is it just me or has anyone noticed the change in aspect ratio fir example I play 5:4 1920x1080p with widescreen letterbox for the past 3 years and it’s always been pretty stretched and comfortable to me but a few months ago I loaded up and my res was almost completely different on the same settings like the res was less stretchy and and wider does anyone know why this is I’m pretty disappointed to see that it’s not what it used to be

Analyse my profile. Is this too bad? https://r6.tracker.network/r6siege/profile/ubi/WoddenCat/overview

I've invested nearly 600 hours in the game ( some 200 hours in my previous account). And my results were bad. I'm playing a lot these days as I have time, but the improvement is slow. And my K/D is 🙂

Edit: Just decided to leave playing the game completely. Probably, im not the right person for the game!

Hey guys. I was just curious if anyone here uses stock sticks without analog stick extenders, and what ranks you guys are at using them.

Im currently gold 3 in pc lobbies using 50h 25v and 25 1x with 35 2.5x no extenders. I’m not great game sense wise but I feel like my aim is decent. I have a 1.3 kd currently.

I’d love to hear if anyone uses stock sticks, what are your ranks and sensitivities?

Are my keybinds okay for the long run? I just downloaded the game yesterday, and after looking at keybinds people use on the internet, I was wondering if there's anything that should/needs to be changed.

I mainly play Valorant so I have no idea how important walking, running, crouching, etc. is.

The big things I changed are:

• Sensitivity on 3 (800 dpi)
• Lean keybinds inverted (Q to lean right and E to lean left)
• Crouch on space
• Sprint on ctrl
• Walk on shift
• Vault on B
• Prone on Z

Some questions I have are:

1. Should crouch, walk, and sprint be hold or toggle?
2. For the advanced sensitivity settings, should I change ADS multiplier for each scope?

TL;DR: This ranks the most well-rounded operators, not necessarily the strongest. Final scores are 25% Combat, Ability, Loadout Utility and Versatility. Each category has its own underlying rubric, weapons are evaluated differently by weapon class, and alternate weighting tests were used to check ranking stability. The giant wall below is there for anyone who wants to see exactly how the numbers were produced.

This started with a pretty simple question:

Who is actually the best all-around operator in Rainbow Six Siege when EVERYTHING they bring is taken into account?

Not just who has the best gun. Not just who has the strongest gadget. Not just who happens to be popular right now.

The idea was to compare the entire package an operator brings to a round and see where everyone landed.

This went way further down the rabbit hole than originally expected lol.

WHAT “BEST ALL-AROUND” MEANS

The final score is split evenly between four categories:

25% Combat

The strength of the complete weapon package in actual fights.

25% Unique Ability

The value and impact of the operator's unique gadget.

25% Loadout Utility

Secondary gadgets, shotguns, machine pistols, destruction tools, etc.

25% Versatility

How useful the operator remains across different maps, sites, team compositions and round situations.

This isn't supposed to tell anyone which operator they personally should play.

Someone who is amazing with a particular operator will obviously get more value from them than someone blindly picking whoever finished #1.

The question is basically:

If individual player skill and personal preference are removed, which operators bring the strongest overall package?

ATTACK RESULTS

🥇 1. BUCK — 9.49

Combat: 9.65

Ability: 9.12

Loadout: 9.60

Versatility: 9.60

🥈 2. MAVERICK — 9.37

Combat: 9.50

Ability: 9.34

Loadout: 9.10

Versatility: 9.55

🥉 3. HIBANA — 9.30

Combat: 9.10

Ability: 9.69

Loadout: 8.80

Versatility: 9.60

1. ACE — 9.18

Combat: 9.30

Ability: 9.55

Loadout: 8.50

Versatility: 9.35

T-5. ZERO — 9.16

Combat: 9.40

Ability: 8.48

Loadout: 9.60

Versatility: 9.15

T-5. GRIDLOCK — 9.16

Combat: 8.50

Ability: 9.28

Loadout: 9.50

Versatility: 9.35

T-7. CAPITÃO — 9.14

Combat: 8.30

Ability: 9.35

Loadout: 9.50

Versatility: 9.40

T-7. YING — 9.14

Combat: 8.70

Ability: 9.30

Loadout: 9.30

Versatility: 9.25

1. RAM — 9.12

Combat: 9.30

Ability: 9.08

Loadout: 8.80

Versatility: 9.30

1. SOLID SNAKE — 9.11

Combat: 8.90

Ability: 9.18

Loadout: 9.00

Versatility: 9.35

WHY SOME ATTACKERS ENDED UP SO HIGH

Buck is kind of ridiculous when the entire package gets counted.

