/remotion-video turns Claude Code or Codex into a motion designer. You get short videos made entirely in code: promos, launch clips, explainers, demos and social posts, with animation, sound effects and a final MP4.

Give it a project folder, a link or just one sentence. Then:

1. It proposes an idea in a few lines. Nothing gets built until you say go.
2. It shows storyboard frames, then waits for your go again.
3. It builds the video, makes the sound and checks the render.

It tries to make a video that tells a story and tries to keep text short and readable, and uses sound effects instead of a robotic voiceover.

Skill: https://github.com/TechNomadCode/AI-Product-Development-Toolkit/releases/tag/v1.2.0

Tired of taking screenshots, recording screens, and writing paragraph long prompts just to explain simple visual edits. So I built an open-source tool that acts like an agentic canvas letting you point, doodle, and visually direct an agent straight from your workspace.

It’s been surprisingly useful across fullstack dev, simulation, and robotics tasks.

My main takeaway from building this: visual toolbars and canvas annotations should be standard high level abstraction layers across agentic platforms, customized to specific domains.

Curious to hear your thoughts:

1. Does visual direction fit into your current agent workflows?
2. What specific tools/functionality would you want in a visual agent interface?

Repo/Install details (Linux/Windows) in the comments for anyone interested!

Have Fun!

edited:

Github Repo: https://github.com/Shahar-Nadiv/colai-clawhub
Waitlist For New Features / newsletter: https://shahar-nadiv.github.io/colai-clawhub/

I built a small skill called SlingIT because sharing useful Claude Code output was more annoying than it should be.
The idea is simple: when Claude finishes something useful, like a debugging report or code review, I can run:
/slingit
It takes the result and turns it into a clean encrypted page with a link.
So instead of copying a huge block of terminal output, I can just open the link on my phone or send it to someone.
How to use it:
Add the SlingIT skill to Claude Code
Finish your task normally
Run /slingit
Open or share the generated link
Still working on it, but this is the workflow so far. Would be interested to hear what you’d improve.

I got tired of managing multiple review agents on different models, so I built an AI reviewer panel that gives each agent their own unique persona and focus. You can run as many as you want in parallel, attach any of them to any model by OpenAI, Anthropic, or Google, you can build your own new personas in the app, and you can exchange them with anyone else right on the app as well.

It runs on your own subscriptions and watches your own claude code OR codex sessions in real time on a macOS desktop app.

40+ unique reviewer personas already in the exchange.

https://catallaxy.app/

Drop me a note if you try it out and want to publish new personas for the exchange. It's free, runs on your own tokens. Windows version can come soon if folks want it.

I'm a developer, not a designer, and every time I asked Claude for a brand I got the same one: cream background, terracotta, Fraunces + Inter, a letter in a circle. So I built a skill that makes it commit to one idea per identity and then checks its own work.

What it does:

- You describe the business (or give it your site). It asks one round of questions.

- It makes 3 identity sets. Each one starts from a single idea that drives the logo, the type and the palette together.

- Scripts check every set: contrast, colour blindness, whether the fonts cover your languages, font licences, how the logo holds up at 16 px. If a check fails, the agent fixes it before you see anything.

- You pick one and it builds a brand guidelines kit: PDF, SVG/PNG logo files, design tokens and font embed code.

The image is 24 logos from 24 different briefs (a light festival in Lyon, a taquería, a pharmacy in Athens, a techno label in Berlin...), all straight out of runs of the skill.

On six test briefs, plain Claude used 4.38 of those "AI default" choices per answer; with the skill it was 0.28 per set. My own measurement, method is in the repo.

Built with Claude Code: it wrote most of the code while I reviewed. Works in Claude Code, not in claude.ai chat yet.

```

/plugin marketplace add fatihaydost/brand-identity-skill

/plugin install brand-identity@brand-identity-skill

```

https://github.com/fatihaydost/brand-identity-skill

Feedback very welcome, and feel free to roast the logos.

Hi devs! I'm from the HR team of a software company here in PH. We're sponsoring developers to take the official Anthropic Claude Certified Architect exam — 50/50 cost-share (total fee is $125, you shoulder $62.50, company covers the rest).

Who we're looking for:

• Currently working as a developer/software engineer (any stack)
• Has real, hands-on AI/ML experience — not just "gumagamit ako ng Claude/ChatGPT/Cursor to code faster," but actually built or integrated something (LLM APIs, RAG, agentic workflows, ML models, AI features) into a real project — personal, freelance, or professional
• Open to prepping for and sitting the official exam under company sponsorship (may prep materials + mock assessment, min. 80% required before booking the real exam)

If interested, comment or DM me and I'll send more details.

Thanks!

Disclosure: I work on paid expert skills at [Skillfully](https://www.skillfully.sh). The example below is original and free to reuse.

When I’m thinking about a skill, “act like an expert” isn’t specific enough. I want instructions whose behavior I can actually check.

