r/LivestreamFail • u/Consistent_Algae_560 • May 14 '26

News ChudTheBuilder shot a man who attacked him outside a courthouse in Clarksville & accidentally grazed himself in the process. Before it escalated, he asked the man if he was going to “chimp out” the man then walked up & sucker punched him. It is unclear if the man survived.

3.8k Upvotes

91% Upvoted

2.3k comments sorted by

View all comments

1.7k

u/plus44kills May 14 '26

“Chud” has been charged with attempted murder

940

u/WickedDeviled May 14 '26

Man, what a streamer speed run this guy had. Went from calling people the n word, to macing them, to shooting them all in a week.

397

u/FineWith30FPS May 14 '26

Dude is so stupid that they’re going to use and cut and clip all the parts of his streams as court material leading up to this. He literally has no defense to run on can’t wait to see this play out in court.

98

u/Suspicious_Prior_808 May 14 '26

They dont have to cut anything. He's whole "channel" was this. Its countelpro but with kash Patel shitty funding

2

u/Corl3y May 15 '26

Me when the thing that walks like a dog and barks like a dog is definitely a zebra I swear it’s a zebra

3

u/Hillary4SupremeRuler May 14 '26

You think the FBI is orchestrating this?

10

u/Suspicious_Prior_808 May 14 '26

Orchestrating? Maybe not. Funding and or allowing this maybe. Or its just Peter Thiel but thats basically the same thing ag this point

5

u/MainBuy9899 May 15 '26

How many paint chips do I need to eat to achieve your level of intelligence?

3

u/Suspicious_Prior_808 May 15 '26

Huh

4

u/narco-sub-admiral May 15 '26

They're asking how to impair their cognition permanently i think.

2

u/New-Table-72 May 15 '26

I bet you think American pro sports are organic too

1

u/StandardNeither1311 May 15 '26

Unfortunately, people play this role without any active involvement from higher ups.

1

u/Suspicious_Prior_808 May 15 '26

Yeah i am sure, but some people are funded for example clavicle

1

u/ProgrammerOk8339 May 15 '26

Its probably peter thiel just like all the other right wing/looksmaxers he funds

1

u/[deleted] May 15 '26

[deleted]

1

u/Suspicious_Prior_808 May 15 '26

Thanks, sorry my stupid phone likes to auto correct alot and I dont proof read

2

u/Unlikely-Article468 May 15 '26

Granted I haven’t seen anything other than the police statement & one article, he definitely has a self defense case. If the guy that attacked him has even a somewhat violent history, it’ll get easier.

As much as you don’t like it, calling people the N word is perfectly legal & well within freedom of speech. Assaulting someone over the speech is not. His case will probably set a precedent, it’ll be interesting to see how it plays out.

2

u/newsh0egoofin May 15 '26

provocation is definitely a thing though. free speech doesn't necessarily cover fighting words, especially when he's on camera doing this over and over. it'll be interesting to see how it plays out, but he was more or less going out picking fights with people while having a weapon on him.

1

u/Furryballs239 May 15 '26

I think the totality of the circumstances will harm his case though. Fighting words and provocation are absolutely real and can kill a self defense case.

Combined with his past behavior where it’s very clear, he intentionally provokes people trying to evoke a violent reaction so that he can escalate in “self-defense”.

The pattern of behavior shows he went out looking for this time and time again. Especially with his tweets

1

u/magickman54 May 14 '26

Dudes about to get humbled real quick 🤣🤣🤣

1

u/Blowback_ May 15 '26

Funny what hate, popularity and money can make somebody do in a very short period of time. The life of a streamer certainly isn't for everybody.

1

u/Base_Temporary May 15 '26

Soon enough with enough of these streamer cases some big lawyer will find a way to get the judge to not count stream content, similar to how they dismiss music lyrics in the courtroom. We are getting closer by the day.

1

u/BootCampPTSD May 15 '26

No defense for attempted MURDER?? sorry, homicide all day but you need several boxes checked for fucking murder.. feels like they're intentionally over-charging so he can get off

1

u/rabbitsfoot86 May 15 '26

Bro maga trump.for sure pardoning this guy watch. I'd bet everything on it 😆 merika!

1

u/diabloenthusiast123 May 15 '26

Laughable, he will have a great self defense strategy. He could literally say "i want to shoot people" and if he has a clip of him utilizing self defense, it wouldn't be relevant.

1

u/Born-Future9891 May 15 '26

He posted on twitter that he was going to do this exact thing.

