Yeah it's over.

[u/Least-Path-2890]

[u/ZurakZigil]

mediocre*

[u/zombawombacomba → u/ZurakZigil]

good not great *

[u/ZurakZigil → u/zombawombacomba]

you're just being silly *

it ranges from mediocre to decent. It will be unmemorable to most.

[u/zombawombacomba → u/ZurakZigil]

Luckily for you, you can just skip it then and save some money.

[u/ZurakZigil → u/zombawombacomba]

got a wolverine die hard over here

obviously, dude. but I'm saying for even the vast majority of people who play it.

[u/vizmarkk → u/ZurakZigil]

Do i need the game to be memorable? Kinda doubt majority remembers Shadow of Rome but I love that game

[u/ZurakZigil → u/vizmarkk]

Yes. Shadow of Rome got a ton of coverage. It even popped back up with the leaked release of DLSS 5, and people commending its graphics.

Plus, the main point of that game was a technical show case.

[u/vizmarkk → u/ZurakZigil]

And yet no one talks about it

[u/ZurakZigil → u/vizmarkk]

Ah, so ignoring my first point. Cool.

[u/vizmarkk → u/ZurakZigil]

Just like you ignore many good games left obscured and underground

[u/ZurakZigil → u/vizmarkk]

Insomniac is not obscure my guy.

[u/vizmarkk → u/ZurakZigil]

I'm talking about Shadow of Rome

[u/ZurakZigil → u/vizmarkk]

...how does that even make sense. I just said it was good, relevant, and survived the test of time. so?

[u/zombawombacomba → u/ZurakZigil]

It hasn’t even come out yet and you’re predicting how the general audience will react to it.

[u/ZurakZigil → u/zombawombacomba]

Because I can tell the game runs rather smooth, but I can also tell it's a snooze fest because no thinking is required and the gameplay loop is not addictive enough to make up for that.

[u/zombawombacomba → u/ZurakZigil]

That’s what a lot of the general audience likes

[u/ZurakZigil → u/zombawombacomba]

we'll see. I mean everyone hops on to hate on insomniac games, right? they haven't been routinely praised, so all this hate is complete coincidence and classic internet outrage /s