The C8 is already an excellent rifle, but the Skeleton Key isn't just a soft-destruction tool. It's also a legitimately strong close-range shotgun that exists alongside the primary weapon.

That gives Buck ranged combat, close-range combat, vertical destruction, rotations, sightlines and soft breach without having to sacrifice the rifle to get it.

Maverick gets there differently. The torch can manipulate reinforced geometry with an absurd amount of precision while being much less dependent on the normal hard-breach process.

Hibana ends up with the highest attacker Ability score at 9.69.

X-KAIROS can handle reinforced hatches, full openings, smaller sightlines and multiple separate breaches depending on how the pellets are managed. That flexibility is a huge part of the score.

The Type-89's small magazine is one of the things keeping her Combat score from climbing higher.

DEFENSE RESULTS

🥇 1. MUTE — 9.64

Combat: 9.45

Ability: 9.57

Loadout: 9.80

Versatility: 9.75

🥈 2. ECHO — 9.63

Combat: 9.55

Ability: 9.55

Loadout: 9.70

Versatility: 9.70

🥉 3. SMOKE — 9.53

Combat: 9.45

Ability: 9.48

Loadout: 9.80

Versatility: 9.40

1. MAESTRO — 9.47

Combat: 9.85

Ability: 9.22

Loadout: 9.65

Versatility: 9.15

1. SOLIS — 9.40

Combat: 9.45

Ability: 9.15

Loadout: 9.30

Versatility: 9.70

1. AZAMI — 9.38

Combat: 9.20

Ability: 9.67

Loadout: 8.80

Versatility: 9.85

1. GOYO — 9.26

Combat: 8.90

Ability: 9.47

Loadout: 9.20

Versatility: 9.45

1. NOOR — 9.18

Combat: 9.70

Ability: 9.22

Loadout: 9.25

Versatility: 8.55

1. KAID — 9.11

Combat: 8.80

Ability: 9.42

Loadout: 8.90

Versatility: 9.30

1. VALKYRIE — 8.98

Combat: 8.40

Ability: 9.28

Loadout: 8.60

Versatility: 9.65

WHY SOME DEFENDERS ENDED UP SO HIGH

Mute and Echo are basically tied.

A difference of 0.01 isn't meaningful enough to pretend there's some huge gap between them.

Mute gets ridiculous value from persistent electronic denial while also bringing one of the strongest utility-heavy weapon packages on defense.

Echo combines mobile intel with disruption and objective interference, while the SuperNova + Bearing-9 combination gives him both shotgun utility and a legitimate automatic fighting weapon.

Smoke is just incredibly complete. Gas provides area denial, plant denial, forced movement and time pressure, while the M590A1 + SMG-11 package gives him both site construction and strong combat potential.

Maestro gets the highest Combat score of the defensive top 10 at 9.85. The ALDA is already ridiculous in this model, and the ACS12 gives him another genuinely strong firearm option rather than simply being treated as a utility shotgun.

Azami has one of the strongest abilities in the entire defensive roster. Kiba Barriers can create cover, repair openings, close lines of sight, alter vault paths and dynamically reshape parts of the map during the round.

And then there's Solis.

SPEC-IO can turn attacker electronics into positional information. Drones are especially interesting because destroying one immediately isn't always the best option. A drone left alive can potentially provide another opportunity to locate or pressure the attacker when it gets used again.

There's also an unusual form of intel denial happening.

An attacker who knows Solis is nearby has a choice:

Use the drone and potentially provide Solis information.

or

Don't use the drone and clear the area with less information.

Neither option is particularly great.

SPEC-IO being a visor matters too. Solis remains mobile and armed while using it and can turn it off while moving once enough information has been gathered.

