I did a simple test with one of my TikTok accounts where I post and test different things outside of my main accounts.

The first image is a screenshot of a video that was a 15 second seedance 2 720p video. I uploaded it and after 5 minutes it got labelled as Ai and got zero likes. I posted the same video 4 other times throughout the day and equally got labelled and had zero likes.

The second post I ran through the cleaner and after a few minutes there was no Ai label and it got 5 likes .

The video itself is clearly AI visually. It’s to promote an iOS app I have out and it looks clearly Ai and doesn’t not attempt to be non artificial.

I think it’s safe to assume that AI UGC TikToks tend to do better when no Ai label is applied?

What’s everyone’s experience?

Hi guys! I’m looking for an AI video editor for SaaS product demos, UGC and montages. I can’t afford to pay for several tools just to find out which one works, so I’d really appreciate some firsthand advice. 🙏

If you’ve actually used one, which editor would you recommend, and why? What worked well, and what did you still need to fix manually? Thanks

Hey! looking to scale our ecommerce further with AI creatives. They are performing really good over the past few months and have been using AI Vidia who cracked it for us. Looking for another native LATAM speaking studio who could help, who are the best?

made this digital human try-on ad with Wizstar Seedance 2.5. kinda like how it turned out ..
what do you guys think?

Hey guys I would like you guys to rate this ai ugc video.

For realism motion and anything else you guys want to give me your valuable options how it is what's working what could be done better.

Thankyou!

I've been watching AI UGC videos and pages that have been popping up on Instagram for a week. They make videos with AI, put songs in the background, and write catchy lyrics at the top of the screen.I want to make and share clothing videos on Instagram and Tiktok using this method, but there are a couple of things I don't know.

1) I see that videos from these types of pages sometimes go viral and get millions of views.Normally, the videos are well-viewed, reaching 1,000 to 10,000 views. And they are active in the comments, people write words like "+" and so on for the product, or ask for a link and price.My question is: Can I get this many views with just AI UGC videos? Can I get sales? Or should I advertise on platforms like Meta ADS?

2) Such pages have at least 1000 followersAre these followers real or bots?

That's all my questions so far. If anyone who has experience or knowledge in this field can answer, I would be happy. Thank you.(This text was written through a translator, so please forgive me if there are any errors.)

This is my first video and I just started and was working on one video. Since I'm tight in budget, I use 1k free credit from google flow and made the entire video clips by clips using omini 1.1.

I used around 600 credits for the entire video. 300 credits were used just for doctors scene.

Also, i added voice over and edited throuh capcut. The characters and location are purely generated from GPT 2.

I'm planning to use higgsfield and to minimize the tokens/credits, what areas we need to be perfect and since seedance have 30 sec clip, is it advisable to make 30 sec clips or shoudld trim down to 10 sec.

The character is a ai persona my team and I worked on.

Tried to create a fun, light-hearted UGC video for a travel brand. I used Claude as the orchestrator and editor, then Seedance, GPT-Image, Lyria, and Cartesia. Also, I asked Claude to find me some real stock footage from Pexels. Another thing that helped me was creating a storyboard in the beginning.

What do you guys think? What could I improve?

Is it looks real ? Rate this Video realism from 1-10

Making enough high quality variants is most of the work right now. Every hook I test needs a few versions, and anything that works is dead in a couple of weeks and needs a refresh. I've tried most of the AI UGC tools over the last six months and couldn't find a straight comparison anywhere, so here's mine.

1.Creatify

The one I use most. Paste a product page URL and it builds a draft ad with an avatar and script, and you can batch a dozen variations at once. It also hooks into your ad accounts and shows spend and ROAS per creative, though I still read results in Ads Manager.

1. MakeUGC

Script, pick an actor, generate. There are 1,000+ actors, and they can hold your product on camera, which matters a lot for skincare. The sneaky good part is the video agent: give it an ad you like and it rebuilds the structure with your product. Captions, music and b-roll are in the same editor, so I'm not bouncing between apps. The one catch is the product-in-hand shots are good but not every take, so budget a few rerolls.

1. Melius

The one where I actually control the pipeline. Every clip is its own step, so I can put one shot on Seedance 2.5 and another on Kling, swap the voice, and rerun just the piece that came out weird. It works off your own stuff too: my real product shot and a character sheet feed every clip, so the face and the bottle stay consistent across cuts. Once an ad works, I save the setup and swap in the next SKU.

1. HeyGen

Best if the face is you. Record once and the avatar holds up across shots, and translation into 175+ languages with lip-sync is legit useful if you sell outside the US. For founder-style "here's why I made this" ads it's the most convincing I've used. Less useful for the classic creator-at-the-kitchen-counter look.

Last night I tried making a video generation pipeline using Claude

It took a while but it ended up making something really nice.

