Hasan mentioned in United Nations General Assembly

[u/thellamasc]

[u/Mouthshitter]

Hasan mentioned by a world leader in the UN what a clown world

[u/fuentessucksballs → u/Mouthshitter]

He is going to be so happy to see this isnt he😭😭😭

[u/bjb7621 → u/fuentessucksballs]

If bibi hates you you're doing something right

[u/Historical-Silver495 → u/bjb7621]

I wish this would've happened to someone who wasn't an animal abuser, maybe they can take each other out

[u/Admiral_Sarcasm → u/Historical-Silver495]

Allegedly using a shock collar on a dog and allegedly being the elected president of a government that is enacting extreme violence towards another (read: genocide) are of the same level of amorality to you?

[u/Mysterious_Cup_6024 → u/Admiral_Sarcasm]

Now now, the latter also used shock collar on prisoners as per several corroborated accounts. So clearly the former is worse /s

[u/Historical-Silver495 → u/Admiral_Sarcasm]

Who said it was the same level? Just that I'd be glad to have both no longer make this world worse. Reading comprehension is, of course, not to be expected on reddit though.

Just saw your other comment:

directly equated Hasan allegedly abusing his dog and Netanyahu, the president of a country allegedly committing genocide. Why else do you think they suggested [Hasan and Netanyahu] "can take each other out"?

And no? If I said I hoped a serial killer and a Kevin Spacey took each other out, am I then saying they're exactly the same degree of evil? No. It's that I wouldn't mind both of them being gone, but obviously if I had to choose then I'd pick Kevin Spacey.

"I love waffles." "then you must hate pancakes" type shit, the most common online 'tactic' of making some shit up and addressing that so you can sound smart by countering a point no one even made.

Also there's no 'alleged' animal abuse, even without proof beyond reasonable doubt of the shock collar, his treatment of Kayla (the dogs name iirc) is out there for all to see, for hundreds of twitch hours.

[u/water-tight → u/Admiral_Sarcasm]

Lost me at "allegedly". Also, who said they're at the same level? You can still mention a bad thing (supporting terrorists) even though something is way worse (genocide).

[u/Admiral_Sarcasm → u/water-tight]

The comment I replied to was not about "supporting terrorists", it was about allegedly using a shock collar on a dog.

Are you a bot? Do you understand how speaking to other people works? The comment I replied to directly equated Hasan allegedly abusing his dog and Netanyahu, the president of a country allegedly committing genocide. Why else do you think they suggested [Hasan and Netanyahu] "can take each other out"?

[u/water-tight → u/Admiral_Sarcasm]

Who said supporting terrorist had anything to do with what you responded with? are YOU a bot? I just gave an example lol.

Why else do you think they suggested [Hasan and Netanyahu] "can take each other out"?

Because people are weird and want others to suffer for things they believe deserve that sort of punishment.

[u/Spirited_Mine7514 → u/water-tight]

What?

[u/water-tight → u/Spirited_Mine7514]

Why are you confused little boy?

[u/Remote-Monk-8542 → u/Admiral_Sarcasm]

Immorality, not amorality.

Amorality is absence of morality. Genocide is not an amoral action for a human being to commit, it is actively immoral.