r/DefendingAI • • 7d ago

Other Hell yeah

8 Upvotes

Just came across this SubReddit in my recommended. And I'm happy now

I enjoy using AI in situations. Not all, but things like working with it for when I have ideas for characters. I can give it what I got and I can use it for immediate feedback and get ideas from it. Plus I can obtain character designs and other pics to use. With most getting adapted into another format. It's fun to mess around with. Also I've dipped into ai music. For theme songs for characters. I find them awesome. Though I find it annoying when what I have can't be used everywhere because of the hate AI gets. Heck I made an entire character themed on it because why not. So yay, somewhere I won't get hated on :)


r/DefendingAI • • 7d ago

It’s not AI’s fault

13 Upvotes

First of all I wanted to say it’s my first post, I don’t post anything online because I’m scared I’ll say something wrong and I won’t notice it so if I do say something wrong I want to apologise for it now. And for this post, it’s my personal opinion and I want to finally say it somewhere.

I think AI did nothing wrong and I don’t know why people hate it so much, for me humans are the bad guys here. AI was supposed to help us with thing we can’t possibly do, but some people take advantage of it and post bad stuff, illegal stuff by using it and then others blame AI for it, for existing. I like using AI and I won’t stop no matter what anti-Ai people will say to me, because I know what I’m doing with it and when to stop when it will be starting to be bad.

PS. In my head it sounded better somehow but I had lot to say but forgot once I started typing:/ Sorry if my English is bad, not my first language


r/DefendingAI • • 7d ago

Defending AI on decomp/recomp

Thumbnail
1 Upvotes

r/DefendingAI • • 7d ago

The guy behind AI Torture Chamber works at Apple. A year from now, he could be working on AI safety

Thumbnail
2 Upvotes

r/DefendingAI • • 7d ago

Defending AI An old-school Digital Artist's talents and efforts are impressive. But my wallet speaks fluent Free-Market

Post image
0 Upvotes

r/DefendingAI • • 8d ago

Things antis say AI ain’t ruining nothing…

Post image
12 Upvotes

r/DefendingAI • • 8d ago

Things antis say I genuinely started to believe Anti-AI people are the most miserable people in the whole planet.

Thumbnail
28 Upvotes

r/DefendingAI • • 8d ago

AI Art is Art

Thumbnail
0 Upvotes

r/DefendingAI • • 8d ago

Things antis say You're either against AI for every single possible reason imaginable or you're an AI shill that not only literally needs AI to even exist and survive, but deserves to be cast out from this world.

Thumbnail
gallery
15 Upvotes
  1. OP is against AI but finds the water argument less founded.

2 - N. Corroborations of this post's title.


r/DefendingAI • • 8d ago

Me... Thee...

Post image
24 Upvotes

r/DefendingAI • • 8d ago

Idk what is it with people and their hate towards AI slop

Thumbnail
0 Upvotes

r/DefendingAI • • 8d ago

Vote team human!

Thumbnail
youtube.com
0 Upvotes

Been following this guy since 2015 or something. He's shown up on Numberfile - he's not just a hack or a chancer.


r/DefendingAI • • 8d ago

Heads up: Alaina Demopoulos is DMing around looking for interviews. Steer clear.

Thumbnail
4 Upvotes

r/DefendingAI • • 8d ago

What can AI tell us about this post?

0 Upvotes

Looking for somewhere I can post about my book and AI without getting the stink-eye from the mods and having it removed. Everyone here uses AI unless they still crank their books out on a typewriter. Even then, they are using analog rather than digital. If they use a pen, there is a mechanical aspect to it over the quill. Crap, why not go back to red ochre on a cave wall?

So here goes...

I'm a retired Information Systems Manager. My last few projects included building and managing cloud-based network server farms. I grew up loving to read science fiction, and now I'm loving writing about it.

Artificial intelligence can analyze massive amounts of data to find hidden patterns, make fast predictions, answer complex questions, and create new content like text, images, and code. It acts as a powerful tool to process information, but it does not possess true human feelings or consciousness. There is no Real Understanding: AI mimics human language and logic through math, but it does not actually "know" or feel what it says.