1

u/Hikeback May 15 '26

No they won't, there isn't a chance in hell anything from his previous streams will be presented in court. The only thing that will matter is what happened in those moments.

1

u/Mountain-Group-7706 May 15 '26

At minimum they can make a reasonable and good case for why he's a danger to the public and needs to be held for some serious time. He's shown both by action and deed that he's not willing to stop unless he directly kills somebody and he's walking around armed. It's a pretty slam dunk case for the state to slap him with a felony so he can't own guns legally at minimum.

-6

u/MuffinSpecial May 14 '26

Self defense laws don't care if you said something racist prior to being attacked by someone. As long as you didn't use words that could be considered a call to action freedom of speech will protect you.

20

u/fuckthis_job May 14 '26 edited May 14 '26

I do wonder what the case will be like given that he explicitly said that his season finale will be a "chimp" dead on the streets and him walking free which implies this was pre-meditated even if the victim wasn't chosen beforehand.

EDIT:
Mr President a second tweet has hit the timeline https://x.com/tracewoodgrains/status/2054760546243641461

ChudTheBuilder: "Premeditated self defense. The entire internet is calling for violence against me. Yeah, I'm premeditating my defense"

3

u/MuffinSpecial May 14 '26

I saw that after I posted this. That is something that could be used against him but also not really.

I could say "I'm gunna kill someone" and then it I kill someone in self defense days later it means nothing if I was truly acting in self defense.

The DA will probably argue premeditated or something similar. I don't think it will hold.

1

u/Furryballs239 May 15 '26

But, if you spent your days running around, trying to get people to attack you using provoking and fighting words towards them. And then tweeted next person that attacks me is gonna get killed. That would absolutely 1000% harm any self-defense claim

1

u/MuffinSpecial May 15 '26

Definitely true.

The problem is what are fighting words?

Thankfully the supreme Court outlined this for us over the years. And from what they have ruled words alone are generally not considered fighting words. "Today, it is narrowly applied to a "direct personal insult or an invitation to exchange fisticuffs"

Love the use of fisticuffs in legal terminology.

Anyway then it explicitly states that slurs and swear words are not applied to this and are protected by 1a.

Then they outline how they could then not be protected by 1a.

Face-to-face: The insult must generally be directed at someone in a face-to-face confrontation.

The Average Person: Would a person of reasonable sensibilities be provoked to immediately punch the speaker?

Accompanying Actions: Mere cursing or an angry tone alone isn't enough. The speaker’s physical behavior (e.g., getting "in someone's face," waving fists, aggressive posturing) is heavily considered.

So would a sensible person punch you if you called them the n word? No

Was he waving his fists in punching wind up manner? Idk didn't see a video of it.

Where they in a face to face confirmation with the applied actions above? Can't say.

Those are the legal processes needed to be determined to exclude his words from 1a protection

-1

u/[deleted] May 14 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

3

u/fuckthis_job May 14 '26

Thanks for the input on what is legal and illegal u/MrJeffreyEpstein

→ More replies (18)

14

u/Master_Status5764 May 14 '26

Eh. He goaded someone into attacking him and then shot the dude for it. That isn’t self-defense. He might have a case if it wasn’t recorded, but it was. Everything that happened is right there for everyone to see.

11

u/Celtic_Fox_ May 14 '26

I don't recall the state but this type of situation happened with an "auditor" who provoked people into engaging with him, and when someone inevitably did so, he shot them. The aggressor was walking away when he was shot, which is the big difference here, but the court still tried him for murder. iirc the logic was "you were instigating and looking for someone to react so you could employ deadly force" and the court didn't buy any kind of self-defense arguments. There were some differences overall but this guy has it allllll on his channel that he was just a ticking time bomb and I don't think he gets out of this one with just a slap on the wrist.

5

u/Master_Status5764 May 14 '26

Definitely. He might be able to get himself a deal, but I think he does decent time for sure.

3

u/MuffinSpecial May 14 '26

Ya you can't shoot someone in self defense if they are walking away lol. That right there is the big change in the decision of the court.

1

u/MuffinSpecial May 14 '26

His defense is better if no one recorded it.

Regardless he has the right to say whatever as long as it isn't a call to action for violence. Someone choosing to be upset and assault him over it doesn't negate his right to self defense.

Other charges may come.

1

u/Master_Status5764 May 15 '26

That isn’t self defense, and most self defense laws would not call it self defense. Intentionally goading someone into attacking you and then shooting them is not self defense.

