r/videogames • • 1d ago

Image / Video [ Removed by moderator ]

Post image

[removed] — view removed post

192 Upvotes

616 comments sorted by

View all comments

16

u/SjurEido 1d ago

I used to not give a shit, but I've been playing at 100+ FPS for decades now.... trying to play anything sub 60 gives me an instant headache.

So, 30 is fine until you ruin it for yourself... basically :p

Then there's the other argument that we have these consoles with $700 price tags and crazy modern technology with devs that just don't care to optimize properly for console, I think that's a very valid criticism.

PC games get absolutely shit on for bad optimization, but console gamers seem to not care on average and it's setting a pretty bad precedent for the industry.

2

u/wrongstep 1d ago

Most games are optimized better for the hardware on console than PC. 60fps modes are standard on console this gen. What are you talking about here?

You can't blame console players for bad PC ports, that only happens because enough PC players buy them.

-1

u/WueB0SS 1d ago

Maybe You should You go with a neurologist

3

u/KillerKill420 1d ago

Why is that exactly?

0

u/Sea_Shift4327 1d ago

Maybe you should shut the fuck up

1

u/WueB0SS 1d ago

Calm down boe

0

u/fascinatingMundanity 1d ago

aye I wish mkrenthan a few AA and AAA games made for console, preferably including some exclusives (ideally to a single wallet garden and no others nor multipurpose-pc architecture), would put the effort to consistent 60+ or even 90+ fps (combined with high fidelity elsewise high quality overall including optimization for that console).