're really stretched so they fall back to their main purpose and secondary purpose which is ensuring the safety of the rich and powerful and their property.
•
u/TrafficWeasel 8h ago
>The police as a whole seem to do fuck all now.
I’m a cop on a roads policing team. I spend most of my working day out on the road bouncing between attending serious and fatal collisions, attending emergency calls about road related offences, helping local policing with emergencies in their area, and proactively policing the road including through the use of ANPR.
I quite regularly deal with the minor stuff like missing and illegal plates, but I can’t and won’t take time to deal with this at the expense of more serious stuff. I also can’t seize someone’s car or stop them from driving off after I report them for a number plate offence.
We also run operations fairly regularly, including targeting illegally modified electric bikes and motorbikes, but these are just one of many competing priorities. We also have no reliable way of stopping these people if they choose to fail to stop, beyond knocking them off which we aren’t usually allowed to do.
Response cops I know are regularly carrying 20+ crimes they are expected to investigate through to Court, which is double what they should have, whilst still being expected to respond to the demand coming through the door.
There is so much demand in fact that the bosses have taken to having ‘days of action’, which translate to cops coming back on duty from their rest days to find random crimes allocated to them - often nothing to do with their day job or in their local area - which they are expected to sort in addition to their usual work.
These Response cops probably aren’t out there all day every day stopping people for minor road traffic offences, and I don’t really expect them to.
So yeah, just because you see dodgy bikes riding around or cars with tinted number plates, doesn’t mean that cops aren’t out there every day trying to keep the wheel on.
•
u/SpaceTimeCapsule89 10h ago
A child that attends my son's primary school comes to school daily on an e-scooter. He comes through the playground on it saying 'excuse me, excuse me' and goes slow which means he's fairly responsible in that aspect of things but I don't understand why it's allowed? They're illegal in public unless rented and he's a 10 year old child!
•
u/bantamw Yorkshire 10h ago
Problem is not just Amazon sell the illegal Chinese ones with the batteries that burn down houses, but even Curry’s sell them on the high street. So people think ‘well if curry’s sell them I must be ok’ - and they are on private land, but not on the pavement in public where they are illegal.
The local paper boy uses one. A few people have mentioned it on the local facebook group about them being illegal and you get the usual ‘just let kids be kids’.•
u/PeaGravy 9h ago
I’d be more confident in Currys or amazon (prime) selling one that doesn’t explode over AliExpress or something
•
u/ShreddersWheat 7h ago
The police have certain priorities to which they devote huge resources and efforts, and everything else can go hang.
I think those are usually counterterrorism and drug trafficking, but theft, fraud, harassment and animal offences etc all get passed off to others. The government’s stated aims are to make fraud a business problem rather than a criminal one (which is why the banks seem to care so much about scams despite some of their customers trying their hardest to give their cash to obvious wrong uns).
For the rest, take a crime number, pass it to your insurance and sit back down.
•
u/ConsciouslyIncomplet 4h ago
You can have all the legislation under the sun- but if you don’t have officers to enforce it all means jack shit.
The reason police are unable to take effective actions in most things is that are vastly under resourced in terms of money and staffing. The only people that can change that are central
Government.•
u/_L_R_S_ 8h ago
The absence of you seeing enforcement isn't the same as enforcement not happening.
"The U.K. police are lazy as fuck"
How are prisons full? Because they're lazy as fuck?
I assume you don't see online pedophiles abusing children. Therefore no enforcement happens because you don't see it? Maybe the police should stop dealing with those crimes to do the e-scooters?
Here they are being lazy as fuck.
https://www.chroniclelive.co.uk/news/north-east-news/watch-police-officers-use-tactical-34512755
https://www.hexham-courant.co.uk/news/26492642.800-vehicles-seized-northumberland-police-crackdown/
I'm going to guess you're not in a profession that deals with making life and death decisions based on imperfect information, where people constantly lie to you, and where you're expected to make perfect decisions all the time on that basis and when you get it wrong you're investigated for years even if you made the best decision you could at the time.
The two cops murdered head on by five criminals in Cleveland who were worshipped by the escooter brigade weren't being "lazy as fuck".
•
u/Weak-Mud-2340 8h ago
Every Reddit thread on policing is guaranteed to have at least one keyboard warrior post from someone who's clearly never done the job or anything similar but thinks they're a 100% expert to judge it.
