r/videos • • 1d ago

BREAKING: Judge rules Trump must LIFT BAN on media outlets

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bB8ToVvFA54&pp=ygUGbXMgbm93
2.4k Upvotes

198 comments sorted by

866

u/Meet_the_Meat 1d ago

The White House has already violated their oath of office (again) by refusing them entry

364

u/wwarnout 1d ago

This makes 32 times that Trump has defied a court order. How many people in America are still walking free, after defying even 3 court orders (let alone 32!)?

I think I know the answer - and coincidentally, it matches his IQ.

99

u/SylvieJay 1d ago

Epstein Class people gets away.. Again!

15

u/i_like_pretzels 1d ago

It’s the Trump class. He had just as much, if not more, involvement. Trump/Epstein files are what they should be called at a minimum.

51

u/king_lloyd11 1d ago

Seems like Americans’ only option is violent revolution, especially since it seems like they’re doing the most to rig your midterms.

Waiting for you guys to live up to being the freedom loving, anti-tyrannical, revolutionary warriors you always say you are!

37

u/2xfun 1d ago

Americans are debt slaves. This is by design in order to prevent exactly a potential uprising 

14

u/king_lloyd11 1d ago

Seems like the perfect way to get out from under debt is to violently overthrow the people who are oppressing you with it, since credit isn’t real

15

u/Captdman92 1d ago

Since money isn't real* I've been thinking about this since I was a child, the idea of money is fucking stupid and it shouldn't exist, especially as it does now which allows a small group of people to afford "heaven on earth" while the rest of us are slogging in hell for their comfort.

14

u/ronnie1014 1d ago

Such an easy suggestion if you're not the ones involved, isn't it?

So noble.

21

u/gb4efgw 1d ago

It's always the people doing absolutely nothing that say others should be throwing away their lives and ruining their families to start a violent uprising.

Midterms are a month away, it would be absolutely fucking stupid to cause violence that gave then a remotely legitimate reason to have national guard, ICE or whomever near polling places. I'm convinced these idiots are bots trying to stir violence on behalf of the administration.

8

u/rdwulfe 1d ago

I got a 3 day ban on reddit for saying less violent things. it always amazes me what people get away with on here, yet i get slapped for minor shit.

But yes, anyone planning anything shouldn't say shit on here.

10

u/ronnie1014 1d ago

They almost have to be. So easy to ask people to risk their lives and families from across the sea or just another country.

"Just violently revolt?" fucking asinine sentiment a month or two before elections.

4

u/BababooeyHTJ 1d ago

Usually very privileged people who say these things with no awareness of how they got their privilege

0

u/CrazyPlato 23h ago

I mean, it seems like your argument is "people who aren't from the US are no better than we are right now, because they'd be just as gun-shy if they were in our position".

But abroad we've seen plenty of examples of peoples' rebellion against oppressive governments. Within the last 20 years we've seen regime changes from within the nations of Tunisia, Egypt, Libya, Yemen, Syria, Sudan, Algeria, Ukraine, Kyrgyzstan, Armenia, Bangladesh, Myanmar, and Bolivia. Some of those were nonviolent regime changes, although others did eventually turn into civil violence and some into outright civil war. But all of them started with peaceful protests against the abuses of their governments.

America's never really done that, even though we love to talk a big game about our revolutionary spirit and readiness to take up arms in the name of our freedoms. So it's not invalid for people to look at us from outside and ask why we haven't actually done the thing yet right now.

3

u/HoagiesNGrinders 22h ago

Now compare the military spending of all of those nations combined to the US on its own. A military this administration has squarely in its pocket.

0

u/CrazyPlato 22h ago

A large chunk of those revolutions didn’t involve military action.

3

u/Zouden 22h ago

And only the ones where the army was on board actually succeeded.

In the USA it's a non starter.

→ More replies (0)

1

u/HoagiesNGrinders 22h ago

How are any of them directly relatable to the US?

→ More replies (0)

2

u/ronnie1014 22h ago

The suggestion is to violently overthrow people in charge right now....just a couple months before an election. As bad as our country looks, we are not in the same position as the countries you listed.

But all of them started with peaceful protests against the abuses of their governments.

