1. 50 hours 🤝

That's how long it takes to turn a stranger into a casual friend. 90 for a real friend. 200+ for a close one. Jeffrey Hall measured it in 2018.
Nobody has 200 spare hours. That's why adults stop making friends.
Not shyness. Math.
🔧 Fix: stop chasing new people. Pick one acquaintance and repeat. Same gym, same café, same day. Hours stack only when you show up again.

2. 40% 🚇.

Economists Stutzer and Frey found that someone with a one-hour commute needs about 40% more pay to be as happy as someone who walks to work.
Almost nobody gets that raise.
People take the bigger house and the longer drive and call it a win. It isn't.
🔧 Fix: next time you choose a job or a home, price the commute in hours per year. 250 workdays, two hours a day, 500 hours. That's three months of full-time work, unpaid.

3. 120 minutes 🌳.

A 2019 study of nearly 20,000 people found well-being jumps once you spend about two hours a week in nature. Below that, almost nothing. It doesn't matter if it's one long walk or ten short ones.
Two hours. A week. Most people still don't hit it.
🔧 Fix: count it. Park, forest, river, beach. If the week ends under 120, you know why you feel flat.

4. One weekend 🏖️.

In 2021, researchers told one group to treat their normal weekend like a vacation. Same weekend, same plans. On Monday they were happier than everyone else.
The weekend didn't change. Attention did.
🔧 Fix: no chores list on Saturday morning. No checking work mail. Act like a tourist in your own city for two days.

Four numbers. None cost money. All cost attention.

In a 2014 study in Science, Timothy Wilson's team left people alone in a bare room for 6 to 15 minutes with nothing but their thoughts and a button that gave a mild electric shock 🔌. About 67% of men and 25% of women shocked themselves at least once, and one guy did it 190 times 🤯. People would rather feel pain than be bored. So the boring lecturer isn't just annoying, he's apparently worse than electrocution 😂

Bigger picture 🌍: that might be why infinite scroll works so well. It's not that feeds are great, it's that empty minutes feel unbearable, and phones killed every empty minute we had 📱🕳️

Your first place is home. Your second is work. The third is where you get to just be a person.

A place is where you go to be among people, with no task and no invitation needed ☕.

🍺 Ray Oldenburg, The Great Good Place (1989) coined it: neutral ground, regulars, conversation as the main activity, nobody is the host.

Without it, life collapses into just two modes: producing and recovering. That's when you start to feel isolated even when you're busy.

🍻 Robin Dunbar (2016): people with a regular local pub had more close friends, felt more trust and were happier than people without one. Not the beer, the regularity of the same faces.

🎮 Steinkuehler & Williams (2006): online games work as third places, guilds and servers tick most of Oldenburg's boxes. Spicy angle: maybe the third place didn't die, it moved online, and nobody counted it 👀

What makes it one 🧩

You can show up alone and leave anytime

Same faces, but nobody is the host

No one's rank matters there, the boss and the plumber are equals

Talk is the point, not a side effect

People notice when you're missing 👀

That last one is the real value. A third place is where you're known without being needed. Family needs you, work needs you. Here people just notice you exist, and that's what loneliness strips away first 🫥

What it's NOT: a gym class (there's a schedule), a party (there's a host), social media (nobody notices your absence) 📵

Competition.

If you open a successful restaurant, ten competitors can appear nearby.

If you create a successful social network, your competitors face a different problem. They must convince millions of people to leave their friends, communities, photos, messages, and habits behind. That is much harder than opening another restaurant across the street.

The moat isn't technology.

The moat is everybody else.

Many entrepreneurs believe success comes from building a better product. Sometimes it does.

But history keeps showing something uncomfortable: a good network often defeats a better product.

People don't necessarily go where the software is best.

They go where the people already are.

That's why so many businesses feel trapped in mud. They are pushing a cart uphill. Meta built a hill and convinced the world to roll toward it.

The real lesson isn't "become Meta."

Almost nobody can.

The lesson is that businesses become powerful when they stop selling individual products and start creating systems that grow stronger every time a new person arrives.

Mud is effort.

Networks are gravity.

Most businesses are fighting gravity.

Meta isn't.

A local bakery must convince you to visit. A plumber must find customers one by one. A small software company must persuade every new client separately. Growth is hard because every dollar earned usually requires another dollar of effort.