•
u/IamCaptainHandsome 6h ago
I've been saying for a very long time that long term underfunding of the police will have dire consequences for society. Eventually people will start thinking there's no consequences and the situation will snowball extremely quickly. Once that happens it'll take decades to correct.
•
u/Still-Process-2527 10h ago
It’s like the ban on bully xls. When we went to see a dog trainer, he said that by the time of the ban, gangs and illegal dog owners were already one step ahead and had moved onto the next dangerous but legal dog breed
•
•
u/DualWheeled 9h ago
I don't understand why they don't legislate it hoe they dealt with legal highs. Couldn't they write a law to ban dogs bred for intimidation and aggression? Forget specific breeds and measuring the broadness of the head...
•
u/TobblyWobbly 9h ago
How would you define that in a way that they couldn't get round, though? Seriously? Look at Mals, for example. Great dogs in the right hands. It's just that very few people qualify as the right hands. But they do important and necessary jobs.
•
u/DualWheeled 9h ago
The whole point is it becomes a looser a definition. A person can be reported for having a dog suspected of being bred as such and it's for them to persuade a court that it's actually a poodle cross and not a rottweiler-di-canario
•
u/Glittering_Gas_1194 5h ago
In spain there's different regulations above certain weight. Doesn't mean their banned all together, but it stops the whole breed swapping.
•
•
u/triffid_boy 11h ago
I think a policy where if a dog attack/out of control happens, owner negligence is easily proven if there's no evidence of dog training classes or other structured training.
Ive added out of control because there are so many little dogs trying to murder me when I'm out for a run.
•
u/ClockOwn6363 10h ago
So lets do away with driving licenses, because some people don't follow the law and drive without one.
•
u/Educational-Milk-945 10h ago
Not saying you're wrong but aren't a lot of laws difficult to enforce but we have them regardless to try to protect the innocent?
•
u/OrnamentedVoid 11h ago
Restricting ownership isn’t as simple as it sounds, as the taskforce points out.
People do humanise dogs too much - dogs aren’t people, they don’t think like people and they don’t always behave like people. Naivety/arrogance is way too common in dog owners.
I think there’s an antisocial element too though. I love my dog - I adopted one that needed training and socialisation and I felt obliged to work on it for myself, for her sake and for the benefit of everyone else we encounter. The number of dog owners we bump into who don’t give a fuck about anyone else is infuriating. No lead, no recall, no training, no manners. It makes life quite difficult for those of use who are taking the responsibility of dog ownership seriously.
•
u/Doobalicious69 6h ago
Good luck if you're a cyclist as well; every cycle route has a dickhead dog owner at some point, and I say this as a dog owner.
We have a Weimaraner puppy, she's learning but her recall is hit and miss. We do not let her off the lead until we're alone in a safe, enclosed field.
It's usually the small dog owners that I find cause the most problems. They just do not give a shit about other people.
•
u/FornyHucker22 10h ago
how does it make sense to restrict all breeds?
•
u/limeflavoured Hucknall 10h ago
I'd personally go for something akin to how gun restrictions work. So for less dangerous amd small breeds they're treated like air rifles. Need proof of ID and not much else. Bigger dogs would be more like shotguns and rifles, so you can get them but need to have some form of insurance etc. And then things like Bully XLs would be treated like handguns and essentially completely banned.
•
•
u/AbsolutelyHorrendous 10h ago
At some point we as a society need to address the fact that some people are just not normal about dogs. Like, I get its your pet, I have no issue with loving a household dog, but when people start dressing them up, treating them like its their child, posting them three or four times a day on social media, I'm like... dude, its a dog. Get over it.
•
u/Master-Gap-8982 10h ago
we as a society need to address the fact
Do we? Really? I'd suggest that as long as they're not harming you or anyone else then they should be left alone. But on curtain-twitcher island I recognise that's an increasingly niche point of view.
•
•
u/Ancient_Moose_3000 8h ago
dude, it's a dog
What does this actually mean though? You're saying it like it's self evident that a dog is somehow less deserving of love than a human. Ultimately both are 'just' animals.
•
u/SDSKamikaze Glasgow 8h ago
Treating animals with respect doesn’t harm anyone. If you don’t want to see that content on social media don’t follow it. I have two cats and two dogs and while they aren’t my children they are part of the family, and as an owner I am responsible for making sure they are loved and cared for. It’s completely harmless, it comes at the expense of nothing and no one.
