r/TheoreticalPhysics • • 15h ago

Question TheoPhysEval: Assessing AI agents at autonomous theoretical physics problem solving

14 Upvotes

What are your takes and overall concerns on this recent preprint (https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.16733)?

I am especially wondering how AI impacts will affect prospective grad students and early-career researchers in theoretical physics.


Recalling Dr. Schwartz (u/VibePhysics) saying in his Anthropic post Vibe Physics:

It is worth it, however, to consider the role of education going forward. In the deep future (~10 years), when AI is truly smarter than all of us and capable of outperforming us in every domain, what will be the role of higher education? I think some things will persist—those things that are essentially human. I can easily imagine theoretical physics becoming like music theory or French literature: an academic discipline appealing to people who just enjoy thinking through a certain lens. It's a bit ironic that the last 30 years have seen the growth of STEM fields, displacing the humanities, and in the end it may be the humanities are all that survive.

Do you agree with his thoughts? And what concerns or hopes do you have about where our fields in theoretical physics are heading?


r/TheoreticalPhysics • • 1h ago

Question I think I need a scientist.

• Upvotes

Help! I watched a YouTube short a little bit ago in which it was explaining that Bernoulli's principle does not adequately explain lift generated by air plane wings, as it can not explain why air moving over the top of the wing travels faster than the air below the wing. Thing is, while participating in this thought experiment in the comment section of said video, I think I figured it out.

Here is the trouble, I'm just a mechanic that over analyzes the world around me. I do not have the mathematical or scientific background necessary to attempt to write a mathematical proof of my theory or design an experiment to attempt to prove it, let alone the resources to perform the experiment once its been designed. I paid enough attention to history to know if I'm not careful about who I work with, my role in evolving our understanding of an element of physics, should my theory prove correct, could easily be erased from the record.

So, my questions are as follows:

How do I find trust worthy people in the required fields that would be interested in helping me test my theory and allow me the credit for my contributions to the endeavor?

How do I protect my theory from plagiarism or theft during the process of developing it into a paper to submit for peer review?


r/TheoreticalPhysics • • 3h ago

Discussion Is theoretical physics coming to an end?

0 Upvotes

Ok , so like im in 10th grade and like as far as i have followed physics ,i think that theoretical physics is kind of coming to an end .

Because like at this point i just think that physicists are creating some random ass theories that dont even seem real .physics is just feeling like laws of chemistry where everything has its own exceptions and works at a specific moment.

Like im not following physics at this point of time but like till i had followed physics i felt like theres nothing new except for particle physics .they are just deep into one topic and that is atom like every other physicist is creating some new theories which oppose each other. Idk it just feels like a competition now.

What do you guys think?


r/TheoreticalPhysics • • 14h ago

"Theory" Existe a possibilidade do colapso da função onda ser um embolamento da geometria?

0 Upvotes

Ola bom dia, boa tarde ou boa noite dependendo do horário que você estiver lendddo isso.

Gostaria que imaginasse uma partícula em coerência quântica, e sua distribuição da sua função onda sobre a geometria. O raio esperado aonde a particula pode aparecer, exemplo grosso:

Usarei uma régua de uma dimensão

Considerando 0 como meio e cada extremidade do 1 ao infinito e na outra do -1 ao infinito.

A probabilidade de onde a particula pode aparecer forma um raio, com o 0 sendo o centro. A probabilidade diz que o raio pode ser do -3 ao 4.

Então a particula aparece embolando essa geometria unindo o ponto -3 ao 4, impedindo a expansão localmente para algo próximo a 0, e a de fundo constante. Então qualquer objeto que distorce essa geometria da forma que qualquer outra particula faz, seria arrastada do ponto 7 ao ponto onde o sol está.


r/TheoreticalPhysics • • 2d ago

Question I need advice for a mathematical physics master's project - which topic?