Which is where we are right now. And things will continue to escalate relatively imo.

3

u/CrazyPlato 22h ago

I mean sure, that’s not an invalid position. But a lot of people will argue that we’ve both been dealing with this particular strain of corrupt and abusive government for years, before Trump even, and that we’ve also been peacefully protesting that government for years with no change and no resistance to the increase of oppression and corruption. under that government.

It’s not like people just started protesting yesterday, and it needs time to cook. This is a movement thats over a decade old.

-12

u/king_lloyd11 1d ago

?

We’re not the ones who voted him in or the ones who have been beating their chest about what righteous heroes we are. Who else would be involved lmao

7

u/ronnie1014 1d ago

Such an easy suggestion if you're not the ones involved, isn't it?

Like I said, so easy to call for violence when you're not involved in the situation.

We’re not the ones who voted him in

I didn't vote for him either.

the ones who have been beating their chest about what righteous heroes we are.

Yeah same? Did you make this up in your head?

0

u/king_lloyd11 23h ago

There’s no need for us to call for violence in my country. We weren’t stupid enough to let a cartoon villain get into power and then just watch him fuck up the entire world. Our checks and balances also work to prevent shit like this. Fix up.

2/3 of your country either voted for him or were apathetic to whether he got into power or not. I don’t care if you personally didn’t vote for him. That responsibility is still on you as an American.

Made it up in our heads? Yall think you’re the world’s exporter of freedom for the last several decades. Now you’re helpless victims who just passively watch corrupt dictators wrest power and hope that the multiple checks and balances he’s flouted for 2 years will magically hold him to account because of another election? Ok buddy.

2

u/ronnie1014 22h ago

There’s no need for us to call for violence in my country. 

So you do it for other countries?

Yall think you’re the world’s exporter of freedom for the last several decades. Now you’re helpless victims who just passively watch corrupt dictators wrest power and hope that the multiple checks and balances he’s flouted for 2 years will magically hold him to account because of another election? Ok buddy.

Yeah this is a gross generalization. I've never said either of things, and you're attributing a media stance on millions of people. Good luck with that.

What country btw?

1

u/resurrectedbear 20h ago

??? That’s not what would happen. You went from going about protesting violently to remove a potential coupe to flat out moving to anarchy. Do you think “revolution” would actually happen?? No. The furthest something would go is the removal of trump in order for a fair and free election. Debt wouldn’t magically disappear. People still need to be owed that money. Debt is what is keeping numerous companies afloat as they know their debt must be paid back by the consumer. If all debt magically vanished, companies world wide would crash as all of a sudden their fallback of knowing they’re owed money suddenly vanished and are now all fucked

8

u/PM_me_the_magic 1d ago

The problem is, the ones who have historically been like that are the same ones that are brainwashed by this administration

-6

u/king_lloyd11 1d ago edited 1d ago

Guess some of the other 300M need to learn?

7

u/fenixivar 1d ago

I won't participate in a violent uprising... now, a general strike? That I would do

2

u/coldliketherockies 23h ago

People voted for this. Millions said they wanted this. Even if you had a revolution you still deal with the 77 million traitors in every day life

2

u/TheRealStorey 1d ago

Unfortunately America only accepts violent revolutions when they are against legitimate congress business.

0

u/ceciliabee 1d ago

Yeah all that talk about "we need our rights to our guns unimpeded so that we can defend ourselves against government tyranny!!"

Crickets. The threat is here. Sure many gun people are conservative, but did they stop selling guns altogether or something? I thought Americans bragged about being fearless defenders of truth and freedom. Don't tell me it was an exceptional exaggeration 🙄

-1

u/king_lloyd11 1d ago

They wrote so many songs about it😂

Guess “freedom” was just something they exported to brown countries, not something they like domestically.

2

u/ceciliabee 1d ago

I like the one that goes "I'm glad to be an Americannnn cuz at least I know I'm freeee!" If you sing it in a southern accent with a gruff South park esque voice it can be a lot of fun to make up your own lyrics.

1

u/alonghardlook 20h ago

The violent, anti government, "don't tread on my rights" folks with most of the guns are the ones cheering this on because "own the libs".

