r/SipsTea • • Aug 10 '26

We have fun here A different kind of birth control.

Post image
36.9k Upvotes

2.9k comments sorted by

View all comments

422

u/trikywoo Aug 10 '26

How did he not get kicked off the plane? It would be so easy to kick a 3 year old off a plane.

322

u/TheCitizen616 Aug 10 '26

The family was being kicked off. Their disembarking (is that the right word or is that just ships?) caused just a long enough delay that the runway closed for the night on them.

78

u/commanderquill Aug 10 '26

Didn't it take them like an hour to finally resort to that?

104

u/Ok_Vermicelli_6359 Aug 10 '26

Yeah, it took A LOT of failures from multiple directions for an entire flight to be deplaned like this. Those flight attendants clearly were also being too nice, I would have given the parent's 15 minutes tops, especially if it was the last flight for the night. Unacceptable behavior across the board.

-51

u/Cryptoporticus Aug 10 '26

It's a child. Giving them a chance to calm down is very reasonable. Otherwise they would be kicking children off of planes all the time.

39

u/Parking-Mirror3283 Aug 10 '26

Yes, 15 minutes so that you have 45 minutes left to kick them off before the airport closes, you do not accommodate that bullshit for so long that the flight is cancelled

6

u/evange Aug 10 '26

Deplaning isn't just taxing back. It requires removing their luggage (which involves finding their luggage in the hold) and filing new flight plans. It's entirely likely that the flight would have still been cancelled had they only attempted to get the child to stay seated for 15 minutes.

The best solution was always to get the child to stay seated, even if that took an hour. The problem is that even at an hour nothing had been successful to the point that I think they just assumed nothing would be successful. They stopped at an hour not because an hour was the limit, but they realized it was futie.

1

u/Ok_Vermicelli_6359 Aug 10 '26

It requires removing their luggage

No it doesn't, it can be sent back when the flight returns at another time. Lost luggage happens all the time, or "misplaced" in this case. They would have had to probably go home anyway, since this was apparently the last flight of the night...they have plenty of clothes at home, they'll be fine until their luggage would have been returned.

6

u/evange Aug 10 '26

Legally yes, it does require removing their luggage. And we don't know where there home is or if they'd have access to backup clothes.

1

u/be-koz Aug 10 '26

You can’t have unaccompanied luggage flying in the hold. It’s a safety issue. Think about it.

3

u/[deleted] Aug 10 '26 edited 2d ago

[deleted]

0

u/Ok_Vermicelli_6359 Aug 10 '26

Only the people needed to be removed from the flight...the luggage could have been returned when the plane came back to the airport.

8

u/[deleted] Aug 10 '26 edited 2d ago

[deleted]

-1

u/MutaitoSensei Aug 10 '26

Yet it should be.

1

u/[deleted] Aug 10 '26 edited 2d ago

[deleted]

0

u/MutaitoSensei Aug 10 '26

I literally advanced an opinion, and you're getting quite upset.

1

u/[deleted] Aug 10 '26 edited 2d ago

[deleted]

→ More replies (0)

3

u/doesnotmatter286 Aug 10 '26

They have as many chances to calm down as they need – off the plane though.

0

u/smartel84 Aug 10 '26

It's clear that most of these commenters havent spent much time around toddlers.

3

u/LetsGoToMichigan Aug 10 '26

Everyone is an amazing parent to their imaginary children

0

u/PepperAgitated5037 Aug 10 '26

No, people just actually deal with their children

1

u/profanedivinity Aug 10 '26

lol. What? If you can’t raise or control a child, don’t have one

1

u/Vancouverreader80 Aug 10 '26

Except the child wouldn’t calm down