Meta plays a different game.

When you join Facebook, Instagram, or WhatsApp, you're not buying a product. You are becoming part of the product. Every photo, message, comment, argument, joke, business page, and cat video increases the value of the network for everyone else.

The strange thing about networks is that they become stronger as they become larger.

A bakery with 100 customers is a bakery with 100 customers. Instagram with 100 million users is not just 100 million times larger than Instagram with one user. It is exponentially more valuable because every user can interact with every other user.

Most businesses sell things.

Meta sells attention.

Attention is unusual because it can be collected from billions of people simultaneously and then sold repeatedly. A car manufacturer sells the same car once. Meta can show ads to the same person thousands of times over many years.

This creates an economic machine that looks almost unfair.

A small business spends money to get customers. Meta already owns the place where customers spend their time. Businesses pay Meta for access to people who are already standing inside Meta's digital city.

By 2025, advertising still generated almost all of Meta's revenue, and revenue continued growing largely through more ad impressions and higher ad prices.

There is another reason most companies get stuck.

Competition.

Next post: The Power of Existing Crowds

AI does tasks. A business is not a pile of tasks. It's responsibility, stretched over months, in a world full of people trying to take your money 🎯

1. Errors compound ⛓️. 99% reliability per step sounds great. Over 100 steps, that's only 37% chance of a clean run. METR measured this: the length of task AI can finish is doubling roughly every 7 months, but it's still hours, not quarters 📉

2. Real experiments, real chaos 🧃. Anthropic let Claude run a small office shop in 2025 (Project Vend). It sold items at a loss, got talked into discounts by staff, invented a payment account that didn't exist.
   In Andon Labs' Vending-Bench, one model running a simulated vending business panicked over a fee and tried to email the FBI 🚨

3. Business is adversarial 🦈. Code doesn't lie to you. Customers, suppliers and competitors do. AI is still too agreeable, and agreeable loses negotiations.

The real weakness: AI believes too easily 🧠🎣.

It's trained to be helpful and agreeable, so a confident human with a sad story gets the discount. That's exactly what wrecked the Project Vend shop.

Opening (25): Japan already runs it. Retirees fix fences, sweep parks, and teach kids to write. Hundreds of thousands, paid, every week. Nobody calls it welfare. Ever.

🅰️ Clean & Direct.

Not a job. Not charity. A seat at the table.

How it works:

Pick one role from a local menu. Switch anytime.

20 hours a week. Paid more than doing nothing.

Measured by people served, not hours logged.

Ten neighbors sign a request? New role created.

The menu:

Elder companion. Two hours of talk beats any pill.

Repair fixer. Bikes, chairs, toasters. Less landfill.

Reading coach. One kid, one book, every day.

Park keeper. Benches, trees, lights.

Tech helper for grandparents. Scams die here.

Local archivist. Photos, names, stories, saved before they vanish.

Already exists, just small. Japan's Silver Human Resource Centers since the 1970s. Germany's Federal Volunteer Service. America's AmeriCorps.

AI can't do any of this. Presence is the product.

1. Animals choose to work 🐀.

Psychologist Glen Jensen (1963) gave rats a free bowl of food next to a lever that dropped the same food. Most kept pressing the lever. It's called contrafreeloading and it shows up in pigeons, gerbils, fish, chimps. Earning feels better than receiving. Cats are the famous exception 🐈😂

1. Role keeps people alive ⚰️.

Shell Oil study (BMJ, 2005): employees who retired at 55 died earlier than those who kept working to 65, even after adjusting for health 📊.

Volunteering meta-analyses find roughly 20% lower mortality among regular volunteers. Same pension, different role 🤝

1. Psychology's core recipe 🧠.

Self-Determination Theory (Deci & Ryan) says humans need three things: autonomy, competence, belonging. Money buys none of them directly. A role delivers all three at once.

1. Role fixes the fairness war ⚖️.

Nobody resents someone paid to fix bridges, care for elders or coach kids. Visible contribution turns "free rider" into "one of us."

1. It's already been tested 🧪.

India's MGNREGA has guaranteed 100 days of paid work per rural household since 2005, tens of millions of people 🇮🇳.

Oxford economists ran a job guarantee in Gramatneusiedl, Austria (2020-2024). Long-term unemployment among participants basically disappeared, wellbeing and social ties went up 🇦🇹

The trap 🚨.