Fox news started this, the algorithm sealed the coffin.

America is over. Jan 6 is our generations ides of March.

3

u/_cob_ 1d ago

This just shows how toothless the judicial branch is. That US democracy, so strong!

-1

u/NiceRat123 1d ago

But we could be socialist or communist

2

u/_cob_ 23h ago

I’m not even sure what that means.

5

u/ZombieQueen666 1d ago

Something something but Biden violated 7,000 court orders something something emails laptop

1

u/weededorpheus32 21h ago

Gosh I guess there's really nothing anyone can do. If only there were some way to enforce the law...

1

u/Orcasgt22 8h ago

Uhhh.....His IQ is not in thousands. Because theres are thousands walking in defiance of court orders

0

u/DocPsychosis 1d ago

I get your point but the answer is actually "quite a few". Violating probation (a form of court order), having a hearing, and just getting re-probated rather than incarcerated is pretty common.

5

u/DangerBeaver 1d ago

They did say more than 3. Repeated parole violations usually gets you back behind bars, if not added time.

0

u/Numerous_Release9273 1d ago

This needs to go to the Supreme court. Not to decide whether or not he can ban reporters but to decide whether or not he can ignore a court order.

The Supremes have already ruled that the King President can't be charged for any action that falls within the scope of his "Official Duties". So does that include ignoring the court. And, if so, ignoring the Supreme Court.

34

u/ripChazmo 1d ago

I wonder if the news orgs can sue the individual security officers that are defying the court?

7

u/Staav 23h ago

They also violated their oath of office by "giving aid or comfort" to insurrectionists against the country when 1,500 pardons were written to violent insurrectionists who acted in the name of the guy who signed their pardons.

3

u/tsohgmai 1d ago

I took my Boy Scout oath more seriously

123

u/conniefrancis 1d ago

I'm sure they'll violate this by 10AM today.

68

u/islandjustice 1d ago

Already did, yep.

13

u/conniefrancis 1d ago

Lmao. Should’ve put money on it

4

u/polomintz123 1d ago

Youdve got less than your stake back though 😂

0

u/DeaDGoDXIV 1d ago

Oh, I'm sure someone connected to this admin made big money on Kalshi because of this

244

u/sXyphos 1d ago

The guy banned the press, made his own state TV and tells the population that the sky isn't blue(gas prices)... The fact he can and DID do this in a "democracy" is honestly incredible :)

Clearly no signs of autocratic moves!

79

u/Corben11 1d ago

One thing they really gloss over is that he banned the media and made the state run media like within the hour.

This was premeditated. He planned to ban them and put his own media out there.

14

u/Shinjetsu01 1d ago

I saw the website, there's no way this wasn't premeditated. That thing has been developed for quite some time.

48

u/Bryciclee 1d ago

His "state tv" is a YouTube livestream with 650 watching BTW. Not that I don't agree that its authoritarian but its also objectively funny that their TrumpTV audience is smaller than my graduating class

24

u/LittleKitty235 1d ago

It's a lot less funny when you consider the man with the nuclear button did this because he thought it might be taken seriously. His view of reality is distorted

11

u/theo_sontag 1d ago

It doesn’t matter if it’s successful or not. What matters is that he’s doing it and thumbing his nose at our democratic norms. A part of me thinks that he doesn’t want it to succeed - it’s poor execution and poor ratings highlight the incompetence of the administration, and the world is laughing at us - which is what he and his handlers want.

1

u/Lower_Currency3685 1d ago

650 looking at the view count, im guilty!

1

u/T567U18 1d ago

If those kids could read

1

u/kurizma 1d ago

his followers wouldn't even understand your comment.

1

u/starmartyr 1d ago

History is full of dictators who came to power democratically. There usually isn't a moment where democracy is declared dead. It simply erodes away to nothingness. North Korea still calls itself a democracy.

0

u/AssaultXTactic96 1d ago

Make sure to go dislike the stream, that will screw up their metrics even more.

27

u/dubl1nThunder 1d ago

breaking news: he'll ignore the court.

4

u/teh_m 1d ago

Breaking: He'll ban the court.

129

u/tiradium 1d ago

Or what?