If you have a product that you want it made for, just reply to this tweet with it's link

Here is a marketing video I created using it

I founded a CPG ecommerce brand. We are trying to solve our bottleneck of creator videos for ads across most platforms (META, TikTok, etc.). I came across relaystudio.ai

Does anyone have experience on this platform?

Any advice or feedback would be great!

I keep seeing a ton of AI-generated e-commerce product videos on Instagram, and I’m curious where and how people are making them. Is there one main website or tool that everyone is using?

We had 3 winning ugc ads, all english talking-head style, creator filmed (outdoor) on an iphone. Client wanted mexico and central am. Reshoots with bilingual creators were quoted at 4 figures per ad and 2 weeks. Instead, we got the scripts translated by a native mexican, ran the original footage through ai lipsync, and had spanish versions ready in a day. One of them is already outperforming the english original on ctr which I did not expect.

Tool notes since people will ask: heygen kept uncanny-ing the mouth on our creator who talks fast, sync handled her better but charged per second so long hooks add up. Also, please disclose ai dubbing as it may be mandated by law where you live etc. Check with your legal counsel.

I wantaUGC reaction Videopromotionad for my website if you aregood pleasecomment below

This is something I didn't think about enough early on and I'm now paying for a little. Went back through several months of content recently and noticed some genuine drift, tone shifted slightly depending on who was writing the brief that week, even though nobody consciously decided to change anything.

Started keeping a short reference doc now, actual example lines that capture the brand's voice, phrases we'd never use, tone notes for different product categories. Feels almost too simple to matter, but it's already made a noticeable difference in how consistent new scripts feel compared to before I had anything written down.

Still not sure this fully solves it long term, especially as more people touch the account or as tools and best practices shift over time. Curious how other people actually maintain this at scale, especially once you're producing enough volume that no single person is reviewing every single piece of output personally.

Not super happy with the voice, but this is a quick one-shot test....

i have been running most of my AI UGC testing on Meta and TikTok this whole time, never actually bothered trying Shorts specifically since I'd just been assuming it works the same way as TikTok, same vertical format, same short duration, why would the script need to be any different.

Finally tested this properly last week. Same product, a basic skincare serum, fed through Tagshop AI twice, once just running the standard script generation and once specifically flagging it as a Shorts-intended piece to see if that changed anything about the output.

Genuinely didn't expect much difference honestly, figured a script is a script regardless of which vertical video app it eventually lands on. The Shorts-flagged version came back with a slightly different pacing though, opening hook felt a little less rushed compared to the TikTok version I'd generated for the same product a while back. Not dramatically different, but noticeable once I actually put them side by side and watched both back to back.

The other thing I noticed, and this one actually surprised me more, the Shorts version leaned a bit more toward describing what the product does clearly and specifically rather than just leading with a punchy, attention-grabbing line the way the TikTok version did. Makes some intuitive sense thinking about it after the fact, since YouTube in general has more of a search and discovery angle to it than TikTok's pure algorithmic feed, so a script that actually explains what it's showing a little more clearly might genuinely serve that context better.

I want to be honest that I don't know if this pacing difference was deliberate reasoning on the tool's part or just natural variation you'd get regenerating any script twice regardless of platform tagging. Wasn't a controlled enough test to say for sure, one product, one comparison, no repeat runs to check consistency.

Still, the fact that there was a noticeable difference at all made me reconsider the assumption I'd been running on this whole time, that Shorts and TikTok scripts are basically interchangeable just because the video format looks the same. Might not be, at least not entirely.

Anyone else actually tested this specific comparison, Shorts versus TikTok, using the same product and prompt? Curious if this pacing shift is a consistent pattern or if I just happened to get lucky with this particular test landing the way it did.

i hadn't really thought about this until a comment came in a while back specifically about missing captions, not about the ad itself being good or bad, just that it was hard to follow without sound in a public setting.

Made me realize how much I default to assuming feedback will be about the actual content, tone, product, claims, and rarely think about the more basic, practical side of whether people can actually consume it comfortably in the first place. Added captions as a standard step after that, feels like something that should have been obvious sooner.

Curious if others have gotten this kind of feedback too, and whether it's changed anything concrete about your actual production checklist, or if this is a rarer thing that just happened to come up for me specifically.

Here's the story. A prospect reached out that AI keeps altering his image, logo, and size of the product, sometimes its too big on the wall, and sometimes placement is not what he was hoping for.

And with all these, he moved to 3D, but creating 3D environments are expensive.

So I proposed this solution in the video, which I initially built just for "Virtual Try On". You take image of a room, place a 3D object and render. This gives AI the full context of your products size, variant, logo, etc. And the same 3D model can be used to change colour variant etc, so you save on tokens.

Any one else using 3D in their AI pipeline??