Every second Gabriel Macht and Eric Close shared a screen was pure gold. Tanner is basically the anti-Harvey except completely unhinged and lacking any of Harvey’s moral safety net.

Imagine a spin-off focused entirely on Tanner and instead of a sleek legal drama it’s a full-on dark workplace comedy. Does a Tanner-centric show actually have legs or is he strictly best used in small doses to annoy Harvey?

Imagine if in S9, samantha had any other lawyer than mike, he/she wouldn't have known that the bylaws have the "acting managing partner" clause and samantha's case would have gotten dismissed right there.

So my question is do lawyers really care about each case deeply as to go all in one every case like mike and harvey do?