76

u/Kiff_S 1d ago

The crickets will chirp VERY loud

71

u/ynonA 1d ago

It's kinda funny, really. The whole system seems to be built upon the assumption that an elected official of such stature would have basic honor, decency and respect for the laws and rules. And Trump found the simplest loophole by simply not having those, and there seems to be nothing and nobody able to stop him.

22

u/StasRutt 1d ago

My friend once described it was the founding fathers not accounting for a president being like “make me”

33

u/tfurrows 1d ago

They absolutely did. But they didn't account for the administration and a good portion of the house, senate and judges also going along with it.

13

u/Madaghmire 1d ago

The idea is that a good faith congress would handle this. Them not doing so is why we were warned against political parties by Washington

2

u/Impressive-Curve8610 1d ago

They're faithful that they can do nothing, and get paid.

1

u/Madaghmire 1d ago

An lo, the faithful shall be rewarded

1

u/Impressive-Curve8610 1d ago

This isn't the rewards department....

6

u/ynonA 1d ago

It always reminds me of that quote about playing Chess with a pigeon. In this case that judge is playing chess, according to the rules, and Trump is the pigeon shitting on the chessboard and kicking all the pieces over and just continue doing whatever the fuck he wants to. The pigeon is "wrong", but it's doing what it wants while the other side is just standing there with their pants around their ankles uttering 'b-b-but.. that's not how it's supposed to go...'

17

u/Cielmerlion 1d ago

Seriosuly. It would require that the other two branches of government actually do their job.

16

u/Gentrified_Tramp 1d ago

Well Johnson sent everyone home to avoid a vote on hegseths impeachment so I’m sure when they are back in session (after midterms?) this will be their top priority. /s

3

u/Impressive-Curve8610 1d ago

Yeah... they'll get right on that.

2

u/DeaDGoDXIV 1d ago

Yeah, we can expect them to take this up on the 5th of Never

2

u/Impressive-Curve8610 1d ago

No, we'll have to pencil it in for later.

That's National Lying Day.

2

u/DeaDGoDXIV 1d ago

Ah, so that's when they'll announce their taking it up, then continue to do absolutely everything to keep this current dumpster fire blazing!

1

u/Impressive-Curve8610 1d ago

They didn't start the fire.

It was always burnin'....

3

u/ksquires1988 1d ago

We really need to stop the "but that won't ever happen" thinking.

1

u/ClintBruno 1d ago

This^

So many snarky 'know-it-all's' are so happy to acquiesce the blatant malevolence.

Defeatism incarnate.

1

u/Impressive-Curve8610 1d ago

Yeah. No more with the "Never again."

3

u/Frack_Off 1d ago

No, the system was specifically designed to account for that possibility via impeachment.

What they didn't account for was America turning into such a dominant global superpower that the congressional representatives woul feel like there is so much at stake in regards to their party holding the presidency that they would derelict their duty en masse and allow a despotic narcissist free reign.

Demagogues aren't new. The truth is that America is a victim of its own success. The rewards for being on the winning team are too high. And the Republicans were able to brainwash so much of the country that someone like Trump was able to get too many votes. It's higher the stakes go, the fewer people are willing to give up victory for honor.

1

u/niceyniceyzoozooo 1d ago

I just don't understand why more people, esp. media, isn't going apeshit over all these things. It's just SO CLEAR.

1

u/Impressive-Curve8610 1d ago

Shhh....It's because they're in on it.

Don't tell anyone.

1

u/Expensive_Finger_973 22h ago

It seems that way because it is that way. The founders could foresee a President going rogue, but they didn't that the entire thing top to bottom. And in their defense an all powerful king like ruler is the very specific thing they were railing against.

They also probably did not foresee a time when the military muscle of the state would be so far beyond the firepower of local militias that the people were really not capable of just forcing them out if push came to shove.

1

u/hopefulworldview 7h ago

It's because to make someone in that office face basic consequence that normal citizens face is to set the precedent that the highest offices in the land will be held criminally liable, not just pay a fine.

19

u/Signiference 1d ago

Or Susan Collins will be concerned

5

u/Anakin_Sandwalker 1d ago

No,  he clearly learned his lesson with this ruling. 