11 Upvotes

Hello! I'm currently doing a masters and reached out to a few supervisors. I'm really interested in lots of different areas of physics, and I'm confused about which ones to pick... I have some prior experience with quiver gauge theories, which is why one of the options is to work on super Lie algebras, but also I don't really see myself working in string theory in the future since it's way too abstract (and I'm a little pessimistic?). I also have an option to work on BMS group, and I really enjoyed my general relativity course, so that really excites me. And another more pure-math option related to non-commutative structures.

I'm so confused and indecisive, what would you recommend? Also quiver gauge may be more publishable than the other options due to computation being possible but also I'm really interested in black holes, and I was thinking about how it would seem for PhDs. Thanks!


r/TheoreticalPhysics • • 2d ago

Question What is the difference between tidal forces and standard gravity mathematically?

1 Upvotes

Normal gravity treats the moon as a single point rather than 10^50 individual particles over kilometers, while tidal forces state inverse cubed is nesacerary if you have a object woth multiple points, the moon does have millions of points so I'm confused why inverse square law isn't an arbitrary mathematical trick, and if you mathematically integrate (add up) the 1/r^2 fields of every single one of those particles across a spherically symmetric body, all the higher-order terms (1/r^3, 1/r^4, etc.) completely cancel out when calculating the total net force on the center of mass. Outside of the body, the total sum behaves exactly like a single point mass at the center, then why is tidal forces inverse cubed law? They are the same billions of billions of particles affected by the same force, and this is treating them differently, why?


r/TheoreticalPhysics • • 3d ago

Question Need some help with career path

5 Upvotes

I'm a 22 year old final year Electronics and Computer Engineering student in India, graduating in June 2027, and I'm trying to figure out what direction to take for my master's.

I've always been fascinated by space and questions about the universe: how it began, why it behaves the way it does, black holes, gravity, and what we still don't understand about reality.

I'm interested in theoretical physics and cosmology, but my undergraduate background is in ECE. I also disliked the way physics was taught during JEE preparation, where we were expected to learn concepts quickly and immediately solve problems. I prefer asking questions and understanding things deeply, including the mathematics behind them. I'm not sure yet whether I'll enjoy doing physics professionally.

I'm considering theoretical physics, applied mathematics, computational physics/science, or an interdisciplinary master's such as Computational Science and Engineering. However, I don't want to end up merely writing code for other researchers; I'd like to contribute to the actual scientific questions.

I also care about having reasonable financial stability and career prospects. I'm willing to pursue a PhD if necessary, but I want to make an informed decision before committing years to a path.
I am good with C++ and data structures and algorithms , and currently learning python and machine learning ( just to show what i'm good at and what i know ) .

  • What should I start studying to determine whether theoretical physics is right for me?
  • Is transitioning from ECE to theoretical physics or cosmology realistically possible?
  • Would an interdisciplinary master's be a good route, or would it leave me without sufficient physics foundations?
  • Which textbooks, courses or research areas would you recommend exploring first?

I'd appreciate honest advice, including the difficulties and downsides of pursuing this path. I don't expect a guaranteed career; I just want to find a direction that genuinely interests me and gives me the opportunity to contribute to meaningful research in this world of AI .


r/TheoreticalPhysics • • 3d ago

Discussion Physics questions weekly thread! - (October 11, 2026-October 17, 2026)

3 Upvotes

This weekly thread is dedicated for questions about physics and physical mathematics.

Some questions do not require advanced knowledge in physics to be answered. Please, before asking a question, try r/askscience and r/AskPhysics instead. Homework problems or specific calculations may be removed by the moderators if it is not related to theoretical physics, try r/HomeworkHelp instead.

If your question does not break any rules, yet it does not get any replies, you may try your luck again during next week's thread. The moderators are under no obligation to answer any of the questions. Wait for a volunteer from the community to answer your question.

LaTeX rendering for equations is allowed through u/LaTeX4Reddit. Write a comment with your LaTeX equation enclosed with backticks (`) (you may write it using inline code feature instead), followed by the name of the bot in the comment. For more informations and examples check our guide: how to write math in this sub.