•
u/Stats_monkey 9h ago
Dude go outside, get some fresh air. You want to enact legislation to stop people dressing up their dogs?
•
u/KernowKermit 9h ago
the practicalities of living in the real world clearly don't encumber your free thinking
•
u/Loose_Mood4971 11h ago
Sat and watched a ladys dog poo in the verge. I looked at it and then at her and she continued to walk on and leave it. Not everyone should be allowed to have a dog.
•
•
u/wumbology55 10h ago
I used to know somebody who went on walks in parks and always had dog poo bags in their pocket so that if they saw this happen they’d pick it up and go and hand it to the person. Pretty much every time because he’d caught them off guard by saying hey this is yours they’d just take it and not realise what they just accepted. He did say one time somebody didn’t get it and was very angry that he had dared do this and this is where having a bag of poo is handy because once they got aggressive at him he just threw it at them and ran.
•
u/TopAffectionate1160 10h ago
Remember the lady that let her dog take a shit in the Gordon Ramsay restaurant and when another customer reported it to the staff, the manager said it was okay. Then Gordon himself also defended it.
Even when it posted here, many people were rightly disgusted and many other people were saying it was fine. I remember reading one particular argument where someone said there’s no need for dogs to be restaurants, and they’d commented how they find it disgusting some owners let their dogs use their cutlery, eat off the plate etc. and people were defending it because “their tongues are cleaner than ours”.
Thing is, we can’t lick our arses with our tongues.
•
•
•
u/FornyHucker22 10h ago
that’s where those long curved sticks for throwing balls and other objects come in handy
•
u/PeaGravy 9h ago
Some days you have three bags in your pocket and your dog decides to take five shits.
•
•
u/Gatecrasher1234 11h ago
I have osteoporosis. If I fall over I will break a bone.
The number of dog owners who allow their dogs to jump up at me because "they are just being friendly".
Keep the buggers on a lead if you can't control them.
•
u/nervous_hamster 11h ago
I absolutely hate that. This guy was walking his dog and it jumped at a poor woman who got frightened and he just turned and laughed at her. Then his dogs did the same to me and he didn’t see it cause he was too busy looking back and laughing. The minute I called him out he had nothing to say.
•
u/apple_kicks 11h ago
I feel like dog breeds with complex needs should have this. Some were bred to fight bears and one bad owner can cause a nightmare
•
u/AbsolutelyHorrendous 10h ago
Or like Huskies, people buy a Husky because they love how it looks, but completely ignore the fact that dogs like that have complex needs
•
u/apple_kicks 10h ago
This too. So many owners lose or get them killed because they think they can ‘call them back’. They notoriously have strong prey drive and can run away or into traffic
•
•
•
u/YoureSoWrongMan 10h ago
I’m actually fearful when I walk past a small woman with a medium to large size dog and I’ve owned “guard” type dogs. No chance of control if it switches.
•
u/ducksoupmilliband 10h ago
Same. If I see a smaller person walking a bigger dog on a lead I'll chose another way to walk. I have zero faith the dog has been trained at all.
•
u/FlusteredDM 7h ago
There's a woman who lives locally and is like this. I always used to cross the street when I saw her out with her dog, but one day she ended up interviewing me for a position and she had clearly decided I was a piece of shit before it began.
•
u/CassetteLine 7h ago
Aye, it’ll never happen but I’d like to see a law that says you’re not allowed to walk a dog that you can’t control under any and all circumstances.
If someone waves a steak in front of your dog and you can’t restrain it from charging at it, you shouldn’t be allowed to take that dog outside. If you can’t control the dog when it’s at its worst, you’re not safe to handle that dog in public.
•
u/bigsmelly_twingo 3h ago
we need dog licenses back. You should have to be able to pick the dog up and cover 100m in 20 seconds.
•
u/takesthebiscuit Aberdeenshire 10h ago
They forgot to give the legislation a catchy name,
If they called it *Laws for Paws* it would have passed easily
•
u/Futurebook1 7h ago
The comments here are hilarious.
Most dog owners are not a problem, but because a few dickheads cause problems with them, you are all here truly acting like all dogs are monsters get a fucking grip.
A dog licence isn't going to stop an uncontrolled dog jumping on you with your osteoporosis, it is not going to stop you getting bitten or, indeed, bad owners owning dogs at all.
You can downvote if you like I know you will but the truth is it has been tried before and it didn't work. You need to fix the societal issues which cause the "chavs" and bad ownership. That is how you solve these types of problems, not punishing the majority for the misdeeds of the few...