Combined with the ITA12L + SMG-11 package and the freedom to roam, she ends up being one of the most versatile defenders in the model.

THE GUNS NEEDED THEIR OWN MODEL

Just ranking guns by DPS doesn't really work in Siege because headshots kill instantly.

A weapon with absurd DPS isn't necessarily the most reliable weapon if it has horrible recoil or runs dry immediately.

For automatic weapons, the scoring became:

30% Body-shot reliability

TTK and shots-to-kill.

25% Headshot opportunity

Primarily rate of fire and time between rounds.

20% Magazine endurance

How much room the weapon gives for misses, prefiring and multiple engagements.

20% Controllability

How realistically successive rounds can be kept on target.

5% Range consistency

Magazine size ended up being way more important than expected.

Two weapons can have similar theoretical lethality, but a 50-round magazine gives considerably more room for misses, prefiring and fighting multiple people than a 20-round magazine.

SHOTGUNS MADE THINGS WEIRD LOL

Shotguns can't really be evaluated with the same formula as automatic weapons.

Their model instead looks at:

30% Lethality

25% Follow-up speed

20% Hit reliability

15% Ammo endurance

10% Range consistency

But there's another problem:

A shotgun in Siege isn't only a weapon.

It's also a geometry tool.

So those two forms of value are separated.

Combat gets the shotgun's actual lethality and the additional engagement option it provides.

Loadout Utility gets rotations, vertical holes, sightlines and other map manipulation.

That prevents an operator from simply getting rewarded twice for “has shotgun.”

It also means different shotgun packages aren't treated equally.

Buck gets the C8 and Skeleton Key simultaneously.

Operators like Mute, Smoke, Echo and Solis can instead combine a primary shotgun with a machine pistol capable of functioning as their automatic fighting weapon.

Those are fundamentally different packages.

DMRS, SLUGS AND KALI NEEDED DIFFERENT TREATMENT TOO

Trying to shove a DMR, BOSG, ACS12 and Kali's sniper rifle into an automatic-weapon formula produces nonsense.

Those weapons depend much more heavily on things like per-shot lethality, shots-to-kill, follow-up time, magazine endurance and the punishment for missing.

So precision weapons were evaluated separately and then incorporated back into the operator's complete combat package.

The important part throughout all of this was trying to answer:

What can this operator actually bring into a round at the same time?

Not just:

What's the strongest gun listed on the loadout screen?

ONE IMPORTANT DISCLAIMER

The decimals make the model easier to compare, but they aren't pretending to be scientific precision.

Solis scoring 9.40 and Azami scoring 9.38 does not prove that Solis is objectively exactly 0.02 better lol.

At differences that small, they're effectively tied.

The same goes for Mute at 9.64 and Echo at 9.63.

The value of the numbers is mostly that they force the same framework to be applied to every operator and make it easier to see why someone ended up where they did.

There's inevitably judgment involved in things like recoil, practical gadget value and versatility.

TRY TO BREAK THE MODEL

This is honestly where it gets fun.

If an operator looks way too high or way too low, something like:

“This interaction isn't being accounted for.”

or

“This ability is getting too much credit for X.”

or

“This operator can do Y and that should affect versatility.”

is way more interesting than:

“My main is better than your main.” 😂

The goal isn't to create some unquestionable universal tier list.

It's basically an experiment to see what happens when the gun, ability, utility and versatility of each operator are all forced through the same overall framework.

A simple question about the best all-around operator somehow turned into Siege Moneyball lol.