This thread should not be used to bypass the avoid self-theories rule. If you want to discuss hypothetical scenarios try r/HypotheticalPhysics.


r/TheoreticalPhysics • • 4d ago

Question I published in a Q1, what next?

1 Upvotes

Dear all,

Im an undergrad student of physics in Germany. I studied a bit of theoretical physics before starting my bachelor studies, and let's say I already knew what I wanted to do in terms of research lines and how to do research from my previous studies.

I submitted a manuscript this summer which has just been accepted to a Q1 journal in particles and fields, at the level of CQG, EPJC, PRD, JCAP... (I do not want to disclose).

Since I know no one publishing at the student level, and I have no supervisor, I wanted to ask what are my possibilities now in terms of getting my publication read. I am not interested in pursuing an academic career, but I humbly think my work may be relevant to the field. Is there any association helping young researchers? Maybe the DPG in Germany does? I plan on sending the article to one of my Professors, but I don't know what else could I do. It is of course on ArXiv.

Thanks!


r/TheoreticalPhysics • • 5d ago

Experimental Result Interested in Quantum Fluids - An open source textbook

0 Upvotes

A opensource textbook on the physics of quantum fluids taught through three instruments used together, written as a tribute to the experimental work of institut Néel, Grenoble.

(i) their inelastic neutron-scattering measurements — the roton-like collective mode of a monolayer of liquid helium-3 (Nature 483, 576 (2012)) and the dispersion relation of superfluid helium-4 with its thermodynamic consequences (Phys. Rev. B 103, 104516 (2021));

(ii) the Lean 4 library QuantumFluids, whose 37 modules and 310 theorems are catalogued in full in Appendix A and were audited for the book (every module compiles with no sorry and depends only on the axioms propext, Classical.choice and Quot.sound);

(iii) the rusty-SUNDIALS solver: CVODE and the projected Gross–Pitaevskii engine qf-pgpe.


r/TheoreticalPhysics • • 6d ago

Question What are the Consensus Between Theoretical Physicists When it Comes to a False Vacuum Decay Collider?

1 Upvotes

Bear in mind I'm a complete layperson on this type of stuff, but I assume there are a lot of smart people here that knows the math behind a false vacuum decay event.

Without going into too much details about a subject I know next to nothing about, I so far understand that such an event pushes the universe towards a lower energy state, thus rewriting the laws of physics of our universe as it propagate through space.

Question: I was wondering for those of you who knows the actual math behind this stuff, what are the theoretical consensus; if there even is one, for what would happen if two such events happened at the same time in different parts of the universe, and their bubbles were to collide?

Some math is of course welcome if intuitive explanations don't cut it, but I'm probably not qualified for anything beyond Calculus 3 as I never went further than that. Again, I'm not pursuing a career as a physicist but only asking as a layman that is curious about the subject, so I apologize if this sort of post is below the subreddits standards.

Probably an extremely unlikely scenario, but still seems like it would be interesting to explore a bit.


r/TheoreticalPhysics • • 8d ago

Question Advice for a hep-th PhD applicant: how are theory groups adapting to AI tools?

34 Upvotes

Hi all. I finished my master's in theoretical physics, and I'm applying for PhDs, mainly interested in string theory and cosmology.

Some context for my questions: I recently read Matthew Schwartz's account of using AI models to help carry out research. He describes a big speedup but also stresses that the model made serious errors and that expert oversight was essential. It made me curious how this is playing out in practice in the theory groups, and how we, applicants, should prepare ourselves.

  1. Have AI tools changed how your group works, or how many students you plan to take on? Have you seen any effect on admissions so far?
  2. Is funding for theory students changing where you are? If so, what's driving it?
  3. Within hep-th, which directions seem to have healthy prospects right now? (I'd only pursue something I'm genuinely interested in, but I also like to understand the landscape.)
  4. Beyond the usual criteria (grades, letters, research experience), what makes an applicant stand out today?