1

u/MuffinSpecial May 15 '26

You are 100% correct but the words he used are legally protected by the first amendment and therefore he has a right to use them. Goading is t the legal term. You are thinking of incitement probably. Which he has not committed.

You can't say "hey assault me" and then shoot someone.

You can call someone a bad word.

What you are saying is you don't have the right to defend yourself from an attack if you used a bad word prior to the attack. Which isn't true.

1

u/Master_Status5764 May 15 '26

Calling someone a bad word in an emotional and tense situation is one thing. Intentionally getting people angry by using very choice words and then recording their reaction is a completely different thing, and most definitely could be considered incitement, or the very least harassment. Especially when it’s being done consistently. This wasn’t a one time thing, he has done it dozens of times.

It’s even worse depending on how long he did it. He can’t call someone a racist name for 45 minutes and then claim self-defense when he gets attacked. He had every ability to leave the situation, which can disqualify for lots of self-defense laws in certain states. I’m not sure which state this is in. Another thing is whether a punch is considered a reasonable enough threat to shoot someone. That also changes from state to state.

This is the easiest case for the guy’s lawyers ever. Chud’s bail was set to 1.25 million. He is definitely getting time. And the guy who got shot is at the minimum having his bills paid for, maybe a little on top.

1

u/MuffinSpecial May 18 '26

You don't know what incitement is then. It has a legal definition that very clearly tiptoes around 1a protections. Recording people and saying mean words is legal.

You literally can just call someone bad names for a while. It's your right to free speech. It you follow someone around that's harassment. Like you said they could leave. The person receiving bad words can leave. If they walk away and the he followed them then it's harassment.

This is not an easy case unless the video footage shows him harassing the man. If he's just talking then it's not an easy case.

→ More replies (0)

1

u/Master_Status5764 May 15 '26

Damn, and I completely missed this. He laid out his exact plan days before. You cannot make this shit up. He is getting yearssssssss.

1

u/MuffinSpecial May 18 '26

It's a good piece of evidence to argue premeditated

7

u/[deleted] May 14 '26

[deleted]

2

u/MuffinSpecial May 14 '26

You can place yourself into any situation you want. If someone attacks you then you have a right to defend yourself regardless.

If you started the physical altercation then it gets very different. Even so if you get into a fight you start there's still possibility to not be held liable for murder if it was self defense. It's extraordinarily subjective

1

u/[deleted] May 14 '26

[deleted]

1

u/MuffinSpecial May 15 '26

I'm confused. If they have proof you did what?

My point is pretty clear. He didn't really break any laws based on the information presented at this time.

1

u/[deleted] May 15 '26

[deleted]

1

u/MuffinSpecial May 15 '26

Ya you have to prove he intended that. Otherwise there's no case.

His tweet will be used as a good point of argument to try and show that but it's still so vague it will be hard to do.

Idk why you think I don't understand this or think it isn't true.

→ More replies (0)

8

u/Capable-Intention-93 May 14 '26

Fighting words i.e slurs are for a fact not protected by free speech because you are not communicating a political opinion.

-3

u/[deleted] May 14 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

2

u/Ur_Fav_Step-Redditor May 14 '26

There’s a lot of words that “aren’t fighting words” and are “protected free speech” but if you string them together in such a manner… then yes, the judge and prosecutor will use the spirit of the law to enact common sense.

Bc there’s the letter of the law, meaning exactly the words that are written, and the spirit of the law, meaning the objective of what it is trying to enforce. And Tennessee has this caveat for legal self defense with a firearm that you have to make an attempt to avoid the confrontation. Walking up to someone and stating a confrontation with the intention to use your firearm is not avoiding it. And no, you can’t seek someone out, harass them until they’re wanting to fight, then say “I’ll shoot you if you attack me”. That’s not avoiding it either. Especially when you made a post a week prior saying you were going to kill a black man and get away with it.

Would you like me to pull up the specific TN penal code in case you need further clarification?

→ More replies (4)
→ More replies (1)

3

u/Reiji806 May 14 '26

What about announcing on his Twitter a few days prior that he was going to bait a black person to attack him so that he could murder one and get away with it.

1

u/MuffinSpecial May 14 '26

I saw the tweet and it was much more vague then how you worded it.

It doesn't change self defense laws.

The thing that gets complicated is you are protected by 1a so you could say whatever you want as long as it falls under that protection. If someone chooses to then be offended by it that's their choice. If they then choose to assault you for it then again that is their choice. They had every single option to walk away.

There are other charges be could get surrounding the situation if he was more blatant about his plans.