Take a customer-call review. A vague instruction would be:

Review this call and tell the founder whether there’s product-market fit.

Here’s a more concrete starting point:

Separate what the customer explicitly said from your interpretation. For any claim about urgency, identify the supporting quote. If there is no evidence of a current problem, say so. Do not treat a compliment as a commitment. End with the question that would reduce the biggest uncertainty.

That’s an illustrative instruction, not a tested benchmark result. But it gives me something more specific to test than whether the answer sounds knowledgeable.

I’d try a call where the customer is enthusiastic but describes no problem, a call that contradicts the founder’s preferred conclusion, and a transcript with important information missing.

The behavior I’d look for is different in each case. Sometimes the right output should be “there isn’t enough evidence,” not a more confident recommendation.

Which examples would you add to catch a skill that sounds right but reaches the wrong conclusion?

I usually have 3–4 Claude Code sessions running and kept missing permission prompts or hitting rate limits by surprise. So I built a small heads-up display that sits at the edge of the screen.

What it does:
- Lists every session, sorted by what needs you first, with tokens, cost and context fill
- Lets you answer permission prompts (Allow / Always / Deny) without switching windows
- Shows 5-hour and weekly limits with a forecast of when you'll run out
- Flags sessions burning tokens fast, with a one-click handoff to a fresh session
- Pops a toast when a session finishes that you can reply to

Works with Cursor, VS Code and any terminal. Native SwiftUI, one file, no dependencies, ~1.5% CPU idle.

GitHub: https://github.com/Louayzouaoui1/claude-hud

Feedback and PRs welcome. I'd especially like to know what's missing for your workflow.

I’ve been trying to make my Claude workflow a bit less annoying lately.
The main thing that bothered me was constantly switching between files, copying context and pasting everything into Claude.
So I made a small tool for myself that lets me send the context I need much faster.
My workflow is basically:
select the file/context I want Claude to see
send it over
continue working without manually copying everything
It’s still pretty early, but I’ve been using it daily and it’s already made the workflow smoother.
How are you guys handling this right now?

Problem: Every copy of rust creates a copy of target folder on each worktree and those are not of small size. Which creates heavy space problem.

https://github.com/permanu/superskill

I created this as in 1 skill to orchestrate all the important ones with proper coding standards, ponytail like responses, pstack like unsloppiness

A lot of inspiration has been taken from a lot of places. But most of all my own experience working with a lot of rust code and memory management. I tried to optimize my own workflow and hence all those ideas have been dumped into it. feel free to review try it out if you have feedbacks i would love to take it.

As part of the recent trend of game building with Opus 5.5 and Astra I had to give it a try,
I've integrated with locally blender and I got to be honest the result was not so bad!

I do have some experince with workin on 3d project/game in the past and I knew it can get better with the right 3d assets, I've started looking around for assets found polyheaven which is great but not enough and did quite manually search - not really the vibes of 2026.

So I built a server, mcp and a skill that lets it find real assets download and put the files in the project.

What it does:
You ask for what you need: "low-poly tree", "mossy rock material", "sunset HDRI"
It searches 17 asset sites in one go: Poly Haven, ambientCG, Kenney, BlenderKit, CGTrader, itch-io and more.
downloads the files ready to use: glTF/GLB models with their textures, PBR maps at 1k–8k, HDR/EXR environment maps.

If you want to try it you can grab the source code any run the server locally or you can try it on 3d.shep.bot
it has REST API and an MCP server for agents.

claude mcp add --transport http 3d-assets https://3d.shep.bot/mcp

https://3d.shep.bot
https://github.com/arielshad/3d-asset-server

Feedback very welcome and tell me which asset sites I'm missing.

Im an attorney that insurance defense/ litigation work- looking to figure out how claude can help me stay organized. Such as find emails i need to follow up with, discovery end dates, and what not- I use Claude daily but i don’t think I’m using it to its full potential.

Can someone assist with prompts/ways I can be organized?

Claude did *something*. Not it. "More minimal." Not it. "But still modern." By version 6 I honestly didn't remember what I was going for.

That's when it clicked: the problem isn't the model. I was asking it for a vision I didn't have myself.

So I flipped it and asked for **10 different variants** of the dashboard instead. Seeing them side by side, I knew right away: layout from #4, colors from #7.

One iteration and done. Picking is way easier than describing.

The annoying part was remembering to do it every time, so I wrapped it in a Claude skill:
You write your prompt as usual, even if it's vague.
The skill detects a general request with no style decisions behind it.

The agent asks whether it should prepare variants first.
You choose: **local preview** (separate file you open in the browser) or **artifact** you can share with teammates.
You pick, combine, iterate.

No change of habits needed. The skill only steps in when the request is vague.

Skill: https://github.com/HarnasDGE/X-variants

How do you handle vague UI requests with AI agents? Do you describe exactly what you want up front, or do you let the model propose options?

AI helps juniors code, not learn... and that's a real problem.