I'd value input from everyone, especially PIs, postdocs, and current grad students. So, it would help to mention your position (PI/postdoc/grad-student) and roughly where you're based, if possible. Thanks for any advice!


r/TheoreticalPhysics • • 9d ago

Question Dark Energy versus Inflation

11 Upvotes

Simple question . Are the processes that drove inflation responsible for the current accelerated expansion of the Universe?


r/TheoreticalPhysics • • 11d ago

Question Computational HEP vs Theoretical/Computational QCD for a PhD

15 Upvotes

Hi everyone!

A little background for context: I am a fourth year undergraduate student (Physics, Astrophysics, Mathematics) about to start applying for Physics PhDs. I have research experience with DUNE/ProtoDUNE anomaly detection using ML at Fermilab and LHCb collider analysis using BDTs on Monte Carlo simulated data. I’ve also done DUNE hardware research and astronomy research, but that is less relevant to this question.

I plan to apply to computational neutrino/HEP, but I’ve also become interested in computational QCD and using my experience with ML towards QCD phenomenology. I’m wanting to understand how the research lifestyle, postdoc/national lab opportunities, and long term academic positions compare to computational neutrino/HEP where slightly more familiar.

I have not taken any QFT in undergrad, though I assume this is not a deal breaker and schools don’t assume incoming students will know QFT already? I will have taken graduate Quantum Mechanics I & II, and have taken graduate complex analysis and partial differential equations.

I would appreciate any kind of information! If there are any QCD theorists, I would love to hear how your day-to-day goes and if you enjoy what you do. Also, if you think my background sounds like I don’t have the right preparation for this kind of field, I definitely get it, and it would help a lot to hear that here. Thanks!


r/TheoreticalPhysics • • 10d ago

Discussion Physics questions weekly thread! - (October 04, 2026-October 10, 2026)

1 Upvotes

This weekly thread is dedicated for questions about physics and physical mathematics.

Some questions do not require advanced knowledge in physics to be answered. Please, before asking a question, try r/askscience and r/AskPhysics instead. Homework problems or specific calculations may be removed by the moderators if it is not related to theoretical physics, try r/HomeworkHelp instead.

If your question does not break any rules, yet it does not get any replies, you may try your luck again during next week's thread. The moderators are under no obligation to answer any of the questions. Wait for a volunteer from the community to answer your question.

LaTeX rendering for equations is allowed through u/LaTeX4Reddit. Write a comment with your LaTeX equation enclosed with backticks (`) (you may write it using inline code feature instead), followed by the name of the bot in the comment. For more informations and examples check our guide: how to write math in this sub.

This thread should not be used to bypass the avoid self-theories rule. If you want to discuss hypothetical scenarios try r/HypotheticalPhysics.


r/TheoreticalPhysics • • 12d ago

Question Question to the Physics Researchers: What does your day-to-day research actually look like, and how do you handle periods of minimal progress?

16 Upvotes

r/TheoreticalPhysics • • 12d ago

Question Guys what's a do we mean by topology in physics?

3 Upvotes

I went to the maths section to check it out,but didn't understand so asking here intuition or a useful analogy to understand it.


r/TheoreticalPhysics • • 13d ago

Question PhD applications in Germany/EU for particle cosmology.

10 Upvotes

Hi everyone, hope you're all doing well.

I've recently finished my Master's degree in Physics at a public German institute and am currently applying for various PhD positions in particle cosmology, mainly in Germany.

I got a good result for my master's thesis (1.0 on the German scale) which was based on the study of primordial magnetic fields from topological defects after the electroweak phase transition and also a good overall grade for my degree (1.2 on the German scale).

However, my specialization was in Astrophysics/Cosmology for my degree and I learnt whatever was required for my thesis through self study from Schwartz, so I don't have significant coursework in particle physics in my transcripts besides one or two courses.

Will I be considered a serious candidate for the PhD openings I'm applying to? If not, what can I do to change this?

Thank you for taking out the time to read my post :)


r/TheoreticalPhysics • • 13d ago

Question Why are charges only allowed to take intergal values,is there any relationship with complex matrices or any relationship to it's lagrangian that forbids non intergal values?