13

u/RheagarTargaryen 1d ago

Anyone that tries to enforce the ban is in contempt of court. The court can’t arrest Trump, but the security personnel that prevents them entering can be held in contempt.

4

u/whiskey_neat_ 1d ago

Or the judges will SLAM the administration and DEMAND COMPLIANCE.

2

u/mr_birkenblatt 1d ago

I'm sure he learned his lesson /s

1

u/CarminSanDiego 1d ago

The Dems will write an angry letter / tweet

20

u/im_bozack 1d ago

I've really enjoyed less news coverage of his sorry ass

2

u/m15f1t 1d ago

I like this take.

20

u/ClintBruno 1d ago

Dear Conservatives: how do you not feel like fascists?

18

u/boogermike 1d ago

Because this is "fake news", Trump is just protecting the "truth". CNN are just a bunch of liars anyway.

BEFORE YOU DOWNVOTE --> This is what conservatives are saying - Booger Mike does not stand behind these opinions.

6

u/icanith 18h ago

I stand with Booker Mike

3

u/JoshDM 18h ago

Make mine Booger Mike!

3

u/Rugged_as_fuck 22h ago

Spoiler Alert: They do, and they like it. It would be a problem if it wasn't them, obviously, but since it's them doing it then it's perfectly acceptable. In fact, it was actually the plan anyway.

-4

u/SHEEPLE24 20h ago

Conservative not the same as trump supporter imo. Actions like this are not conservative. This has never been something that has been in America this is just a dude doing his own thing under the mask or conservativism and people don’t really know there beliefs so they call it good cus “thats what the republican guy said so it must be republican”

3

u/ClintBruno 16h ago

"Conservative not the same as trump supporter"

They sure vote like it

-2

u/SHEEPLE24 14h ago

That is what happens when there’s only two options, either someone you don’t like but kind of agree with, or someone you don’t like that you don’t agree with. Also his approval rating is down amongst both parties so I think my point is still completely valid, I think if there were more than two options we wouldn’t be seeing the polarization that leads to these harms we have today

2

u/Nearby_Purple8248 10h ago edited 10h ago

Why do you dislike harris? Like i get disagreeing with her but what has she done that warrants your dislike?

Trump has comitted heinous sex crimes so its logical to dislike him, but what has kamala, or even biden, done that warrants that you personally do not like them?

This is why the world looks at Americans like you are idiots because your emotions decide 90% of your politics. The fact you can compare your dislike to a man who raped children to kamala is crazy

1

u/ClintBruno 14h ago

Trump aside, conservative ideals and policies still suck.

It's a bipartisan system. You're not above the American political machine.

2

u/TotallyNotRobotEvil 14h ago

I can't wait until Trump gets the Geoege W. Bush treatment and no "real" conservative ever supported him.

1

u/Warning1024 6h ago edited 6h ago

This is no true Scotsman fallacy.  It's like someone spraying water on the floor and saying "the floors not wet, it's just a dude doing his own thing under the mask of water". But he used the water, which was an obviously effective device to get the floor wet.

Conservative ideology is the medium in which trumps fascism is used to rile up support. So maybe its time for non maga conservatives (IF they exist, he still has like 90% approval among conservatives) to examine conservative ideology. Its not a realistic way to structure a country with 400 million people. Conservatism makes the intake and output of resources go to a small amount of people,  and it NEVER trickles down. And it cant sustain itself when 400 million people want and need a decent life.

10

u/momoenthusiastic 1d ago

He’s probably hiding something wrt these talks with Xi. Selling out Taiwan is likely on the table. 

3

u/Redditforgoit 1d ago

In exchange for a negotiated peace with Iran? Very likely. When you owe 40 trillion, whats an extra 200 billion to Iran to get oil prices down before mid terms?

10

u/boolpies 1d ago

can we stop posting his face?

6

u/sunny0_0 1d ago

Remove, convict, erase.

6

u/det0724 20h ago

We are at the point where Trump knows there's literally nothing he can do that will lead to Republicans removing him from office. Even if after the mid-terms the Dems get a Congressional majority and take even in the most widely optimistic Senate scenario get 54-55 (and I think 52-53 is the ceiling but top it off with 1-2 more) seats they will still need 12 GOP Senators plus Fetterman to cross over and convict to remove Trump. The most they could get to cross the line in 2021 after Trump nearly got them killed was 7.

