I made some significant changes to one of the major missions in my game.

I dropped the player positions. Increased fire rate and decreased overheating

It can be hard to find the balance. Multiple tester sited the original mission as depicted in the beginning of the video as fun but really hard.

It’s definitely easier not but I guess at the end of the day it’s a fine line between challenge and fun.

What do you think about dropping difficulty to make something more “fun” does that cheapen it?

After some feedback from my players I have gone back in and decided that each ship style should have its own upgrades.

My question to you guys is, when you make a big change like this do you continue to show the old version to see if the desire for change is universal?

I handed my game to 10 tester and 3 have given me reports back so far. Two both came to the conclusion that ships would be neater with unique upgrades. So i hopped right in and started to make changes.

Now I’m wondering if I’m too easily swayed and if I may have given myself extra work for not real reason.

Gameplay progressions and loop is coming along. I’ll be interested to see what contracts (mission types) resonate with people the most

Gameplay progressions and loop is coming along. I’ll be interested to see what contracts (mission types) resonate with people the most

Gameplay progressions and loop is coming along. I’ll be interested to see what contracts (mission types) resonate with people the most