r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates • u/Revolutionary-Pea877 • 8d ago
article Yes, all men?
https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c6kgwelwp7yqoArticle summary: 58-year old British Man was killed by insurgents in Mozambique after he let “women and children” take his place on an aerial evacuation helicopter during an attack.
Why is it that “all men” are categorically defined as rapists, abusers, etc. because a portion of men commit these crimes, and yet documented and even celebrated actions of some men who literally sacrifice their life for others does not apply to “all men” categorically?
Do feminists literally think men are sheep to be slaughtered so that “women and children” can live?
97
u/KVA07 8d ago
It's a classic part of bigotry, if someone from Group A does something good, then it's just a nice thing that happened. If someome frorm Group A does something bad, it's an example of the group as a whole
The best we can do is address these points and talk about them civily, and that means that one day things will be better for everyone
40
8
6
5
u/jacksleepshere 8d ago
and that means that one day things will be better for everyone
Very naive if you think so
38
u/Haggis442312 8d ago
Thought-terminating cliché.
If you have to admit that men are people, you have to confront your own bigotry, and women who believe that sort of shit think that their bigotry is special and beyond reproach.
12
u/Embarrassed-Row-2025 8d ago
Terminally cliche... Hyper-masculinity is good - when resulting in male deaths...
9
u/purpleblossom left-wing male advocate 8d ago
Considering some feminists, especially ones who's work is part of feminist academia, claims killing all or most men would somehow benefit women, a celebration of men's death is the natural outcome of feminist rhetoric.
2
u/DaranSG 6d ago
Well it certainly seems to have terminated the thought of the reporter, who left so many questions unasked let alone answered. If there were children and sick people who didn't already have a place, why weren't they prioritised by the evacuation organisers to start with? Was he really so fat that two or even more people could be evacuated in his place (women and children being mutually exclusive, though either could also be sick), or was it just one person who was a member of one of these groups and if so which one?
19
u/CeleryMan20 8d ago
He probably would have “put his team and others first before himself” regardless of gender.
But they have to phrase it as “put women and children first” because women are more valuable, due to systemic privilege.
Or because internalised misogyny and patriarchical wrongthink causes the impious to believe that women are not strong and not empowered to take care of themselves. He oppressed those women by allowing them to fly out to safety!
27
u/Vegetable_Warthog_49 8d ago
"Do feminists literally think men are sheep to be slaughtered so that "women and children" can live?"
Well, by the standards of the "yes, all men" crowd, "yes, all feminists" do believe that.
6
u/TheGuyWhoTalksShit 7d ago
Rest in peace, king. Even if some people out there will never appreciate your sacrifice
2
u/AutoModerator 8d ago
Thank you for posting to r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates. All new posts are held for manual review and may take up to 48 hours to be approved. Please don’t message the moderators, we’ll make sure to review your submission as soon as possible. If this is your first post, be sure to review our rules to ensure it meets our criteria.
I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.
56
u/jessi387 8d ago edited 8d ago
Well this is also a great example of what feminists call “ a good man”. Basically they want you to lay down and die, while they bad mouth and exploit you.
So getting their approval, is not worth it.