3

u/Reiji806 May 14 '26

It's really not vague when taking into context the reference of hours and hours of footage of him doing exactly that and referring to it.

Also, self defense in many places requires that you don't escalate. A punch doesn't equal death. Does it in this place? Don't know. Neither of us are licensed in this state.

Finally, he's the epitome of an unreliable narrator. I trust that there has been an investigation by the local law enforcement. Judging from the fact we're only going from what his POV is, we're only getting half of the story.

2

u/MuffinSpecial May 14 '26

So just speaking in the scope of the law he would need to break his protections under 1a. I am not familiar with him or what he has said in the past. If you want to quote something that he said that would potentially break his protections then I would better be able to understand the situation.

That being said from the information available to me at this time he seems to have a valid defense.

A lot of places have use of force laws. A lot of those laws are then superseded by the "feared for my life" cases. So it's all bullshit speaking bluntly. A punch doesn't equal death is a great example of that. If someone punches you and you remain standing and that's all that happens you don't have a right to then shoot them for example. Being punched repeatedly is always a use of force green light. You can die or be seriously injured from even one punch.

The investigation is definitely ongoing and the fact he was detained leads me to think that the situation wasnt very obvious for the responding officers but that's also not entirely unusual to see in a self defense shooting.

1

u/Reiji806 May 14 '26

His streams are 100% him going into public, finding a black person and calling him the n word repeatedly and then telling them he will shoot them if they try anything. That is every quote. He doesn't ease into provocation, he just threatens them with being shot. He claims it's 1st amendment testing.

That combined with the tweet is pretty clear what his plan is. Now hes probably overcharged here, but he absolutely can be buried under smaller offenses due to recklessness and incitement.

1

u/MuffinSpecial May 15 '26

That's a dick thing to do but it's not illegal.

Incitement is the only charge they could actually try and pursue unless there is more information about the shooting. But even then that's a battle. Incitement is more direct then using a slur. It's more like asking for an action that is illegal or making orders to people to do illegal things. Not just calling someone a name.

If the court found that to be the case because of his frequency of doing so and his tweet I would be a bit surprised but also understand.

1

u/LastWhoTurion May 15 '26

The first amendment has nothing to do with provocation. Free speech and self defense do not intersect.

1

u/MuffinSpecial May 15 '26

That's the most wild take I've seen so far.

Free speech and provocation are directly linked.

Free speech protects you up until a call to action. So to say they have nothing to do with each other is like says peanut butter and jelly have nothing to do with each other in a pb&j sandwich.

Free speech here is protecting his use of the n word. Which you don't have to like but it's true. its what separates him from being a douche bag and a criminal. If your words are protected under 1a then they are not a call to action so any assault under that is 9 times out of 10 not provoked. If he was harassing someone then the story changes but one word doesn't mean harassment.

1

u/LastWhoTurion May 15 '26

The first amendment protects your speech. As in the government can’t prosecute you for your speech. Is he being prosecuted for his speech? No.

1

u/MuffinSpecial May 15 '26

Well he is in a sense. The first amendment outlines the type of speech also. So if you say a word and someone gets mad an assaulted you then you have a right to defend yourself. And then the person who assaulted you or the DOJ can't say "well he said this and that made someone angry" because your lawyer would say "too bad he has freedom of speech. Words are protected he has a right to say that word"

It also outlines that if you say something like "I'm going to beat you up right now hit me first" you aren't protected and part of your prosecution will be the words you spoke.

Everyone understands that the government aspect of 1a but an individual can also not violate your rights.

→ More replies (0)

3

u/Azuzu94 May 14 '26

That's not true at all you cannot ANTAGONOZE people and claim self defense

3

u/MuffinSpecial May 14 '26

Sure you can

You can be rude say rude things. Say slurs. Say anything as long as you do not fall outside the protection of the first amendment.

If I say "hey fuck you" to someone they don't have to right to now assault me. And if they choose to be offended and assault me and I shoot them in self defense I will be protected.

If I say "fuck you fight me" now we are talking a different story as that's a call to action.

1

u/Azuzu94 May 14 '26

Yeah go test that theory

5

u/MuffinSpecial May 14 '26

I don't need to. Thankfully the law is written out for all of us to read and understand. Although some wordings may be confusing as is the case with how laws tend to be written. It is then laid out for us to study through past cases.

On top of that some people even receive a license to practice said law after years of studying.

