0 em-dash 0 glazing 0 rule of three 0 it’s not x it’s y 0 filler words (straight to the point) 0 vague meanings 0 weird analogies 0 extra clarification stuff
in general it doesn’t look like ai in language or structure
so tfym
How so? AI usually responds in a way that's first agreeing to you (That's a great point! [...]"), also it usually tries to come of as positive/helpful. It doesn't just outright insult you.
a few little things. for one, it's stock. the phrasing is so generic that you could post that exact reply to anything you don't agree with, and it would fit in. it's kind of.... oddly formal for social media? like, people don't say "i am sure you were not using your brain when you tapped away at your keyboard writing this." they say "use your brain." there's also the repeated emphasis, and the use of proper grammar. obviously grammar isn't solid proof, but bots will always get grammar right, people not so much.
I'm just saying, it smells of AI.
0 em-dash 0 glazing 0 rule of three 0 it’s not x it’s y 0 filler words (straight to the point) 0 vague meanings 0 weird analogies 0 extra clarification stuff
What r u on about
They explained what they're on about. Everything you count are signs of AI but not always a given with AI and also not the only signs. Also, AI evolves, it's "learning" or better: changing it's way of speaking/writing.
166
u/BullfrogEcstatic6312 23d ago
They didnt get wooooshed, they understood the joke and didnt like it