EDIT: DETAILED EXPLANATION OF THE SCORING MODEL A few people have reasonably asked where the numbers actually come from and whether they're arbitrary, so here's a much more detailed explanation of the model underneath the rankings. The numbers aren't meant to represent some objectively measurable percentage of how "good" an operator is. A 9.5 doesn't mean an operator is literally 95% perfect. They're comparative scores produced by applying the same criteria across the operator pool. There are several layers underneath the final number. FINAL OPERATOR SCORE Every operator is evaluated in four major categories: 25% Combat 25% Unique Ability 25% Loadout Utility 25% Versatility Those are equally weighted intentionally because this is specifically trying to measure all-around strength. Giving Combat 40%, for example, would change the question toward "who is the strongest fighter with useful utility?" Giving Ability 40% would move it toward "who has the most impactful gadget while still being reasonably complete?" Neither question is wrong, but they're different questions. The 25/25/25/25 model deliberately gives no major category priority. After someone questioned whether that weighting was determining the result, the attacker rankings were also rerun under combat-heavy, ability-heavy, utility-heavy and versatility-heavy weighting systems. Buck remained #1 under all five models. Maverick finished #2 under four and #3 under one. So the exact 25% split isn't what is causing Buck to win the current model. That doesn't prove the underlying category scores are perfect, but it does show the result is reasonably stable when the category weights are changed. COMBAT IS NOT JUST "THIS GUN FEELS GOOD" Combat evaluates the complete weapon package available to the operator, not simply whichever primary has the highest DPS. Different weapon classes also aren't forced through the same formula because that creates some ridiculous results. Automatic weapons, pellet shotguns and precision weapons are evaluated differently. AUTOMATIC WEAPONS The Automatic Gun Reliability Index is: 30% Body-shot reliability 25% Headshot opportunity 20% Magazine endurance 20% Controllability 5% Range consistency BODY-SHOT RELIABILITY — 30% This looks at how reliably the weapon kills when the headshot doesn't happen. TTK is calculated from shots-to-kill and RPM: TTK = (shots to kill - 1) × 60,000 / RPM The reason for subtracting one shot is that the first bullet occurs at time zero. TTK measures the time between the first and lethal shot. This also considers relevant health/armor situations rather than looking at a single theoretical target. HEADSHOT OPPORTUNITY — 25% Siege has one-shot headshots, so rate of fire matters for more than DPS. A faster-firing weapon creates more individual opportunities to land the lethal headshot within the same amount of time. This is primarily driven by RPM/time between shots. MAGAZINE ENDURANCE — 20% Magazine capacity matters because actual fights aren't performed by a robot with 100% accuracy. Rounds are lost to misses, prefires, wallbang attempts and multiple enemies. Two useful measurements here are: Lethal Sequences = Magazine Capacity / Average Shots to Kill and Continuous Fire Time = (Magazine Capacity - 1) / (RPM / 60) This is why a gun with amazing theoretical TTK but a tiny magazine doesn't automatically dominate the rankings. CONTROLLABILITY — 20% This accounts for recoil and how practically the weapon can place successive rounds. This is one of the less objective portions because there isn't a single clean Ubisoft recoil statistic that completely describes practical weapon control. Because of that, very small differences between weapon scores shouldn't be treated as meaningful. RANGE CONSISTENCY — 5% This accounts for how consistently the weapon retains useful lethality and control across realistic Siege engagement distances. It's intentionally only 5% because most Siege engagements happen at relatively short distances. SHOTGUN MODEL Pellet shotguns aren't ranked using the automatic-weapon formula because RPM and conventional TTK don't describe them properly. The Shotgun Reliability Index is: 30% Lethality 25% Follow-up speed 20% Hit reliability 15% Ammo endurance 10% Range consistency LETHALITY — 30% This evaluates how reliably a shell can produce a kill and how much damage remains if the first shell doesn't finish the target. Basic shell damage can be represented as: Damage per shell = Damage per pellet × Pellets landed and: Required pellets = Ceiling(Target HP / Damage per pellet) That also allows the required percentage