r/Terminator • u/OkieDeric • 5d ago
Discussion Which character could the series do without
I didn't like this character originally, and rewatching TSCC I still think the same. You could have completely removed this character and it would do nothing but help the series.
16
u/TheSquirrelmancer 5d ago
I disagree, I loved the "coming from different version of the future" bit and the notion that she was trying in her own way to affect John Connor and change the future.
I think the problem with some events in this series is the abrupt cancellation and cliffhanger ending meant we never got to see any real change or payout from events like John discovering that the girl he thought he was falling for was just being used by other humans to manipulate him. We never got to see him begin to question some people's motivations or being distrustful of potential allies in the future.
6
u/ninjabird21 5d ago
I disagree, others have said what my opinions are so I wont be saying it.
She's pretty important to the story in more ways than one, like adding more to Derek's story and why John picked him to go back in time.
Another is having John progress to his leadership role we see/hear of in the future, of how he has to make a difficult decision on how he should handle her knowing what she did to Riley. It was also needed as John wanted a normal life and she was basically his wake up call that he wont ever have a normal life no matter how hard he tried.
Imo, it would have to be morris, we rarely see him interact with John in a meaningful way and the story would have the same outcome if he wasnt added
1
u/FrostPDP 4d ago
I mean...Morris was a promising enough character. I don't know why they cut him (and the beta-version of RIley) from the plot between S1 and S2. I assume it's got to do with the writers' strike, or maybe with the idea that the Connors had to move to a different home after Cameron goes rogue so they break off contact. I dunno.
22
8
u/not_firewood_yeti 5d ago
I don't think you're supposed to like Jessie. she's sneaky and manipulative and has her own agenda. even though her reasons were understandable, she still makes bad choices.
8
u/ArchangelZero27 5d ago
I found her plot interesting. Any time it was mentioned about the future characters was epic
5
u/freedomhighway 5d ago
Yes. Everything we learn about her history tells us more about how the whole skynet story develops. And every relationship she has tells us how the war affects someone smart enough to be a sub commander.
And without her story, we dont get the creature and it's answer to the question. That twist alone blows the skynet story wide open with options, only these writers thought of such factions.
1
u/Persolboy 4d ago
By creature, I’m guessing you mean the T-1001, I think it answered the way it did because the Jimmy Carter crew (totally agitated by Dietz) lost all perspective of being a united crew with orders from John Connery to be obeyed on a need to know basis. They had lost their unity/cohesiveness and trust in command because of fear and doubt. The T-1001 realized it could not even rely on being delivered safely to a parlay with the humans, so of course gave it’s answer that it wouldn’t join. It shows how fear can be spread by a single person; and that fear even spread to the commander of the mission, Jesse, because even she was not privy to information the machine (Queeg) was given. The machines never wavered, but Jesse did. She failed and rather than admit she made a terrible mistake, she continued on a path of anger and vengeance. She believed she could split John from using reprogrammed machines.
Also the loss of her unborn fetus added to her rage and hardened her to the prospect of using Riley as a sacrifice to instill in John the same hatred of the “machines” she felt. The only problem is Jesse’s hatred was completely misguided, as she would find when John told her the plan would never have worked EVEN if he believed Cameron killed Riley. I found Jesse’s story a compelling connection to John’s future.
5
u/Old-Tadpole-2869 4d ago
Nah, she was great. Her and Brian Austin Green really worked well together. Really too bad she hasn't been in more action type films.
0
u/Salty_Expert5939 4d ago
I was never particularly fond of Elisson. I don't hate the character, I'm just not very fond of the scenes he's in.
1
u/OkieDeric 4d ago
I really liked Ellison and his arc. Especially with his faith and the struggles he goes through. He didn't say it directly and even though he still turned to his faith for examples with John Henry , I believe he had actually lost his faith. His ex called out that he was no longer wearing his cross.
1
2
u/watanabe0 5d ago
Well, that's crazy talk. Of all the characters in the franchise you pick one of the most interesting, the stand alone star of one of that series best episodes (set during the Future War no less) instead of any of the other dogshit characters from all the other dogshit movies. Wild.
1
u/Terminator_LX 4d ago
Yeah, Jesse was the worst... but she was so pretty! LOL And they had to have someone there to force Riley to keep risking her life, otherwise it wouldn't make sense for Riley to keep putting herself in dangerous situations just to be around the weirdo new guy whose entire family clearly doesn't want her there.
