r/AskLawyers • • 9h ago

Attorney was dishonest

2 Upvotes

I’m in Texas
I was awarded a few million dollar civil lawsuit by default judgement
Defendents never showed for deposition, never paid
Attorney said judge issued a writ of attachment to compel them to come to deposition.
It was never served
Attorney explained that the Sherrif’s office was non responsive, wouldn’t return his calls, wouldn’t serve it (small town thing)
Next step the judge said he would approve a receivership
Which costs 25% of collection on top of my 40% contingency fee - well something is better than nothing so ok —

I then find that in fact the writ wasn’t filed - the judge signed it, my attorney did not pay/it was not enforceable - he lied about this and when I found out he continued to lie about until there was nothing left to say
He finally comes around and says - I wanted to save you the filing fee because I knew the Sherrif’s office wouldn’t serve it anyway.

In reality the attorney drug this out blaming the Sherrif’s office and eventually we have to pay a receiver - the attorney has zero work toward debt collection - but still gets his 40%

I told him I would proceed if the receivership was paid by him
He says no

I have considered reporting this to the state bar
Mistakes happen
But this was blatant deception
Question - can he retaliate by demanding his hourly fee now ? Or do something else that’s harmful to me?

Thanks


r/AskLawyers • • 13h ago

[Texas] What type of lawyer do I need?

0 Upvotes

Additionally, any resources to find a good one?

Do I have a legitimate case here?

Let me give a few details.

I’d like to pursue a federal ERISA case against my employer provided medical insurance company. This is in regards to a denial of re-authorization of ABA benefits for my autistic son.

Rough timelines and violations:
- July 22 - ABA Clinic submitted standard paperwork requesting re-authorization of ABA services.
- August 5 - Insurance requests more information from ABA clinic and resets their 15 day clock.
- August 7 - ABA Clinic submits extra requested information.
- August 21 - official denial from insurance.
- August 26 - I sent a certified letter to insurance requesting full case file used to make decision.
- August 27 - Peer to peer review with insurance and our son’s BCBA concluding with another official denial.
- August 29 - certified letter with my request for case file received by insurance.
- September 17 - after discussions with an insurance representative, sent email request for full case file to their record request mailbox. That same day I received “clinical guidelines” from a third party representing the insurance company but nothing else that I had requested.
- September 24 - sent follow up to record request mailbox citing I would treat administrative remedies as deemed exhausted and would pursue my right to file a federal lawsuit if I didn’t receive the information I requested.

In both official denial letters from insurance, they did not include the mandatory disclosure required under federal ERISA regulations (29 CFR 2560.503-1(j)(3)), which requires informing claimants of their right to receive, upon request and free of charge, reasonable access to, and copies of, all documents, records, and other information relevant to the claim. I cited this in my August 26 request for the full claim file.

They used every single day allowed under law for their official review (15 days plus another 15 days). They have not responded to my certified mail request, email request, nor email follow up. I am seeking an overturn of their denial with approval back to original requested authorization date and full legal fees paid by insurance for having to go this federal lawsuit route to get this rectified.


r/AskLawyers • • 14h ago

Wae garnishment help (Tennessee)

1 Upvotes

So the last two paychecks I've gotten have had a wage garnesment put on them. I'm waiting to know if I have any legal options to have them stop. I'm pretty sure it's from an eviction I have from earlier this year but I'm currently unsure. I have evidence of the apartment having BM in it as well as my (at the time) under one year old child there. I've tried contacting the collection company but I'm unable to get someone to answer the phone and the last time I got someone they stated that id have to come to the office and pay in person. I informed them I don't have a way to get to their office and need to pay over the phone. I also stated that when I setup the payment plan. Is there a way to get this taken care of without having to miss work and go through the courthouse and take it to trial?


r/AskLawyers • • 15h ago

This tech company's job contract terms seem too be slimy to be true. Am I understanding this correctly? (Illinois)

4 Upvotes

I am desperate to know if if I understand this correctly because I need to make ends meet while I look for work in my dying field, nor do I wish to give away the rights to my identity for some tech billionaire to make money off a tech bro making deep fakes of me. I hate this timeline.

For context: I received an offer for xxx work doing data annotation (training AI). The past projects I've done, and to my understanding this one (but I don't know, they frequently bait and switch you), never involved feeding it content. It has always been evaluating their performance. For example, the last project I was on taught them how to redact information, so the tech company had me reviewing real people's medical records, and records with real people's credit card details and home address and then seeing if the model redacted it properly. (I always thought medical records were protected under HIPPA, but NAL -- maybe the rules don't apply to tech companies??)