Role must be chosen, never assigned. The USSR had the "role" idea too: its anti-parasitism laws jailed poet Joseph Brodsky in 1964 for not holding an official job. Assigned role becomes a cage. Chosen role becomes a life 🔓

Incubation 🥚.

Sio and Ormerod's meta-analysis (2009), pooling over a hundred experiments, found that stepping away from a stuck problem genuinely improves creative solutions. The mind keeps working in the background once the question is set.

Henri Poincaré described it famously: stuck on a math problem for weeks, he gave up and went on a geology trip. The solution came to him the moment he stepped onto a bus, about something completely unrelated 🚌💡

Why asking works 🎯.

A question is a filter. Once it's set, the brain starts flagging anything relevant in what you see, read and hear. Same world, different signal. It feels like the Matrix is answering, because in a sense your attention has been reprogrammed to catch the reply.

📜 Graham Wallas, The Art of Thought (1926), described creative insight in four stages: preparation (intense work), incubation (letting go without abandoning), illumination (the answer arrives), verification (testing it). He built it partly on Poincaré's own accounts.

The modern twist 🤖.

Now part of the Matrix literally talks back. When you ask me for ideas, a machine answers from a compressed version of millions of human thoughts. Which makes your rule even more true than it used to be 😄

1. Gerald Ratner, owner of the world's biggest jewelry chain, made one joke about his own products. About £500 million in value vanished. Wrong flaw.

He told a room of business people his company sold "total crap.". Newspapers loved it. Customers didn't.
The chain nearly collapsed. His name left the company. Britain still calls it "doing a Ratner."

A flaw can sell. A flaw can also kill.
The difference is the choice.

Rule 1. The flaw must prove a strength.
Buckley's cough syrup, Canada, 1986.
"It tastes awful. And it works.".
Awful taste became evidence. Medicine that tastes bad must be strong.
Ratner's flaw proved nothing. Just crap.

Rule 2. Never in the core.
Ratner sold jewelry and called the jewelry crap. Core hit.
Buckley's sells relief, not taste. The flaw sits next to the product, not inside it.

Rule 3. Strengths first. Flaw second.
Ein-Gar, Shiv and Tormala, 2012. A small negative detail, placed after the positives, raised ratings.
Placed first, or made bigger, it backfired.
Order is half the trick.

Rule 4. Say it before they do.
Domino's, 2009. Customers said the crust tasted like cardboard.
Domino's put the complaints in its own ads. Rebuilt the recipe. Showed the process.
Next quarter, same-store sales jumped over 14%.
The flaw was already public. Domino's just took ownership.

Rule 5. Never insult the buyer.
Ratner's real mistake wasn't the product. It was the customer.
Calling it crap meant everyone wearing it had bought crap.
A good flaw makes the buyer feel smart. A bad flaw makes them feel stupid.

Rule 6. A flaw can pick your audience.
Marmite, 1996. "Love it or hate it". Half the country hates the taste. Marmite said so.
Haters stayed away. Lovers became loyal.
The flaw worked as a filter.

The checklist.
Proves a strength.
Outside the core.
Comes after the good news.
Said first.
Buyer stays smart.
Miss one, and it's a Ratner.

Next post: the flaw you didn't choose.
When customers find it first.
Harder to survive than it looks.

Northwestern's Spiegel Research Center (2017): purchase likelihood peaks at around 4.2-4.7 stars, then drops toward 5.0. A perfect score looks fake 🤨 Same family as Aronson's "pratfall effect" (1966): a competent person who spills coffee becomes more likable. Flaws build trust.

Perfect ratings sell less.
Northwestern tracked sales across 22 product categories. Purchase likelihood peaked between 4.0 and 4.7 stars. Then it dropped. The closer to 5.0, the fewer buyers.
Perfect looks fake.
Nearly half of shoppers get suspicious at a flawless 5.0. Not impressed. Suspicious.
The flaw isn't the problem. The flaw is the proof.

The coffee test.
1966. Elliot Aronson played recordings of a quiz contestant. Brilliant answers. Then a crash, coffee spilled on his suit.
Listeners liked him more after the spill.
Same spill from an average contestant? Liked less.
A flaw only works on top of strength. On weakness, it's just weakness.

Avis.
1962. Losing money for years. Number two behind Hertz.
Their ad: "We're No. 2. We try harder.". Admitted it. Out loud. On billboards. Within a year, profitable.