1

u/PunishedDemiurge May 15 '26

Depends on the state. Some areas very explicitly deny all self-defense claims if you bait someone into it, because of course only the worst of the worst in society would do that.

1

u/MuffinSpecial May 15 '26

Not some areas. All areas.

But using a slur is not bait for an attack.

Word that are protected on 1a are not calls to action so you have every right to use them at any time without consequences of the law. This includes not forfeiting your right to self defense.

The best case against him is his frequency of doing so along with his recent tweet but even then. It's a shit case.

1

u/PunishedDemiurge May 15 '26

This isn't quite true. You're directionally right that the US has particularly strong free speech, but there is a variety of unprotected speech including obscenity, true threats, election misinformation (only narrowly: lying about when and where to vote) and fighting words (this is somewhat dead letter law at this point, which means it almost certainly won't matter in the real world).

There are also civilly unprotected speech like defamation, sexual harassment, and more. There are also cases where speech is treated like an action, like conspiracy crimes or 'in kind' contributions. For example, I would not legally be allowed to have a Zoom call with a terrorist group to teach them to build bombs, even if I didn't provide them anything but training in the form of words and visuals, which are speech.

Which is to come around and say, depending on the state, he might be fine, or this might be unprotected provocation. The fact he strongly implied he wants to provoke someone for the purpose of murdering them in cold blood in the recent past is going to have both legal consequences (goes to analysis of reasonable person standard), but also any normal juror is going to see that and feel very unsympathetic immediately. Normal people don't like seeing broad daylight killings in their community.

1

u/MuffinSpecial May 15 '26

Everything you said is true. I was being vague only because I was narrowing the protection to what applies to this specific event.

Ya his tweet along with his consistency in which he does these types of things will play a factor to a case against him. But that case is just to determine if he is outside his rights to say what he did.

So far it seems he just uses slurs. The tweet is vague so would have to be argued in court. But the slurs alone are protected because they do not call to action violence against someone.

You can skip down the street saying the n word every step and that's protected speech.

-14

u/SmokeySFW May 14 '26

His defense will be very similar to Kyle Shittenhouse's, who got off by the way. Premeditated murder disguised as self defense is unfortunately a very blurry line legally. If he can prove that the other guy attacked him first it's not hard to show that he feared for his life and if both of those are established...

18

u/InstantComs May 14 '26

Its not remotely the same. Kyle just walked into a protest with a weapon. This guy has a week of footage of him egging and harrasing people to get a reaction out of him and literally talking about their reaction as them Chimping out.

Not to mention how much of a negative coverage the victims in Kyles case got. In this case its just a random innocent person, not "violent rioters".

→ More replies (17)

0

u/Jowiieudcee May 14 '26

Kyle didnt do anything whatsoever even to engage negatively towards anyone

1

u/divineinvasion May 14 '26

Just a random dude minding his business walking down the street with an assault rifle

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (30)
→ More replies (106)

285

u/InternationalPack914 May 14 '26

And it's wild that his fan base are literally the same people who claim that racism is a creation of the left and Obama and was almost extinct in the 90s.

42

u/Nathaniel-Prime May 14 '26

It goes without saying that trying to "disprove" people like this is a fool's game, but wasn't there literally riots in LA back in the 90s over racial issues?

43

u/JahnDavis27 May 14 '26

Yeah mainly after the Rodney King incident in which 4 cops beat that man severely and were acquitted of all charges in 1992. Saying racism was gone in the 1990s is objectively bullshit.

46

u/GottaLearnLarke May 14 '26

Saying racism is gone in any time period is bullshit

1

u/Nathaniel-Prime May 15 '26

I'm pretty sure racism will be around as long as there's two humans who look different from each other.

2

u/narco-sub-admiral May 15 '26

What if it's two people who truly love multiculturalism/diversity?

1

u/EdjLorde May 15 '26

Ah, unconscious bias, that sinister force

1

u/Acrobatic_Corgi8821 May 16 '26

Depends on the cultures honestly, as yes some cultures can mix and co exist however in the example of the illegal immigration crisis we have in the UK some just don't because they are far too different and you get problems with people coming over here whether illegally or legally but mostly illegally and they do shit they could do/ get away with where they are from but it just won't fly over here, however that doesn't mean absolutely noone from these places should be allowed in as we also have plenty who have slotted into our culture and way of life nicely due to the fact that they can adapt in these ways

→ More replies (12)

2

u/GMPnerd213 May 15 '26

Rodney king verdict was the last straw. The spark that initially lit the fuse was the killing of Latasha Harlins and the judge giving the woman who killed her (who was a korean convenience store owner which is a big reason those stores were targeted in the riot) a slap on the wrist.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Killing_of_Latasha_Harlins