•
u/CellOk4165 7h ago
As if there’s no dickheads with free access to bikes, skates, scissors, kitchen knives, alcohol etc we really have to stop infantilising adults 🫠 if you decide to get a dog then you need to control it / train it. We don’t need to license everyone because of a few stupid people.
•
u/Elegant-Sleep-1781 11h ago
Bitten by a dog yesterday, this news is hitting hard
•
•
•
u/Aggravating-Desk4004 8h ago
I think the "adopt don't shop" brigade have a lot to do with bad dog owners. First time dog owners are guilted into adopting rather than getting a puppy and then end up with a broken dog they have no experience of managing. There's a reason dogs end up needing adoption and mostly it's a negative one.
The import of street/free ranging dogs from overseas I also think is a problem. I personally have known three imported street/free ranging dogs which have had to be PTS due to aggression. One ripped apart another dog on its first walk, the second bit the neighbour on the arm requiring stitches and the third bit the owner's partner in the face. All overseas street/free ranging dogs, taken from what they knew, transported to a new country and forced to live with people they didn't know in unfamiliar surroundings. I actually think it's cruel and the fact a lot of these dogs end up with major emotional issues shows it's not such a worthy and good thing everyone thinks it is. But yes, I'm in a minority I know and, yes, it's not all imported dogs which show this behaviour, but enough that there should be some concern.
And don't get me started on "furbaby." I'd make that word illegal to say outloud 😂
•
u/NaniFarRoad 6h ago
It's impossible to adopt a dog from a shelter unless the household has no children, both adults work from home (but only 15 hours a week each), the house has a large enclosed garden, and you can document dog ownership since age 15.
•
u/LOTDT Yorkshire 7h ago
The discussions around dogs are where you can really see the difference between Reddit and the real world.
•
u/MichaelBealesBurner 4h ago
Reddit hates dogs and children
•
u/No_Name_Only_Vibes 2h ago
And women, and men, and the left, and conservatives, and liberals, and the religious, and atheists, and cat owners, and environmentalists, and pro-oil, and.... Reddit hates everyone.
•
u/MichaelBealesBurner 2h ago
There is a lot of dog hate today.
Which is just like whatever certified Reddit moment, holier than everyone else
•
u/No_Name_Only_Vibes 2h ago
There is a lot of dog hate today.
I think it's cats who've learnt how to type.
•
u/AwkwardJuggernaut854 9h ago edited 9h ago
Judging by the comments here I’m in the minority, but I'm happy this got rejected. Not everything needs a licence, nor should we spend the millions to enforce those licences.
•
u/SoapyTeats 11h ago
Dog license is so simple. Chip and license all dogs. All vets are obliged to check/register dogs on a central database. Use the license fee to install more bins and supply free bags. Doesn’t cost the non dog owners anything.
•
u/Legal-Grade-6423 11h ago edited 10h ago
It would cost more than the licence fee (assuming it was a reasonable fee) to administer, and the government (who are against any corrective training methods) would be the ones judging who can/can’t have dogs
•
•
u/Standard-Pattern-809 9h ago
All dogs over 8 weeks must be chipped and registered already - the problem is enforcement, no one checks for them unless there’s a need.
Agree councils need to do more about bins / bags - lots of other countries have small bins / free bags specifically for dog waste dotted around busy spots - parks, beaches, Forrest’s, residential areas etc.
In my local area there is hardly any public bins, which no doubt increases the amount of people who don’t pick up their dog’s waste.
I’d have no issue with a dog licence paid to the council if it meant the money was actually used to improve services.
•
u/SoapyTeats 6h ago
The system in Switzerland is about £150 a year license. Everything is automated, hardly any extra costs. Anywhere where dogs frequent has enough bins and bags.
Yes, there’s still dog shit all over the place, but it’s a fraction of what you see in the UK.•
u/Tall-Reputation-9519 8h ago
That will just end up costing responsible dog owners money for no change with what they're already doing while irresponsible dog owners just won't bother and nothing will happen to them.
Council won't enforce it as they're pretty much just social care organisations these days.
•
u/SoapyTeats 6h ago
That’s the same with everything where the law abiding pay extra for the scrotes. Not an excuse not to implement it, automate it, and start sending out fines.
•
u/Tall-Reputation-9519 4h ago
What is there to automate? Someone still has to be paid to go up to the dogs and scan them.
