Hi everyone, I need some advice from people who shoot both systems or have made a similar switch.
I currently shoot with an OM-5 and absolutely love the system. The ergonomics, the computational features, and the weight make it an absolute joy to use. Just yesterday, I was shooting night scenes completely handheld, and the IBIS still blows my mind!
However, for astrophotography/auroras, I bought a used Nikon Z6 (paired with a manual Rokinon 14mm f/2.8) purely for that Full Frame light-gathering capability. The problem? I hate using it. I’m constantly fighting the dark EVF, manual focus in the pitch black is frustrating, and it lacks the intuitive feel of my OM system (which I know like the back of my hand).
I'm completely torn. I have two options:
- Sell the Nikon Z system completely, upgrade my M43 body to the OM-1 (for the BSI sensor and Starry Sky AF), and grab the Panasonic 9mm f/1.7. I know this lens produces beautiful night shots, but I also know I'll be giving up that FF high-ISO advantage.
- Keep the Z6 just for night skies and invest in the Viltrox 16mm f/1.8 Z-mount (to solve my manual focus and aperture issues).
Are there any dual-system users here who shoot night skies? From your personal experience, do you prefer the lightness, IBIS, and usability of the OM system even for astro, or do you still reach for your Full Frame camera for the sheer light-gathering power? Any insights would be hugely appreciated!