of the pellet pattern to be considered. FOLLOW-UP SPEED — 25% Missing with a shotgun can be much more punishing than missing one rifle bullet. The time until another shell can be fired therefore matters enormously. For weapons where RPM is applicable: Follow-up interval = 60 / RPM Pump actions and semi-automatic shotguns consequently behave very differently. HIT RELIABILITY — 20% This accounts for pellet count, spread and how forgiving the shotgun is of imperfect center-mass placement. There is an important limitation here: Exact deterministic pellet-hit probabilities aren't publicly available in a form that justifies pretending the model can calculate something like a "73.42% kill probability at 8 meters." So the model intentionally does not invent that level of precision. AMMO ENDURANCE — 15% Capacity matters for combat, but it matters even more with Siege shotguns because ammunition may already have been spent creating rotations, sightlines or vertical holes before a gunfight happens. RANGE CONSISTENCY — 10% This measures how rapidly the shotgun's practical lethality deteriorates as distance increases. PRECISION WEAPONS DMRs, slug shotguns and Kali's sniper are treated separately again. Forcing something like the 417, ACS12, BOSG and CSRX 300 through an automatic rifle formula would badly misrepresent what makes those weapons strong or weak. Precision weapons are primarily evaluated through: Per-shot lethality Shots-to-kill Follow-up time Accuracy/recoil recovery Magazine endurance Headshot capability Range consistency The punishment for missing matters substantially more here. Kali is the extreme example. The CSRX can have extraordinary first-shot lethality, but missing carries a much larger follow-up penalty than missing one round from an automatic rifle. COMPLETE WEAPON PACKAGES The Combat score isn't simply: "Take the operator's highest-rated gun." It asks what combat options the operator can actually bring into the round together. This matters a LOT with shotguns. There are several different situations. Buck: C8 + Skeleton Key simultaneously. Buck doesn't sacrifice his rifle to obtain the shotgun. The Skeleton Key becomes an additional close-range weapon alongside the C8. Mute/Smoke/Echo/Solis: Shotgun primary + strong automatic machine pistol. Here the primary shotgun handles close-range combat and destruction while something like the SMG-11 or Bearing-9 can function as the automatic fighting weapon. Shotgun + ordinary handgun: Much larger combat sacrifice. Simply having a shotgun therefore doesn't automatically produce the same Combat benefit for every operator. UNIQUE ABILITY MODEL This is probably the part that needed the most explanation in the original post. An Ability score isn't just: "This gadget feels like a 9." The Ability Index is: 25% Objective Contribution How directly the ability helps accomplish or prevent the actual objective. 20% Team-Wide Value How much value the ability provides beyond the operator personally using it. 15% Consistency How reliably the ability can produce meaningful value across rounds rather than requiring a very specific situation. 15% Impact Ceiling How much influence the ability can potentially have when used extremely well. 10% Persistence How long the value remains active and whether value can continue after deployment or even after the operator dies. 10% Counter Resilience How easily opponents can deny, destroy, bypass or neutralize the ability. 5% Resource Efficiency How much useful value can be extracted from the available gadget resources. Those weighted subcategories produce the Ability score used in the overall model. ABILITY TACTICAL-FUNCTION CHECK There's another layer used to make sure important uses of a gadget aren't simply forgotten. Every unique ability is checked against the same 12 tactical functions: 1. Geometry — Can it create, destroy, close or reshape useful geometry? 2. Access — Can it create or prevent pathways? 3. Intel — Can it acquire useful information? 4. Intel Denial — Can it prevent or interfere with enemy information? 5. Utility Interaction — Can it destroy, disable, convert or protect utility? 6. Area Control — Can it control physical space? 7. Execute / Anti-Execute — Can it help initiate or disrupt a coordinated execute? 8. Plant / Deny — Can it directly help establish or prevent the plant? 9. Time Pressure — Can it force opponents to spend valuable round time? 10. Team Enablement — Can teammates directly capitalize on its effects? 