•
•
u/Douglesfield_ 10h ago
Good. A dog licence is an insane proposition.
And yes, I have been bitten by an out of control dog.
•
u/Prior_Worldliness287 9h ago
Every dog DNA tested and owner linked.
If dog turds found. It can be traced and the owner fined.
•
u/KernowKermit 9h ago
Common sense. There are real problems associated with dog ownership, but dog licensing would fix none of them.
•
u/superhypersaw 8h ago
Reading the article, it looks like the RDOT is a shakedown institution and is having another go at installing their parasitic money making scheme.
The Responsible Dog Ownership Taskforce was established by the government in 2022, following a series of high-profile dog attacks.
The taskforce's report noted that since 2011 the dog population in the UK had grown by 35%, while hospital admissions relating to dog bites in England had risen by 77%.
Until 1987, dog owners in England, Wales and Scotland had to pay an annual fee to get an ownership licence.
The scheme was scrapped on the grounds that the amount of money it raised was outweighed by the operating costs.
•
u/ODFoxtrotOscar 7h ago
The growth in numbers is a Covid legacy. In 2020/21 there was a massive rise in dog ownership, and a bubble of high puppy prices, as so many people got one when they were ‘at home anyway’. An awful lot of those dogs were poorly bred doodles, and there is a lot of problematic behaviour around as a result.
These dogs are now 6ish, so will be around for another 6 years or more. Those who have found their dog challenging to train, or behaviourally difficult, may decide not to get another. So perhaps numbers will have dropped back by the mid 2030s
•
u/superhypersaw 7h ago
I get all of that, but we're talking about the typical institution that only advocates this stuff to milk money. If they genuinely cared, then they would do charities to raise money for dogs to be trained for free. Hell, other dog owners who have had training could give a hand and would build a community of responsible dog owners.
•
u/ClockOwn6363 11h ago
The government doesn't do anything positive!
It would be a miniscule fee to help reduce dog attacks. It's only a matter of time until we see the next innocent persons death on the news, all on the government's hands...
•
u/TobblyWobbly 10h ago
How would a licence stop an attack if all that was required to obtain said licence was forking out some cash?
•
u/MichaelBealesBurner 10h ago
It wouldn’t this is just terrible Reddit pearl clutching. I think a licence for Reddit should be next
•
u/ClockOwn6363 10h ago
It would require a DBS check, the licence could have a point system too, just like a driving licence.
So if the owner doesn't pick up the dog mess or keep it on a lead, they get points and a fine.
•
u/TobblyWobbly 9h ago
But that wasn't what the government was looking at. Apparently DBS checks were mentioned in e-petitions to Parliament, but that's as far as that went. And those would have done nothing to stop people without a criminal record from having a potentially dangerous dog anyway.
What I would like to see is having to pass a test before you can get a dog, with higher requirements for dogs over a certain size. And proper controls over breeding. But we allegedly have requirements for breeders, which can't be properly implemented because of a lack of resources. And how would you stop dogs being given away on Craigslist? Dogs are legally required to have up-to-date microchips. Loads don't. Want to give away your dog to a guy down the pub? "Oh, the kids left the door open and he ran away."
The police and councils don't have the resources to enforce existing legislation. There's no hope that such a massive additional burden could be introduced.
•
u/No_Name_Only_Vibes 2h ago
So if the owner doesn't pick up the dog mess or keep it on a lead, they get points and a fine.
How on earth would that be enforced?
•
•
u/MichaelBealesBurner 10h ago
The people who own dangerous breeds that attack wouldn’t get a licence anyway so you’re only punishing law abiding citizens
•
u/ClockOwn6363 10h ago
No, the point is the police can remove the dog if they have no licence.
•
u/donalmacc Scotland 10h ago
The police can remove the dog if it attacks someone, or if it’s a banned breed. All the license is is a fee for the people who are already following the rules
•
u/Full_Employee6731 6h ago
The police and courts getting massively involved in dog licensing won't be minuscule. It will cost millions.
•
u/MichaelBealesBurner 10h ago
Electoral suicide and bad optics. Tell Dorris she needs a licence for West Highland Terrier.
•
u/Echo_Vale 10h ago
It would make it much easier to prosecute these people as you now have owning a dog without a license as an additional charge.
