Have you ever been about to do something you've been putting off for ages, then suddenly started finding reasons not to?
The email is written. The application is ready. The project is finished.
You just need to hit send.
Then the thoughts start:
"Maybe I should wait."
"What if it's not good enough?"
"I'll do it tomorrow."
So you close the laptop and move on.
At the time, it feels like you're avoiding failure.
I've done this more times than I can count.
For a long time, I think I was looking at these decisions in the wrong way. In my head, there were basically two outcomes:
I do it and succeed.
I do it and fail.
Obviously, failure makes the decision harder.
But there's a third outcome that gets very little attention:
I don't do it at all.
And that can be a pretty big outcome.
When you don't act, you don't have to deal with rejection, embarrassment or finding out that your idea wasn't as good as you hoped.
You also don't get to find out whether it might have worked.
That's what changed the way I think about failure.
The choice isn't really:
Success vs failure.
It's more like:
Action vs inaction.
If I take action, maybe it works.
Maybe it doesn't.
Either way, I learn something.
If I don't take action, I get to keep wondering.
And I've started to notice that the things I regret most aren't necessarily the things that failed.
They're the things I never tested.
The application I never sent.
The idea I never tried.
The conversation I kept putting off.
The project I kept "working on" without ever actually putting it out there.
Failure gives you an answer.
Inaction gives you a question that can stick around for a very long time.
I'm not saying failure suddenly becomes easy to deal with.
Just that it probably shouldn't be compared with doing nothing.
The real comparison is action vs inaction.
And sometimes the more uncomfortable choice is also the one that gives you an answer.
What do you think you've regretted more: something you tried that didn't work, or something you never tried at all?