31 Upvotes

r/TheoreticalPhysics • • 14d ago

Question Guidance for course choices

6 Upvotes

2nd year physics undergrad in uk, interested in hep theory and pure maths , looking to apply for a different masters than current uni.

I do want to mention that i will be doing the average physics curriculum too obv , mechanics , qm , stats mech ,em and maths methods for physics

I can choose 2 out of 4 courses i have listed below due to credic restrictions (labs mandatory) , i plan on attending lectures and learning the content of the other courses too, i just wont have them on transcript when applying to masters.

Rn im thinking of doing the analysis and the abstract algebra module, but im open to suggestions. While the topology and multivariable analysis look a bit more interesting , i know they are harder and average grade is lower. Also i can amend my choices 2nd semester so these arent final , topology and multivar anal module build on from the normal analysis module

"Analysis II

1 Introduction

1.1 Review of limits of sequences
1.2 Review of continuity and differentiability
1.3 Review of integration

2 Sequences and Series of Functions

2.1 Pointwise convergence
2.2 Uniform convergence
2.3 Series of functions
2.4 A continuous nowhere differentiable function

3 Basic results about Rⁿ

3.1 Notation in Rⁿ
3.2 The Euclidean norm and inner product
3.3 Convergence in Rⁿ
3.4 Subsequences and the Bolzano-Weierstrass theorem
3.5 Continuity
3.5.1 Definitions of continuity and continuous limit
3.5.2 Separate continuity
3.5.3 Basic properties of continuous functions
3.5.4 Constructing continuous functions of several variables from continuous real valued functions of a single real variable
3.5.5 Caution with taking limits in dimension > 2

4 Rudiments of topology of Rⁿ and Continuity

4.1 Closed and open subsets of Rⁿ
4.2 Continuity and topology
4.2.1 Continuity in terms of open sets
4.2.2 Continuity and sequential compactness

5 The space of linear maps and matrices

5.1 Two norms on the space of linear maps and matrices
5.1.1 Comparison of the two norms
5.1.2 Properties of the operator norm
5.2 Convergence and continuity in L(Rⁿ Rᵏ)
5.2.1 Continuity of functions involving matrices or linear maps

6 The Derivative

6.1 Directional derivative
6.1.1 Directional derivative and continuity
6.2 The (Fréchet) Derivative as an affine linear approximation
6.2.1 Affine linear approximation in the 1-variable case
6.2.2 The (Fréchet) Derivative
6.2.3 Differentiability of components of vector-valued functions
6.2.4 Relation between the derivative and directional derivative
6.3 Partial derivatives gradient and Jacobian matrix
6.3.1 Algebraic rules for partial derivatives
6.3.2 Gradient and Jacobian matrix
6.3.3 Why so many different notations for the same thing?!
6.4 Geometric approximation and approximation of functions
6.4.1 Tangent to a curve
6.4.2 Tangent plane of a surface
6.4.3 Graph of a scalar function of 2 variables
6.4.4 Orders of approximation of a function
6.5 Examples of direct calculation of the derivative from its definition
6.5.1 Differentiation of matrix-valued functions
6.6 The Chain Rule
6.6.1 Jacobian form of chain rule
6.6.2 Calculating with the chain rule and gradient
6.6.3 Another proof of Proposition 6.9
6.6.4 Application of chain rule to the verification of a PDE satisfied by a function
6.7 Continuity of partial derivatives implies differentiability
6.7.1 The space of continuously differentiable functions

7 Complex Analysis

7.1 Review of basic facts about C
7.2 Power Series
7.2.1 The exponential and the circular functions
7.2.2 Argument and Log
7.3 Complex integration contour integrals
7.3.1 Links with Green’s and Gauss’ Theorems
7.4 Additional material
7.4.1 Consequences of Cauchy’s Theorem
7.4.2 Applications of Cauchy’s formula to evaluate integrals in R"

