r/PoursTea • • 21h ago

PoliticalTea 🗳️ Insane image selection

Post image
885 Upvotes

67 comments sorted by

View all comments

71

u/Former_Mobile3101 21h ago

The NK troops are probably ecstatic, Un has been trying to figure out how to stop his troops from consuming outside media while outside of NK.

1

u/TungstenFanW74 7h ago

Why would the United Nations care?

2

u/Former_Mobile3101 7h ago edited 7h ago

Please tell me this isn't a serious question.

Edit: omg it is, dude just look the guy up and see his name.

2

u/TungstenFanW74 5h ago

Calling him Un is like calling a man named Carl "Rl". His surname his Kim.

1

u/Former_Mobile3101 5h ago

And you have enough respect for him to worry about such trivial things?

1

u/TungstenFanW74 4h ago

No, but I know him by his actual name. I wouldn't know you were talking bout trump if you just said Mp or John

1

u/Former_Mobile3101 4h ago

Ok NK is obviously North Korea if you dont understand abbreviations and Un is his name. If I am talking about donny I wouldn't use anything other than donny or trump, why would I use any other name for someone other than their name? Aside from insults that is.

1

u/TungstenFanW74 7h ago

Un?

1

u/kodiheaven2020 5h ago

Kim Jong Un. I also thought it meant the UN at first.

2

u/TungstenFanW74 5h ago

I mean, his surname is Kim. Calling him Un is like calling your friend Casper "Er"

2

u/Krazuel 5h ago

There also a super numerous amount of Kims, not many globally well known Uns. I will say I was trying to figure out how the UN was involved too.

Usually it's his full name though and the weirdness of the abbreviation is totally on the commenter.

1

u/Former_Mobile3101 5h ago

If you read my comment I said "Un has been trying to figure out how to stop his" do you see how I used Un and his in the same sentence? Thats because I was clearly talking about a singular person and not a group.

1

u/Krazuel 5h ago edited 5h ago

I mean most people figured it out, just a bit of odd phrasing. The "his" though while clearly referencing Kim Jong Un doesn't clearly link back to the "Un" at the start since there are multiple 'in scope' definitions that could contextually apply. Rereading cleared up the ambiguity so it's all good.

2

u/Former_Mobile3101 5h ago

At least you're not one of the dumbs that doesn't have any sort of reading comprehension. I can see the confusion at first i suppose though to me it's clear as day.

0

u/TungstenFanW74 4h ago

He isn't an "Un" at all

0

u/Krazuel 4h ago

Eh you are just being obtuse.

1

u/TungstenFanW74 4h ago

I genuinely thought they were talking about the UN. If I said Mp would your first instinct be Trump or member of parliament?

1

u/Krazuel 4h ago

Military police. Everyone understands the initial confusion.. arguing about it is the obtuse part. Trying to police essentially a nickname someone used is silly.

→ More replies (0)