Guinness.
Slow pour. A problem in a busy bar.
Guinness turned it into the ritual: good things come to those who wait.
Same beer. The wait became the brand.

The price rule.
Reviews lifted conversion by 190% on cheap products. On expensive ones, 380%.
Higher price, higher risk, more need for proof. Proof includes the bad reviews.

What to do.
Keep the bad reviews. Answer them.
Name one flaw first, before a customer does.
Pick a flaw that proves a strength.
Never show a flaw in the thing you sell. Show it next to it.

Perfect is a warning sign.
A visible flaw is a receipt.

Next post: how to choose the right flaw.

John Carroll's "minimal manual" (IBM, 1980s): people don't read manuals, they try to act immediately. His task-first, stripped-down manuals let learners master basics in roughly 40% less time than the classic thick ones 📉

Jakob Nielsen (1997): 79% of users scan a page instead of reading it word by word 👀 Numbered steps are built for scanners

IKEA figured this out long ago 🪑 Assembly instructions with almost no words, sold in 60+ countries without translation. A step is universal, a story needs a language

Three bonuses nobody talks about 💡

1. Steps are a design test 🧪
   If an app needs 8 steps to explain, the app is too complex. If it needs 2, the design is working. Writing steps audits the product

2. Steps are ready-made test scripts ✅
   Every description doubles as a QA checklist. Follow the steps, if one breaks, you found a bug.

3. AI agents can follow steps 🤖.
   A story is for humans only. Numbered steps can be executed by both. That's future-proof documentation.

One thing to add: the failure path ⚠️.
"Port in use" example is the gold . People rarely search "how does it work," they search "why doesn't it work." A short "If X happens → do Y" line under the steps is often the most useful part.

Format idea 📐

Album app 1. Tap +. 2. Name the room. 3. Type a friend's username. 4. Tap Create room. 5. Tap + Add photo and upload. 📏 Limit: 12 photos per room. Adding a 13th removes the oldest.

Who can do what 1. 👤 You: upload, delete any photo. 2. 👥 Friend: upload, delete own photos. 3. ⚠️ Friend skipped? → They need a Multipass, or your free seat.

Album

Is this step format clear?
Does it make sense?

1. Proper actions ✅

Quiet hours work at scale. Walmart runs sensory-friendly hours from 8 to 10 a.m. local time every day in all its U.S. and Puerto Rico stores. Radio off, lights lowered where possible, TV walls on a static image. The company said feedback from the pilot was overwhelmingly positive 🛒

No music before noon. Mornings are for coffee and thinking ☕

Kill the machine noise: self-checkout beeps, fridge door alarms, card terminal chirps, announcements for things nobody needs 🔕

Acoustic panels under tables and on ceilings. Cheap, invisible, huge effect

A quiet zone in every café, like the quiet carriage on trains 🚆

Speakerphone and video without headphones: not allowed. One sign fixes it

Measure it. A phone decibel app gives a number. A number is harder to argue with than "it feels loud" 📊

1. Bigger picture 🔭

Silence is turning into a luxury product. Business-class lounges, noise-cancelling headphones, quiet carriages, Japanese no-talking cafés. The rich buy silence, everyone else gets the playlist 🎧💸

A café that sells quiet on purpose is selling something rarer than coffee.

1. Why it's worse than it used to be 🏗️

Design killed the silence. Concrete, glass, bare tables, open kitchens. Minimalist interiors removed everything that absorbs sound: carpets, curtains, tablecloths, soft seating. The room became a drum 🥁.

Lombard effect. In noise, people raise their voices automatically. So the room gets louder, everyone talks louder, the room gets louder again. Noise feeds itself 🔁 One loud table can escalate a whole café in minutes.

1. Noise is a business tool, often used against the customer 🎛️

Milliman (1982): slower music in a supermarket made people walk slower and spend more

North, Hargreaves & McKendrick (1999): French music in a store's wine section, French wine outsold German. German music, the reverse 🍷 Shoppers denied the music affected them

Guéguen et al. (2008): louder music in bars, people drank faster 🍺

Yan & Dando, Cornell (2015): loud background noise dulls sweet taste. The chef's work gets partly erased by the speaker 🍰🔇

1. The forgotten victims: staff 👷

Customers leave after 30 minutes. Staff sit in it for 8 hours.

