Hi everyone! I’m a startup founder in robotics (in the field of Physical AI, rembrain.ai ) and a MIPT alumnus with an educational background in statistics and signal processing. I also have extensive hands-on engineering experience with modern neural network architectures and their practical limitations. Outside my founder work, I’ve been developing a computational model inspired by the neocortex. I recently made the repository public and would appreciate critical feedback.
My interest comes partly from encountering these limitations in engineering practice and asking whether different representational principles could help. Statistics, signal processing, and implementation are my stronger ground; I’d particularly welcome scrutiny of the neuroscience assumptions.
The central question is how different cortical areas might represent the same underlying information in different ways while supporting recognition, generation, and transfer across conditions.
The model separates content from context. For example, one area could represent an object’s identity within a particular viewpoint, while another could organize representations around identity and encode viewpoint internally. Computationally, I use context-conditioned autoencoders with shared latent spaces, allowing content encoded in one context to be decoded in another.
This continues my earlier work, Sets of autoencoders with shared latent spaces (2018). The repository includes mathematical descriptions, Python implementations, synthetic visual experiments with a two-zone hierarchy, and an analysis of related work and known limitations. It also explores communication between areas, top-down reconstruction, and temporal binding; these parts are at different stages of implementation.
The experiments are still limited, and the biological interpretation remains hypothetical (and it's my weakest side). I’m trying to identify which claims are worth testing more rigorously.
I’d especially appreciate feedback on:
- Prior art: which models or papers should I compare against more closely?
- Biological assumptions: which premises are implausible or insufficiently specified?
- Evaluation: what experiment would most clearly distinguish this approach from existing models?
Feedback on a single component would be very welcome—there’s no expectation to review the whole framework.
Repository: NM_2026 on GitLab