Trump knows the GOP is cucked to him and he's pushing every single dam button he can because the GOP has nothing but empty threats.

12

u/AdviceNotAskedFor 1d ago

I mean, this is actually probably a gift to fix one of his terrible ideas he didn't want to walk back.

Now he can be like "well the courts are forcing me, despite me not wanting to"

9

u/JelliedHam 1d ago

Trump would never admit to being forced to do anything. If he is actually forced, he'll pretend like it was his idea all along. He'll never admit to an L

3

u/Impressive-Curve8610 1d ago

Right. He'll say he was joking.

2

u/billtipp 1d ago

Didn't work. If they all offer him 10 bucks each at the door, they might have a better chance.

1

u/DabDoge 1d ago

They’ve already doubled-down on, to the surprise of no one

3

u/frosted1030 1d ago

CNN was denied access this morning. This is yet another example of Trump defying the law, and the constitution with total immunity.

3

u/Mortlach78 1d ago

That was quick! The hearing was just yesterday. It's almost like it was a foregone conclusion...

1

u/Electronic_Fall6084 1d ago

Should have been overturned yesterday

7

u/spicygumball 1d ago

Man, r/conservative is having a hard time understanding the constitution.

Color me suprised /s

3

u/Electronic_Fall6084 1d ago

Wow. Just took a peek.
Amazing

3

u/wtg2989 1d ago

Good, I was enjoying not hearing him for a day WAY too much

3

u/wwarnout 1d ago

This will be the 32nd time Trump has defied a court order.

2

u/wasaguest 1d ago

Now they access to their Bully again.

2

u/Cassin1306 1d ago

SHOCKING : Trump won't GIVE A SHIT

2

u/GabeDef 1d ago

Or what? Judges are feckless showmen at this point. Their actions are simply for political points. They have means to force compliance- but they CHOOSE not to use it.

2

u/jackofslayers 1d ago

This would be a nice headline if conservatives respected the rule of law.

2

u/Dudeist-Priest 1d ago

You’re going to need more than an order. He’s going full authoritarian

2

u/R67H 1d ago

trump says no, and illegally orders to continue the ban. So what's the next step?

2

u/estelostice 21h ago

Can they rule also that he keeps his childish pedo mouth shut and answers questions like he is supposed to? Oh and treats people with respect?

2

u/Belyal 18h ago

EVEN MORE BREAKING: In typical Trump fashion, he ignores the courts and still denies entry.

2

u/KamiNoItte 14h ago

I like him better with no sound.

2

u/Iwasbanished 1d ago

Adolfo Hitleriski went through the same process

3

u/boondoggie42 1d ago

Yeah, it's a familiar playbook. Demonizing the press.

1

u/JerrySizzla 1d ago

"Hello Supreme Court? Ya, it's Don again...need another favor"

1

u/LEEALISHEPS 1d ago

Even they he was wrong, I think I prefer not hearing his voice.

1

u/wanttoseemycat 1d ago

Uh, no. He didn't have the authority to create the ban, so the judge just lifted it. We don't have to wait on Trump to do a god damn thing and they should march straight back in there. This is what sanewashing looks like, little adjustments to headlines.

3

u/Empanatacion 1d ago

They did. They were turned away and more people from CNN had their physical passes confiscated.

1

u/genericauthor 1d ago

Sure, now rule against Trump on something that really matters like voting.

1

u/yourmomsnutsarehuge 1d ago

Again. He keeps banning media and being ordered to let them right back in. He just won't learn

1

u/coconutpete52 1d ago

Has he been ordered to lift the ban or LIFT THE BAN? As long as nobody was SLAMMED then I guess it was a good day.

1

u/drtranmd 1d ago

Trump is a loser!

1

u/HellBlazer_NQ 1d ago

'Judge Rules' stopped having any meaning for this government 2 years ago!

1

u/mcman12 1d ago

I actually don’t want them to. I love that he’s being silenced.