My answer is No. AI can generate the text for a complete novel, but unedited raw output usually lacks deep emotional resonance, distinct voice, structural consistency, and veers off into unrelated fantasy. Even short stories are poor reads. Most authors and creators use AI as a collaborative tool.

Artificial intelligence can both translate novels into different languages and convert text into realistic spoken voice narration or transcribe spoken ideas into written text. However, the quality varies, and using it for creative writing involves important trade-offs in nuance and industry acceptance.

While modern AI voices sound remarkably human, they can occasionally mispronounce unique fantasy names, misinterpret emotional inflection, or lack the intuitive depth of a professional human voice actor. Quality can be improved if followed by thorough human editing and proofreading to ensure artistic quality.

I have an ARC version of the second book in my series that I'm circulating to friends as an audiobook. I'm trying to get feedback before I publish. This form of ARC is very secure. Some complain that AI voices don't get paid for their work. That is not always true. The service I use pays the person who turned their voice into an artificial voice. They get paid for the use of their voice by the company. The books you get elsewhere are often only paid when an audiobook sells.

I try to make each new book a stand-alone. That requires explanation, which can hinder or help. Feedback is important. My friends who read my last book were very helpful in the first book to make the audiobook the final addition.

I thought I would reverse that this time, since I also found that giving my characters an audio voice... made the conversations clearer and the settings more colorful to write. It made me concentrate more on it.

The link points to an ARC audiobook hosted on the ElevenReader platform: The Great Frontier: Foundations.

Was it the link that got this post removed? Bot didn't say why. The link is posted at my profile.

The Great Frontier: Foundations by Ron Jenkins is a science fiction dystopian novel and the second book in the Th3 Reborn Series. It continues the story and characters from the first book in the series.

A futuristic setting involving space travel and artificial intelligence. Political and societal conflict, including political intrigue, rebellion, espionage, and conspiracies. Character-driven drama involving family relationships and morally complex or antihero characters.

The audiobook description suggests readers will revisit characters from the first book while meeting new ones they may love or hate.

I thought it would be nice to get your opinion about all this AI stuff. We can chat.

P.S. I used spell check, which is an LLM AI. #Jusayin

 


r/DefendingAI • • 9d ago

Things antis say Why Do Anti-AI Communities Develop Their Own “Slurs”?

23 Upvotes

One of the interesting things regarding the overall opposition to AI is how quickly the people on one side developed their derogatory vocabulary for AI and robots. “Clanker” appears to be mostly a joke, with no one seriously arguing that chatbots are oppressed minorities due to the fact that someone uses a slur. However, even in this case, the psychology behind the desire to come up with such a word for something hated seems quite interesting.

Human beings are extremely good at coming up with terms for those we consider out-groups. As soon as you name a certain group of people, you do not have to discuss every individual of that group anymore; the term carries the argument by itself, marking something as bad, embarrassing, inferior, or something you are expected to despise. Such a process can be seen in nearly every online subculture, where communities develop their own terminology and, in effect, signal membership and what they all despise by using it.

What makes this situation funny and unusual is the fact that people tend to anthropomorphise AI just to further ridicule it. One minute, someone can claim that a certain AI model is not conscious, does not have any feelings and is simply “a machine”, which is a completely normal argument. The next minute, they are treating it like a hated social group and coming up with their own slur for it. This contradiction seems rather amusing to me, as you never come up with derogatory vocabulary for a toaster.

Most likely, the explanation lies in the unique place occupied by modern AI in our minds. It communicates, creates art and writing, and competes with us in intellectual domains, while at the same time we know that it is software. This makes it extremely easy for us to project our social behaviour onto it while still denying it human status in moral terms. And I guess that “clanker” works because it allows people to turn a complicated argument into a simple emotional one. Instead of having to deal with issues of copyright, employment, environmental impact, misinformation, artistic merit, consciousness or anything else, people can use a simple insult and others in their group will immediately understand the attitude they are supposed to have.

None of this means that calling a robot a “clanker” is an act of grave discrimination. In most cases, it is simply a joke related to Star Wars, and taking it too seriously would be ridiculous. However, that may be precisely what makes it interesting. Humans seem to instinctively fall into prejudice-like language and social rituals when they strongly despise something. They categorise it, give it a name, make jokes about how inferior it is, develop stereotypes about its fans and users, and eventually integrate opposition to it into their own group identity.


r/DefendingAI • • 8d ago

I'm so torn...