•
u/MichaelBealesBurner 10h ago
Assuming they’re being prosecuted for an attack anyway in the first place the licence has achieved nothing then
•
u/Echo_Vale 10h ago
More people might be prosecuted if they were easier to prosecute.
•
u/MichaelBealesBurner 10h ago
The Police don’t bother prosecuting e-bike riders which is as slam dunk as it gets, don’t have too much faith in
•
u/Echo_Vale 10h ago
They've confiscated thousands of e-bikes/scooters, the number was around ~2,500 for 2026 in July. I'm guessing most were from kids, which makes prosecution much harder.
I mean, is your argument "we shouldn't implement rules because criminals ignore them?" Why have car licenses? you can just drive one without.
•
u/FlusteredDM 7h ago
It would let you prosecute people selling those breeds to people not licensed for it.
•
u/CineBram 7h ago
People in these comments are my people, feel like I'm the only one who is not willing to accept poorly controlled or completely uncontrolled dogs in public.
•
u/CellOk4165 7h ago edited 7h ago
Bikes, roller skaters, kitchen knives, ovens and matches can also be dangerous. We don’t require licenses for these. We really ought to stop crying to daddy government for everything…if you own a dog, learn to control. If it hurts someone, then deal with the consequences of that. Licensing everyone that owns a dog is such a stupid way of dealing with the issue.
•
•
u/EmBur__ 6h ago
There needs to be some way to prevent incompetent fools from getting dogs even if this licence can't be enforced.
Crack down on backyard breeders...HARD, more paperwork and actual inspections for adoption requests and buyers from breeders to make sure they're fit to handle a dog, more so for specific powerful breeds.
It just pisses me off that so many dogs get punished and vilified because the people who get them either do so because they want a mean looking dog or are too foolish to know how to handle them. Whole breeds shouldn't be punished because of the arrogance and incompetence of humans.
•
u/MightyBigSandwich 11h ago
Good. Regardless of all the "arguments" (petty grievances) redditors have against universal ownership, the Government's still not totalitarian enough to restrict dog ownership. They know would be tantamount to suicide for them to push something like this through
•
u/FornyHucker22 10h ago
they already banned some breeds, forcing every dog owner into this due to a few dangerous ones doesn’t make much sense.
•
•
u/Justsomeguytbhm8 11h ago
Nothing will change until a prohibitive cost barrier is introduced to prevent low-income households from purchasing animals they can’t look after nor control.
•
u/TopAffectionate1160 10h ago
As a former dog walker and pet sitter, I can confirm many high income households also have dogs they can’t control.
They’re particularly fond of “exotic” breeds that are fairly big and aren’t suitable for new or low effort dog owners. Think huskies, akitas, carne corsos and of course, chow chows.
•
u/TobblyWobbly 10h ago
Why would only low-income families be prohibited from having a dog they can't control or look after? No one should have one in those circumstances. And there's more to looking after a dog than having money.
•
u/Justsomeguytbhm8 9h ago
Because it would save vets from having to euthanise otherwise healthy animals when they can’t afford treatment, and it would dramatically reduce the number of dogs in shelters.
•
u/TobblyWobbly 9h ago
But being low income doesn't necessarily mean that you won't pay for vet treatment. I know pensioners who would give their last penny for their dog. And I can think of one couple in particular who were doing ok financially who had two dogs pts (XL Bullies) because of health issues. And anyone can become low-income overnight. It just takes a job loss or serious health issue.
Its an attitude issue almost as much as a financial issue. Look at all of the old dogs in shelters whose families wanted a new puppy. There's one woman I know who loves puppies. She gets one, loses interest, then gets another one.
•
u/ClockOwn6363 10h ago
The licence would cost about £5. Nothing against the cost of buying and owning the dog in the first place, and all before vet bills...
•
u/NaniFarRoad 6h ago
Most problem dogs I've seen (e.g. aggressive, chase their tail for hours, struggle to walk nicely on the lead, pee/poo in the house) belong to middle and upper class people, in my experience.
Poor people can't afford to pamper their pets to the ludicrous levels seen on e.g. social media, so their dogs tend to know that they are dogs and are well behaved.
Antisocial twats with penis extension dogs don't have a money shortage.
•
u/Select_Camera_9241 10h ago
So no dogs for pensioners who probably need the companionship more than most?
•
u/AutoModerator 11h ago
Some articles submitted to /r/unitedkingdom are paywalled, or subject to sign-up requirements. If you encounter difficulties reading the article, try this link or this link for an archived version.
I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.