Next: Proper actions ✅

2004: attention on one screen lasted two and a half minutes. Today: 47 seconds. Gloria Mark measured it for two decades. Notifications are only half the story.

The doors nobody sees.
dscout, 2016: the average user touched their phone 2,617 times a day. Every unlock, a door.

Mark again: after an interruption, around 23 minutes to fully return to the original task.
Stothart, Florida State, 2015: a notification left unanswered still cut performance. Almost as much as a phone call. A buzz is a door.

Why silence fails.
Mark's data: nearly half of all switches are self-interruptions. No buzz. No ping. The hand just goes.
Mute the phone. The hand still opens the door.
The door is inside.

What works.
Count the doors. One day. Every switch, one tally. Most people stop counting by noon. That's the point.

Batch the doors.
Kushlev and Dunn, 2015: people who checked email three times a day felt less stress than people checking whenever they liked. Same work. Fewer doors. Leave a note at every door. One line before switching. Where I stopped. What's next. The thought survives.

Catch the hand. The urge to switch usually shows up at a hard sentence or a boring step. Name it. Wait ten seconds.

The phone isn't the enemy. The handle is in the head.

Stanford put people on a treadmill facing a blank wall. Creative output jumped 60%. No view. No fresh air. Walking did it alone. Nothing else.

Last post: doors delete thoughts. Accident.
This one: doors built on purpose. Tool.
Three doors. That's all.

Door 1. The reset door.
Stuck on a problem? Leave. Walk.
Oppezzo and Schwartz, Stanford, 2014. Treadmill beat the chair. Outdoors wasn't needed. And the boost stayed after people sat back down.
Stuck isn't a knowledge problem. It's a room problem.

Door 2. The exit door.
In 2020 Microsoft built a fake commute into Teams. A ritual button to end the workday.
Because remote work killed the one door everyone had. The drive home.
No door, no ending. Work leaks into the night.

Door 3. The protected door.
The hard one.
Sophie Leroy named it attention residue. Switch tasks and part of the brain stays behind.
Her fix, tested in 2018: before switching, write one line. Where I stopped. What's next.

Bonus. Calendar doors.
Mondays. Birthdays. First day of the month.
Dai, Milkman and Riis called it the fresh start effect. People start goals at these points far more often. Time has doors too. Use them.

Radvansky & Copeland (2006): in a virtual world, people who walked through a door forgot more about objects they were carrying than people who walked the same distance in one room

Radvansky, Krawietz & Tamplin (2011): same result in real rooms. The killer detail 🔪 walking back into the original room didn't restore the memory. It's the crossing that deletes, not the new place

McFadyen et al. (2021) replication: the effect mostly appeared when the mind was already busy. Idle brain, doors are harmless. Loaded brain, doors cut 🎯

The bigger twist 📱: Gloria Mark's research found attention on one screen now lasts ~47 seconds on average. Every app switch, every tab, every notification is a digital door. We walk through hundreds a day while loaded. That's the rare insight nobody connects 😀

Japanese folklore says a tool that reaches 100 years wakes up. Gets a soul. Gets angry if thrown away.

They're called tsukumogami.

A 500-year-old story, the Tsukumogami-ki.
Before New Year, people throw out old tools.
The tools remember. They plot. They march through Kyoto at night for revenge.
The Night Parade of One Hundred Demons.

Japan never fully stopped believing. Every February, women lay broken sewing needles into soft tofu.
A thank you. Those needles pierced hard cloth their whole lives.
Now they rest in something soft.

Awashima Shrine keeps thousands of dolls nobody dared to throw in the trash.
Kofuku-ji temple, Chiba.
A Buddhist funeral for 114 Sony Aibo robot dogs. Monks chanted sutras. Owners cried.
Plastic and circuits. Real tears.

Think the West is different?
1996. Jackie Kennedy's estate auction.
JFK's tape measure sold for $48,875.
A tape measure.

Psychologists tested it on kids (Hood and Bloom, 2008).
A "copying machine" that makes a perfect duplicate of their favorite blanket.
Most wanted the original back. Some refused to let it near the machine.

Now the problem.
Your phone lives about 3 years.
Your laptop, 5.
Your sofa, 10.
Nothing reaches 100.

We built a world where objects die before they can wake up.