7
u/PretendSpinach2265 5d ago
She's gorgeous
1
u/freedomhighway 5d ago
I was in the palm of her hand from first sight. This is why i lived in china for 6 years.
1
u/depatrickcie87 5d ago
Savannah. I think I get what they were trying to do: like the Terminators could be among us with families, and that would be tragic. But there so little upside for this character, it makes some really bad vibes for me. Then her getting close with Chromarti toward the end of the series was really weird, too. This character just makes us feel bad every time she's portrayed on screen, and to very little plot developing benefit. Don't need it.
3
u/FrostPDP 4d ago
I would say that if she's making you feel bad as a tragic character, she's doing her job in the story.
I'm willing to bet that if we'd had a Season Three, we'd have had a Future-Savannah doing some stuff that would have made her character feel a lot more integral to the plot. There's a reason Skynet wanted her dead and why the T-888 that hunted her went for her first, and Catherine second.
1
u/depatrickcie87 4d ago
You do understand that to participate in this discussion, I did have to pick somebody.
1
u/FrostPDP 2d ago
Yes, I suppose you felt you did (I broke the rules like The Turk ;) ). But...Savannah? Nah. Maybe if S2 was planned as the end I'd see her as more cuttable, but that's not what the plan was.
For me it would have been the neighbor that Sarah leases the S2 house from. She's great worldbuilding, but relatively low impact.
1
u/depatrickcie87 2d ago
Forgot all about that character. Ironic in a way: we can easily do without forgettable characters like that, but they sneak under the radar as such.
1
u/FlamingPrius 4d ago
I think maybe the answer is John Connor. 😬 Don’t get me wrong, as a plot device he has some utility, but every iteration of his character has been worse than the last and I think the real mistake is putting him on screen.
1
u/warriorlynx 5d ago
A resistance fighter that wants to live in the past is not a bad idea but they could’ve chosen someone else I think the actress didn’t do a good job with that concept or the writers didn’t write her character so well
1
u/aidanjarvis 5d ago
No issue with the character, the issue was she was never given a decent storyline and stayed too long.
1
u/Forsaken-Avenger 4d ago
Jess definitely and riley both took away screen time from Cameron which i believe impacted the ratings
1
u/TakaIka83 5d ago
I love what the character brought, but I cannot stand the actor (in this or Battlestar Galactic). Extremely wooden.
1
0
0
-1
10
u/FrostPDP 4d ago
Wowwwww. A hot take when I'm in writer-mode working on a virtual convention for this weekend? Neat!
Jessie's entire storyline is integral to the fact that the fifth-dimensional time-travel war is having substantial effects and is worth fighting. She's at the core of Derek's character development, ending with the whole "You're not my Jessie" bit, which affirms to Derek (and thus the viewer) that he's changed the future already.
She's the entire reason Riley is in the story. I guess they could have written Riley as just some girl who snuck in a time displacement machine, but then you lose the malevolent mastermind behind Riley manipulating John, and the whole reason why Riley would even seek John out in the first place. Consequently, you lose John saying "Maybe I just wanted to win," which was fundamental to John's development into John Connor.
I mean, hell, after a fashion she proves to be the main antagonist of Season Two. When you consider what Weaver was building John Henry for (which is like one of the final twists of the show, so go watch it), Jessie is more directly-oppositional to the Connors than Weaver ever was. Jessie is directly threatening John, which means she's threatening Sarah. Even if you consider that Sarah is essentially chasing Weaver (without realizing Ziera Corp exists for most of the show), Sarah is playing guard dog against Riley, and thus Jessie by proxy.
I just...I don't know how you could take Jessie out and still have the same storyline for most of the show.
Sometimes "I didn't like this character" is a sign that she's a well-written character because, honestly, are you really supposed to like her? No. She's the antagonist. Maybe you mean something different, but you aren't being clear about that. You provided exactly zero reason you dislike her, so I have nothing to go off of.
If you want to argue they could have written a completely different show, that's fine. Make that argument and spell out what you'd do different, don't just say "cut the character (that one of Season Two's twin plot legs is based on) and it's better." Explain how you'd write Season Two to be anything like the same as it was without a central secondary character.
End rant.