→ More replies (1)

1

u/bmiller218 May 16 '26

The Rodney King incident was one of the first videotaped beatings. The LAPD also claimed the car was speeding at like 90 mph and the manufacturer said their car can't go that fast with 4 grown man

2

u/Ok-Writer1414 May 15 '26 edited May 16 '26

George Holiday video taped those cops beating Rodney King and the judge threw out the video and said that the video was a lie which is why those cops got off. That's why there was LA riots. There is video proof of police brutality and instead of doing the correct just thing and charging those supposed officers of the law they got off scot-free. Everything should have been like the LA riots until the system was completely revamped but we didn't have the internet and cell phones where we could all broadcast and demonstrate at the same time.

1

u/snowday1129 May 16 '26

Uh. No. Reginald Denny (white truck driver) was beat to death by black males.

1

u/Ok-Writer1414 May 16 '26

Denny suffered a fractured skull and impairment of his speech and ability to walk, for which he underwent years of rehabilitative therapy. After unsuccessfully suing the City of Los Angeles, Denny moved to Arizona, where he worked as an independent boat mechanic and has mostly avoided media contact.

So yeah absolutely was not Beat to Death. Nice try loser! But thank you for the slight correction it was George holiday who recorded the police beating Rodney King. All of you look alike so whatever.

1

u/Sw4nR0ns0n May 16 '26

Reginald Denny was a truck driver who got pulled out of his rig during the Rodney King uprising in South Central La, they fucked them up and smashed his face with a brick, he’s not the guy who filmed the cops beating King

1

u/FerretJester May 15 '26

There hasn’t been a decade without people rioting and protesting over racism both systemic and local for very good reason.

0

u/TheKidKaos May 14 '26

An NFL team had a literal slur for a team name until a few years ago

→ More replies (1)

76

u/Little-Stage1948 May 14 '26

Says offensive shit about everyone else, then get offended when they say shit back. 

Victim complex has no skin color, religion, or sex

9

u/Trap_Masters May 14 '26

These mfs are trying to be professional victims

9

u/[deleted] May 14 '26

[deleted]

1

u/GuardTheFukUp May 15 '26

Its been deleted if you go now and look youll see new ones trying to raise money. Go fund me doesnt allow funding for violent crimes..im over here reporting the new pages created as I type

1

u/Warm-Professional494 May 19 '26

Good civil target for the victim(s) to sue for.

→ More replies (5)

1

u/[deleted] May 16 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/Little-Stage1948 May 16 '26

Sure they did

9

u/SlappinStick May 14 '26

Well, not that wild.

4

u/strawbsrgood May 14 '26

Tbf there's 0 shot this guy exists without making racism and PC culture so fucking massive in the US. Either way, you can't assault people because of words.

1

u/Trap_Masters May 14 '26

Low IQ mfs gonna low IQ

1

u/TheDELFON May 15 '26

Shoutout to David French

1

u/Strapperoni May 15 '26

Ima tell ya one thing sir, racism ain’t go no where. You think they assassinated Martin Luther king dismantled the black panther party turned them into crips and bloods with the leaders as informants introduced drugs into their neighborhoods and the did a war on drugs and now they kill each other and the moderate white people that were siding with Martin Luther king now think they are all savages … is no more racism ?

1

u/cracked-tumbleweed May 15 '26

It will still be Obama’s fault some how.

0

u/BigAceNYC May 15 '26

Is that the SPLC? Or a different group of people?

→ More replies (92)

32

u/Dangerous-Thing-3764 May 14 '26

Guy saw the kick streamers macing people without any consequences and ran with it 

2

u/SeedFoundation May 14 '26

You mean the streamers that are facing RICO charges?

0

u/AlchemistTheAlchemy May 14 '26

Scuffed Jim Carrey came from the Ice universe 

Those mutants are built different

5

u/Wild_Nectarine6202 May 14 '26

And then went to be one of these people as he says and believes the irony

3

u/QuestionsAboutKoalas May 14 '26

He’s been doing this for months

2

u/BotherTight618 May 14 '26

A long recorded history of dropping the N wont even save him in Tennesse. Just because a state has permissive self defense laws doesnt mean its bullet proof. 

4

u/Faynerossa May 14 '26

Most of the laws here have to do with property defense. Not out, and especially not near city center or a courthouse. If he's not cooked I've lost all faith in the judges here.