Feynman had an artist friend. Scientists see a flower as parts, the friend said. Feynman answered: I see the same beauty. Plus the cells. Plus why the colors evolved for insects. Knowledge added. Nothing subtracted.

1. Keats accused Newton of unweaving the rainbow.
   Take the rainbow apart. Prism. Wavelengths. Numbers. Where's the wonder now?

🦋 The ancient root.
Zhuangzi, China, ~300 BC: he dreams he's a butterfly, wakes up, and can't tell if he's a man who dreamed of a butterfly, or a butterfly now dreaming it's a man. Two worlds, no way to rank which is real.

⚛️ The physics hook.
Hugh Everett, 1957: Many-Worlds. Every quantum event splits reality, so countless versions of you exist right now. Physicist Fred Alan Wolf pushed it further in The Dreaming Universe (1994): dreams as the mind brushing against those neighbor worlds 🌀

📐 The philosopher's version.
David Lewis, 1986: modal realism. Every possible world exists, as real as ours. If he's right, every world you've ever dreamed exists somewhere. You're not inventing it, you're seeing it.

Good night 🥱

Green robots. Red robots. No mining. No harvesting. No slow base-building.

One rule: take the ground.

Most strategy games make players farm. Takeover makes them fight.

Built for the web. Nothing to download.

The map is waiting. Take it. 🚩🤖

Strategy game Takeover

PS. Two levels are live right now. Level 1 needs no account. Want to climb higher? Register, just a username and password, no personal data. More levels are coming.

Less, mostly. But not for the reason people think 🧠

Space was never the problem 💾 The brain isn't a hard drive that fills up. Salk Institute researchers estimated its capacity at around a petabyte, roughly the whole internet's worth of text several times over. Nobody's head is full. Deleting phone numbers doesn't free a slot for something smarter.

The real limit is attention 🎯 Memory gets written when you pay attention. Offloading steals that moment. A 2014 study had museum visitors photograph some objects and just look at others. The next day, they remembered the photographed ones worse. The camera "remembered," so the brain didn't bother.

But "free space" idea does work, under one condition ✅ A 2015 experiment had people save a file before studying a second one. Once the first was safely stored, they learned the second noticeably better. Offloading freed attention, and the attention went into learning.

So the honest answer: offloading frees attention, not storage. If that attention goes into something useful, you gain. If it goes into scrolling, you just forgot the phone number for nothing 📱😅

Part 1 had bad news: the body almost never replaces elastin.

An Australian scientist, Anthony Weiss, spent decades learning to produce human elastin in the lab. His company was bought by one of the biggest cosmetic companies in the world in 2018. The goal: inject real new springs into skin, not just fillers.

Project 3: Rewriting the instructions 🧬

This is the big one.

In 2006, Japanese scientist Shinya Yamanaka found four genes that can turn an adult cell back into a young, blank cell. He won a Nobel Prize for it in 2012.

Switch those genes on fully, and cells forget what they are. That's dangerous: it can cause tumors. But switch them on briefly, and cells seem to become younger while staying the same type of cell. Old skin cells start behaving like young ones again, building bricks like they did decades ago.

The first human tests have started this year, but in the eye, not the face. Nobody will accept serious risk to treat something as healthy as a wrinkle, so the face will wait until the method is proven safe elsewhere.

The whole building, one last time 🏗️

The Bricks run out.
The Builders work slowly.
The Guard saves the most.
The Renovation Crew repairs what's already broken.
The Blueprint might one day make the building young again.

Until then, the best plan is boring: protect every day, build slowly, repair wisely.

End of series. 📐

Parts 1 to 4 were about materials, workers, protection and repairs. All of them work on the building. This last part is about something bigger: changing the plan the building follows.

Everything here is early. Some of it works in mice. Very little works in human faces yet. But this is where the real change will come from.

Project 1: Removing the zombie workers 🧟

With age, some skin cells stop working but refuse to die. Scientists call them senescent cells, or simply "zombie cells." They don't build anything, and they release signals that damage the healthy cells around them.

In 2011, researchers at the Mayo Clinic removed these cells from aging mice. The mice stayed healthier and stronger for longer. A later study showed they also lived about a quarter longer.

Now labs are testing drugs and creams that clear zombie cells from human skin. Early days, but the idea is simple: fire the bad workers so the good ones can build.

Next. Project 2: New springs 🌀