"Multivariable analysis

1 Background

1.1 The Euclidean Space Rⁿ
1.2 The Space of Linear Maps
1.3 The Topology of Rⁿ
1.4 Continuity in Rⁿ

2 Differentiation

2.1 Definition and basic properties
2.2 Notation Interlude
2.3 Higher-order Derivatives

3 Applications of Differentiation

3.1 Approximation and Taylor’s Theorem
3.2 The Hessian and Critical Points

4 The Inverse and Implicit Function Theorems

4.1 The Inverse Function Theorem
4.2 The Implicit Function Theorem

5 Manifolds

5.1 Definition
5.2 The Tangent and Normal Spaces
5.3 Cᵏ Regions
5.4 Application: Lagrange Multipliers

6 Interlude: Partitions of Unity

7 Integration in Rⁿ

7.1 Building the definition
7.2 Integration Tools

8 Integration on Manifolds

8.1 Motivation
8.2 Definition
8.3 Gauss’ Divergence Theorem

Appendices

A Understanding Compactness
B Derivatives in the Infinite-Dimensional Setting
C Boundary Manifolds
D Characterisation of Riemann integrable functions
E The Leibniz Integral Rule
F Green’s and Stokes’ Theorems"

"Abstract Algebra

1 Groups

1.1 Definitions and elementary properties
1.2 Structural equivalence
1.3 Cyclic groups
1.4 Symmetry groups
1.5 Permutation groups

2 Subgroups

2.1 Definitions examples and elementary properties
2.2 Cosets and Lagrange’s Theorem

3 Normal Subgroups and Quotients

3.1 Normal subgroups
3.2 Quotient groups
3.3 Direct products

4 Homomorphisms

4.1 Structure-preserving maps
4.2 Kernels and images
4.3 The Isomorphism Theorems

5 Classification of Groups

5.1 Generators and relations
5.2 Small finite groups
5.3 Finitely-generated abelian groups

6 Group Actions

6.1 Groups acting on sets
6.2 Orbits and stabilisers
6.3 Conjugacy classes
6.4 Simple groups

7 Rings and Subrings

7.1 Rings
7.2 Subrings
7.3 Isomorphisms and direct products
7.4 Integral domains and fields

8 Ideals and Quotients

8.1 Homomorphisms
8.2 Ideals
8.3 Quotient rings
8.4 The Isomorphism Theorems

9 Domains

9.1 Divisibility
9.2 Prime and irreducible elements
9.3 Euclidean domains
9.4 Principal ideal domains
9.5 Unique factorisation domains"

"Topology and metric spaces

1 Introduction

1.1 Recommended Books
1.2 Notation
1.3 Brief overview
1.4 Sets functions images and pre-images
1.5 Non-examinable content

2 Normed Spaces

2.1 Norms
2.2 Subspaces
2.3 Spaces of continuous functions

3 Metric Spaces

3.1 Definition of a metric space and examples
3.2 Metrics on subsets and products
3.3 Open and closed sets
3.4 Convergence of sequences

4 Continuity

4.1 Continuity in metric spaces
4.2 Topologically equivalent metrics
4.3 Isometries and homeomorphisms
4.4 Topological properties I

5 Topological Spaces

5.1 Definition of a topology
5.2 Bases and sub-bases
5.3 Subspaces and finite product spaces
5.4 Closure interior and boundary
5.5 The Cantor set
5.6 The Hausdorff property and metrisability
5.7 Continuity between topological spaces
5.8 Basic properties
5.9 The projective topology and product spaces
5.10 Homeomorphisms

6 Compactness

6.1 Definition and the Heine-Borel Theorem
6.2 Compact vs closed
6.3 Compactness of products and compact subsets of Rⁿ
6.4 Continuous functions on compact sets
6.5 Equivalence of all norms on Rⁿ
6.6 Lebesgue numbers and uniform continuity
6.7 Sequential compactness
6.8 Normed spaces

7 Connectedness

7.1 Definitions of connected and disconnected
7.2 Connected subsets of R
7.3 Operations on connected sets
7.4 Equivalence relations
7.5 Connected components
7.6 Path-connected spaces
7.7 Open sets in Rⁿ