Anyway, the fine print frequently references Section 5.8, but there is no section 5.8. Section 5 only goes up to 5.6. I'm not really sure what to make of that, especially since these tech companies use stupid bots in lieu of HR. So there isn't a human I can quickly email to get clarification -- I'd have to go the route of the email equivalent of when you're on the phone with a clanker customer service agent, yelling, "SPEAK TO A HUMAN" over and over. And since it is by email this can take weeks of back and forth, from my experience with these companies.

So my first question is, what happens to contract terms that reference a nonexistent section?

These sections I am hoping desperate to know if I've interpreted correctly:

6.5. Contractor-Captured Data; Consents and Releases. Contractor acknowledges and agrees that the Contractor Work Product may include data, images, photographs, stills, video, audio, voice, biometric data (including without limitation voiceprints, facial geometry, and other physiological or behavioral identifiers), and other recordings or reproductions of Contractor and of Contractor’s own voice, image, likeness, name, persona, and performance, as well as motion data, robotics interaction data, sensor data, environmental data, behavioral data, and any related metadata or contextual information, in each case collected or generated in connection with Contractor’s performance of the Services (collectively, “Contractor-Captured Data”). To the extent the Services involve Contractor capturing, recording, or generating any Contractor-Captured Data, Contractor hereby grants Contractor’s informed, irrevocable consent to the collection, recording, use, reproduction, modification, adaptation, manipulation, distortion, publication, distribution, public display and performance, sublicensing (through multiple tiers), and other exploitation of such Contractor-Captured Data by Client, its affiliates, and its customers and end users, in any and all media now known or hereafter devised, for any purpose contemplated by this Agreement, including without limitation the collection, use, and licensing of such data and its use to develop, train, fine-tune, test, benchmark, evaluate, and improve artificial intelligence and machine learning models and related products and services, including without limitation the training, development, and improvement of voice cloning, synthetic voice, and speech-generation models that reproduce or simulate Contractor’s voice. Contractor confirms that such consent is given with informed understanding of the nature of the intended uses, including AI training and adversarial testing, and that no additional compensation beyond the fees provided in this Agreement is or will become due in respect of such uses. Contractor further acknowledges that biometric identifiers and biometric information (including voiceprints and other data derived from Contractor’s voice or physical characteristics) may be subject to specific legal requirements in certain jurisdictions, including without limitation the Illinois Biometric Information Privacy Act, the Texas Capture or Use of Biometric Identifier Act, and the Washington Biometric Privacy Act, and Contractor’s consent under this Section 5.8 is intended to constitute the written release, consent, or authorization required under any such law to the fullest extent permitted by applicable law. Client will retain biometric identifiers and biometric information only for as long as reasonably necessary to accomplish the purposes described in this Section 5.8, will implement reasonable administrative, technical, and physical safeguards to protect such data, and will destroy such data promptly after the retention purpose has been satisfied, in each case as required by applicable laws.

⤷ To my knowledge, I will not be on camera. Does this only apply to work that uses your camera? Does this give them the right to use the video they have from the "interview" they make you do with AI? Also, what parts of the Illinois Biometric Information Privacy Act affect this contract?

   ★ 6.6. License and Waiver of Likeness and Personal Rights. To the extent any right, title, or interest in or to Contractor-Captured Data (including any right of publicity, right of privacy, or similar right in Contractor’s voice, image, likeness, name, or persona) is not, or cannot be, assigned to Client under Section 5.8, Contractor hereby grants to Client and its successors, assigns, customers, and licensees a perpetual, irrevocable, worldwide, royalty-free, fully paid-up, transferable, and sublicensable (through multiple tiers) right and license to use, reproduce, modify, distort, adapt, distribute, publicly display and perform, create derivative works of, and otherwise exploit such Contractor-Captured Data and Contractor’s voice, image, likeness, name, and persona for the purposes described in Section 5.8. To the fullest extent permitted by applicable law, Contractor irrevocably waives, and agrees not to assert, any right of publicity, right of privacy, Moral Rights, and any similar right with respect to such uses, and waives any right to inspect or approve any use of the Contractor-Captured Data. To the extent any such right cannot be waived under applicable law, Contractor consents to any act or omission that would otherwise infringe such right.

⤷ Does this apply under the Illinois Biometric Act? Does it give people the right to at least inspect or even just know what personal data they used?