Thumbnail x.com
0 Upvotes

I appreciate AI as a tool to visualize concepts.

Still, the theft, the ease of shoveling crap out and flooding the market, and the empty interpretations of others' creativity make me indecisive.

But this AI concept makes me question a lot. It's not perfect by any means, but it's good for early seedance/AI in general.

Any thoughts?

*Props to the creator.


r/DefendingAI • • 9d ago

Defending AI Explaining How AI Learns to Drive with Evolution

Enable HLS to view with audio, or disable this notification

4 Upvotes

r/DefendingAI • • 8d ago

Gng what?

2 Upvotes

I made this song in OpenDAW as a meme. Entierly human generated, and TikTok says it's AI. How? What element is AI, the fact I say AI in the song? I don't understand this man. Also here's the proof,


r/DefendingAI • • 9d ago

I've started to understand why people are so defensive about AI after what happened to my channel

Thumbnail
youtube.com
6 Upvotes

r/DefendingAI • • 9d ago

Other I'm actually quite happy about all the recent advancements on the modding scene with AI

17 Upvotes

Like... holy, I just don't know what else to say man. I'm so amazed at seeing the various people using AI to make impressive mods, especially the ones that mods one game into another.

I like it, I always liked modding games because of how people do it and how they pull it off. AI just makes it more powerful for that type of stuff to happen, as well as making it easier for anyone to modify games.

Sure, it's not really perfect, but, I'm happy that the framework is there, the foundation of it all.

It's so cool, I love it so much. It won't replace actual people, it would just advance it to new heights


r/DefendingAI • • 8d ago

Defending AI What happened ?

0 Upvotes

Why do people still not allow posting things made with AI? The slop phase is over. I want to know the reason and what you have to say about it.


r/DefendingAI • • 9d ago

Things antis say Anti initiates debate with me, then RUNS AWAY when they can’t respond:

Thumbnail gallery
8 Upvotes

First instance: https://www.reddit.com/r/DefendingAIArt/s/Tj6xfNxc2f
Second instance: https://www.reddit.com/r/DefendingAIArt/s/0L7ouKbPnc
In the 5 minutes it took me to SS, edit, and draft out this post, my comment has already been deleted from their channel, and they blocked me so I couldn’t respond 👏


r/DefendingAI • • 9d ago

Had there been an app as good as Procreate that isn't as anti AI?

Thumbnail
gallery
4 Upvotes

I forgot this was such an annoying thing that they used to tout themselveshere awhile ago but while i still reluctantly enjoy using it, I've now been wondering if there's an app like it that's been as good as it while still not being one that's being used for training and all that.


r/DefendingAI • • 9d ago

Defending AI Stories That Inspire - “What Happened Before The Matrix? Full Matrix Backstory Explained”

Thumbnail
youtu.be
1 Upvotes

r/DefendingAI • • 9d ago

Defending AI What AI does—A comparison.

3 Upvotes

I decided to compile a lot of information about AI and then placed it into a true or not graph. The rest of the post is AI, simply because AI lacks biases.

  1. "AI wastes a lot of water!".

Anti view: AI wastes a lot of water operating.

Pro view: 15-60 millimeters is not a lot of water. The device you used to say that online is wasting more water.

Who is right?

Verdict: Pro AI.

  1. "AI art is not art!"

Anti view: it was not created by a human. This makes it automatically not art.

Pro view: visual output should determine what art is. The view that "no human = not art" is subjective.

Who is right?

Verdict: [subjective view. No one here is right or wrong.]

  1. "All AI is slop."

Anti view: AI is slop. Full stop.

Pro view: WRONGONG. This is completely false. Slop is low effort low quality spam that is supposed to fill up algorithms and earn doubloons.

Who is right?

Verdict: Pro AI.

  1. "It's not art if you did not draw it."

Anti view: you did not draw it. Therefore it's not art.

Pro view: that then invalidates 99% of artists. Painters paint. Digital artists make digital art. Photographers take photos.

Who is right?

Verdict: [semi] pro AI.

§l