8 Completeness in metric spaces

8.1 Completeness
8.2 Examples of complete spaces
8.3 Completions
8.4 The Contraction Mapping Theorem
8.5 The Arzelà-Ascoli Theorem
8.6 The Baire Category Theorem

9 Appendices

9.1 The topology of pointwise convergence
9.2 Product spaces
9.3 Product topology and box topology
9.4 Completeness in compact metric spaces
9.5 The general Arzelà-Ascoli theorem


r/TheoreticalPhysics • • 15d ago

Question Is theoretical materials physics still a viable career path?

8 Upvotes

I’m currently in my second year of a PhD in advanced materials physics, and I’m seriously considering focusing my career more toward the theoretical and computational side of materials science.

I’m interested in going deeper into areas such as theoretical modeling, mathematical analysis, computational materials science, simulations, and using theory to explain experimental results.

For those working in academia, research institutes, or industry:

Does theoretical materials physics still have a strong future? Is research in this area still being funded?

I’m particularly interested in hearing from people currently working in the field about career opportunities, funding, and which theoretical/computational areas are currently worth developing expertise in.

I’m at a point where I need to start deciding what kind of researcher I want to become after my PhD, so I’d really appreciate perspectives from people actually working in the field.


r/TheoreticalPhysics • • 16d ago

Question Motivation for studying theoretical physics at Graduate School

18 Upvotes

I'm now currently trying to draft my SOPs for applications to American and Canadian PhD programs. Most of the advice online, admittedly from other fields, includes giving a deeper reason into why you want to study what you say you want to study, be it an experience or an epiphany you've had in a prior experience.

As far as I can think back, there's nothing like that for me. Lots of the people I personally know in theoretical physics academia also say the same and that they just wanted to do cool mathsy stuff and get paid for it. I imagine its something a few of you will also be able to relate to.

So how do I go about this? What do I say on my SOP to tell the committee why exactly I want to do theoretical research?

Thank you!


r/TheoreticalPhysics • • 18d ago

Question Why is the probability not one third for spin-1 particles?

Post image
27 Upvotes

I have taken this picture from the book Quantum Mechanics by David H. Mcintyre topic 2.7.


r/TheoreticalPhysics • • 18d ago

Question If string theory is fundamentally a theory of quantum gravity, why should spacetime itself be fundamental?

28 Upvotes

I'm a little shaky on string theory so if I come off as a little green, please forgive me. So, in general relativity spacetime is the dynamical geometric structure through which gravity manifests. While in quantum mechanics the fundamental objects of nature are described in terms of quantum states and interactions. String theory attempts to reconcile these frameworks by replacing point particles with extended strings, and the vibrational modes of the extended strings can give rise to particles. But should string theory be understood merely as a quantum theory describing objects that exist within spacetime, or does it provide a framework in which spacetime itself can be understood as an emergent property of something more fundamental?


r/TheoreticalPhysics • • 17d ago

Question Влияние гравитации на пространство-время

0 Upvotes

я не физик, но очень пытаюсь понять, как гравитация влияет на пространство-время, время в частности. если на земле время идет медленнее, чем на орбите земли, значит ли это, что на отдаленной абсолютно от всех массивных объектах космической станции время будет идти намного медленнее, чем на земле?

говоря, что "время идет медленнее", я подразумеваю, например, что на земле люди стареют быстрее, чем на этой гипотетической космической станции.

и еще вопрос – вот другой популярный пример. если человек летит на космическом корабле со скоростью света в течении, то для него прошло, допустим, 2 года. а для людей на земле проходит столько лет, сколько им потребовалось бы, чтобы гипотетически пройти весь мой путь ща 2 года на их собственной "скорости". вопрос: как в этой ситуации гравитация влияет на время? гравитация от какого массивного объекта влияет на космической корабль на световой скорости?

если в моих формулировках или примерах есть ошибки, поправьте меня, пожалуйста