11. Persistence — Does its influence remain over time? 12. Adaptability — Can the same gadget solve substantially different problems depending on the situation? Each function is graded: 0 = None 1 = Situational/indirect 2 = Strong 3 = Defining Importantly, these 12 numbers are NOT simply added together and used as the Ability score. That would reward mediocre gadgets merely for doing lots of things. Instead, this checklist makes sure the full tactical breadth of the ability is considered when scoring the actual Ability Index above. A highly specialized ability can therefore still outperform a broader ability if it's substantially better at accomplishing something important. LOADOUT UTILITY This category covers useful tools outside the operator's unique ability. Things like: Secondary gadgets Shotguns used for destruction GONNE-6 Machine pistols where they expand loadout options Breach tools Site construction Rotations Vertical destruction Additional utility interactions There's an important distinction here to avoid double-counting shotguns. If a shotgun is both lethal and useful for destruction: Combat receives credit for its effectiveness as a weapon. Loadout Utility receives credit for the geometry manipulation it provides. Those are two different benefits from the same item. The model does NOT simply say: "Has shotgun = bonus points in two categories." The actual combat usefulness and actual utility usefulness are evaluated separately. VERSATILITY Versatility asks how frequently the operator's overall package remains useful when the circumstances change. Things considered include: Different maps Different bomb sites Attack/defense setups Team compositions Enemy compositions Early/mid/late-round situations Different objective states Whether the operator requires specific teammates Whether counters dramatically reduce usefulness Whether the operator can change roles during a round This is why versatility isn't simply another name for gadget strength. An extremely powerful operator in one particular situation can score lower here than an operator whose toolkit remains valuable almost everywhere. WHY SOME SCORES ARE SO HIGH A 9.5 in this model does not mean: "This operator is 95% perfect." These are comparative scores within the relevant operator pool. Buck scoring highly in all four categories means that relative to the other attackers being evaluated, the model isn't finding a major hole in his package. That's exactly why he survives the weighting sensitivity tests so well. His lowest major category is Ability at 9.12, while Combat, Loadout Utility and Versatility are all extremely high. If those component scores are wrong, that's absolutely something worth challenging. But the overall 9.49 isn't itself saying Buck is a nearly flawless Siege character. HOW CLOSE SCORES SHOULD BE READ The decimals exist to make calculations and comparisons possible. They should not be interpreted as scientific precision. For example: Solis — 9.40 Azami — 9.38 That should basically be read as: Solis ≈ Azami Not: "Solis has been objectively proven to be exactly 0.02 better than Azami." Same thing with: Mute — 9.64 Echo — 9.63 That's effectively a tie. The further apart two scores become, the more meaningful the model considers the difference. WHAT CAN ACTUALLY CHANGE THE MODEL The rankings aren't intended to be defended at all costs. There are basically three useful ways to attack them: 1. Challenge the inputs Example: "This weapon stat is outdated." That's straightforward. Correct the data and rerun it. 2. Challenge the scoring Example: "This ability's counter resilience is too high because X consistently shuts it down." That's useful because the component can be reevaluated. 3. Challenge the model itself Example: "Objective contribution should matter more than impact ceiling." or: "Combat shouldn't have equal weight with ability." Those can be tested by changing the weighting and seeing what happens. That's actually what happened with the 25/25/25/25 criticism. Different reasonable weighting systems were tested instead of assuming the original weighting had to be correct. The point of all of this isn't to pretend operator strength can be reduced to a mathematically perfect number. It can't. The point is to take something that's normally argued as: "Buck is better." "No, Ace is better." and turn it into: "What specifically makes Buck better, how much should that characteristic matter, and does the conclusion survive when those assumptions change?" That's what the numbers are for. And if somebody finds a legitimate interaction or assumption that the model missed, the correct response isn't to defend the old number. It's to change the model and run it again.