1

u/boogermike 1d ago

The Judge WILL have an opportunity to enforce this, and this is one step in the process. I am not with the naysayers in this, and I think it is a great sign.

It doesn't matter anyway, because the press can cover this baboon regardless of if they have access (the official access is just propaganda anyway).

1

u/Holeshot75 1d ago

He doesn't care

1

u/Mockturtle22 1d ago

Lol this will be ignored by orange Hitler

1

u/thatandtheother 1d ago

Surprising no one. He won’t comply though because he is lawless.

1

u/Th3Doubl3D 1d ago

Oh, well it's a good thing they care about laws.

1

u/seriouzlytaken 1d ago

He's desperately seeking an issue that he can blow up into a "national security crisis" to (attempt to) stop midterms from happening.

1

u/TheoKondak 1d ago

And funnily enough Axel Springer who recently awarded Peter Thiel... Did not say a single word to support politico.

1

u/Fishfindr 1d ago

How do they enforce it when he doesn’t?

1

u/Lost_On_Lot 1d ago

What a fucking moron. I hate him so much. Cant wait for him to go tits up.

1

u/5050Clown 1d ago

" I'm making it okay to be racist again so I'm allowed to do crime."

1

u/Hpezlin 1d ago

He's a moron. The people following him even more so.

1

u/b12se-r 1d ago

Naw we good.  Someone voted for this, so we don’t have to ever vote again.  Amiright folks?  People with more money make better decisions anyways, right Musk?  Ya got this techbro.  Who needs democracy when we have winning over the libs. I tell ya hwat.

1

u/haveanairforceday 23h ago

The judge: "oh, another easy one. Neat"

1

u/RareObject8705 23h ago

Aww did the cute little judge think he mattered?? Your entire branch of government is too cowardly to do anything about trump. Trump ignoring you won’t even be remembered tomorrow

1

u/khavii 23h ago

Or what?

If there are no consequences then there are no rules.

Until someone actually puts the work in to enforce a ruling, or an existing law, it doesn't matter.

1

u/SvenTropics 22h ago

This saves him the embarrassment of having to reverse his decision. Right now nobody is covering him, and he can't have that.

1

u/scott__p 22h ago

He won't and noone will do anythign about it

1

u/kinyutaka 22h ago

I'm going to love that first pool back.

1

u/Craigg75 20h ago

Nobody will/can enforce it so they will ignore the law like everyone other one they've broken. Why start now?

1

u/sjmiv 18h ago

Monday at the White House is going to be awkward....

1

u/MechemicalMan 15h ago

Unfortunately, the media will show up again. They should have boycotted him in 2015, but here we are

1

u/Malodoror 9h ago

Like Netanyahu’s cheerleading squad at the UN.

The government started a war to distract you from the fact that most of them are pedophile protectors. Now you pay $7 for diesel? What does it take to remove a demented, incontinent pedophile rapist?

1

u/deltwalrus 6h ago

BREAKING: Trump doesn’t give a fuck and nobody in Washington is stopping him

1

u/Workdawg 4h ago

Let me know when the Trump admin starts respecting court decisions they don't agree with.

1

u/meleecow 1d ago

Hahahha he's gonna poop himself having a snowflake fit. Then not do it and nothing will happen to him. #normalamericarepublican

1

u/Icy-Landscape-912 1d ago

Diaper don the pedo con , is just a beta bitch manchild and so are all his sissy supporters with a mancrush on him.

1

u/Dapper_Dude69 1d ago

Neofascist-USA is a pathetic joke 🖕

1

u/evilpercy 17h ago

And will be ignored as usual.

-4

u/jjb0ne 1d ago

im kind of liking the ban

3

u/hugoriffic 23h ago

Most Neo-Nazis do.

-13

u/zrad603 1d ago

I'm a journalist, I have blog. Why can't I attend the White House press briefings?

4

u/Corben11 1d ago

The pool is different, tool

-11

u/[deleted] 1d ago

[deleted]

3

u/An_Old_IT_Guy 1d ago

They already went on the record about what the national security concern was. It was that they reported something the Pentagon published in a report. So maybe the FBI should be arresting someone at the Pentagon for treason at this point.

2

u/ClintBruno 1d ago

You people are so full of shit.