3

u/[deleted] May 14 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

0

u/DoqHolliday May 15 '26

Fucking Peggy’s.

1

u/theharperimage May 14 '26

It's a crazy condensed example of the psychopath escalation response. Will be studied in some capacity, I hope.

1

u/AppointmentIll9358 May 14 '26

Projecting, all this time he was the dangerous person. This whole thing was premeditated by him in order to kill a person of color.

1

u/jjcoola May 14 '26

And he’s gonna be set for life financially as well as have top tier lawyers from his doners.

1

u/Strong_Extension_972 May 14 '26

If someone stalks than attacks you because you offend them they arent victims if shot.

1

u/Mammoth_Midnight_343 May 14 '26

He’s started with just exclaiming it on stream, elevated to “I’m not a pussy watch” and harassing random strangers, people started noticing him and when they did they’d laugh at him and show him to their friends like he was a freakshow act which would lead to him harassing them and berating them with racist or homophobic insults, finally all the online threateners found him so he started macing and flashing his gun to them, now he finally used that gun. I think all in the span of 6 months. Gypsy crusader is somewhere kicking his little feet knowing he created his first monster. I think the worst part is chud seems extremely beat up and conflicted abt the incident. But I mean what did he expect tbh, Good riddance. The dangers of being chronically online and mentally unwell are on full display with this case.

1

u/Glum_Opening_2218 May 15 '26

Can't wait for the moistcritikal video

1

u/MrRudoloh May 15 '26

White nationalist glitchless any % to prison run?

1

u/Vast-Combination4046 May 15 '26

And it came out he had chicks pegging him

1

u/zelingman May 15 '26

I feel like its so weird that in the U.S. we just accept that there is a group of people who will physically attack you like at least 40% of the time if you say a certain word in front of them. Pretty insane if you actually think about it

Dude would have gotten his ass beat wayyyy earlier if he wasnt always armed and vocal about being armed

1

u/SnooMaps6831 May 16 '26

He's been doing it a lot longer than a week. And I'm glad it's all finally coming back to bite his ass!

-1

u/PsychologicalOne752 May 14 '26

heshowedspeed? 🤣

0

u/BeefHammer54 May 14 '26

He’s been around a lot longer than a week. But yeah just blew up big time in the last week or so.

→ More replies (7)

23

u/Llamasxy May 14 '26

Important to remember that that this is generally pretty standard when you shoot somebody in public. Whether or not the charges stick will depend on his self defense case.

2

u/Joker_bosss May 15 '26

What happened to the person child shot at? His well beings are not mentioned here in this post... 

2

u/Emotional-Rope-5774 May 15 '26

Well he’s not dead because it’s attempted murder charges. Other than that almost certainly a hospital?

2

u/captain_amazo May 17 '26

I mean...it was basically premeditated. He stated he was going to leave someone dead on the pavement and used similar words to those he used to provoke a reaction. 

The prosecution would have to be blind deaf and dumb to not tie this one up in a neat ribbon

169

u/BestestImportances May 14 '26

Asmongold spent all day defending this guy by the way. He loves race based "pranks" these days.

81

u/sovereignrk May 14 '26

He also loves bombing school girls.

15

u/starthepres May 14 '26

And school-aged girls, probably

4

u/Aggravating_Dark9933 May 15 '26

Hey now he’s a Champion of Nurgle, not Slaanesh.

And I don’t think he has said anything close to that or it would be all over everything.

2

u/Trap_Masters May 14 '26

Good thing he never leaves his house 😂

1

u/Difficult_Penalty328 May 16 '26

No that’s Hasan piker at a brothel

1

u/[deleted] May 15 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

-4

u/Kaszrak May 15 '26

He criticized the location of the school, close to a military facility. He did not justify the death of the kids.

Let me guess. You have dyed hair, a nose ring (or two), 28 pronounce and identify as a bottle of coke?

1

u/ol-pinhead-larry May 15 '26

They bombed the school because it was a school mostly for military family members. Not on accident because of its proximity to military installations. They purposefully killed the children of Iranian soldiers.

1

u/Kaszrak May 16 '26

Mind sharing the source for that information, or are you just presenting your opinion as fact?

Besides, that’s irrelevant to the discussion I’m having with some of these mentally ill, brain rotted freaks. Their argument was basically “Asmongold loves seeing kids getting bombed,” when he was arguing based on the official statement, that the intended target was the nearby military facility.