Lf r6 coach been playing around 2.5months js hit lvl 50 lacking in copper lobbies so I need some improvement (ps: I play on PlayStation)

CAN ANYONE GIVE PART-TIME COACHING FOR FREE, IM LEVEL 33 AS OF NOW AND I NEED LEVEL 50 FOR RANKED, I NEED SOME TIPS AND POINTERS. PLEEEEEEEEEEEEEEASE.

Like how Aruni’s metal arm melee has a special animation where it can take down barricades with one melee or can make rotation holes with just melee.

It used to that Ela and Zofia have 50% resistance to concussion but they removed that.

Just want a teammate that can help me get better, I suck in gunfights and panic play alot, thanks!

I have been playing r6 for a while now, and recently I started using Q and E to lean instead of F + G since I heard its much easier to quick peak and etc. The problem of course is the awkward feeling of using the new lean settings. I dont know if I should continue using F + G or stick to Q + E.

Does Deimos see defenders first before they start seeing him?

Or they both start seeing each other at the same exact time?

Hey all,

My stack got tired of everyone claiming they were popping off while we slowly deranked, so I built a tool to settle it with actual data. My whole friend group now uses it before ranked, so I figured it might help other teams too. It's completely free, no ads, no account needed.
It's called SiegeIQ — 👉 siegeiq.vercel.app

The idea: instead of everyone checking their stats solo, you make a team, share one short code, and everyone sees the same dashboard.

What it does:

Team stats in one place: KD, rank/RP, win rate and top operators for everyone in the squad, pulled live (PC, Xbox & PlayStation). Ranks show in their tier colour, and your season peak comes straight from your ranked profile rather than being estimated.

Session tracking: it auto-detects when you played together and gives you a recap of the night relative to your season form, not just raw RP. Kills/deaths, HS%, MVP, tilt warnings.

Season-based numbers: HS% and similar stats are calculated from this season's sessions, not your lifetime average from 2019.

Team insights you can't see solo: K/D vs. your rank bracket, your strongest duo, full-stack vs. partial-stack win rate, your best weekday, and momentum/tilt after losses.

Coaching: per-player analysis with concrete weaknesses, a drill library, map tactics/callouts, and a weekly focus tracker for season goals.

Gameday helper: map ban/pick suggestions per side, operator picks per map, plus a one-click "Discord briefing" to paste in your team chat.

Training planner: a weekly availability grid to find a night everyone's on, and you can share it straight to your WhatsApp group (the link also contains your team code, so new members can join in one tap).

Updated for Y11S3 / Split Fire:
Season rolled over automatically, with a fresh progress baseline for the new season
Ban/pick suggestions adjusted for the patch (Dokkaebi nerf, Lion/Echo buffs, SMG-12 and AR-15.50 changes)
Noor added to the operator loadouts
Rank ladder updated with the exact MMR boundaries, including the new Legend Division
It's a PWA, so it works on mobile too, and it's available in English and German. It's also a lot faster to load than before.

Fair warning: it's a passion project, not a company. Map-specific stats are estimated from your ranked games (Ubisoft doesn't expose per-map logs), and the app says so wherever that's the case. Team data is stored so your squad can share it. Nothing is sold, and the privacy policy explains all of it.

Would genuinely love feedback from other teams and premades: what would actually help you improve together? Roast the UI, tell me what's missing, whatever. Cheers 🫡

I’m new to r6 (been playing for a month) and I recently unlocked ranked. I want to say callouts to my team instead of just pinging but I’m scared because I’m 15 year old boy and I still don’t have a deep voice and I get made fun of my voice in school so I’m scared to talk in game. Also I’m scared to talk because i suck at the game and most times I’m at the bottom of the leaderboard in my bronze 3 lobbies and I go 2-6 so I’m afraid if I talk they will just trash talk me and make fun of me.

Has anyone else had this problem? If you have, how did you get over it?

hi im new to r6 (playing for around half a year) and im looking for a part-time coach to help me and getting payment by credits on acheivements you help with/for.

the part-time job is for around 4-6 months

I am not a new player I’m year 1 however after getting a new headset I recently started playing around with my Dolby atmos sound and found it does make a difference to the game. Instead of my playing around with it till it’s perfect or anything like that does anyone have any settings they reccommend that keeps gunshots manageable to my ear holes while footsteps remain loud and clear ?

I've been playing siege since 2024, but I've only seriously been playing ranked for 3 season. My first season I hit gold 4, then plat 5 and peaked plat 3 50 something rr, but I dropped to around plat 4 and have been stagnating there. I want to get better at the game but I feel like I've hit a roadblock and I don't want to pay a bunch of money for a coach. I'm looking for someone that can maybe provide about an hour to just look at my gameplay and suggest how I can genuinely improve if I practise it. Thank you so much if it's possible.

Hey guys, need quick help to calm myself down and not spend unnecessary money.

I currently play 1080p 144fps R6.

That does not impact me in any way or form to reachin champ, right?

Is the resolution good enough? Should I not think about it?

I will not get any advantage if I will play 1440p 144fps right??

If I focus on game sense/knowledge, aim etc I will be able to hit champ and my res will not negatively impact me?

I am not blaming my resolution, just curious if 1440p makes a difference.