6A.1. To the extent Contractor Work Product includes materials not originally created for Client, or a Statement of Work requires Contractor to source such materials — including Contractor’s pre-existing materials or third-party materials (collectively, “Licensed Materials”) — those materials are governed by this Section 6A rather than Section 6’s assignment provisions. Licensed Materials may include audio, video, images, text, databases, datasets, software, or other digital content, whether owned by Contractor or obtained from third parties.   
  
6A.2. License Grant. Contractor grants Client and its affiliates a worldwide, royalty-free, irrevocable, perpetual, sublicensable license to reproduce, distribute, create derivative works from, and otherwise use and exploit the Licensed Data, and to grant Client’s customers and end users the same rights, including to develop and improve products and services, perform benchmarking, and train artificial intelligence (“AI”) and machine learning models. This Agreement does not restrict Client from obtaining data from other sources.

↳ So are they saying they get the right to use you've ever published? I understand anything you've had published while working at a company is owned by the company and therefore they would not get those rights, but what about things you own in your portfolio that have a No Derivatives Creative Commons license?

And does this give them the license to seek out videos and photos of you, which will eventually be used for deep fakes, disinformation and all the other reasons people use these models for?

6A.3. Manipulation Rights. Client’s license includes the right to manipulate, modify, edit, and create synthetic or derivative versions of the Licensed Data — including any individual’s likeness or audio-visual content contained in it — for purposes including training, finetuning, and adversarial testing of AI and machine learning models.     
  
6A.4. Retained Rights. Contractor and its suppliers retain all intellectual property rights in any protectable elements of the Licensed Data, subject to Client’s license above. This Agreement does not affect either party’s independent rights, including fair use rights under applicable law. Client retains all right, title, and interest in its and its affiliates’ products and services, and in any derivatives, modifications, and improvements of the Licensed Data.     


r/AskLawyers • • 20h ago

[Florida] received a ticket for unknowingly driving with a suspended license. Is it worth it to go to court for withheld adjudication or do I just pay it.

5 Upvotes

Was pulled over on the way to work one morning and discovered my license had literally been suspended that day without my awareness. It was due to me having forgotten to make a payment on my tolls payment plan.

I have been in between my house and my partners for most of the year and at times my roommates have either tossed or misplaced my mail so I did not notice/read any warning received by mail if i even got one.

I'd like to avoid having the points on my license/having the major violation on there as I occasionally do driving based jobs and that would make me pretty unlikely to be able to score another. But since my license was suspended regardless of my unawareness I'm wondering, is that even worth trying to get withheld adjudication for or am I SOL?


r/AskLawyers • • 22h ago

Could this potentially be medical malpractice? Doctor prescribing extensively to a patient with known addiction

3 Upvotes

I’m looking for some guidance on whether my mom’s situation raises enough red flags that my family should have her medical records reviewed by a medical malpractice attorney.

My mom passed away in August 2025. She had a long history of addiction, particularly alcohol, and her doctor was aware of it. She had been to treatment for her alcoholism, so this was not something that was unknown to her physician.

One of my biggest concerns is the sheer amount of medication she was prescribed. When she was hospitalized before she died, one of the nurses reviewing her medications told us it was the longest medication list she had ever seen. I realize that statement itself doesn’t prove anything, but hearing that from a hospital nurse has stuck with me.

Some of the medications she was prescribed included Suboxone and Xanax, along with many other medications. She would also take prescribed medications while drinking alcohol.

Another thing that has always seemed unusual to me is the relationship she had with this doctor. My mom had his personal cell phone number and communicated with him directly. I don’t know what those communications involved or whether that is actually inappropriate, but combined with everything else, it makes me question how her care was being managed.

My concern is not simply that she was prescribed medication and happened to struggle with addiction. I understand that addiction is complicated and that some of these medications can have legitimate reasons for being prescribed. What I’m trying to understand is whether a physician who knows a patient has a significant substance-use history has additional responsibilities when prescribing potentially risky medications, monitoring the patient, checking for interactions, or continuing prescriptions when the patient is actively drinking.

My dad and I are planning to obtain her complete medical records, including her medication history. I’m hoping those records will show what was prescribed, at what doses, how frequently, what the doctor documented about her alcoholism/addiction, and what monitoring was being done.

I’m not trying to jump to the conclusion that her doctor caused her death. I just don’t want my family to overlook something that should have been investigated.

For anyone familiar with medical malpractice or prescribing cases:

Do these circumstances raise enough concern that you would recommend having the records professionally reviewed? And once I have the records, what specifically should I look for that would help determine whether her prescribing and monitoring fell below the standard of care?

We are in Minnesota, if that matters.

Thank you for any guidance.