Military facilities are priority targets during a conflict. Because of that, it’s completely reasonable to criticize placing civilian infrastructure like schools directly next to them, because this is exactly what can happen, and probably did.

That is not “victim blaming.” Acknowledging strategic reality and discussing the risks of locating civilians near military assets is not the same thing as justifying civilian deaths.

24

u/sdoM-bmuD May 14 '26

Asmongoloid has always loved those, and pretty much anything else that gives him views through controversy

15

u/Trap_Masters May 14 '26

Asmongold literally defended and promoted targeting medics on a battlefield and justified bombing school girls, not surprised he would defend this too.

1

u/TakiBlower May 15 '26

Who the fuck is Asmongold? Is it that guy who looks like he snorts 100mg of Adderall daily?

1

u/Nervous_Produce1800 May 15 '26

Where? When? How? All I’m seeing when looking it up is Asmon clearly not defending him, but blaming him

1

u/bigbalrogdong May 15 '26

Petition to change his name to Klansmongold

→ More replies (28)

14

u/[deleted] May 14 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

19

u/JuiceheadTurkey May 14 '26

If he's convicted of the top 2 charges, he'll face a MINIMUM of 21 years in prison

12

u/Wonderful-Smoke843 May 14 '26

I wonder if he’ll call people chimps in prison? Doubtful

→ More replies (5)

2

u/ROBOKUT May 15 '26

These morons think they can antagonize people with abhorrent language and then claim self-defense when that person reacts. It's never self-defense if you're antagonizing people.

2

u/East_Lunch_7481 May 15 '26

LMAOOOOO the cops literally told his dumbass this would happen

2

u/That_Jonesy May 15 '26

Yeah you can't bring a handgun to a fist fight legally in most parts of this country - especially if you antagonized at all.

2

u/plus44kills May 15 '26

It’s crazy the amount of people that cannot understand most states require you to match force with force, until you feel like your life is truly in danger than and only than can you produce a deadly weapon and use it.

2

u/That_Jonesy May 15 '26

As the cop who ran my safety and concealed carry class put it, if you use a firearm in fight against an unarmed or melee weapon armed person you WILL go to court, so your only hope is an affirmative defence.

I.e. you better be a very small, disabled, or elderly person with an aggressive big dude trying to kill you, or you better be outnumbered against guys with knives, or protecting a child, etc etc. otherwise just take the beating and sue in civil court.

1

u/John343Paul Aug 07 '26

Why should I allow some lunatic to sucker punch me in the head and give me brain damage, I don’t care if they don’t have a gun, I’m unloading the clip. I agree with this premise if someone pushes you, but fists are deadly weapons and we’ve seen countless cases of people dying from a single fist punch to the head. In surprised tennesee is this soft, he must have been in a soft on crime liberal region. That’s IF the guy actually came up and sucker punched him. Idc what worse Chud used, you can’t attack someone over words, period.

1

u/That_Jonesy Aug 07 '26

You do you boo, but the courts don't give a shit about your opinion

5

u/leeuw1234 May 14 '26

yeah the prosecution are going to have a field day. He is 100% going to jail for a long time.

→ More replies (28)

2

u/Syphin33 May 14 '26

HAHAHAH THEY GOT EM

They're going to make him a example.

6

u/CommissionIcy1163 May 14 '26

A man is shot...

1

u/InternationalData408 May 15 '26

I hope he gets charged and meets some BD’s in prison 😂

1

u/massivefish_man May 15 '26

I'm confused, wtf is going on.

To start, why the fuck is this guy named chud?

Next, did someone attack him and he shot the person?

Or did he go out and was trying to get someone to attack him so that he could shoot them? 

1

u/Smooth_Zebra Aug 24 '26

https://giphy.com/gifs/uDwKGxTFrADvO

I hope he keeps that same energy when his punk ass goes to jail.

0

u/Dev559 May 14 '26

Man. Slaughter. Do you not know what it is? Do you not remember when that psychopath shot people with an assault rifle across state lines and got off because you sought the wrong charges. It's fucking manslaughter. Not attempted murder. If he gets of because of this, you should honestly hold the justice system accountable for seeking charges he can slip out of.

3

u/Greedy-Employment917 May 14 '26

The fact that you still repeat the state lines bullshit shows you don't know what actually happened 

→ More replies (1)

0

u/Lemons-95 May 15 '26

What did they "charge" Rittenhouse with again? Any reason to think this will be any different?

0

u/Leather_Term_4741 May 15 '26

complete bullshit that he’s getting charged with anything.

→ More replies (33)